<h2 id="CHAPTER_VII">CHAPTER VII.</h2>
<blockquote>
<p class="hang">Mr. Seward refuses to meet the Rebel Commissioners—Lincoln’s Forbearance—Fort
Sumter—Call for 75,000 Troops—Troubles in Maryland—Administrative
Prudence—Judge Douglas—Increase of the Army—Winthrop
and Ellsworth—Bull Run—General M‘Clellan.</p>
</blockquote>
<p class="drop"><span class="uppercase">It</span> was on the 12th of March, 1861, that the rebel
or Confederate States sent Commissioners to the
United States to adjust matters in reference to
secession. Mr. Seward refused to receive them, on
the ground that they <i>had not withdrawn</i> from the
Union, and were unable to do so unless it were by
the authority of a National Convention acting according
to the Constitution of the United States. On
the 9th of April the Commissioners left, declaring
in a letter that “they accepted the gage of battle.”
As yet there was no decided policy in the North,
and prominent Democrats like Douglas were not in
favour of compelling the seceding States to remain.
Mr. Everett was preaching love, forgiveness, and
union, while the Confederate Government was seizing
on “all the arsenals, forts, custom-houses, post-offices,
ships, ordnance, and material of war belonging to
the United States, within the seceding States.” In
fact, the South knew exactly what it meant to do,
<span class="pagenum" id="Page_103">103</span>
and was doing it vigorously, while the North was
entirely undecided. In the spring of 1861, Congress
had adjourned without making any preparation for
the tremendous and imminent crisis.</p>
<p>But the entire South had not as yet seceded. The
Border States were not in favour of war. In the
words of Arnold, “to arouse sectional feeling and
prejudice, and secure co-operation and unanimity, it
was deemed necessary to precipitate measures and
bring on a conflict of arms.” It was generally felt
that the first blood shed would bring all the Slave
States into union. The anti-war party was so
powerful in the North, that it now appears almost
certain that, if President Lincoln had proceeded at
once to put down the rebellion with a strong hand,
there would have been a counter-rebellion in the
North. For not doing this he was bitterly blamed,
but time has justified him. By his forbearance,
Maryland, Kentucky, and Missouri were undoubtedly
kept in the Federal Union. His wisdom was also
shown in two other respects, as soon as it was
possible to do so. There had existed for years in
New York an immense slave-trading business, headed
by a Spaniard named Juarez. Vessels were bought
almost openly, and Government officials were bribed
to let these pirates loose. This infamous traffic was
very soon brought to an end, so far as the United
States were concerned. Another task, which was
<span class="pagenum" id="Page_104">104</span>
rapidly and well performed, was the “sifting out” of
rebels, or rebel sympathisers, from Government offices,
where they abounded and acted as spies. Even
General Scott, an old man full of honour, who was
at the head of the army, though true to the Union,
was Southern by sympathy and opposed to coercion,
and most of the officers of the army were like him
in this respect.</p>
<p>The refusal of Mr. Seward to treat with the
rebel government was promptly made the occasion
for the act of violence which was to unite the
Confederacy. There was, near Charleston, South
Carolina, a fort called Sumter, held for the United
States by Major Robert Anderson, a brave and loyal
man. On the 11th of April, 1861, he was summoned
to surrender the fort to the Confederate Government,
which he refused to do. As he was, however, without
provisions, it was eventually agreed, on the 12th
April, that he should leave the fort by noon on the
15th. But the rebels, in their impatience, could not
wait, and they informed him that, unless he surrendered
within one hour, the fort would be bombarded.
This was done, and, after a bombardment of thirty-three
hours, bravely borne, the Major and his band
of seventy men were obliged to surrender.</p>
<p>It is true that this first firing on the American flag
acted like the tap of the drum, calling all the South
to arms in a frenzy, and sweeping away all the
<span class="pagenum" id="Page_105">105</span>
remnants of attachment to the old Union lingering
in it. The utmost hopes of the rebel leaders were
for the time fully realised. But the North was, to
their amazement, not paralysed or struck down, nor
did the Democratic sympathisers with the South
arise and crush “Lincoln and his minions.” On the
contrary, the news of the fall of Sumter was “a live
coal on the heart of the American people;” and such
a tempest of rage swept in a day over millions, as
had never before been witnessed in America. Those
who can recall the day on which the news of the
insult to the flag was received, and how it was
received, have the memory of the greatest conceivable
outburst of patriotic passion. For a time, all party
feelings were forgotten; there was no more thought
of forgiveness, or suffering secession; the whole
people rose up and cried out for war.</p>
<p>Hitherto, the press had railed at Lincoln for
wanting a policy; and yet if he had made one step
towards suppressing the rebels, “a thousand Northern
newspapers would have pounced upon him as one
provoking war.” Now, however, his policy was
formed, shaped, and made glowing hot by one
terrible blow. On April 15th, 1861, he issued a proclamation,
announcing that, as the laws of the United
States were being opposed, and the execution thereof
obstructed in South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama,
Florida, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas, by combinations
<span class="pagenum" id="Page_106">106</span>
too powerful to be suppressed by the
ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he, the President
of the United States, called forth the militia
of the several States of the Union, to the aggregate
number of 75,000, in order to suppress said combinations,
and to cause the laws to be duly executed.
In strong contrast to the threats of general slaughter,
and conflagration of Northern cities, so freely thrown
out by Jefferson Davis, President Lincoln declared
that, while the duty of these troops would be to
repossess the forts and property taken from the
Union, “in every event the utmost care will be
observed, consistently with the objects aforesaid, to
avoid any devastation, any destruction of or interference
with property, or any disturbance of peaceful
citizens, in any part of the country.” He also summoned
an extraordinary session of Congress to
assemble on the 4th of July, 1861.</p>
<p>This proclamation awoke intense enthusiasm, “and
from private persons, as well as by the Legislature,
men, arms, and money were offered in unstinted
profusion in support of the Government. Massachusetts
was first in the field; and on the first day
after the issue of the proclamation, the 6th Regiment
started from Boston for the national capital. Two
more regiments departed within forty-eight hours.
The 6th Regiment, on its way to Washington, on
the 19th April, was attacked by a mob in Baltimore,
<span class="pagenum" id="Page_107">107</span>
carrying a secession flag, and several of its members
were killed.” This inflamed to a higher point the
entire North; and Governor Hicks, of Maryland, and
Mayor Brown, of Baltimore, urged it on President
Lincoln that, “for prudential reasons,” no more troops
should be sent through Baltimore. This Governor
Hicks had, during the previous November, written
a letter, in which he regretted that his state could
not supply the rebel states with arms more rapidly,
and expressed the hope that those who were to bear
them would be “good men to kill Lincoln and his
men.” But by adroitly shifting to the wind, he
“became conspicuously loyal before spring, and lived
to reap splendid rewards and high honours under
the auspices of the Federal Government, as the most
patriotic and devoted Union-man in Maryland.”
Yet as one renegade is said to be more zealous than
ten Turks, it cannot be denied that, after Governor
Hicks became a Union-man, he worked bravely, and
his efficiency in preserving Maryland from seceding
was only inferior to that of the able Henry Winter
Davis. This Governor Hicks had suggested to President
Lincoln that the controversy between North
and South might be referred to Lord Lyons, the
British Minister, for arbitration. To these requests
the President replied, through Mr. Seward, that as
General Scott deemed it advisable, and as the chief
object in bringing troops was the defence of Washington,
<span class="pagenum" id="Page_108">108</span>
he made no point of bringing them through
Baltimore. But he concluded with these words—</p>
<blockquote>
<p>“The President cannot but remember that there has
been a time in the history of our country when a General
of the American Union, with forces destined for the defence
of its capital, was not unwelcome anywhere in the State of
Maryland.</p>
<p>“If eighty years could have obliterated all the other
noble sentiments of that age in Maryland, the President
would be hopeful, nevertheless, that there is one that would
for ever remain there and everywhere. That sentiment is,
that no domestic contention whatever that may arise among
the parties of this republic ought in any case to be referred
to any foreign arbitrament, least of all to the arbitrament
of a European monarchy.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>It is certain that by this humane and wise policy,
which many attributed to cowardice, President
Lincoln not only prevented much bloodshed and
devastation, but also preserved the State of Maryland.
In such a crisis harshly aggressive measures in Maryland
would have irritated millions on the border, and
perhaps have promptly brought the war further
north. As it was, peace and order were soon restored
in Baltimore, when the regular use of the highway
through that city was resumed.</p>
<p>On the 19th April, 1861, the President issued
another proclamation, declaring the blockade of the
ports of the seceding states. This was virtually an
<span class="pagenum" id="Page_109">109</span>
answer to one from Jefferson Davis, offering letters
of marque to all persons who might desire to aid
the rebel government, and enrich themselves, by
depredations upon the rich and extended commerce
of the United States. It may be remarked that the
first official words of Jefferson Davis were singularly
ferocious, threatening fire, brigandage, and piracy,
disguised as privateering, in all their terrors; while his
last act as President was to run away, disguised as an
old woman, in his wife’s waterproof cloak, and carrying
a bucket of water—thus typifying in his own person
the history of the rebellion from its fierce beginning
to its ignominious end.</p>
<p>It may be doubted if there was in those wild days
in all North America one man who to such wise
forbearance added such firmness and moral courage
as President Lincoln manifested. By it he preserved
Maryland, Kentucky, Tennessee, and Missouri, and,
if moderation could have availed, he might have kept
Virginia. Strange as it seems, while the seceding
states were threatening officially, and hastening to
carry out, all the outrages of war, the Legislature
of Virginia resolved that President Lincoln’s mild
message announced a policy of tyranny and “coercion;”
and, in spite of the gentlest letter of explanation ever
written by any ruler who was not a coward, the state
marched out of the Union with drums beating and
flags flying. “Thenceforth,” says Holland, “Virginia
<span class="pagenum" id="Page_110">110</span>
went straight towards desolation. Its ‘sacred soil’
was from that hour devoted to trenches, fortifications,
battle-fields, military roads, camps, and graves.” She
firmly believed that all the fighting would be done
on Northern soil; but in another year, over a large
part of her territory, which had been covered with
fertile farms and pleasant villages, there were roads
five miles wide.</p>
<p>At this time, there occurred an interesting private
incident in Lincoln’s life. His old adversary, Judge
Douglas, whom he warmly respected as a brave
adversary, had passed his life in pandering to slavery,
and, as regards the war, had been the political
Mephistopheles who had made all the mischief. But
when Sumter was fired on, all that was good and
manly in his nature was aroused, and he gave all
his support to his old enemy. “During the brief
remainder of his life, his devotion to the cause of his
country was unwearied. He was done with his
dreams of power,” but he could yet do good. He
was of service in inducing great numbers of Democrats,
who still remained pro-slavery men in principle,
to fight for the Union.</p>
<p>Four years to an hour after the memorable reconciliation
between Judge Douglas and President
Lincoln, the latter was killed by the rebel Booth.
“Both died,” says Holland, “with a common purpose—one
in the threatening morning of the rebellion,
<span class="pagenum" id="Page_111">111</span>
the other when its sun had just set in blood; and
both sleep in the dust of that magnificent state,
almost every rod of which, within a quarter of a
century, had echoed to their contending voices, as
they expounded their principles to the people.”</p>
<p>Judge Douglas had warned the President, in
the hour of their reconciliation, that, instead of
calling on the country for 75,000 men, he should
have asked for 200,000. “You do not know the
dishonest purposes of those men as I do,” he had
impressively remarked. In a few days, it was evident
that the rebellion was assuming colossal proportions,
and therefore President Lincoln, on May 3rd, issued
another call for 42,000 three-year volunteers, and
ordered the addition of 22,114 officers and men to
the regular army, and 18,000 seamen to the navy.
This demand was promptly responded to, for the
draft had as yet no terrors. On the 18th of April,
a plot had been discovered by which the secessionists
in Washington, aided by Virginia, hoped to fire the
city, seize the President and Cabinet, and all the
machinery of government. By prompt action, this
plan was crushed. A part of it was to burn the
railway bridges, and make the roads impassable, and
this was successfully executed. Yet, in the face of
this audacious attack, the Democratic press of the
North and the rebel organs of the South continued
to storm at the President for irritating the secessionists,
<span class="pagenum" id="Page_112">112</span>
declaring that “coercion” or resistance of
the Federal Government to single states was illegal.
But at this time several events occurred which
caused great anger among loyal men: one was
the loss of the great national armoury at Harper’s
Ferry, and also of Gosport Navy Yard, with
2000 cannon and several large ships. Owing to
treachery, this navy yard, with about 10,000,000
dollars’ worth of property, was lost. Another incident
was the death of Colonel Ellsworth. This young
man, who had been a law student under Mr. Lincoln,
was the introducer of the Zouave drill. For many
weeks, a rebel tavern-keeper in Alexandria, in sight
of Washington, had insulted the Government by
keeping a secession flag flying. On the 24th May,
when General Mansfield advanced into Virginia,
Ellsworth was sent with 13,000 troops to Alexandria.
Here his first act was to pull down the rebel flag.
On descending, Jackson shot him dead, and was
himself promptly shot by private Brownell. Two
days previous, the first considerable engagement of
the war had occurred at Big Bethel, and here Major
Winthrop, a young Massachusetts gentleman of great
bravery and distinguished literary talent, was killed.
The grief which the deaths of these well-known
young men excited was very great. They were
among the first victims, and their names remain to
this day fresh in the minds of all who were in the
<span class="pagenum" id="Page_113">113</span>
North during the war. The funeral of Ellsworth
took place from the White House, Mr. Lincoln—who
was affected with peculiar sorrow by his death—being
chief mourner.</p>
<p>During this month the war was, to a degree,
organised. As soon as Washington was made safe,
Fortress Monroe, the “water-gateway” of Virginia,
was reinforced. Cairo, Illinois, commanding the
junction of the Mississippi and Ohio rivers, was
occupied, and Virginia and North Carolina were
efficiently blockaded. Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland,
the District of Columbia, and a part of Virginia,
were divided into three military departments, and on
the 10th May another was formed, including the
States of Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois, under charge
of General Geo. B. M‘Clellan. The object of this
department was to maintain a defensive line on the
Ohio River from Wheeling to Cairo.</p>
<p>In the month of July, 1861, the rebels, commanded
by General Beauregard, threatened Washington, being
placed along Bull Run Creek, their right resting on
Manassas, and their left, under General Johnston, on
Winchester. They numbered about 35,000. It was
determined to attack this force, and drive it from
the vicinity of Washington. Both sides intended this
to be a great decisive battle, and it was generally
believed in the North that it would end the war.
Government had been supplied with men and money
<span class="pagenum" id="Page_114">114</span>
beyond its demands, and the people, encouraged by
Mr. Seward’s opinion that the war would last only
sixty days, were as impatient now to end the rebellion
by force as they had been previously to smother it
by concessions. There were few who predicted as
Charles A. Dana did to the writer, on the day that
war was declared—that it would last “not less than
three, nor more than six or seven years.” On
the 16th July, the Federal army, commanded by
General M’Dowell, marched forth, and the attack,
which was at first successful, was made on the 21st.
But the reinforcements which Johnston received saved
him, and a sudden panic sprung up among the
Federal troops, which resulted in a headlong retreat,
with 480 killed and 1000 wounded. The army was
utterly beaten, and it was only the Confederates’
ignorance of the extent of their own success which
saved Washington. It was the darkest day ever
witnessed in the North, when the telegraph announced
the shameful defeat of the great army of the Union.
Everyone had anticipated a brilliant victory; but yet
the news discouraged no one. The writer that day
observed closely the behaviour of hundreds of men
as they came up to the bulletin-board of the New
York <i>Times</i>, and can testify that, after a blank look
of grief and amazement, they invariably spoke to this
effect, “It’s bad luck, but we must try it again.”
The effect, in the words of Raymond, was to rouse
<span class="pagenum" id="Page_115">115</span>
still higher the courage and determination of the
people. In twenty-four hours, the whole country was
again fierce and fresh for war. Volunteers streamed
by thousands into the army, and efforts were promptly
made to establish Union forces at different places
around the rebel coast. This was the beginning of
the famous Anaconda, whose folds never relaxed
until they strangled the rebellion. Between the 28th
August and the 3rd of December, Fort Hatteras,
Port Royal in South Carolina, and Ship Island, near
New Orleans, were occupied. Preparations were
made to seize on New Orleans; and, by a series of
masterly movements, West Virginia, Kentucky, and
Missouri, which had been in a painful state of conflict,
were secured to the Union. Virginia proper had
seceded with a flourish of States Rights. Her Western
portion recognised the doctrine so far as to claim its
right to leave the mother-state and return to the
Union. This was not done without vigorous fighting
by Generals Rosencranz and Morris, to whom the
credit of both organising and acting is principally
due, although General M‘Clellan, by a clever and
Napoleonic despatch, announcing victory, attracted to
himself the chief glory. General M‘Clellan had previously,
in Kentucky, favoured the recognition of that
state as neutral territory, as the rebels wished him to
do—an attempt which Lincoln declared “would be
disunion completed, if once entertained.” On the
<span class="pagenum" id="Page_116">116</span>
1st Nov., 1861, General Scott, who had hitherto
commanded the armies of the Union, asked for and
obtained his discharge, and was succeeded by General
M‘Clellan. “If,” as Holland remarks, “he had done but
little before to merit this confidence, if he did but little
afterwards to justify it, he at least served at that time
to give faith to the people.” For three months he
organised and supervised his troops with the talent
which was peculiar to him—that of preparing great
work for greater minds to finish. His photograph
was in every album, and on every side were heard
predictions that he would be the Napoleon, the
Cæsar, the Autocrat of all the Americas. The
Western Continent would be, after all, the greatest
country in the world, and the greatest man in it
was to be “Little Mac.” He was not as yet known
by his great botanical <i>nom de guerre</i> of the Virginian
Creeper.
<span class="pagenum" id="Page_117">117</span></p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />