<SPAN name="To_Mrs_White_Peak"></SPAN>
<h2>To Mrs. White Peak</h2>
<p class="c3">One of the Pillars of Respectable Society<br/>
</p>
<p>Ever since your call and our conversation regarding Sybyl
Marchmont, I have felt a rising tide of indignation. It has reached
the perigee mark and must overflow. If it reaches you and gives you
a thorough soaking, I shall feel satisfied.
</p>
<p>I have always known you were only half-developed. There are many
such people in the world. They serve their purpose and often do
much good. They miss a great deal of life, but as they rarely know
that they miss anything, it is a waste of sentiment to pity them.
</p>
<p>I have pitied you, nevertheless. I have often wished I could
give you the vital qualities you lack.
</p>
<p>My pity turned to indignation when I heard you express yourself
in such unqualified terms of condemnation regarding other women who
happened to be unlike you in temperament.
</p>
<p>You say there is a certain line which no well-born and womanly
woman can pass in thought or feeling or action.
</p>
<p>You regard the true women of earth as a higher and rarer order
of creation than the best of men, and any woman who by action or
word confesses herself to be quite human in her temperament, you
feel is, to a certain extent, "unclean and unsexed." You believe
the really good women of earth are always on a plane above and
beyond the physical. When any woman falls from her pedestal you
despise her.
</p>
<p>How dare you, madam, sitting in your cold, white chastity, lay
down laws of what you consider purity, morality, and cleanliness,
for other human souls?
</p>
<p>How dare you condemn those who do not reach your standard?
</p>
<p>What do you know of life, great, palpitating, throbbing, vital
life, terrible and beautiful life, terrible while passing through
the valleys of temptation, beautiful upon the heights of
self-control?
</p>
<p>How dare you assume greater virtue, greater respectability,
greater fineness of sentiment, than the tempest-tossed,
passion-beaten souls, about you?
</p>
<p>What do you know of real virtue, real strength?
</p>
<p>You have been poor, you tell me, in worldly riches, and you have
been lonely, yet you have never once degraded your womanhood by an
"unworthy " impulse. Never known a temptation of the senses. Those
things disgusted you.
</p>
<p>You have preferred toil to taking favours from inferiors, and
you have kept yourself clean in thought, word, and deed, and now
you have the reward of such virtues—a good home, a husband, and
children.
</p>
<p>You are a more devoted mother than wife, as you have always
dwelt upon a lofty white peak of chaste womanhood, from which any
descent into the earthly realms of life and love was repugnant—so
rarely "pure" and high your nature.
</p>
<p>Yet you have been a dutiful, loyal wife, and you are a devoted
mother.
</p>
<p>You despise all carnal-minded women, and cannot understand how
women fall—save that they lack good birth and breeding.
</p>
<p>You will aid in a benefit for their reformation, but you do not
want to see them or to come near them. It makes you ill.
</p>
<p>You are to be congratulated on never having added to the evil in
the world.
</p>
<p>But permit me, madam, to tell you some truths about yourself—and
the large army of "respectable women" you represent.
</p>
<p>However "well born" you may be, you are only half-born. The
complete human being has three sides to his nature—spiritual,
mental, physical.
</p>
<p>The men and women who are evenly developed on the three sides
are few. This is sometimes their fault—sometimes their misfortune.
</p>
<p>We all pity the human being who is mentally dwarfed. We are
sorry for the one whose spiritual nature is undeveloped.
</p>
<p>But why should the many women who are devoid of the physical
qualities of human nature presume to lay claim to perfection and to
regard the normal woman as a suspicious character?
</p>
<p>You have a fine, active mind, a highly spiritual nature, but you
are stunted in strong, physical emotion. You are incapable of it,
and pride yourself upon the fact.
</p>
<p>If that pleases you, well and good.
</p>
<p>But how dare you criticize God's <i>complete human</i> beings,
who feel the great vibrations of the universe, who glow and thrill
with that divine creative force, who live a thousand lives and die
a thousand deaths before they learn the glory of self-conquest.
</p>
<p>How dare you shrink even from those who fall by the wayside, and
call your shrinking "purity"!
</p>
<p>Let me ask you another question:
</p>
<p>How dare you turn away from that girl who went through the door
of the Magdalene Home you helped establish, with her fatherless
child in her arms?
</p>
<p>She fell from woman's holy estate!
</p>
<p>Yes, through mad love for a man—she loved him with her soul, her
mind, her body. She lacked knowledge, balance, and wisdom; she had
only love and passion.
</p>
<p>And you, madam, how about <i>your</i> children?
</p>
<p>They were born of a "dutiful" wife. You descended from your
lofty altitude unwillingly—only at duty's call. You are so
"refined," yet you are a loving mother and pose as the highest type
of woman.
</p>
<p><i>God never made in his whole universe of worlds such a "duty"
as unwilling motherhood</i>. Motherhood without the call of sex for
sex is indecent—criminal. You, too, madam, <i>fell</i>.
</p>
<p>That girl in yonder "home" your "charity" helped establish, who
loved unwisely, fell. Her fall was through love—yours through a
legal ceremony.
</p>
<p>All the churches, all the religions and the laws of earth,
cannot make motherhood holy and right without the mutual mental,
spiritual, and physical union of two beings.
</p>
<p>Heaven and earth <i>both</i> must sanction a child's conception
to produce a "well-born" soul.
</p>
<p>There is no greater sin on earth than the creation of a human
life without complete accord of the creators.
</p>
<p>No wonder the world is full of miserable half-born beings, when
mothers like <i>you</i> claim to be the Madonnas of earth.
</p>
<p>No wonder natural, complete, striving souls hide their true
natures under a false exterior, when women like <i>you</i> rule
church and society.
</p>
<p>What shame or degradation is there, pray, in being animate with
the all-pervading impulse which underlies the entire universe?
Every planet, every tree, every flower, every insect, is the result
of sex seeking sex, atom calling atom.
</p>
<p>The universe <i>is</i> because of the law of sex attraction.
</p>
<p>And you, poor, puny, pallid woman, dare decry and despise that
law, and dare insult God's animate creature!
</p>
<p>Know this, madam, there is no strength worth boasting that has
not conquered weakness. No virtue worth the name that has not
conquered temptation. No greatness of character that has not
overcome unworthy impulses.
</p>
<p>Enjoy your negative goodness and be glad you are "good."
</p>
<p>Morality is acceptable to the world, however it conies; but dare
not sit in judgment on other human beings fighting battles whose
smoke never reaches your nostrils, striving for heights of which
you never even dream, and who meanwhile have missed certain
degradations which you seem to consider creditable achievements.
</p>
<p>Madam, I bid you adieu. That word means "I commend you to God,"
the God who made the two sexes, and intended love to unite them.
</p>
<p>May He enlighten you in other lives, if not in this.
</p><hr class="c2">
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />