<h3>ANNE RADCLIFFE.</h3>
<p><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_273" id="Page_273"></SPAN></span></p>
<p class="heading">[BORN 1764. DIED 1823.]<br/>
EDINBURGH REVIEW.</p>
<p><ANTIMG src="images/ib.jpg" alt="B" width-obs="69" height-obs="67" class="floatl" />ORN
in 1764, died in 1823, this lady was as truly an inventor, a great
and original writer in the department she had struck out for
herself—whether that department was of the highest kind or not—as the
Richardsons, Fieldings, or Smolletts whom she succeeded, and for a time
threw into the shade; or the Ariosto of the North, before whom her own
star has paled its ineffectual fires. The passion of fear, "the latent
sense of supernatural awe and curiosity concerning whatever is hidden
and mysterious"—these were themes and sources of interest which, prior
to the appearance of her tales, could scarcely be said to have been
touched upon. The "Castle of Otranto" was too obviously a mere caprice
of imagination; its gigantic helmets, its pictures descending from their
frames, its spectral figures dilating themselves in the moonlight to the
height of the castle battlements,—if they did not border on the
ludicrous, no more impressed the mind with any feeling of awe than the
enchantments and talismans, the genii and peris, of the "Arabian
Nights."</p>
<p>A nearer approach to the proper tone of feeling was made in the "Old
English Baron;" but while it must be admitted that Mrs Radcliffe's
principle of composition was to a certain degree anticipated in that
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_274" id="Page_274"></SPAN></span>
clever production, nothing can illustrate more strongly the superiority
of her powers, the more poetical character of her mind, than a
comparison of the way in which in her different works the principle is
wrought out; the comparative boldness and rudeness of Clara Reeves' mode
of exciting superstitious emotions as contrasted with the profound art,
the multiplied resources, the dexterous display and concealment, the
careful study of that class of emotions on which she was to operate,
which Mrs Radcliffe displays in her supernatural machinery. Certainly
never before or since did any one more accurately perceive the point to
which imagination might be wrought up by a series of hints, glimpses, or
half-heard sounds, consistently at the same time with pleasurable
emotion, and with the continuance of that very state of curiosity and
awe which had been thus excited. The clang of a distant door, a footfall
on the stair, a half-effaced stain of blood, a stream of music floating
over a wood or round some decaying ch�teau—nay, a very "rat behind the
arras,"—become, in her hands, invested with a mysterious dignity; so
finely has the mind been attuned to sympathise with the terrors of the
sufferer by a train of minute details and artful contrasts, in which all
sights and sounds combine to awaken and render the feeling more intense.
Yet her art is more visible in what she conceals than in what she
displays. "One shade the more, one ray the less," would have left the
picture in darkness; but to have let in any farther the garish light of
day upon her mysteries, would have shown at once the hollowness and
meanness of the puppet which alarmed us, and have broken the spell
beyond the power of reclasping it. Hence, up to the moment when she
chooses to do so herself by those fatal explanations, for which no
reader will ever forgive her, she never loses her hold on the mind. The
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_275" id="Page_275"></SPAN></span>
very economy with which she avails herself of the talisman of terror
preserves its power to the last undiminished, if not increased. She
merely hints at some fearful thought, and leaves the excited fancy
surrounded by night and silence to give it colour and form.</p>
<p>Of all the passions, that of fear is the only one which Mrs Radcliffe
can be properly said to have painted. More wearisome beings than her
heroines, and anything "more tolerable and not to be endured" than her
love tales, Calprenede or Scuderi never invented. As little have the
sterner passions of jealousy or hatred, or the dark shades of envious
and malignant feeling, formed the subjects of her analysis. Within the
circle of these passions, indeed, she did not feel that she could walk
with security; but her quick perception showed where there was still an
opening in a region of obscurity and twilight as yet all but untrodden.
To that, as to the sphere pointed out to her by nature, she at once
addressed herself; from that, as from a central point, she surveyed the
provinces of passion and imagination, and was content if, without
venturing into their labyrinths, she could render their leading and more
palpable features available to set off and to brighten, by their
variety, the solemnity and gloom of the department which she had chosen.</p>
<div class="figcenter p4">
<ANTIMG src="images/i242.jpg" width-obs="186" height-obs="42" alt="Decoration" /></div>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />