<h3>ESTHER JOHNSON.</h3>
<p><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_177" id="Page_177"></SPAN></span></p>
<p class="heading">[BORN 1684. DIED 1728.]<br/>
JEFFREY.</p>
<p><ANTIMG src="images/ie.jpg" alt="E" width-obs="68" height-obs="66" class="floatl" />STHER
Johnson, better known to the reader of Swift's works by the name
of Stella, was the child of a London merchant, who died in her infancy,
when she went with her mother, who was a friend of Sir William Temple's
sister, to reside at Moorpark, where Swift was then domesticated. Some
part of the charge of her education devolved upon him, and, though he
was twenty years her senior, the interest with which he regarded her
appears to have ripened into something as much like affection as could
find a place in his selfish bosom. Soon after Sir William Temple's death
he got his Irish livings, besides a considerable legacy; and as she had
a small independence of her own, it is obvious that there was nothing to
prevent their honourable and immediate union. Some cold-blooded vanity
or ambition, however, or some politic anticipation of his own possible
inconstancy, deterred him from this outward and open course, and led him
to an arrangement which was dishonourable and absurd in the beginning,
and in the end productive of the most accumulated misery.</p>
<p>He prevailed upon her to remove her residence from the bosom of her own
family in England to his immediate neighbourhood in Ireland, where she
took lodgings with an elderly companion of the name of Mrs
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_178" id="Page_178"></SPAN></span>
Dingley—avowedly for the sake of his society and protection, and on a
footing of intimacy so very strange and unprecedented, that, whenever he
left his parsonage-house for England or Dublin, these ladies immediately
took possession and occupied it till he came back. A situation so
extraordinary and undefined was liable, of course, to a thousand
misconstructions, and must have been felt as degrading by any woman of
spirit and delicacy; and, accordingly, though the master of this
Platonic seraglio seems to have used all manner of paltry and insulting
practices to protect a reputation which he had no right to bring into
question,—by never seeing her except in the presence of Mrs Dingley,
and never sleeping under the same roof with her,—it is certain both
that the connection was regarded as indecorous by persons of her own
sex, and that she herself felt it to be humiliating and improper.</p>
<p>Accordingly, within two years after her settlement in Ireland, it
appears that she encouraged the addresses of a clergyman of the name of
Tisdal, between whom and Swift there was a considerable intimacy, and
that she would have married him, and thus sacrificed her earliest
attachment to her freedom and her honour, had she not been prevented by
the private dissuasions of that false friend who did not choose to give
up his own claims to her, although he had not the heart or the honour to
make her lawfully his own. She was then a blooming beauty of little more
than twenty, with fine black hair, delicate features, and a playful and
affectionate character. It seems doubtful to us whether she originally
felt for Swift anything that could properly be called love; and her
willingness to marry another in the first days of their connection,
seems almost decisive on the subject; but the ascendancy he had
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_179" id="Page_179"></SPAN></span>
acquired over her mind, and her long habit of submitting her own
judgment and inclinations to his, gave him at last an equal power over
her, and moulded her pliant affections into too deep and exclusive a
devotion.</p>
<p>Even before his appointment to the deanery of St Patrick's, it is
utterly impossible to devise any apology for his not marrying her, or
allowing her to marry another; the only one he ever appears to have
stated himself, viz., the want of a sufficient fortune to sustain the
expenses of matrimony, being palpably absurd in the mouth of a man born
to nothing, and already more wealthy than nine-tenths of his order; but
after he obtained that additional preferment, and was thus ranked among
the well-beneficed dignitaries of the Establishment, it was plainly an
insult upon common sense to pretend that it was the want of money that
prevented him from fulfilling his engagement. Stella was then
twenty-six, and he near forty-five, and both had hitherto lived very far
within an income that was now more than doubled. That she now expected
to be made his wife appears from the care he took in the Journal
indirectly to destroy that expectation; and though the awe in which he
continually kept her probably prevented her either from complaining or
inquiring into the cause, it is now certain that a new attachment, as
heartless, as unprincipled, and as fatal in its consequences as either
of the others, was at the bottom of this cruel and unpardonable
proceeding.</p>
<p>During his residence in London, from 1710 to 1712, regardless of the
ties that bound him to Stella, he allowed himself to be engaged by the
amiable qualities of Miss Esther Vanhomrigh; and, without explaining the
nature of those ties to his new idol, strove by his assiduities to
obtain a return of affection, while he studiously concealed from the
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_180" id="Page_180"></SPAN></span>
unhappy Stella the wrong he was consciously doing her. [The consequences
of this double connection form one of the most tragic stories in our
language—the formal ceremony by which he made Stella his wife, under
the cloud of secrecy, and still keeping her from the enjoyment of her
rights; the death of Miss Vanhomrigh of a broken heart, and the
miserable fate of Stella.] Vanessa (so he called Miss Vanhomrigh) was
now dead. The grave had heaped its tranquillising mould on her agitated
heart, and given her tormentor assurance that he should no more suffer
from her reproaches on earth; and yet, though with her the last pretext
was extinguished for refusing to acknowledge the wife he had so
infamously abused, we find him, with this dreadful example before his
eyes, persisting to withhold from his remaining victim that late and
imperfect justice to which her claim was so apparent, and from the
denial of which she was sinking before his eyes in sickness and sorrow
to the grave. For the sake of avoiding some small awkwardness or
inconvenience to himself,—to be secured from the idle talking of those
who might wonder why, since they were to marry, they did not marry
before, or perhaps merely to retain the object of his regard in more
complete subjection and dependence,—he could bear to see her pining
year after year in solitude and degradation, and sinking at last to an
untimely grave, prepared by his hard and unrelenting refusal to clear
her honour to the world even at her dying hour.</p>
<div class="figcenter p4">
<ANTIMG src="images/i043.jpg" width-obs="162" height-obs="15" alt="Decoration" /></div>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />