<SPAN name="startofbook"></SPAN>
<div style="height: 8em;">
<br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/></div>
<h1> IT MIGHT HAVE HAPPENED TO YOU </h1>
<h3> A Contemporary Portrait Of Central And Eastern Europe </h3>
<h2> By Coningsby Dawson </h2>
<h4>
New York: John Lane Company London: John Lane, The Bodley Head
</h4>
<h3> 1921 </h3>
<p><br/><br/><SPAN name="linkimage-0001" id="linkimage-0001"> </SPAN></p>
<div class="fig"> <ANTIMG src="images/0002.jpg" alt="0002 " width-obs="100%" /><br/></div>
<h5>
<SPAN href="images/0002.jpg"><ANTIMG src="images/enlarge.jpg" alt="" /> </SPAN>
</h5>
<p><br/><br/><SPAN name="linkimage-0002" id="linkimage-0002"> </SPAN></p>
<div class="fig"> <ANTIMG src="images/0008.jpg" alt="0008 " width-obs="100%" /><br/></div>
<h5>
<SPAN href="images/0008.jpg"><ANTIMG src="images/enlarge.jpg" alt="" /> </SPAN>
</h5>
<p><br/><br/></p>
<hr />
<p><br/><br/></p>
<p><b>CONTENTS</b></p>
<p><SPAN href="#link2H_4_0001"> <b>IT MIGHT HAVE HAPPENED TO YOU</b> </SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN href="#link2HCH0001"> CHAPTER I—IT MIGHT HAVE HAPPENED TO YOU</SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN href="#link2HCH0002"> CHAPTER II—THESE MY LITTLE ONES </SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN href="#link2HCH0003"> CHAPTER III—A DAY OF REST AND GLADNESS </SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN href="#link2HCH0004"> CHAPTER IV—THE SIGN OF THE FALLING HAMMER</SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN href="#link2HCH0005"> CHAPTER V—ONCE IS ENOUGH </SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN href="#link2HCH0006"> CHAPTER VI—IT IS NOT SAFE </SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN href="#link2HCH0007"> CHAPTER VII—CHRISTMAS EVE IN VIENNA </SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN href="#link2HCH0008"> CHAPTER VIII—A HOSPITAL IN BUDA </SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN href="#link2HCH0009"> CHAPTER IX—AN ECONOMIC EXPERIMENT </SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN href="#link2HCH0010"> CHAPTER X—BABUSCHKA </SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN href="#link2HCH0011"> CHAPTER XI—THE SOUL OF POLAND </SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN href="#link2HCH0012"> CHAPTER XII—ONE CHILD'. STORY </SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN href="#link2HCH0013"> CHAPTER XIII—THE CASE OF MARKI </SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN href="#link2HCH0014"> CHAPTER XIV—AN IMPERIAL BREAD-LINE </SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN href="#link2HCH0015"> CHAPTER XV—POLAND'. COMMON MAN </SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN href="#link2HCH0016"> CHAPTER XVI—THE NIGHT OF THE THREE KINGS</SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN href="#link2HCH0017"> CHAPTER XVII—DOES POLAND WANT PEACE? </SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN href="#link2HCH0018"> CHAPTER XVIII—THE PROBLEM OF DANTZIG </SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN href="#link2HCH0019"> CHAPTER XIX—YOUNG GERMANY </SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN href="#link2HCH0020"> CHAPTER XX—NEITHER PEACE NOR WAR </SPAN></p>
<p><br/><br/></p>
<hr />
<p><SPAN name="link2H_4_0001" id="link2H_4_0001"> </SPAN></p>
<br/>
<h1> IT MIGHT HAVE HAPPENED TO YOU </h1>
<p><br/><br/></p>
<hr />
<p><SPAN name="link2HCH0001" id="link2HCH0001"> </SPAN></p>
<br/>
<h2> CHAPTER I—IT MIGHT HAVE HAPPENED TO YOU </h2>
<p class="pfirst">
<span class="dropcap" style="font-size: 4.00em">Y</span>ou may feel
inclined to dispute the assertion. You may even consider yourself insulted
by the suggestion that it might have happened to you. “It could
never have happened to me,” you may argue. But it could.</p>
<p>You had no control over the selection of your parents or the date and
place of your birth. The advantages which saved you from having it happen
to you were the merest accidents; they did not arise from your own
inherent merit. It was your good luck to be born in America. No protest of
yours could have prevented your being born in Central Europe. So, had it
not been for the fortune of your birth, it might have happened to you.</p>
<p>But perhaps you think that though you had been born in Central Europe, the
horrors of injustice and famine, described in these pages, would not have
been shared by you. You would have risen above them; you would have been
too astute, too far-sighted, too resourceful to be entrapped by them.
Whoever else had gone under, you by your superior capacity for industry
would have dug yourself out on top.</p>
<p>You wouldn't. Industry, astuteness, farsightedness, resourcefulness—none
of these admirable qualities would have saved you. You must disabuse your
mind of the prejudice that the starving peoples of the stricken countries
are shiftless, unemployable, uncivilised, or in any way inferior to
yourself. To tell the truth you are probably exactly the sort of person
who, had you been born in Central Europe, would have gone to the bottom
first. You belong to the middle or upper class. You are highly intelligent
and specialised. You gain your living with your brains and not with your
hands. If society were disrupted and temporarily bankrupt, so that the
delicate mechanism of modern business ceased to function, your way of
earning your living would no longer find a market. You would have to turn
from working with your brains to working with your hands. Everyone in your
class would be doing the same; there would not be enough manual labour to
go round. You might have made investments in the days of your prosperity;
but in the face of national insolvency your former thrift would not avail
you. Your investments would be so much worthless paper, totally
unnegotiable. You might have hoarded actual cash, the way the peasants do
in their stockings. Even this reserve would soon be exhausted since, by
reason of the depreciation in the currency, it would take a hundred times
more money to purchase any service or commodity than it used. In starving
Central Europe it is the doctors, professors, engineers, artists,
musicians, business men, lawyers—the intellectual wealth of the
nations, who have been the first to perish. The further they had dug
themselves out of the pit of crude manual labour, where all labour starts,
the more precipitous was their descent.</p>
<p>But perhaps you think that though these things might have happened to you,
you would not have deserved them—not in the sense that Central
Europe deserves them. Had you been an Austrian your moral fineness would
have revolted against your countrymen's war of opportunism and
aggression. Perhaps! But men act in crowds and the probabilities are
against you. All the enemy peoples with whom I have conversed, have
claimed as the ideals which urged them to fight precisely the same ideals
for which we sacrificed and ultimately triumphed—liberty, justice,
righteousness. Had their Governments not convinced them that their
inheritance of freedom was in danger, they would not have risked their
happiness in carnage. This at least is certain, whatever else is in doubt:
the ordinary, home-loving citizen, whatever his nationality, only becomes
a soldier and makes himself a target for shell-fire under the compulsion
of a lofty motive. It was the bad fortune of the citizens of the Central
Powers that their lofty motives were the offspring of lies—lies
retailed to them as truth by the criminals and casuists who were their
leaders. Had we been of their citizenship, should we have been more alert
to discern the falsehood?</p>
<p>That I should write in this spirit, pleading for our late enemies, may
cause a slight amazement in a public who have read my war-books. My reason—I
will not say my excuse:—is that I have visited our late enemies'
need and in the presence of human agony animosity dies. One ceases to
question how far their suffering is the outcome of their folly; his sole
desperation is to bind up their wounds—especially the wounds of
their children. When witnessing death and starvation on the wholesale
scale now prevailing in Europe, he forgets his austere self-righteousness
and substitutes mercy for justice. “It might have happened to me,”
he says; “these women might have been my wife, my mother, my
sisters, and these children, save for the grace of God, might have been my
children.”</p>
<p>One never believes that his own calamities are possible until they have
happened. He thinks of himself proudly, as an individual immune from the
contagion of adversity. It was so that the Russian aristocrats thought of
themselves. If in the summer of 1914 the stranger of <i>The Third Floor
Back</i> had mysteriously appeared at the Imperial Court in Petrograd and
had announced, “Unless you have compassion and share with the
outcast, the day will come when there will not be a peasant in Russia as
forlorn as you,” he would have been laughed ta scorn and sent into
exile. Yet that day has come. In Warsaw you may see the princesses, the
generals, the fops, the plutocrats, the law-givers of that resplendent
Court, clothed in rags, their feet in sodden boots, waiting their turn in
the breadline. After such a sight, no reversal of fortunes, however
far-fetched, seems impossible. It might happen to anybody. It might happen
to me or you. There is even a likelihood that it will happen unless we
learn to have compassion. Central Europe will not die patiently of
starvation indefinitely. Nations which civilisation has condemned to
starve to death have nothing to lose by giving way to violence; they may
have something to gain by it The more desperate their need becomes, the
more likely they are to risk the gamble. They would at least get the
satisfaction before they perished of making other nations, which had been
heedless of their misery, as outcast as themselves. There lies the danger.</p>
<p>So, however fanciful it may seem to say in writing of Central Europe,
“It might have happened to you,” there is a grim possibility
about the final statement, “It may happen yet.”</p>
<p><br/><br/></p>
<hr />
<p><SPAN name="link2HCH0002" id="link2HCH0002"> </SPAN></p>
<br/>
<h2> CHAPTER II—THESE MY LITTLE ONES </h2>
<p class="pfirst">
<span class="dropcap" style="font-size: 4.00em">T</span>oday I visited one
of the strategic points where the battle against hunger is being fought.
It was a former barracks, now a soup-kitchen of the American Relief
Administration, situated in the poorest district of Vienna, where meals
are daily prepared for 8000 children. There are 340,000 undernourished
children in Vienna—a total of 96 per cent, out of the entire
child-population. But these, whom I visited, were all hand-picked and
medically certified as being sufficiently near to extinction to be
admitted. Funds are too low to feed any save those who are within
measurable distance of dying.</p>
<p>The sight was a disgrace to civilization. The snow, which the bankrupt
Government has no money to clear away, had turned to slush. One's
well-shod feet were perishing. The road which approached the desolate
banquet-hall, was an oozy quagmire of icy mud. Within the building at
wooden tables sat an army of stunted pigmies, raggedly clad and famished
to a greenish pallor. They were the kind of pigmies to whom Christ would
have referred, had He been with me, as “These, my little ones.”
They ranged in age all the way from the merest toddlers to the beginnings
of adolescence. No one would have guessed the adolescent part of it, for
there wasn't a child in the gathering who looked older than ten.
They didn't talk. They didn't laugh. They were terribly
intent, for each had a roll and a pannikin of cocoa over which it crouched
with an animal eagerness. And the stench from the starveling bodies was
nauseating.</p>
<p>The people who attended to their needs were Austrians. There are less than
forty American officials in the whole of Europe to superintend the
workings of the Relief Administration. The food had been provided
one-third by American philanthropy, the other two-thirds by Austrians—which
is an answer to those thrifty economists who are so afraid of pauperising
Europe. This is the fixed rule of the American Relief Administration's
activities, that it contributes one-third of the expense and does the
organising, while the country assisted provides the other two-thirds and
the personnel of the workers. When the country is able to function for
itself, as is the case with Czecho-Slovakia, the machinery remains but the
Administration withdraws. Another useful fact to remember is that one
American dollar, at the current rate of exchange, keeps one of these
little skeletons alive for a month. And yet another fact is that the whole
of each dollar donated is expended on food and nothing is deducted for
organisation.</p>
<p>As I stood in that dingy hall and watched the overwhelming tragedy of
spoliated childhood, my memory went back three years. The last time I had
witnessed a misery so heart-breaking had been at Evian, where the trains
entered France from Switzerland, repatriating the little French captives
who had existed for three years behind the German lines. It had seemed to
me then that those corpselike, unsmiling victims of human hate had
represented the foulest vehemence of the crime of war. Yet here today in
Vienna, two years after our much prayed for peace, I have been confronted
by the same crime against childhood, being enacted with a yet greater
shamelessness, for the war is ended, four-fifths of the world has an
excess of food and there is no longer any excuse of military necessity.
Today our only possible excuse is hard-heartedness and besotted
selfishness.</p>
<p>Here today, to all intents and purposes, are the same little slaves of
famine and ill-usage that were to be seen passing through Evian three
years ago, the only difference is that their nationality has changed.
Those were French and these are Austrians. “Poetic justice!
Retribution!” someone may say. To such a man I would reply that the
war was not waged against children. The children of whatsoever nations we
fought never ceased to be our friends.</p>
<p>And these children whom I saw today, most of them were not born when the
war started. They had no voice in our animosities. They did not ask to he
brought into such a world. Many of them since their first breath, have
never known what it was to be warm and not to be hungry. To them joy is a
word utterly meaningless. They have always been too weak to laugh or play.
Two years after our madness has ended they are still paying the price of
the adult world's folly. We have returned home to our comfortable
firesides, but their tender bodies still shudder in the trenches which an
unwisdom, which was partly ours, dug for them.</p>
<p>I entered a shed where little feet were being measured for the Christmas
gift of boots which had arrived from America. What feet! How deformed with
cold, and swollen and blue! They lad never been anything else since their
owners could remember. There was nothing childish about them, except that
they were small. Some were wholly naked; some were wrapped in rags; some
were thrust into the recovered derelicts of splendid adults like myself.
My feet were like stones with trudging through the melting snow, but I
could look forward to a time when mine would be warm. What about theirs,
the feet of little children whose pain was never ended—small feet
that should have learned to dance?</p>
<p>On a bench sat a tiny boy, wizened and jaded as an old man. He was being
fitted. A little ragged girl who was no relation, but was acting mother to
him, told me his age. He was nine, but he was not as big as seven. No, he
wasn't being fed by the Americans—not yet. He wasn't
famished enough; there were other children who were worse. There wasn't
enough food to feed you unless you were very bad. Perhaps he would be bad
enough soon after Christmas.</p>
<p>I didn't dare to tell her that after Christmas, unless the
conscience of the happier world is aroused, there won't be any funds
to feed her little friend, no matter how bad he becomes.</p>
<p>After he had been fitted, I watched her ease the broken apologies for
boots back on to the swollen flesh. She was very tender. She knew how much
it hurt, for her own feet were no better. She had auburn hair, which hung
in ringlets, and kind gray eyes. She took his hand and helped him off the
bench. Away they trudged through the bitter cold and slush, dreaming of
Christmas when for once their feet will be protected. My eyes followed
them. My eyes followed them so much that that afternoon I did a round of
the homes from which these children come. I wanted to find out about the
parents—whether this condition of affairs is their fault, due to
uncurable shiftlessness. I procured my list from the Society of Friends,
who are doing a fine work in house to house visitation. From the homes
which I visited, I select two examples which vividly illustrate the child
need not only of Vienna, but of the whole of Central Europe.</p>
<p>The first home belonged to a man named Klier. He had a wife and three
children, the youngest of which was two and a half and the oldest
fourteen. Before the war he had been a silversmith and comfortably
settled. Today in Austria there is no work for silversmiths and will not
be for many years to come. He had served in the army on the Italian front—he
still wore his uniform—had been captured and had been a prisoner.
During his absence, his wife had had to commence selling the furniture
piece by piece to keep the home going. On his return he could not get
employment. By the time I saw him every solitary possession which he had
had, had gone except two single beds and a pile of rags for coverings. One
of those beds he rented to a lodger, the other his wife, self and children
slept in by turns through the night, trying to keep themselves warm.
Despite this abject poverty, the floor was speckless and had been recently
scrubbed. A little gray-faced tot in a solitary garment—a crimson
velvet frock donated by the Red Cross—stood stoically by, while her
father talked to me. He had at last got a job on a paper, he said, which
would bring him in 1600 crowns a month. 1600 crowns are a little over two
dollars in American money, out of which he had to pay his rent and
lighting. How was it to be done? He shrugged his shoulders hopelessly and
spread his hands abroad. And again I asked a question—did he hope
that things would be better in the future? He made no reply, but grabbed
the child's hand more protectingly and stared forlornly at the blank
wall.</p>
<p>The second home belonged to a man named Lutowsky.</p>
<p>He had been a repairer of street-pavements; pavements are taking care of
themselves at present. His household consisted of a grandmother, aged 71,
a wife in consumption, due to starvation, and five consumptive children.
In painting the picture which I have to paint, I feel ashamed at having
pried on such a depth of sorrow. The home consisted of two rooms. In the
first the grandmother was washing clothes. She explained that she earned
thirty crowns a day for it—less than five cents in American money;
but that after a day's work she was always laid up for a week from
exhaustion. Before the war she had been in receipt of a pension of
twenty-four crowns a month, which would be about five dollars. Since the
fall in money values her pension had been raised to fifty crowns, which at
present rates of exchange represented less than eight cents a month. How
did she exist on it?</p>
<p>In the inner room I found the rest of the family—the son, his wife
and the five children. The youngest child was over two years of age and
was still at the breast—there was nothing else on which to feed it.
The mother was scarcely clad above the waist. Her eyes were sunk deep in
her head and burnt with the fever of famine. About her neck a horrid rag
was knotted, for her throat was puffed with tubercular glands. She spoke
in a hoarse voice, panting with the effort. Her man stood stonily beside
her and made no comment. They had five children, yes. They were nearly
naked, as we could see. They were all consumptive and always starved. It
hadn't been like this always. Probably they would die soon—she
supposed that would be better. Had they any money? Yes, there was her man's
unemployment payment, which amounted to a cent and a half a day, American
money. The world didn't want them. She coughed. The children
commenced to sob, but the man still stared at us stolidly. There was no
furniture in the room, save again one bed with a few rags flung over. it.
The last of a candle guttered in a socket; when that went out, they would
be utterly in the dark. By its light, as I turned to go, I noticed that
yet another unwanted baby was expected. They had once been self-respecting
and happy. And this home was typical of the several million homes in which
the five million children of Europe are starving.</p>
<p>In the outer room, as I departed, the old Grannie was again busy at her
washing, earning those coveted thirty crowns which would exhaust her. Over
her head a motto was pinned against the wall—the only decoration
remaining from a former affluence. I asked my interpreter how it read and
he translated, “May the Christmas-man bring you good luck from near
and far.”</p>
<p><br/><br/></p>
<hr />
<p><SPAN name="link2HCH0003" id="link2HCH0003"> </SPAN></p>
<br/>
<h2> CHAPTER III—A DAY OF REST AND GLADNESS </h2>
<p class="pfirst">
<span class="dropcap" style="font-size: 4.00em">T</span>oday being Sunday,
a day of rest and gladness when even prisoners do not work, I visited the
central gaol of Vienna. Permission is not often granted; in order to
obtain it, it was necessary to gain the consent of the President of the
Austrian Republic. My object in going was to see for myself to what extent
starvation is making criminals out of children and so adding one more grim
touch, by destroying characters as well as bodies, to the monstrous sum of
Europe's child tragedy.</p>
<p>Before the war the Viennese were among the most happy and law-abiding of
citizens. What famine can accomplish in the manufacture of criminals was
illustrated by what I saw on this visit.</p>
<p>It was a sunny day with a sky of intensest blue. The snow and slush of
Saturday had frozen over, so that the streets gleamed brilliantly in white
and steel-gray patches. About the Ring, which encirles the old royal
palace, crowds were promenading in the worn finery of pre-war days. There
was almost a breath of hope—an unwonted alertness.</p>
<p>We drew up before a frowning pile of buildings, the windows of which are
heavily grated, before whose entrances men with rifles stood on guard. We
were immediately conducted to the office of the prison-director; he had
something to say to us. He was a very humane man and most eager to impress
us with his humanity. He had sent for us to warn us that we were about to
encounter sights which would probably shock us. Since the war the
crime-wave had been on the increase in all countries—especially in
those which were most hungry. People seemed to be losing their faculty for
distinguishing between mine and thine. This was the case in Austria, with
the consequence that the supply of gaols could not cope with the demand of
the criminals. All the gaols were overcrowded. This one was. Cells which
had been built to hold one prisoner, now contained four; those built to
hold nine contained as many as thirty. Of course the sanitary
accommodations were insufficient. He did not want us to believe that what
we were about to see was typical of Austrian efficiency. We should
discover that only one prisoner out of four had a bed; that their personal
linen was changed only once a month and that the cells were verminous. We
should also discover that the greater part of the prisoners had not been
brought to trial—many of them had been awaiting their trial three
months. These lamentable conditions had produced frequent riots, which had
only been quelled by flooding the cells to the depth of a yard. Still
worse, children were displaying an increasing tendency to theft. Of
course, that might be due to starvation. In pre-war days they had been
dealt with in juvenile-court, but now all children of fourteen and up had
to be herded with adults. There were so many of them. That was the
trouble. Under the circumstances what else could be done? He bade us
good-bye with a courtly politeness. His last words were a petition that we
would not be shocked. But we were.</p>
<p>And who would not he? Two-thirds of the crimes which had brought these
three thousand unfortunates to this pass, fathers, mothers and children,
had been stealings incited by hunger. There was one ward of mothers who
had stolen to preserve their little ones and were again expecting to
become mothers. They were among the very few of the prisoners who were
segregated. They sat on the edge of cots in their grated cells, dismally
weeping, wondering no doubt what was happening to the children they had
left. Mary, refused admittance to the inn at Bethlehem, has stood in men's
minds as the acme of maternal tragedy; but her neglect does not compare
with the callous usage of these Viennese, captive mothers. And yet, as the
director had said, economic conditions being what they were, what else
could you do with them? You couldn't let them go on filching merely
because they were mothers.</p>
<p>Among the prisoners we found a great many ex-soldiers. There was one, a
strapping chap, who had had all the military decorations he had won
tatooed upon his breast. They were plain for everyone to behold as he had
only a shirt that was torn. Round his neck was tatooed the Iron Cross and
below it, in a long line, all the service medals, starting with the 1914.
When he marched away six years ago, how well would he have fought could he
have guessed that this would be his reward?</p>
<p>In one cell for six men, into which twenty-six had been crowded, we
stumbled on a pathetic piece of vanity. The door was unlocked so quickly
that the prisoners were taken unaware. We discovered a man of sixty, with
what looked like a terrible wound across his mouth, all bandaged. I turned
away to speak to a stunted boy, who looked about fourteen, to ask him why
he was there. He had been arrested for housebreaking because he was
hungry. He wasn't fourteen; he was nearly twenty. When I glanced
back to the prisoner with the wounded mouth, I found myself face to face
with a replica of Hindenburg. The bandage which he had been wearing had
been hastily removed. It was a moustache-preserver, with elastics which
went behind his ears to keep the contraption in place. Out of all his
fallen fortunes, the vermin and the vice, he had salved this petty piece
of conceit to heal his wounded pride. And he had cause; he probably
possesses the most fiercely up-pointing moustaches in Austria.</p>
<p>Cell after cell was locked and unlocked, giving us instant glimpses of
hell. It was famine that had worked this evil; nine-tenths of these people
would have remained good but for that. The atmosphere was so putrid that
one's throat became sore. We lit cigarettes to conquer the stench.
Outside the sun was shining and the sky was dazzling.</p>
<p>This was the day of rest. What did they do with it? Nothing. They sat
dolefully in sullen, uncomplaining apathy, brooding and brooding. They had
no books, no way of entertaining themselves, save in rare cases where the
Society of Friends had visited them. The Society of Friends is the only
institution which does anything for the prisons of Austria. One wondered
what stories those walls could tell of what happened after nightfall. It
was in the darkness the warder informed us that vermin were most voracious—they
crept out. But other things besides vermin creep out in the hours of
darkness—evil thoughts, bred of idleness, taking shape in evil acts.
Of all this the boys and girls of fourteen and over are witnesses and at
last partakers. The sin which has put them in gaol is not theirs, but
society's—their hunger. Yet the price they pay is that they
leave those walls as moral degenerates. Civilization by its callousness
toward these children is running up a heavy score—a score which will
one day come up for settlement and which the world, willingly or
unwillingly, will have to join in paying. The bill will consist of a
leprous taint which will travel in men's bodies down the ages; a
legacy of disease and idiocy.</p>
<p>The memory of the horror stings one's eyes and gags one's
throat with its foulness. It stirs one's mind to an insanity of
anger at the smug complacency of the more fortunate world which contrives
excuses for withholding its help. What have these fathers and mothers done
to be in gaol?</p>
<p>Their children were dying; it was noble of them to steal. And the little
child prisoners, why should they be here? During most of their lives,
beginning with the war, they have known nothing but cold and privation.
They were taught by necessity to pilfer—which is scarcely a
sufficient reason for killing their souls. And please remember that this
gaol in Vienna is only a sample of the gaols of all the stricken
countries.</p>
<p>The key turned in the lock and the narrow studded door was swung wide,
revealing a narrow cell of no more than the dimensions of a double bed. It
contained two occupants. One was a woman of the bestial type, almost
wholly animal. Her feet were bare, her hair hung matted upon her forehead.
Her features were swollen and debased. There was no infamy of uncleanness
and violence of which she was not capable. Probably she, too, had her
excuses. On the other side of the cell, smiling with wistful expectancy,
stood a pretty child. She had black curling hair, a complexion of most
delicate rose and coyly-lidded Irish eyes. She leant against the wall,
small-boned and frail, confidently surveying us. She was nearly fifteen.
This was her second term. She had already served a previous sentence of
eighteen months. What for? Stealing. Starvation. No, we hadn't come
to release her—only to gaze at her. But she had thought we were
Americans! Her eyes filled and her lip drooped. The door swung to; it
clanged pitilessly. She ran forward with a pleading gesture; then the
sight of her was shut out. Her hope was gone. We had consigned her to her
hell. And she might have been your daughter or mine.</p>
<p><br/><br/></p>
<hr />
<p><SPAN name="link2HCH0004" id="link2HCH0004"> </SPAN></p>
<br/>
<h2> CHAPTER IV—THE SIGN OF THE FALLING HAMMER </h2>
<p class="pfirst">
<span class="dropcap" style="font-size: 4.00em">T</span>here is an
institution in Vienna known as the Dorotheum. It is the Government
pawnshop and ===has for its sign a falling hammer against a sinking sun.
More than two hundred years ago it was founded by the good Emperor Joseph
to protect his people against the rapacity of private brokers. Formerly
the rule was that if articles were not reclaimed within the space of ten
months, they would be passed under the hammer. Today the respite for
redemption has been cut down to three months; the Government cannot take
the risk of a declining currency over a longer period.</p>
<p>This afternoon I visited the Dorotheum. It is a vast building, constructed
on the grand scale like a palace. Up and down its marble stairway throng
the more respectable part of the tragedy of Vienna; pressing hard upon its
heels come the vulture purchasers, for the most part foreigners, intent on
making bargains out of Austria's want. The Dorotheum is a museum of
domestic sacrifices. Here is the complete story of a country gone
bankrupt. There is no exchange in the world that is so crowded. Never in
its history did it do so thriving a trade. Early in the morning the crowd
begins to gather, each individual carrying a shamefully concealed bundle;
it does not disperse till the gates are closed at night. The Dorotheum is
patronised by all classes, from the bank-clerk, raising a few crowns on an
alarm clock, to the archduchess, pledging her jewels. It is one of the
last ports of call of the proudly destitute.</p>
<p>Before I made my tour of inspection I was ushered into the presence of the
supervisor—a sad, thin man in a flapping black coat who had the
nervous cough of an undertaker. He explained that the season being
Christmas he was very busy. Trade was brisk; everyone in Vienna had
something to sell. This may strike you as quaint, but in Vienna nowadays
Christmas is celebrated by pawning and not by purchasing. Because of this
the supervisor asked to be excused from conducting me personally over his
mausoleum. He entrusted me to a gray, unshaven man who had the appearance
of a broken Count. He may have been a Count. An Admiral, who was the hope
of the Adriatic navy, is banging at a typewriter today.</p>
<p>This morning I shook the hand of a General, earning ten dollars a month,
who once made the Allies tremble by his prowess against the Russians. You
can never be quite sure of your companion in this fallen city of tragic
transformations.</p>
<p>The first room we entered was jammed to the ceiling with everything from
the cheapest electric fittings to the loot of palaces. I noticed a
complete set of Empire drawing-room furniture marked at the absurd price
of a thousand crowns—rather less than a dollar and a half. There
were rare rugs on the walls—the kind one would purchase at Sloane's
for anything above three thousand dollars; they were offered at from three
to sixty dollars. The sixty dollar one was a magnificent specimen. In
another room there was an art gallery, guarded by an ex-engineer of
European reputation, who now survives chiefly on tips. The pictures which
he guarded were all for sale and many of them the work of famous modern
painters. The cheapest I saw was a signed Russian landscape; it would have
cost me thirty cents. The dearest, frame and all, could have been mine for
six dollars. Art is not much in demand in Vienna.</p>
<p>But the more pathetic sight was not the luxuries of the rich, but the
necessities of the respectable middle-class, which had been left
unredeemed for three months and were now to be auctioned off. The price on
the tags represented one-third their value, which had been advanced to
their owners, plus a margin of interest on the Government's outlay.
Here were dresses, millinery, fur coats, gramophones, silver
wedding-presents, libraries and even cradles. There was nothing you can
think of that goes to make a home that some unfortunate had not pledged
and lost.</p>
<p>The Count touched my arm. Wouldn't I like to see how it was done?
How what was done? Why, the pledging.</p>
<p>I followed him out of the crowded room, where the foreigners were
selecting the bargains for which they intended to bid next day. We went
down a narrow, draughty stairway till we found ourselves in a kind of
railway station. All along one side was a tier of windows, with iron
railings leading up to them, and between the railings queues of tired
people. They all carried parcels, as if they were going on a journey, but
when they reached the windows they parted with their bundles—pushed
them through the slit, waited and went away stuffing wads of paper money
in their pockets.</p>
<p>This was the department where the jewelry was pawned. I was escorted
through a door into the room which lay behind the windows. Here in long
rows the valuers sat with scales before them, and magnifying glasses
screwed into their right eyes. As a package was pushed through the slit
across the counter they took it, undid it and examined its contents. They
tested the stones. They weighed the metal. Then they scribbled on a slip
of paper the sum of money the Government was prepared to advance. The
pledger never demurred at the amount offered. He presented the slip at a
neighboring window and the money was counted out.</p>
<p>Watching from the inside room, where the valuing was in process, I could
hardly see the pledgers' faces. It was their hands thrust with a
shameful furtiveness through the windows that told their story. All kinds
of hands! I remember one pair. They belonged to a man of thirty—they
were the supple hands of an artist. Behind the window I could make out his
firm, clean-shaven face. Beside him a young woman was standing—probably
his wife. My attention was attracted to her because, when he pushed the
jewelry across the counter, she made a regretful gesture, as if she would
draw it back. The valuer commenced coldly to examine it. The parcel
contained a woman's bracelet, a man's cuff-links, a gold
watch-chain and a wedding ring. It was the wedding ring that gave me the
meaning of her gesture. The valuer scribbled his offer. It was for 2,400
crowns—about three dollars fifty. The offer was accepted and the
next comer's pair of hands were thrust tremblingly into sight.</p>
<p>Last of all I was taken to the auction-rooms, where the sales were in
progress. The Count warned me that at this time in the afternoon the
auctions were not interesting. It was too late. The expensive lots were
sold earlier. But despite his pessimisms, I was interested.</p>
<p>There was a long room, dimly lighted. Running up and down it in an oval,
was a pathway of tables. It formed a barrier like the enclosure of a
circus. Seated on the outside of it were the bidders, with faces avid as
gamblers'. At a high desk the auctioneer sat enthroned—he gets
seventy dollars a year for his trouble. In the space on the inside, which
the table surrounded, the goods being auctioned were piled. And what do
you think they were? Children's toys. Not new toys, but old
favorites—dolls and rocking-horses and tin soldiers, the pillage of
the nurseries of Vienna. They were the gifts which Santa Claus had left at
little bedsides in years when the world was kinder. Like the wedding ring,
they had to go. Bread was required.</p>
<p><br/><br/></p>
<hr />
<p><SPAN name="link2HCH0005" id="link2HCH0005"> </SPAN></p>
<br/>
<h2> CHAPTER V—ONCE IS ENOUGH </h2>
<p class="pfirst">
<span class="dropcap" style="font-size: 4.00em">O</span>nce is enough,”
says Budapest. “We shall never go Bolshevist again.” When one
listens to the stories of what happened while Hungary was under the heel
of Bela Kuhn, his only wonder is that once was not too much. The first man
to give me an inside picture was the correspondent of the Manchester
Guardian; his mother had been thrown out of a fourth storey window by the
pillaging rabble who visited her home. The second was Hungary's
greatest iron-master, who crouched with his wife and daughter in an
unlighted cupboard during the entire regime of terror. But though Hungary
is sincerely repentant and, as an actual fact, less likely than Great
Britain or America ever to go Bolshevist, the indiscreet experiment of two
years ago has created a prejudice. The need of Hungary is as pressing as
that of any Central European country, but a quite insignificant amount of
relief work is being done. There has been no feeding of children since
last August, when the funds allotted for that purpose gave out. The
American Relief Administration is planning to renew its activities
immediately; but the neutral countries, which have carried on such fine
work in other famished areas, have done next to nothing for Hungary. Yet
Hungary's claims are in many respects more urgent. It has suffered
from the war. It has suffered from the Peace Treaty, which has given away
to Roumania and Czecko-Slovakia its best wheat-lands and all its important
sources of fuel. It has suffered from Bela Kuhn. Last of all and most
recent, it has suffered from the Roumanian invasion, which resulted not
only in theft on a wholesale scale, but also in the most senseless
destruction. From all these causes the country is filled with refugees and
naturally the children are the chief sufferers. There are two refugee
universities in Budapest, which have taken up their headquarters in old
tobacco-factories. When I say refugee universities, I mean literally seats
of learning like Yale and Harvard which have transplanted themselves
entire, with professors and students and now have no visible means of
support.</p>
<p>There are over 40,000 people living in freight-cars in the railroad yards
in and around the city. They lack every means of sanitation. Epidemics are
continually springing up among them which threaten to spread throughout
the country. At the present moment measles and scarlet fever are rife.
There is no means of ventilating a freight-car, except by letting in the
cold, and no means of heating it, except by keeping the doors shut and
stifling. I visited the freight-car dwellers today and was notified of
their presence by a smell not unlike an open sewer. Men, women, and
children lay dying in those boxes, while the living slept beside them.
There was no attempt at decency. Decency is a weak word. All sense of
elementary cleanliness was forgotten. Here women bore children in the
publicity of their families and all the intimate details of married life
were witnessed by the most innocent and the youngest. The freight-cars of
Budapest are not a series of homes, but an itinerant jungle. When the
smell becomes too obnoxious in one spot, they are hauled to another. The
fate of their occupants is nobody's business; they are left to die.</p>
<p>But these people form only a minute fraction of the sum total of misery.
There are upwards of a thousand factories in Budapest and only a hundred
of them are in partial operation. Why? The lack of coal. There are no
woods in Hungary; it is a land of tillage. Most of the mines were
apportioned among other nations. The fields are of little service for
food; the Roumanians carried off the seed which was being hoarded for the
sowing of the next harvest. The Government hands out ration-cards,
designating shops at which the recipients may apply. Queues form early in
the morning, but at the end of a long day's waiting the supplies are
exhausted. One queue is waiting for fuel, another for milk, another for
potatoes. The people who compose them are half-naked; their feet are
unshod; the snow is melting; the women carry babies. Can you realize the
tragedy at the mid of the day when these people return to their families
empty-handed?</p>
<p>Misery is best depicted in individual cases. I went to a maternity
hospital, where devoted Hungarian women are working without thought of
reward to save the lives of the unborn. They have no bed-linen, no
medicines, few instruments. The establishment could be run at a cost of
two hundred dollars a month—less than the cost of a woman's
dress on Fifth Avenue. If the next two hundred dollars are not
forthcoming, in the near future the wards will be closed. As it is they
are so crowded that a mother can only be cared for for ten days.</p>
<p>As an adjunct to the hospital they have a preventive department, into
which they gather the young girls who would become mothers if they were
allowed to run at large. It sounds incredible, but girls are so hungry in
Budapest that they will sell their souls to the first comer for a hunk of
bread. These girls are collected by the department I have mentioned and
are taught to make lace. When I was there today the thread had given out
and no more was obtainable. They make their lace for two dollars for
eleven yards; in America it would be worth at least two dollars for one
yard. As a mere business undertaking it would pay some firm to send the
thread from America and purchase the product.</p>
<p>I went to see the homes from which these girl-children came. There is a
section of Budapest called Tivoli—why I do not know. It consists of
old factories, now stripped and empty. In these buildings the utterly
forlorn have taken up their abode.</p>
<p>I wish instead of writing, I could cut down the distance that separates me
from America. Then I could bring you by automobile to see for yourselves.
A glance would be enough. You would not be able to rest till these wrongs
had been righted.</p>
<p>The roads which lead up to Tivoli are mud.</p>
<p>The place is avoided as a contagion. In many of the homes only one member
of the family is able to appear at a time—the rest are naked. If
they possess a bed, it has nothing but a mattress and the mattress has
been slit so that they may crawl in among its straw for covering. As a
rule the bed is the only piece of furniture; all the rest has either been
sold or broken up for fuel. Everything that will burn has vanished from
the landscape—palings, posts, everything. One pushes open a door—not
one door, but a thousand; the same sight meets the eyes. There's a
mother gaunt with famine, a bare room, an evil odour, a baby thrust into
the mattress, boys and girls in rags, almost naked, and a few rotten
potatoes lying jumbled on the floor. Of any other kind of food there's
not a sign. The moment you appear they start to crawl towards you, hailing
you as a deliverer. Any face that is new and unexpected serves to spur
their desperate hope. They weep and try to kiss your hands, cringing
indecently like animals.</p>
<p>Don't run away with the idea that these people are the scum of the
earth; before the war they were as respectable as you or I.</p>
<p>Take the case of Mrs. Richa. She lives in one room with seven children,
all of whom are tubercular. Yesterday the room had yet another occupant,
but I arrived too late to see him—this morning he died. He lay in
one corner, a little apart from the living and, seeing that he would not
usurp it long, he was allowed to have the mattress. This other occupant
was Private Richa, the husband of Mrs. Richa and the father of the seven
children. He had caught his disease in the winter campaigns against the
Russians—consumption. His youngest child—a baby not yet two—was
stark naked. The room was bare of everything. None of them had been fed
for two days. There was snow outside. When one considers the situation
placidly, Private Richa has done rather better than his family.</p>
<p>Or take the case of Mrs. Schwartz. She and her husband had been in a
prosperous way and had owned a thriving store. At that time they had had
four children. When Hungary was invaded, the Cossacks burnt the store and
cut her husband slowly to pieces before her eyes. The result of this is
that the youngest child is deaf, dumb and imbecile. In her flight between
the retreating and invading armies, two of her children died. She arrived
in Budapest like thousands of others, friendless and penniless. Year by
year, dragging out the agony, she has starved. When we visited her she was
on her last legs—she could scarcely rise.</p>
<p>These cases can be enumerated endlessly till the sheer weight of their
tragedy kills their drama. But the question is what are we going to do
about it? Are we going to let millions of human beings die like rats in a
hole? Are we going to let the children of Hungary perish? They at least
should be saved.</p>
<p><br/><br/></p>
<hr />
<p><SPAN name="link2HCH0006" id="link2HCH0006"> </SPAN></p>
<br/>
<h2> CHAPTER VI—IT IS NOT SAFE </h2>
<p class="pfirst">
<span class="dropcap" style="font-size: 4.00em">T</span>oday I had an
interview, lasting for an hour, with Admiral Horthy, who is Governor of
Hungary. It was he who snatched his country from the throes of Bolshevism
and established in the midst of disaster a representative government. He
is a patriot and man of the world in the finest sense. He was wounded in
the Great War and has lived through to peace days without animosities. My
object in seeing him was to obtain a personal statement from him of how he
proposed to reconstruct the fallen destinies of Hungary.</p>
<p>I was met by a liaison officer whose wife is an American, resident in New
York, and was taken in a car of the American Relief to the palace which
sits above the Danube on the heights of Buda. The old magnificence of
palace etiquette is still kept up. We mounted the marble stairs,
encountering guards, with clanking swords, at every turn. The excursion
seemed more like fiction than reality—more like a page out of <i>The
Prisoner of Zenda</i> through which one walked as a living character. At
the top of the staircase we were challenged by halbardiers, in medieval
uniforms not dissimilar from those of the Swiss Guards. In an ante-room we
were requested to remove our coats and to prepare for the interview. After
a wait of not more than five minutes, we were summoned. Passing along a
hall filled with priceless cloisonni, we came to a doorway outside which a
soldier, caparisoned as though to take part in Grand Opera, was standing.
Behind the door a seaman, as bluff and cheery as any British Admiral was
seated at a desk. His breast was a rainbow flash of decorations. He rose
with his hand outstretched as we entered; his whole attitude one of ease
and friendliness.</p>
<p>His first act was to beckon us to a group of chairs and to offer us
cigarettes. This was the man on whom at no far distant date the peace of
Europe may depend. Admiral Horthy is a cleanshaven, square-faced man, with
resolute eyes and the nose of a hawk. The kind of man who inspires trust
and whom men cannot fail to like immensely.</p>
<p>My first question was how he accounted for Hungary's present forlorn
condition. His answer was forthright—the Peace Treaty. The old
Hungary was an economic entity, complete in itself. It had coal-mines,
wheatfields, factories, and was a seagoing nation. Today it has no outlet
to the sea, no mines and no money with which to buy the coal to operate
its factories. It is like a body in which the arteries have been cut so
that the blood cannot circulate. Even its wheatfields have been handed
over in part as a bribe to other nations. This would not matter so much if
the wheat-lands were under cultivation. But they are not. The wheat-lands
apportioned to Roumania were divided among peasants who had not the
capital to work them. They were compelled by their Government to accept
them under the threat that, if they refused, they would be conscripted
into the army. As a consequence, when the world is crying for food, large
areas of Hungarian tillage in Roumanians hands are lying idle. They are
like the engines and rolling-stock taken in reparation from the enemy,
which may be seen in Roumania, Belgium and France rusting on the rails.
The old Hungary consisted of a conglomeration of races mutually
inter-dependent. Labour travelled from point to point at recognised
seasons along recognised routes. At the harvest Roumanian peasants had for
centuries come to Hungary to lend a hand. They tried to do the same this
year, but were turned back at the frontier by their own soldiery with a
loss of three hundred lives.</p>
<p>“What is the remedy?” I asked.</p>
<p>The Admiral leant forward, gazing at me keenly. “Patience,” he
said. “In the world, constituted as it is today, injustice cannot
triumph. Least of all economic injustice. My job at the moment is to sit
on the lid and prevent men who do not know that it will hurt, from ramming
their heads against a wall.” He made a soothing gesture with his
hands, “Keep quiet and wait, I say.”</p>
<p>“But while they wait your people are starving,” I suggested.</p>
<p>“Yes.” He shuddered as though in some spiritual way he had
known the agony of starvation. “Yes, they are starving; but it will
not be for ever. After the war there was a great lethargy. The nations who
had won only thought of themselves. Now they are beginning to think on
broader lines—this drive to save our children that you are having in
America is proof of that. Next you will begin to enquire into causes and
then you will revise the hurried misinformation of the Peace Conference.
If you don't, there is always Bolshevism.”</p>
<p>“Bolshevism!” I exclaimed. “Do you mean that Hungary
would go Bolshevist again?”</p>
<p>“Never,” his face clenched like the fingers of a hand. “But
if the spring drive of the Russians succeeds, Poland will be overwhelmed.
If that happens, many States of Central Europe will go Bolshevist; Hungary
will be the only State you will be able to trust. Poor Hungary, whom you
have shorn of her possessions, she will be your bridge-head against the
tide of anarchy. We shall get our chance to prove then that we are your
friends.”</p>
<p>“But is there no other way of righting Hungary's wrongs save
through violence?” I asked.</p>
<p>“Yes.” He spoke seriously. “Through justice. We are a
proud people. We don't want charity. We want an opportunity to work.
But our hands are——” He broke off and pressed his hands
together as if they were manacled. “How can we work without coal?
Our factories are closed. Our people are starving. It is not safe to let
people starve too long.”</p>
<p>I went away from my interview with Hungary's strong man with those
words ringing in my ears, “<i>It is not safe to let people starve
too long</i>.” On returning to the American Relief Station I heard
an uproar of piercing wailing. There was a crowd about the door where the
candidates for relief enter. My liaison officer, by virtue of his uniform,
elbowed a way for me to the front. On the cold stone floor a man in a
cassock was kneeling. He held a crucifix. In a secret, murmuring flow of
words he was praying. Before him lay a human wax-work, who was newly dead;
he had collapsed when help was within handstretch. He was a young man,
certainly less than thirty, bleached with under-nourishment. He was neatly
clad in clothes which were thread-bare; he might have been a shop-keeper
or a clerk. The priest continued to pray—the wailing dwindled into
the distance down the corridor as a woman was led away. At last a door
closed behind her and there was nothing but the silence of the crowd and
the murmur of the praying. I glanced at the peering faces, and I knew that
it was true, what the strong man of Hungary had said. It is not safe to
let a nation starve too long.</p>
<p><br/><br/></p>
<hr />
<p><SPAN name="link2HCH0007" id="link2HCH0007"> </SPAN></p>
<br/>
<h2> CHAPTER VII—CHRISTMAS EVE IN VIENNA </h2>
<p class="pfirst">
<span class="dropcap" style="font-size: 4.00em">T</span>his year Santa
Claus made a mistake about Vienna; he forgot to come or else he had grown
tired of paying visits to a people who are so unhappy. In Vienna they
speak of 1920 as the sixth year of the war—they mean the war against
hunger. They can afford no more Christmases till the Peace with Hunger has
been settled. Some of us who had seen the toys taken from the children
being auctioned for bread at the Dorotheum, suspected that this would be
the case—Santa Claus would be too busy in England and America to
find time to visit the stockings of Vienna; so we conspired to commit the
fraud of impersonation. We each stumped up a certain sum with which to
purchase flour, bacon, cocoa, rice, sugar and tinned milk. We obtained the
addresses from the Society of Friends of twenty-five of the most desperate
families. The American Relief Administration lent us a car. As soon as
night had fallen we set off on our rounds; we were warned that if we
started too late, we should find all the homes in darkness; the means of
illumination are expensive. People go to bed as soon as it becomes dark
and save the money that candles would have cost.</p>
<p>We were a curiously constituted party—an amalgam of the new
friendship which can alone bring happiness to the world. Our chauffeur, as
delighted at the undertaking as anyone, was a German. Our pillar of
strength was Dr. John, an Austrian, who had been lamed in the front-line
as a combatant by one of the Allies' shells. The rest of us were
British and Americans. Three years ago we were all soldiers, thirsting for
each other's blood; and here, on this Christmas Eve of 1920, we were
crowded together in the same automobile, bound on the one errand. It was
wonderful. We thought our way back to that No Man's Land of
animosity; it was amazing that we should have hated so much.</p>
<p>We jolted our way between snow-banks, through dim-lit streets, to the
poorest quarter of the city. But even here there was a look of tidiness,
for Vienna has no slums. The absence of slums in a sense enhances the
tragedy of the situation. These people, who are now on their last legs,
were formerly thrifty and self-respecting. They did not merit such a fate.
Vienna was a clean city and its municipal government was ahead of the
times in the attention that it paid to housing conditions. So it happens
that today in well-treed streets, flanked by model dwellings of artistic
design, you are deceived unless you look behind the doors; for these
people are not incorrigible slovens who parade their griefs and trade upon
your pity. They are the unfortunates of a world-wide calamity, who creep
into back rooms and prefer to die quietly. What I propose to do is what we
did this Christmas Eve—push open a few of the doors and let you see
what lies hidden. There is one point which in all fairness it is necessary
to emphasize. In none of the cases which I propose to quote was the
poverty due to shiftlessness. It was invariably due to one of two causes:
the debased value of the currency or the inability to obtain work. The
desire to work was always present. If you ask what is the solution, so
that neither Vienna nor any other city may again pass through such a
travesty of Christmas, I would reply the combined statesmanly effort on
the part of more prosperous nations to stabilise Austrian economic
conditions.</p>
<p>Between a row of tall houses we drew up against a snow-pile. Dr. John was
the first to limp out of the car and to secure the bag of flour. Of all
our gifts the flour was the most unpleasant to carry; it covered one's
clothes with a film of white. There was a rivalry at each new
stopping-place as to who should perform the task which was least pleasant.
Dr. John showed a surprising agility in getting to the flour. If anyone
outstripped him, he begged to be allowed to carry it. The reason he gave
was that he could do so little for his people and that he alone was an
Austrian.</p>
<p>We passed through a dark passage and rapped on a door. It was opened by a
scantily clad woman, wasted with consumption. She had five children
ranging from six months to fourteen years and a husband who was
prematurely white. The room in which they lived was the size of a cupboard
and almost entirely filled by a bed, lacking in coverings, and a cradle.
The children sat about on the floor in rags. As you might imagine, there
was nothing to betray that it was the night before Christmas. Upon enquiry
we discovered that the man was a tile-layer and, since all building has
been discontinued, is permanently out of work. And yet the astounding
thing about these people was their courtesy and courage. They wished us
the season's greetings and mustered smiles. The children were led
forward to shake our hands. When we produced our presents, they were
shaken by a tremor. One feared they were going to cry. I turned my back in
shame at the smallness of the gift and bent over the cradle. Even the
baby, when I stroked her cheek, pulled her fingers out of her mouth and
gurgled. But the worst shame was yet to come, when we were taking our
departure, after we had said good-bye. The father had followed us out into
the darkness. I could scarcely see his face. Suddenly he stooped and I
knew that he had kissed my hand. The man had been a soldier. Three years
ago, had we met, we should have felt it our duty to kill each other. That
he should have shown so much emotion made his need vivid. To be kissed by
a starving man does not increase one's self-respect.</p>
<p>At the next house at which we halted, we felt convinced there must be some
mistake. It had wrought-iron gates and an imposing courtyard. Playing
Santa Claus is well enough, but if one left a bag of flour on John D.
Rockefeller, the gift might be resented. We checked up the address which
the Society of Friends had provided (it was printed in full) as we held
the paper beneath the glare of the automobile-lamps. Dr. John set us an
example in courage; collaring the bag of flour, he went first. We climbed
a well-lighted staircase, passing other occupants of the dwelling who
stared at us mystified. They manifestly belonged to the upper class and
could not fathom the purpose of our errand. Again we rapped on a door. A
pretty woman of about twenty-five, answered our summons. Dr. John, looking
like a miller by this time, tactfully made the explanations. We had
brought something for the children. The Society of Friends had told us
that milk would be acceptable and we had added a few other things to our
present.</p>
<p>There was no mistake. We had come to the right house. The apartment,
beyond the hall, was stripped bare. Everything had gone to the Dorotheum—the
national pawn-shop—to purchase bread. Her husband was a Government
official; the salary he was now getting was four times as large as in
pre-war times, but the purchasing power of a crown was a hundred and
thirty times less. It was impossible to sustain life on it. They were
still occupying their old house because a law had been passed restraining
landlords from increasing their pre-war rents. But even at that they would
soon have to get out. And then where could they go, with the whole of
Vienna under-housed? To the streets, perhaps.</p>
<p>She still maintained her sense of pride. She was terribly grateful, but
terribly afraid some of her neighbours might have seen us. Then she did a
thing superbly eloquent. She had asked our nationalities. “American,
British and Austrian,” we told her, “and there's a
German in the car downstairs.” Her eyes flooded. She tried to gather
all our hands together and clasp them to her breast. “The seventh
Christmas of the war!” she said. “And you come here together
to help me as friends. Almost you make me believe that the war is ended.”</p>
<p>We tiptoed out, moving noiselessly, while she closed the door furtively
behind us. We shared her dread lest any act of ours should have betrayed
her secret and the neighbours should have guessed.</p>
<p>After several calls we found ourselves again in a poorer district. It was
getting late. There were no lights in the windows. We were a little
hesitant about ringing more bells. The proper time for Father Christmas to
arrive is when people are in bed; but in a city of suspicions and sudden
arrests to be roused out of sleep by a group of strange men is more likely
to cause alarm than pleasure. We threw in some extra cans of milk as
compensation and chanced it.</p>
<p>Our ring was answered after an interval by a cheerful little woman with a
wooden leg. She had seven children and was reckoned a widow; her husband
had gone missing in the war. Each child had to be wakened and introduced
to us in turn. They stood in a line, blinking shyly and rubbing their
drowsy eyes. They had evidently been picked up off the floor, for in the
inner room there was only a single bed which, as usual, had as its only
covering a mattress. The clothes of the entire seven children would not
have decently warmed one child. And yet, despite their leanness and rags
they seemed to breathe their mother's optimism. We asked her how she
managed to exist. She smiled bravely, tapping with her wooden leg. She
worked when she could—yes, at washing. There was her man's
pension, and then we must not forget the good God who had sent us.</p>
<p>We glanced round the unfurnished room. It was cold as the street outside,
but scrubbed and speckless. There was no doubt that she was good, but one
was puzzled to discover why she was so persuaded that God had been good to
her. Then she let the secret out—or at least part of it. God was
daily feeding three of her seven children at the American Relief Station.
She seemed to have the idea that God had a lot in common with the Stars
and Stripes. As we turned to go, my eye caught an embroidered motto on the
wall, which read, “My kitchen is clean and my food well-cooked;
otherwise I would not be here.” So she, too, like the Government
official's wife, had her upholding pride. Poverty had failed to down
her.</p>
<p>After this we lost our way for a time in a district where more knifings
happen than in any other in Vienna. At last we found ourselves in a dank,
unlighted room where people rose from the floor like shadows. It was
tenanted in all by four adults and five children. One of the children was
seriously ill. They hadn't been to see a doctor and didn't
know what was the matter with her. She was a pretty, fair little girl and
her body was shaken with fever. No, they had no food. That was nothing
new. One of the men was a gardener; before gardens grew green it would be
easy to die. The other man had been four years a prisoner in Siberia. He
had walked most the way back to Vienna. The walking hadn't improved
his health. He wondered why he had been so anxious to get back. He was
rotting here; he could have rotted with equal ease out there. In the
darkness they flapped their rags and coughed. When we produced our food,
the men showed no enthusiasm. It was the women, hideously angular, who
stooped over our hands and blessed us in the name of their children. We
had done them no service with our Christmas presents; we had only
prolonged their agony by a few days' respite. They made us feel
that. Individuals could do nothing. It was nations who must act and act
quickly if victims of this order were not to perish.</p>
<p>The last visit we paid was in all senses the happiest, for we, came face
to face with triumphant youth. The single room was in the dreariest
tenement we had entered. The snow lay in a melting quagmire outside. It
was the nearest approach to a slum I have encountered in Vienna. The walls
were peeling with damp and the woodwork was mouldy. We had to climb a
flight and then cross along the front of the house by a rickety balcony.
Pushing open a window we stumbled on a pathetic sight—six little
boys and girls curled up asleep on the bare boards with their flesh
showing through their rags. On a bed a handsome man was sitting, strumming
softly on a guitar. He was evidently of gipsy origin; his hair was jet
black, his moustaches were fiercely curled and his face was marble white.
He stared at us doubtfully with his smouldering eyes while the Doctor
explained our intrusion. Then he rose with an air of courtliness and made
us welcome. There was a wild haughtiness about the man—a native
aristocracy—which made us forget his poverty. He had seven children?
Yes. We counted the little bodies strewn about and could reckon only six.
He smiled. That was easily explained. The seventh was a girl of eighteen;
she would be back presently. And his wife, we asked, where was she? His
wife had died last May. She was out with a sack on her shoulder, picking
over the old ash-heaps which have not been disturbed for twenty years. She
was searching with other women as desperate as herself to find fuel. Not
being an expert miner, the ashes had slipped back and buried her. She was
smothered before they could dig her out. Since then his daughter, whom he
hoped we should meet, had been their mother. For himself, he was a
musician and sang in cafis, when people were so good as to listen.</p>
<p>At this point the sound of rushing feet disturbed us. A little girl, who
certainly did not look eighteen, butted her way into the midst of us. It
was plain that at first she had thought we were the police and was out to
fight the lot of us. On finding that our intentions were kind, she fell to
laughing. Her merriment was contagious and in strange contrast to her
father's tragic attitudes. Her little brothers and sisters woke up
and smiled at her. One could see that in her presence they felt safe.</p>
<p>She began to explain between smiles and gulps how happy we had made her.
All day she had been puzzling what to get for the children. She had no
money. Tomorrow would be Christmas. Not to give anything would not be
right. And now, when she had begun to despair——. She dragged
her ragged family to their feet and pushed them up one by one to kiss our
hands. “You shall have a Christmas now,” she kept telling
them; “a real Christmas. One of the finest.”</p>
<p>And it took so little to make this great happiness—such a meagre,
unworthy sacrifice. One less present in each of your stockings would have
brought the same gladness to every starveling in Vienna.</p>
<p><br/><br/></p>
<hr />
<p><SPAN name="link2HCH0008" id="link2HCH0008"> </SPAN></p>
<br/>
<h2> CHAPTER VIII—A HOSPITAL IN BUDA </h2>
<p class="pfirst">
<span class="dropcap" style="font-size: 4.00em">A</span>ccounts of the
starving children are likely to create the impression that the countries
in which they starve are callous. The case is quite the opposite. Hungary,
for instance, used to lead the world in its legislation for
child-conservation. If the parent failed, the State automatically became
the parent. If an unprotected woman were about to become a mother, the
State undertook a man's responsibilities, both for the woman and the
life unborn. The way in which the law operated was peculiarly humane.
There were no barrack-like asylums for the care of these unfortunates.
They were placed in the homes of peasants and visited at regular intervals
by inspectors whose business it was to see that they were being treated
kindly. The mother was not separated from her illegitimate child; they
were placed together in surroundings where their position would become
normal. Since the war this system has broken down; but as far as is
possible it is still maintained. One needs to disabuse his mind of the
prejudice against peoples who are starving, that they are starving because
of their own intolerance. One finds instances of spiritual generosity
which go far beyond the capacity of the Anglo-Saxon mind.</p>
<p>In Buda there is a mosque, which has stood there for centuries. It marks
the tomb of the Mohammedan who brought the first rose to Europe. Because
the beauty of his gift has made life more fragrant, religious bigotry, has
kept aloof from his sleeping-place. There has never been a day since he
was buried there that the call to prayer has not sounded from the minaret,
proclaiming the greatness of Allah above the roofs of a city which serves
a rival god. What does it matter, say the citizens of Buda, if it helps
the soul of the giver of our first rose to rest? A people so poetically
magnanimous are not likely to be wilfully cruel to children.</p>
<p>I visited the Foundling hospital in Budapest where parentless children are
first adopted by the State. It is more like a palace than a hospital—an
imposing series of buildings covering several acres; but it is only
imposing from the outside. It is over-crowded and under-staffed. The war,
with its retreats and invasions, has filled the land with tuberculosis and
rickets. Five hundred are cared for in the cots; thirteen thousand have to
be lodged elsewhere. The nurses are in patched clothing and rags. The
doctors are worn and pale as ghosts. I saw many of the attendants trudging
through the snow without stockings. The wards smell like menageries. They
have no soap, no linen, no anything. And this is the institution which
once led the world in child-conservation!</p>
<p>Do not think that these conditions are due to carelessness; they are
caused by the national bankruptcy. Hungary's exchequer has been
pillaged by both Bolshevists and Roumanians. In the money that is left a
depreciation has taken place which would be equalled in American currency
if the spending value of the dollar were to become less than that of one
cent. Moreover, very many medical requirements have become absolutely
unobtainable. Commodities so common as soap, powder, vaseline, linen are
not to be purchased. The children born in the hospital are wrapped in
paper. Even paper is so scarce that it has to be washed. After it has been
washed it cracks. Its edges become sharp as a razor. There is not a baby
in that hospital whose tender little body is not covered with cuts and
sores. Yet what can the nurses do? Babies have to be clad. There is
nothing but paper.</p>
<p>I wish the people who read this chapter could have accompanied me through
those wards. It was the Christmas season. The occupants of the cots were
little children; the mothers who bent over them, giving them the last of
their strength, were more outcast than Mary.</p>
<p>Because of the coal shortage, no ward in the hospital was properly heated.
I was wearing a coat and had to keep it on. In the little railed beds, the
babies shivered against the bars on bare mattresses. They wore nothing but
a single patched shirt, which left off at the legs for the sake of
economy. The impression they created was not even remotely human; they
looked like sick monkeys from the tropics who had not became acclimatised.
There were lines and lines of them, their bodies blue with cold and
criss-crossed with scars. Most of them could not shift themselves; their
heads were bumpy and their legs withered. The thing that first struck me
was their silence; they had finished all their crying. The doctor informed
me that the mortality among them is over thirty per cent. Their ages were
anything from the newly born to ten years old. It seemed that into those
buildings was crowded the child misery of all the world.</p>
<p>I stopped to enquire who were their parents. They did not know. Their
fathers had been killed in the war and their mothers had died. Some of
them had been picked up in the streets where they had been abandoned by
parents who could drag no further.</p>
<p>I found myself in the maternity ward. The women were as naked as the
children. Of the old stock of gowns only a few were left, which had been
patched and darned till there remained scarcely anything of the original
fabric. Again, as in the case of the children, the mattresses were bare of
coverings. The napkins of the new-born babies were of paper, broken and
washed to shreds. And this was the hospital which for mercy once led the
world!</p>
<p>I was taken to the laundry to see how the paper was laundered. It so
happened that we arrived in time to catch a laundress using a brush to one
of the tattered maternity garments. The fury of the Director, who escorted
me, was extravagant. It knew no bounds. He shouted and thumped and
gesticulated. It was as though the woman had dared to scrub a priceless
piece of tapestry. I thought he would have struck her. Later he apologised
to me for his passion, “On our retention of that gown some mother's
life may depend.”</p>
<p>It was the kind of clout with which no self-respecting housewife in
America would have deigned to mop her floor.</p>
<p><br/><br/></p>
<hr />
<p><SPAN name="link2HCH0009" id="link2HCH0009"> </SPAN></p>
<br/>
<h2> CHAPTER IX—AN ECONOMIC EXPERIMENT </h2>
<p class="pfirst">
<span class="dropcap" style="font-size: 4.00em">T</span>hey wouldn't
need to starve if they would get to work.” The retort and the
criticism which it implies are as shallow as they are selfish. Central
Europe wants to work. It is begging for the chance to work; but it cannot
work efficiently while it is under-nourished.</p>
<p>Here in Prague there is an American business man who has probed deeper
into the Czecho-Slovak economic situation than all the politicians. He has
found a way to feed the nation and to make a profit for himself. He bases
his calculations on the firm belief that a people, heretofore industrious,
still retains the habit; all they require to set them on their feet is
food. He is willing to provide the food and to risk his capital on their
bare word that they will play the game by him.</p>
<p>He has started his experiment with the miners of Carlsbad. The Government
food-ration allowed to working miners is precisely half what it ought to
be. He has offered to supply the other half of the ration, bringing their
allowance up to normal, on condition that the miners will do their best to
increase their output of coal by 20 per cent. They are not to make this
increase by working overtime, but by speeding up during their ordinary
working hours. The average of their present output is calculated on the
results of the past nine months. As repayment and profit on his
investment, he is given the option to purchase one-half of the 20 per
cent, increased output at the inland price, i.e., the price that coal is
selling for in Czechoslovakia. He makes his profit by exporting. The
question immediately arises, why could not Czecho-Slovakia do the
exporting and make the profit herself? The answer is that the partitioning
of Austro-Hungary by the Peace Treaty and the consequent establishing of
new frontiers has bred such a deep international distrust that the new
nations are reluctant to let their freight-cars pass out of their own
territory for fear they should never recover them. At the border
merchandise is unloaded and re-shipped, which adds considerably to the
expense of transportation. Major S., being an American, has a superior
reputation for integrity and His word is accepted when he promises that
cars carrying his shipments out of Czechoslovakia will be returned.</p>
<p>The scheme is much more far-reaching than at first sight it appears. It
embraces not only the feeding of the men, but also of their families. His
share of the coal he intends to sell to Austria, just across the border,
where the scarcity of every kind of fuel is causing a crisis. When he has
done this, many Austrian factories which have been standing idle will be
able to re-open. So, by feeding the Carlsbad miners, he is re-employing
the Austrian working-man.</p>
<p>He was warned when he first discussed his plans, that they would be
rejected by Government and miners alike. On the contrary they have been
eagerly accepted by both Government and miners; but most eagerly by the
miners. The miners all over Czecho-Slovakia are clamouring to be given the
same opportunity. If it pays an individual to indulge in this kind of
commercial enterprise, it would equally pay the Allies. For, while this is
no philanthropy, it attains the ends of philanthropy and has the added
advantage that it is economically constructive. To state the case
cynically, the politicians of the Allies can play the part of Good
Samaritans and find themselves in pocket. The experiment which has started
with the miners of Carlsbad can be extended to cover almost all branches
of industry. But the value of the experiment and its eager acceptance
proves that it is not unwillingness, but inability due to
undernourishment, that prevents Central Europe from getting to work.</p>
<p>In Czecho-Slovakia, as in Hungary and Austria, the commercial stagnation
which has produced every kind, of shortage, is chiefly to be traced to the
establishing of new frontiers. When the Peace Treaty repartitioned Europe,
it took apart a watch which was going, and failed to put it together. All
the cogs and wheels are still here, but they lie scattered about and
consequently there is no movement. An example of this disorganization is
near at hand. The peasants of a certain district of what is now
Czecho-Slovakia, were accustomed to gain their bread by felling trees in
the winter and floating them down the rivers in the summer to Hungary. In
Hungary they sold their logs and stayed to help with the harvest. Then
they returned to their homes in the mountains to eke out a livelihood for
the next nine months with the money they had thus earned. Now that
Ruthenia has become Czecho-Slovak and a frontier has been established,
they are no longer allowed to pass freely into Hungary; consequently they
starve.</p>
<p>The trees in their forests as of old stand ready for the cutting. The
peasants are more anxious than ever to make their traditional excursion.
But someone in Paris scrawled on a map with a blue pencil, so the trees
are not felled and the peasants starve. Conditions are so bad in these
primitive villages that the children would not have lived the year out had
not the American Relief Administration made their rescue one of its
special objects.</p>
<p>Here again, as with the miners, the starvation is not caused by
unwillingness to work, but by the volcanic upheavals of war, followed by a
political redistribution which has destroyed economic stability and
criss-crossed Central Europe with hostile tariff walls in places where the
flow of trade was once traditional and amiable. Whether these countries
will be able to function efficiently after they have adapted themselves to
their new boundaries is a question which only time can prove. For the
moment, as though one had dammed torrents within new confines, diverting
them from their ancient courses, there is a seething swirl of unrest, then
an over-flowing and then stagnation.</p>
<p>All the railroads run towards Vienna, which was the great middleman city
for the old empire. Hungary sent grain. Bohemia sent coal. They did their
trading there and exchanged their products for commodities which they
could not produce themselves. Today Vienna is isolated in a small patch of
scrubby country which is the new Austria. The new Austria has no natural
resources on which to maintain its population. The only way its people can
hope to gain a living is by being again, what they once were, Central
Europe's middlemen. But their currency is so debased that its
purchasing value is almost gone. No one who had anything of actual value
would go to Vienna to exchange it for their unreal money. Nevertheless,
the railroads still converge there; there has been no time to change them.
For all the purpose they serve they might as well run out into the Sahara
desert. The political map, as re-arranged by the Peace, has built walls
across most of the old travel-routes; it has given ancient hostilities a
new means of venting their animosities, has destroyed confidence and
dislocated the entire system of transport. This is without doubt the
fundamental answer to the question, “Why does Central Europe starve?”
The fault is not one of sulkiness or laziness on the part of the people
who do the starving. They are not starving in order to spite the Allies or
because they derive a patriotic ecstasy from starvation. They want to work
and they prefer employment to charity. They claim the right to work; but
if their work is to be of any value to the world, we must first restore to
them their vitality, by nourishing their famished bodies, and then
stabilise their economic conditions so that the marketing of the results
of their industry may be assured.</p>
<p><br/><br/></p>
<hr />
<p><SPAN name="link2HCH0010" id="link2HCH0010"> </SPAN></p>
<br/>
<h2> CHAPTER X—BABUSCHKA </h2>
<p class="pfirst">
<span class="dropcap" style="font-size: 4.00em">P</span>rague is one of
the more important of the jumping off points for Bolshevist propaganda in
Europe; it is at the same time a rendezvous for exiled Russians of
moderate views, who are conspiring to overthrow the Red regime the moment
the hour seems propitious. These exiled Russians all belong to the
Intelligencia—the cultured middle-class. They are university
students, professors, doctors, engineers—the people of brains and
small means who do the sane thinking for whatever nation. They are a class
which is being rapidly exterminated in all the stricken countries. In
Russia they have been smashed into oblivion with clubs and rifles; in
Central Europe they are dying more respectably, because more privately, of
famine. Here, in Prague, for instance, poorly as a working man is paid,
his wages are higher than a school-teacher's.</p>
<p>A fund for their partial rescue has been placed in the hands of the
American Relief Administration by the will of Mr. Harkness. I saw what it
was accomplishing for the first time in Vienna, when I lunched with the
professors of the University, many of whom are world-famous in their
various departments of research. The terrible problem that they have to
face is explained at once when it is stated that the highest salary paid
to a professor, if exchanged into American currency, would be worth at
most one hundred dollars a year. That is the highest; the bulk of the
salaries are much less. Before the war, when a crown had the spending
value of twenty-two cents, they could live comfortably and with the
necessary ease of mind. Today, when the crown has shrunk to the value of
one-sixth of a cent, they find themselves in penury.</p>
<p>The Harkness Fund is providing the professors of Vienna with one meal a
day, to which the professors themselves contribute one twenty-fourth. I
watched them come in to lunch and the ravenous way in which they ate. I
tried to bring the significance of the scene home to myself by shifting
the stage-setting to Harvard or Oxford. They were men of the highest
intellectual type and of an achievement which speaks for itself. The
science and learning of both America and Great Britain are already the
wiser for their devotion. Today we are saving thousands of lives by the
past results of their medical discoveries. Most emphatically they are the
kind of men who, were they to perish, it would be impossible to replace.
And here they were cold, ill-nourished, shabby, bending voraciously over a
rough plenty as though they were outcasts from the gutter. As the lunch
progressed one noticed that, despite their hunger, they were restraining
their appetites. The bread by their plates remained untouched. To the
bread they added various morsels, till by the end of the meal a little
pile had grown up. Before each left, he drew out a piece of paper and
surreptitiously made a bundle of the pile, which he slipped into his
pocket, glancing this way and that to see whether he was observed. Then he
hurried out to where a wife and children were counting the seconds till
his coming.</p>
<p>The next time I saw the Harkness Fund at work was here in Prague. The
American Relief Administration had taken a hall and provided a Christmas
entertainment at which food-packages were to be distributed to the exiled
Russian Intelligencia. When we arrived the hall was jammed. There were
girl university students, with their hair cropped like the women in the
Battalion of Death. They were clad for the most part in old dresses which
had been collected by the Red Cross in America. There were tottering
middle-aged professors, the counterpart of those whom I had seen in
Vienna. There were soldiers of Denikin's and Kolchak's armies
in the loose Russian military blouse. Most of these were students who are
pursuing their studies at Prague University and living of necessity in
human pigsties. And then there were mothers, dragged to pieces by
adversity, carrying babies, with still more babies clinging to their
skirts. Yet, despite their poverty, the gathering had an ecstatic, valiant
look. One glanced from one white face to the next—at the gray-white
sea they made when massed together. The spirit which lay behind those
faces was not broken. Pinched, neglected, emaciated, misunderstood—yes;
but it still stood erect to greet the future. It believed in the future.
It hoped. Moving through the throng like a blessing, came a little bowed
old woman. Her eyes were dim. She had to lean on a tall young soldier's
arm to support herself. Over her cropped gray head she wore a gray piece
of cloth, folded in a triangle. “Babus-chka! Babuschka!” the
whisper went round. It grew into something like a shout. There was no
surging, no jostling. The people went forward one by one to greet her. She
placed her old gnarled hands on their shoulders, drawing their heads down,
so that she could kiss them. Babus-chka—the little grandmother! They
were all grandsons and granddaughters to her. She might have been a saint—but
she was too human. She preferred to be what she has always been, the
little grandmother of exiled Russia.</p>
<p>Next day I went to see where the Intelligencia of Russia are living. They
are housed in a damp, unheated barracks. I opened endless doors; there
were rows and rows of spavined, unrestful beds. Czecho-Slovakia is not
pleased at their presence; they are unwelcome guests. But, if their hope
comes true, they are the brains of the new and better Russia which will
give a lasting peace to the world. Because they believe their hope will
come true, they train their brains relentlessly, studying, studying,
studying. It does not matter that they are not wanted. They will be
wanted. Meanwhile they starve and attend the University and learn.</p>
<p>And then I went to see Babuschka, who has kept this lamp of ardent
idealism burning. She made me her grandson the moment I entered, brushing
aside my stiffly proffered hand, putting her arms round my shoulders and
dragging down my face to hers. After that things were easier; her
all-embracing love had caught me in its web.</p>
<p>Why did they send her to Siberia? She is seventy-seven now and more than
half her years have been spent in exile. After having achieved her goal,
she has again been made an exile. This time by the Red Terror. You know
who she is, for she has been several times to Great Britain and America.
She is Catherina Breshkoffskaja, better known as the Grandmother of the
Russian Revolution, and beloved by her countrymen as Babuschka.</p>
<p>For two solid hours she spoke to me about Russia, telling me how good and
simple the Russian peasants were. “The Red Terror will be over by
spring,” she said; “the peasants will not stand it longer. I
know. We go into Russia secretly, constantly; we see for ourselves. We are
educating the people at the risk of our lives, taking literature to them
and preaching our program. When our hour comes, we shall establish freedom
and give the land to the man who works it. I am seventy-seven, but I shall
live to see the end of Bolshevism and the beginning of a happier world.”
Her eyes became clear as a girl's; she clutched my hands. “Tell
America and England to be patient with us. Make them believe that we are
good like themselves. The Russian people are little children—they
are not bad. They are growing up. Tell them we want their affection, so
that we may grow up to be clean and valiant.”</p>
<p>The door opened; a man entered with a rush of footsteps. He knelt beside
her, kissing her hands in reverence. He was going on a journey. When he
goes on a journey, especially in an eastwardly direction, he is never
certain whether he will return. Lest the blank wall and the firing-squad
should wait for him, he had come to receive her blessing. Babuschka took
his yearning face, kissing his eyes, his cheeks, his mouth. Across his
shoulder she gazed at me and nodded. “It is Kerensky, the
knight-errant of Russia, who wants nothing for himself.”</p>
<p><br/><br/></p>
<hr />
<p><SPAN name="link2HCH0011" id="link2HCH0011"> </SPAN></p>
<br/>
<h2> CHAPTER XI—THE SOUL OF POLAND </h2>
<p class="pfirst">
<span class="dropcap" style="font-size: 4.00em">P</span>oland is
commencing the New Year with her face towards peace and the hope in her
heart that she may never have to fight again. For her the war has lasted
two years longer than for any other country. During the past six years she
has had to fight on five separate fronts. Her devastated area is greater
than that of France. She has cities which have been captured and occupied
seven separate times since 1914 by the armies of seven separate nations.
She is sick of war. She has elected a peasant for her prime minister—a
man who belongs to the class which gains nothing but sorrow from
bloodshed. All that Poland asks from the New Year is the quiet in which to
convalesce from her wounds, so that she may gather strength to construct
her nationhood along the lines of states-manly righteousness. As the
clocks above Warsaw struck the hour of midnight, the prayer in every heart
was, “God give us peace with the New Year.”</p>
<p>How badly she requires peace and how bitterly she stands in need of the
world's mercy, no one can conceive who has not been here. She is a
land of widows, cripples and orphans. She has two millions of
under-nourished children, of whom only one million are being cared for.
She has a million refugees within her borders. Her mark, which was
originally worth twenty-five cents, has sunk to an exchange value of
one-sixth of a cent. The barbed wire entanglements come up to the very
gates of Warsaw. The threat of a Bolshevist invasion in the spring is like
a brutal hand, clapped against her lips, silencing laughter. It compels
her, against her will, to keep her army mobilised; if she disbanded, she
would make invasion certain. Every man she keeps under arms loses her a
little of the world's sympathy. She knows that, but she does not
dare to be unprotected. She is a nation in rags. Until the American Relief
Administration came, she was a nation of funerals.</p>
<p>And yet none of her misfortunes have quenched her unconquerable valor. In
Cracow stands the famous church of St. Mary's. Centuries ago it was
a watch-tower against the invading Tartar; a soldier was kept constantly
stationed there to give warning on a trumpet of the first approach of
danger. In the fourteenth century, while rousing the city to its peril,
the trumpeter was struck in the throat by an enemy's arrow. His call
faltered, rallied and sank. Then, with his dying breath, he sounded a last
blast, which broke off short. The broken call saved the city. Ever since,
to commemorate his faithfulness, there has never been an hour, day or
night, when his broken trumpet-call, ending abruptly in an abyss of
silence, has not been sounded from the tower. The man symbolises the soul
of Poland—the soul of a dying trumpeter who blows a last blast of
warning above the sleeping roofs of civilization.</p>
<p>Poland will surely die in her watch-tower unless the sleeping world whom
she protects, awakes and comes to her rescue. She is dying gamely, with
her back to the wall. She does not whine—she does not slacken in her
effort. The smallest children make themselves sharers in her sacrifice. If
you go to the American soup-kitchens you will find tiny mites of six and
seven shivering in queues to secure the rations. They are there because
they are the only members of the family young enough to be spared. If you
question them, you will find that they have left still younger babies
locked up in the squalid rooms that they call home. To prove their
assertion they show you the key that they carry round their necks. From
dawn to dark the elder children and parents are out at work.</p>
<p>A little girl of eight came to the officials of the Relief Administration
the other day with a pathetic request. She came by herself and explained
that the idea was entirely her own. She wanted to be sent to America. But
had she relations in America? No. Then had she no one whom she loved in
Poland? Yes—her father and mother. But would she want to leave them?
At that question she began to cry. It would hurt her very much to leave
them; but she was so young. There was no other way to help; she could only
eat and there was so little food. If she went away, there would be more
for someone else.</p>
<p>This magnanimity of devotion, touches every class—especially the
women. There is an order in Poland known as the Gray Samaritans. They are
Y. W. C. A. girls of Polish blood, recruited in America, and are among the
most gallant helpers that the American Relief Administration possesses.
Their business is to go into the most remote villages, many of which lie
far away from railroads. The story of the privations of their travels
would fill volumes. In these villages they establish feeding-stations,
train the peasants in their management and then pass on to the next point
where the need is greatest.</p>
<p>Another order of purely Polish origin is The Women's Battalion of
Death. They started in Lemberg, in a crisis of invasion, when not a single
man was left. The last man, if he may be so called, had been a hoy of
fourteen, who had been shot by the enemy as he was searching for
protection for the women. In their dilemma the women armed themselves. The
movement spread; and so the Battalion of Death became a permanency.</p>
<p>On New Year's Eve I went to visit them; they were housed in a damp
building across the Vistula, which had formerly been used as a prison for
captured Russian soldiers. Its passages had a mildewed smell; they were
stone-paved and dark as a dungeon. A door opened. We felt our way across a
vaulted cellar crowded with gray-blanketed, unlovely beds. Another door
opened. The sound of fresh, young voices rushed to meet us and the
tinkling of a worn piano. In a bare, chill room the girl-soldiers of
Poland were gathered. It was their New Year's festival. I think the
first thing we noticed was the merriment of their eyes and the roundness
of their close cropped heads. It would have been easy to have mistaken
them for boys in their dingy khaki. A Christmas tree stood in the corner
robbed of all its presents. They had been dancing as we entered and were
halted, still in couples, gazing towards us shyly. They looked children.
In a land less sorely pressed, they would have had their hair in pigtails
and have been romping in school. Certainly they were not a sight to
inspire terror. The youngest was fifteen—the average age eighteen to
twenty. You would never have imagined that they were a Battalion of Death.
Then you talked with them and understood.</p>
<p>There was one girl who was a sample of the rest. She was pretty, despite
her shaven head; her complexion was high and her eyes frank. She was the
kind of a girl who ought to have had her suitors. Yes, she had seen
fighting; it was in the trenches at Vilna. They had held on too long after
the retreat had commenced. The first thing they knew, the Bolos were upon
them. They came firing as they advanced and her companions were falling.
At the last moment, to save herself, she had shammed death and hidden
herself beneath the corpses. Then followed the story of her escape, told
casually, as though it were the sort of thing that might happen to any
girl. She was just nineteen and of gentle birth. When the fighting was at
its height, there had been girls of title in her battalion; it had been
recruited from all ranks, the same as the men's. Now that the ordeal
was over for the moment, the girls who remained were mostly peasants. Why
did she remain? I asked many of them that question before the evening was
ended. The answer which they gave me was always the same, though phrased
in different words, “To help Poland.”</p>
<p>They didn't mind how they were employed, so long as they helped.
They didn't care how much they suffered, so long as they helped.
They were guarding stores of food at present because they were more honest
than the men. But they would work in soup-kitchens, anywhere, at anything.
If the war sprang up again, they would fight.</p>
<p>They were mere kiddies, most of them, laughing and irrepressible. They
wanted to be free to live, to possess lovers, to be mothers, to have
children. But, like the trumpeter of Cracow, they would not desert their
post while their warning might save the sleeping world.</p>
<p>At the State Reception at the Winter Palace, I gained a further glimpse
into the heart of Polish heroism. I was speaking to Prince Sapieha, the
Minister of Foreign Affairs. He pointed to the fireplace of the Reception
Room. “It was standing there,” he said, “that Tsar
Alexander II gave the death blow to our hopes. We had heard that he was
generous and we had believed that he would free us and give us justice.
There in front of the fireplace he met our patriots who had come to plead
with him. Before they commenced, 'Point de reveries'—no
dreams, he said. That has been our answer through all the ages, whenever
we have complained to our oppressors. They have told us, 'No dreams;'
but we have gone on dreaming till at last our dreams have come true. We
dreamed the seemingly impossible; and we have dreamt ourselves into
freedom.”</p>
<p><br/><br/></p>
<hr />
<p><SPAN name="link2HCH0012" id="link2HCH0012"> </SPAN></p>
<br/>
<h2> CHAPTER XII—ONE CHILD'. STORY </h2>
<p class="pfirst">
<span class="dropcap" style="font-size: 4.00em">S</span>ome weeks ago a
haggard man limped into the headquarters office of the American Relief in
Warsaw. He had come to seek assistance for his daughter. She had just
escaped from Kharkov, where she had been held a prisoner by the
Bolshevists for many months. Her health was broken with hardship; if
something were not done for her, she would die. Unfortunately he could not
offer money; but whatever was done for her he would consider a debt, which
one day he would repay. By profession he was an engineer. The Georgian
Government owed him the equivalent of over three hundred thousand dollars.
He had only that day recovered his daughter and learnt of her condition.
While she was being taken prisoner at Kiev and carried a thousand miles
into the interior, he had been cut off in the Caucasus by another
Bolshevist offensive. She had been escaping while he also had been
escaping, and neither had known of the other's predicament. From
places as far apart as continents, after life and death adventures, they
had both reached Warsaw on the same day and had arrived at the house of a
relative within a few hours of each other. He was almost as spent as she
was. From being rich he was penniless. She was the apple of his eye; she
was only fourteen and in danger of dying. There was no one to whom he
could turn in his distress. So he had bethought himself of the Americans.</p>
<p>Upon investigation his story proved correct. His daughter, Wanda
Marchzcloska, was in the last stages of exhaustion. The American Children's
Relief took her in hand, feeding her first of all on milk, a luxury in
Poland, till at last she was brought back to strength. Her story is worth
recording, as illustrating what relief work is doing and the kind of
sufferings which children are called on to endure in this outpost of
civilization. This is how she told it.</p>
<p>She was in Kiev with her mother when the Bolshevists stormed the city last
May. In the confusion she got separated, her mother escaping while she was
taken prisoner. With ten other Polish girls and eighteen boys, she was
herded by rail and road to Kharkov, a town very far in the interior. On
arrival there, after many miseries, they were lined up in the square and
sentenced to be shot. On the instant that the sentence had been pronounced
it was carried out. When the firing stopped, only she and another girl
remained. A consultation took place; it was decided that she, on account
of her youth, should be spared. The soldiers pleaded for her. But the
other girl————.</p>
<p>The other girl had had a sister who now lay dead across her feet, killed
by the first volley. When she understood that she also had to die, she
commenced to weep bitterly. Wanda Marchzcloska placed her arms about her,
whispering, “Remember, you are Polish.” The tears were dried.
Standing up bravely, her hair loose about her shoulders, she met death
with a smile. And so Wanda, aged fourteen, was left.</p>
<p>Throughout the summer her life was a living hell. She was made the drudge
of the prison. She was worked to a shadow. She was given little to eat and
scarcely any rest. She received many blows; her companions were brutalised
men and women who had lost every instinct of mercy. It was hot within
those walls, she told me—like a furnace. Very often she wished that
the soldiers had not pleaded for her; she wanted to be dead. But the
phrase she had uttered to the girl who was to be shot, lingered in her
memory, “Remember, you are Polish.” She repeated it beneath
her breath when the blows were hard to bear, “Remember, you are
Polish.” Among all the foulness of people and surroundings, she kept
her soul clean by remembering that she was different: she was Polish.</p>
<p>By August she had served her punishment and was released. Her one thought
was to get back to her parents. She set out for Kiev. More than a thousand
miles lay between herself and her goal. How she accomplished the journey
even she cannot tell. The nights were very dark, she says; they caused her
to fear greatly. She hid in woods. She slept on the bare ground. She lived
on roots. Sometimes she thought that those dead children who had been shot
in the square, accompanied her. By luck and cunning she made the last part
of her journey to Kiev by rail. When she got there it was to find that the
city was still in Bolshevist hands. She had no passports; if she had had
them, they would not have served her. But how to get across the frontier
into Poland?</p>
<p>She took to the woods again, this fourteen year old girl, with her body
that was a bag of hones, tattooed with scars and bruises. Growing feebler
and feebler she struggled on. The last hundred miles were the hardest. But
she urged herself forward by repeating, “Remember, you are Polish.”</p>
<p>She does not know at what point she crossed the frontier, or how, or when.
There are gaps in her memory and visions of blank fields across which
moves a scarecrow figure; it must have been her own, she supposes. After
that she forgets everything, till her father's arms were about her,
and she was realising that he was as woe-begone as herself.</p>
<p>That is one child's story. It could be multiplied by thousands. Her
life was saved by the random generosity of some chance giver in America. I
wish he could have seen her today, grateful and demure as she stood before
me. I think he would have slipped his hand again into his pocket and
before he counted his loose bills would have whispered, “Remember,
you are American.”</p>
<p><br/><br/></p>
<hr />
<p><SPAN name="link2HCH0013" id="link2HCH0013"> </SPAN></p>
<br/>
<h2> CHAPTER XIII—THE CASE OF MARKI </h2>
<p class="pfirst">
<span class="dropcap" style="font-size: 4.00em">W</span>hy does Poland
starve? The question needs answering. In our secret hearts we people who
have plenty, are inclined to suspect that the nations who suffer are
purchasing their hunger with idleness. I do not pretend that the situation
at Marki answers all the question, But certainly the reasons for the
hunger there apply to very many towns which once were hives of industry.</p>
<p>Marki lies six miles to the east of Warsaw in the direct path of a Russian
advance. The country through which one approaches it is still marred by
defenses and barbed wire entanglements, hastily prepared last summer to
hold up the Bolshevist attack. Before the war it was a Polish Boumeville
or Port Sunlight—a successful experiment in housing workmen in
healthy surroundings. The village centred about a woollen mill, which
supported three thousand employees. The employees had homes in model
dwellings, rented to them at a moderate figure. They were provided with an
up-to-date school, a hospital, bath-houses, etc., and were in an
exceptional state of contentment. When the great strike occurred in 1905
and 1906, they refused to leave their work and only joined at length under
threats and at the revolver's point. The owners of the mill were
originally British, though circumstances have made it wise for them to
become Polish citizens. They were residents of Marki and one of them, with
whom I spoke today, still retains his Lancashire dialect. Since 1884 the
mill had been manufacturing yarn, until in 1914 it had attained a weekly
output of one hundred thousand pounds. It traded under the name of E.
Briggs Brothers and Company. Then came the war, the general dislocation
and the end of prosperity.</p>
<p>Marki was in Russian Poland. In 1916 it was captured by the Germans. The
mill became a prison-camp for interned Russian soldiers and industry was
at a standstill. Obviously, when there was a crying need for woollens, it
was bad economy to allow this intricate mass of valuable machinery to
stand idle. A German manufacturer was sent down, with a view to setting it
going. His plans were almost completed, when the Roh Stoff Abteilung got
wind of what was happening. The Roh Stoff Abteilung was a company
organized for the systematic looting of captured territories. It paid the
German Government a lump sum for its privileges and an additional
percentage on its profits. It dispatched an agent to Marki to make a
report on the opportunities, with the result that the compatriot
manufacturer was ousted and the wrecking of the machinery commenced.</p>
<p>Today one of the partners, Mr. Charles Whitehead, took me over what was
left after the Roh Stoff Abteilung had completed its work. All the
boilers, motors, piping, belting, brass and copper parts have been torn
out. Even the cork that insulated the roofs has been removed. The bulk of
the machinery still stands, but until the stolen parts have been put back
the whole is rendered useless. To replace these parts is no easy task when
six hundred Polish marks are only worth a dollar and most of civilized
Europe is in disrepair. The damage done was so senseless. The rewards
gained from the sale of the jumbled loot were so disproportionately small
as compared with the expense of its replacement. And so the model village
of Marki is a model no longer. The houses are bare of furniture; the
furniture has been sold for food. The inhabitants are in rags; they shiver
and clutch themselves in a desperate endeavour to withstand the wintry
chill. They have neither shoes nor stockings. They die like flies in their
model dwellings. Because of one ruthless act, three thousand willing
workers are idle and all the women and children who are dependent on them
starve. I do not quote this instance to make the Germans appear sinners
above all men. Ruthlessness goes hand in hand with war. You may find the
same wilfulness of destruction on all the five fronts on which Poland has
been attacked. Cattle, which could not be carried off, have been
butchered. Houses have been burned. Pictures, art-treasures and things
irreplaceable have been smashed to atoms.</p>
<p>But to get back to Marki, how have these three thousand ex-employees and
their dependents managed to survive until now? All of them have not
survived; the youngest, oldest and weakest have perished. Of the remainder
some are in the army. Some have moved away. Others go to work in Warsaw;
they have to leave Marki at five in the morning to tramp the six miles to
the city and do not get back till nine at night. The women have discovered
an illegal method of eking out a livelihood. Flour is Government
controlled; it is forbidden to bake it and traffic in it as bread. But the
regulated price of flour is so low that the farmer often prefers to feed
the wheat to his cattle. By walking fifteen miles into the country, the
women of Marki, are often able to strike a bargain with a peasant. They
bring their treasure home, convert it into bread, walk another, six miles
in the opposite direction and hawk it in Warsaw. The police are on the
outlook for such petty criminals. Some of them get caught, their
merchandise is confiscated and they are sent to prison. From being honest
women they become gaol-birds.</p>
<p>As a model-village you could scarcely imagine any sight more hopeless than
the Marki of today. The stillness of death is in the streets. The chimneys
are breathless. The people are lean, famine-fevered shadows. There is no
laughter. No stir. Funerals are too common to cause excitement. While the
machinery rots in the mill, men's souls rot in their bodies. From a
place which was once throbbing with energy the incentive to endeavour has
seeped away. There is no possibility to work; and if there were, there is
not the strength to undertake it.</p>
<p>And yet there is one building which shelters a gleam of hope—the
school-house in which the American Relief has established its children's
feeding station. It was Mr. Whitehead, part-owner of the pillaged mill,
who led me to it. “If you have any ability,” he said, “to
make conditions known, I wish you would tell the world what Marki owes to
America. Six hundred children died of hunger in our village the year
before the Americans came. Whatever happens to us older fellows, they have
saved our rising generation. I am getting the money to patch up my
machinery; if I live long enough, I shall have all of it running again.
But shall I be able ito patch up the machinery of human bodies? My people
are no more capable of working than my machinery is of running at present.
Their strength has been looted. They must be repaired, just the same as
the machinery in my mill.”</p>
<p>And what I saw on a small scale in Marki is true of the whole of Poland.</p>
<p><br/><br/></p>
<hr />
<p><SPAN name="link2HCH0014" id="link2HCH0014"> </SPAN></p>
<br/>
<h2> CHAPTER XIV—AN IMPERIAL BREAD-LINE </h2>
<p class="pfirst">
<span class="dropcap" style="font-size: 4.00em">I</span>f you can imagine
the House of Lords standing in the bread-line, you will be able to picture
the sight that I saw today. I suppose nothing like it has been seen since
the French Revolution—no reversal of social fortunes half so tragic
and poignantly dramatic. It was an object lesson to anyone who believes
that aristocracy is anything more than environment.</p>
<p>What I really saw was the Imperial Russian Court in miniature. The lady
who introduced me was the wife of the Tsar's High Chamberlain,
Madame Lubinoff. Her husband, at the commencement of the war, was Civil
Governor of Warsaw. Her home was a palace, which is now occupied by Poland's
peasant Prime Minister. Today her husband is her secretary at the
soup-kitchen which she conducts for the Russian Red Cross; her home is as
humble as an artisan's; the people to whom she ministers are princes
and princesses in burst out boots and tatters.</p>
<p>I had been told of the wonderful work which Madame Lubinoff has done for
her exiled compatriots. I had also been told that her work was soon to be
abandoned; that she had sold almost the last of her jewels and that the
funds with which the Russian Red Cross at Paris had provided her had given
out.</p>
<p>We departed in search of her soup-kitchen at about twelve o'clock—the
worst hour you can choose if you wish to get quickly from point to point
in Warsaw, for midday is consecrated to funerals. There are so many of
them that they form almost a continuous procession. They are of all kinds,
from the two-horse hearse, attended by mourning-carriages, to the lonely
man and woman, plodding hopelessly through the mud, carrying a little
child's coffin between them. In spite of delays we arrived at last
at a gateway, leading off a narrow street in one of the least prosperous
quarters of the city. The squalid courtyard beyond the gateway was crowded
with wolfish men and women. They were a strange collection, brow-beaten
and famished. The women wore shawls over their heads; they looked typical
slum-dwellers. Many of the men were in tattered uniforms; all of them were
unshaven and cringing as pedlars. We had to force our way up the narrow
stairs to Madame Lubinoff's office, into which we were ushered by a
grave-faced servant who turned out to be her husband. The Bolshevists
arrested him in Petrograd and imprisoned him for ten months in the dreaded
fortress of St. Peter and St. Paul—which goes far to account for his
crushed demeanour. It was his wife who rescued him, by risking her own
life and bribing his gaolers, which has nothing to do with the present
story.</p>
<p>Madame Lubinoff is a gay and beautiful woman, who hovers always between
tears and laughter. The tears are real, but the laughter is forced. One
marvels at the courage of her tremendous acting. It all started, this work
that she is conducting, she told us, with the sale of a ring. When she
discovered how many lives one ring could save, she sold more. She had been
luckier than most of her Russian friends who, when the Bolshevist regime
set in, had lost everything; whereas she, inasmuch as Warsaw was Polish,
had managed to preserve many of her personal belongings, though of course
her Russian estates were confiscated. The present building in which she
has established her soup-kitchen had been a Russian Church. She gained
permission from the priest to use it by means of flattery; she kissed his
hand, which is an honour paid only to a bishop. She laughed. For the money
with which to run it she sold her jewels and kept on selling them, till
the Russian Red Cross in Paris got to hear about her. For a time they
helped with contributions, but last October they notified her that they
could help no longer. Then the American Relief had come to the rescue with
a donation from the fund left by Mr. Harkness to be expended on the
Intelligencia of Europe. And now that was exhausted. What was she going to
do next? Ah, that was the question! If she did not do something the seven
thousand men, women and children whom she was feeding would play leading
rtles in the daily funerals. She laughed and blinked the tears out of her
eyes. They did things better in the French Revolution; the guillotine was
so very much quicker. Perhaps we would like her to show us round.</p>
<p>Outside the door, doing clerking at a ricketty table, a grubby yet
distinguished man was sitting. She introduced him as Prince Ouhtomsky. He
shook our hands with a manner of extreme courtliness; when we were out of
earshot, she revealed his story. When Warsaw was a part of Russian Poland
he had been one of the richest men in the country. He had belonged to the
hereditary land-owning class, his grants having been made directly to his
family by the Tsar. He was now working for his dinner and two dollars and
a half a week. When she found him, he and his princess had been living in
a room which they shared with other people. He had been trying to keep the
wolf from the door by manufacturing cigarettes. They were not good
cigarettes—cigarette making was not his profession. Besides, it was
illegal in Poland; it was a Government monopoly. So she had rescued him
and given him the job of sealing; envelopes. By allowing him to believe
that he was earning his keep, she prevented him from being too unhappy.</p>
<p>As we passed out through the crowd of be-shawled women, various of them
tried to attract Madame Lubinoff's attention. Some she embraced,
addressing them as “My dear Princess,” “My dear
Baroness,” “My dear Countess.” Despite their sodden
appearance, their display of etiquette was magnificent and exacting. They
drew themselves up with a flash of haughtiness as though their Cinderella
appearance of poverty were no more than fancy-dress. One was reminded that
they had once belonged to the most polished caste of Europe. The effect
was pitiful and fantastic. Eight years ago it would have been madness to
have proposed that they could ever have sunk to this depth. We no longer
wondered that Madame Lubinoff wept while she laughed.</p>
<p>At the top of the stairs she pointed out a haggard fellow, attired in what
was left of a uniform. He had been one of the smartest officers in the
crack regiment of the Russian Guards. He had come to Warsaw a beggar. She
had been puzzled by a familiar resemblance. Then she had remembered—she
had been his partner, when things were in their heyday, at an Imperial
Ball.</p>
<p>As we crossed the courtyard to the dining-room we were accosted—at
every step we were accosted—by a bullet-headed old soldier who wore
the highest military decoration that the Tsar could bestow. It was pinned
against his greasy collar. He was General Rogovich. His request was
humble. He was hungry; he would like to split kindling in exchange for
food. “My General, it is very unfortunate,” our hostess told
him, “but I have more than enough kindling split already.” He
kissed her hand, submitting to her authority and yet, like an unwanted
dog, he followed.</p>
<p>In a booth, at the entrance to the room where meals were served, the most
brilliant comedy actor of the old Petrograd was collecting tickets. Inside
wilted women of exalted nobility were pouring soup and piling dishes for a
pittance as waitresses.</p>
<p>The curious point was that they no longer looked noble; they looked their
part. The utensils were mostly make-shift; the cups were condensed-milk
cans, with ragged metal edges which had been presented when empty by the
American Relief Administration. At the tables sat a large part of what Mr.
Gorlof, the Russian attachi, calls “the spiritual wealth of Russia.”
They were professors, musicians, actors, writers, financiers, doctors,
engineers—the kind of people whose brain value never figures in a
budget, but who constitute the realest asset of any nation. These were the
few who were left from the great mass who had been tortured and shot.</p>
<p>At this point an old white-bearded man came up to us; he was General
Prigorowsky, who had been one of the most brilliant of strategists when
Russia was fighting on the side of the Allies. His face was intensely sad
and his eyes were deep with unfathomable melancholy. At sixty years of age
he was alone in the world, unloved, unprotected and almost unloveable. He
had no idea what had become of his wife or children. For a time he and one
son had been imprisoned together. Every day they had been led out and told
they would be shot. One day only his son had been taken; after that he had
remained alone in his cell. Having escaped, here he was, penniless in a
foreign land which would rather be without him.</p>
<p>From the eating-room we were conducted to the kitchen. Again we were
invited to shake hands with students, army officers and princesses. I had
never realized that there were so many princesses in the world. In a
miserable outhouse four women, who were professors' wives and
resembled rag-pickers, huddled on a bench peeling beets into a basket.</p>
<p>We had climbed a stair and were pausing on a landing, when I happened to
look out of the window. Shambling aimlessly round a wood-pile in the yard
below was a forlorn little figure. He wore a dingy velvet hat—a girl's—made
like a tam-o'-shanter, a girl's coat which trailed about his
ankles, and hoots which were a mere pretence. Upon enquiry I was informed
that he was the Baron Hael Von Holdstein. His father had been a
millionaire. His mother was the daughter of a Lord Mayor of Petrograd and
was working in the soup-kitchen as a waitress. The little Baron, having
nowhere else to go, came with her in the early morning and waited all day
for her.</p>
<p>Beyond the door one heard the sound of sewing-machines revolving. We were
admitted by a woman who had been the wife of the Tsar's coachman.
Her husband had insisted on accompanying the Tsar into exile, so of course
she was a widow. In closely packed rows, resembling a sweat-shop, women of
all ages were stitching shirts. There were two princesses of the same
family. One was the Princess Meschersky, who had been wife of the Consul
General at Shanghai; the other was an orphan, a child of fifteen, who had
recently escaped via Finland. Most of them have no homes and sleep beneath
the machines where they work. In fact, Madame Lubinoff told me, the
wretched building is as crowded by night as by day. Even the desk in her
office is slept on.</p>
<p>“And now you have seen for yourselves,” she laughed, “how
all these people are dependent on me. And they are not lazy. They have
forgotten that they were princes and have learnt to be cobblers, and
carpenters, and tailors. If I had the means to start workshops, I already
have the contracts. But I have not even the means to feed them. I simply
dare not tell them. I shall have to run away.”</p>
<p>“And shall you run away?” we asked.</p>
<p>Her eyes became defiant. “Never.”</p>
<p>“Then where are the funds to come from?”</p>
<p>She paused. “From God, perhaps. Yes, I think from God.”</p>
<p><br/><br/></p>
<hr />
<p><SPAN name="link2HCH0015" id="link2HCH0015"> </SPAN></p>
<br/>
<h2> CHAPTER XV—POLAND'. COMMON MAN </h2>
<p class="pfirst">
<span class="dropcap" style="font-size: 4.00em">T</span>his morning I had
an interview with Witos, the Prime Minister of Poland. If anyone suspects
Poland of Imperialistic aims, Witos is the answer and the direct negation.
He is a Galician peasant, who had his little farm near Cracow. He first
began to be heard from as a protesting voice against oppression, when
Galicia was under Austrian domination. As oppression multiplied his voice
grew, always protesting in defence of the under-dog. It was five years
ago, after Russian Poland had been occupied by Germany, that he became
representative of the Polish nation and leapt to the stature of a
life-sized patriot. Today he is the Abraham Lincoln of Poland, a man of
the people whose integrity is unpurchaseable. But his integrity without
sanity would be worthless; it is his shrewd common sense that is saving
the situation. He has his knife out for nobody except rogues and robbers.
If he ever had class hatred, he has forgotten it.</p>
<p>He chooses princes, Jews and common men as his advisors—people who
were formerly intolerant of each other. His democratic simplicity leavens
the lump. He values neither race, nor birth; the demands that he makes are
intrinsic merit and enthusiasm for humanity.</p>
<p>He resides in the magnificent palace which belonged to the Civil Governor
of Warsaw, when Warsaw was a part of Russian Poland. It was formerly the
home of Madame Lubinoff, whose sacrifices to save the Russian refugees I
have already described. A palace as the residence of a peasant Premier
seems to mar the picture of his altruism; the unfavorable impression is
corrected the moment you have seen the palace.</p>
<p>I don't know what they were doing with the lower part of it; it
looked as if they were ploughing up the tesselated pavements and getting
ready to plant potatoes. One rubbed shoulders with labourers and stumbled
over mounds of earth in an endeavour to find an entrance. There were no
armed guards. There were no military challenges—no gorgeous uniforms
and flashing bayonets. Of whatever Witos may be afraid—and every man
is afraid of something—it was evident that he has no dread of
assassination.</p>
<p>At last we pushed open a narrow door where a shabby porter relieved us of
our hats. When we asked for directions, he jerked his thumb casually,
indicating a marble staircase. Accepting his advice we found ourselves in
a lofty chamber, stripped of all decoration and furniture. There we were
met by a Government clerk, who ushered us into an empty ball-room and
requested us to wait.</p>
<p>It was a palace, yes; but lacking in splendour. Nothing but the husk
remained. In imagining the gay scenes that it had witnessed, the pomps and
pageants, the triumphs and envies, the vanished glitter of bombastic
lavishness, one experienced the kind of pity a faded beauty inspires when
her coquetry has been made dreadful by old age.</p>
<p>Would we come? The Government clerk was beckoning. As we followed him
across the naked expanse of dance-floor there was something intimidating
about those echoing vacancies. One thought of the women who had queened it
there—the flash of their eyes, luring adoration, the glide of their
dainty feet and the quick in-take of their breath. Where were they?
Waiting their turn at Madame Lubinoff's soup-kitchen, mouldering in
Bolshevist prisons or dead, which was happier.</p>
<p>In the smaller room which we entered a man, quite unremarkable at first
sight, was seated at a desk. He was the kind of man that you may see by
the thousand anywhere from Ellis Island to San Francisco. His face was
bony and lined from exposure. He was gone at the knees with overwork. His
hands were disfigured with manual labour. He wore the high leather boots
of a peasant. His suit was of a cheap shoddy material—tobacco
coloured, the kind that shrinks and wrinkles in the rain and sun. In all
outward aspects he was a common man—common in his voice, his
gestures, his attire. His shirt was rough with a turn down collar; he wore
no tie, so one saw the stud. He was the common man of Poland, guiding the
nation's destinies. One remembered Lincoln's saying, that God
must have loved the common people very much because He had made so many of
them.</p>
<p>He left his desk and came towards us with a lagging step. With the
exactness of simplicity and a curious glance of wonder, he shook our hands
each in turn uncordially. Then he signed to us to seat ourselves at a
round table.</p>
<p>The conversation which ensued, if it can be called a conversation,
proceeded through an interpreter as Witos speaks only Polish. When he
understood the nature of my errand, he requested that I would ask him
questions, so I led off by asking him to assure me that Poland harboured
no plans for territorial aggression. His eyes narrowed; then he hid them,
looking down at the table and rapping with his knuckles. If I would submit
that question to him in writing, by tomorrow he would write me back an
answer. Then I asked him my next question. What was the most constructive
assistance that nations friendly to Poland could render? Again he would
like me to write my question and give him time to write an answer in
return.</p>
<p>His reply was the same to everything I asked. He was still the peasant at
heart, wise, kindly, fully conscious of his disadvantages and a little
distrustful of anyone who approached him professing benevolent
friendliness. He was clever enough to know the limitations of his
cleverness. He was cautious almost to the point of being unenterprising.
He was so natively shrewd, that he would rather appear stupid than run the
risk of being trapped. He would answer any question, yes. But he refused
to be jockeyed into answering in a moment. Interpreters are unreliable and
so are interviewers. When he spoke, he always spoke the truth. A lie was a
thing abhorrent to him. He had arrived at his present position of trust
not through brilliance, which is a comparatively frequent talent; but
through courageous honesty, which usually gets murdered before it has the
chance to utter itself.</p>
<p>So I promised to write him my questions. But upon reflection I believe
that that is unnecessary. What I wanted to obtain from him was an
assurance that Poland wants peace within her borders and is not ambitious
to grab territory. Witos answered me more emphatically by his truthfulness
and his shrewdness than if he had swamped me with arguments and words.
Such a man, so common; so honest, so representative of the workers who
suffer, will be the last to lead his nation into rash, imperialistic
adventures.</p>
<p><br/><br/></p>
<hr />
<p><SPAN name="link2HCH0016" id="link2HCH0016"> </SPAN></p>
<br/>
<h2> CHAPTER XVI—THE NIGHT OF THE THREE KINGS </h2>
<p class="pfirst">
<span class="dropcap" style="font-size: 4.00em">I</span>t was January the
sixth, the eve of the Festival of the Three Kings, which is the day before
the Russian Christmas, that we found ourselves automobiling across the
devastated stretch of country which lies between Brest-Litovsk and the old
Russo-German front-line. Our object in going was to see how the peasants
were living in the destroyed areas and what was being done to save their
starving children.</p>
<p>The mention of devastated areas conjures a picture of the kind of
destruction that happened in France. But in Poland the problem of
devastation is quite different. It is almost true to say that the whole of
Poland is devastated. In France the destruction was intensely concentrated
in a narrow belt of country where battles were fought. In Poland, with its
tremendous distances, the depth of devastation is rarely less at any point
than two hundred miles. If in the summer of 1920 a Polish soldier had
started from Warsaw in the defence against the Bolshevist invasion, had
fought his way to Kiev, had fallen back in the retreat to Warsaw and,
after the Polish victory, had again advanced to the present Polish
front-line, he would have marched over a thousand miles in the space of
four months.</p>
<p>We set out on a misty morning to cover the hundred and fifty kilometres
which lie between the ruined city of Brest-Litovsk and the nearest town of
Kovel. The road runs straight as a pencilled line across the sullen
landscape. In all that stretch of country there is scarcely a sign of
cultivation. The fields have become a wilderness, the rivers have
overflowed and the whole is a barren swamp. The desolation was begun in
1915 when the Russians retreated before the Germans, driving the civilian
population behind them, seizing the cattle and harrying with fire and with
dynamite. They destroyed all the post-houses, which made communications
possible, and blew up all the bridges. Then came the German occupation and
the establishment of the Russo-German trench-systems forty kilometres to
the east of Kovel. Whatever had been overlooked by the retreating Russians
was picked clean by the advancing German armies. Until the Armistice this
occupation lasted. When the Poles regained their freedom, the peasants who
had been refugees during all this period, began to come back. They Had no
sooner settled than the Bolshevists' assaults commenced, sweeping
clean across this same stretch of tillage to the very gates of Warsaw.</p>
<p>As you travel the bleak road between Brest-Litovsk and Kovel, every sight
is eloquent of the misery that has been wrought. The route is marked by
grave-yards and solitary crosses. Some are merely scratched on trees, the
burial was so hurried. All surrounding is a brooding silence. One comes to
clusters of houses, crouched beneath the weight of sky. Their roofs have
collapsed; their walls are charred. Tenanting these ruins are gaunt human
beings who hurry out of sight like pariahs. Sometimes we met them
struggling along the road on purposeless journeys. They wore no shoes;
their feet were swathed in sodden rags. They had a hunted look and gave us
a wide berth as though they feared our cruelty. Many of the travellers
were children, with gray faces and hunted eyes.</p>
<p>At Kovel we picked up our guide. She was one of the Gray Samaritans—an
American citizen of Polish origin who hailed from Pittsburgh. Her name was
Christine Zduleczna; she has been working in the most appalling parts of
this unhappy country for nearly two years. The Gray Samaritans are
Polish-American girls, recruited by the Y. W. C. A. and at present
attached to the American Relief Administration. All of them can talk the
Polish language and most of them were old enough to remember the land of
their birth at the time when they emigrated. Because of their dual
nationality they are invaluable as a liaison between the need of the
country and the American authorities. Their self-effacement is a sight to
make more comfortable people blush. They practise the sacrifice of saints
and the fearlessness of soldiers.</p>
<p>Kovel is a wretched hovel of a town, unsanitary, permanently splashed with
mud, inhabited by Jews and White Russians. Nothing that Gorki or Tolstoi
has described is more accursed and Godforsaken. Dirty, starveling shops,
whose entire contents could be purchased for a dollar, stare out on a
street which is a continuous puddle full of hidden holes and bumps.
Droschkies, drawn by feeble ponies, move weakly through the squalor. No
one seems to have anything to do. Men in mangy fur-coats, with sweeping
beards and unspeakably filthy faces shuffle aimlessly along the pavements.
Soldiers step by more briskly, but with an expression in their eyes of
people who are condemned. It was here, outside a dingy stable, facetiously
named the Bellevue Hotel, that we met Christine Zduleczna. She looked trim
and confident in her horizon-blue uniform—a triumph of courage over
circumstance. Her spirit was as unbowed and eager as her appearance, as we
were soon to discover. She was one of the girls who remained at their
posts last summer, evacuating peasants till the Bolshevists were almost
within hailing distance. There was one girl on the Lithuanian Front who
outstayed discretion and was captured.</p>
<p>Having taken Christine Zduleczna aboard, we ploughed our way out of the
mud of Kovel and travelled due east towards the Front The signs of war
were becoming more recent and frequent. Freight-cars in the railroad yards
flapped in ribbons, tom into shreds by shells. Engines lay on their sides,
as full of holes as pepper boxes. Carcases of animals were strewn about.
At one point there was a pile of bones, as high as a house, picked clean
of flesh. Then the rusty red of barbed wire commenced and the dreary maze
of abandoned trench-systems.</p>
<p>There was not a sign of human habitation, not a roof or a wall left
standing; and yet people lived there. How? In the timbered dug-outs which
the Germans had constructed; in old gun-emplacements; in shell-holes. They
lived like foxes, anywhere and anyhow by burrowing underground. And what
do they feed on? In many parts of the devastated areas they are eating
grass as though they were cattle. They boil it into a kind of soup. Where
they have no flour of any sort, they bake bread out of a mixture of bark
and acorns. But our Gray Samaritan informed us that there was almost no
ruined village that we had passed, where an American Children's
Relief Station had not been established. She knew, for she had established
them; that was her job. Whoever dies in Poland, the children will be saved
as long as America recognises their necessity. But if America were to grow
forgetful, most of them would be dead before another summer. The cruelty
of the situation is that only the children can be fed; the parents, the
grandparents and the boys and girls above the age of fourteen have to take
their chance.</p>
<p>The melancholy of dusk was settling over this old battlefield, where for
long years men had cursed and hated and butchered one another, when we
drew up at our first point of call in the trench-dwellers' colony of
Switniki.</p>
<p>Floundering in the mud and making a strong effort to keep our footing, we
crossed a trench and approached a hut constructed out of the debris of the
battlefield. Quarter sections of corrugated iron, 'which the Germans
had used for their gun-emplacements, had been riveted together, and the
sides and top had been covered with sod. The place was in darkness when we
knocked at the door. It was still in darkness when we were allowed to
enter. Then, very sparingly, the only candle was lighted. It would be
blown out the moment we departed. By its illumination we saw an old man
and woman—they looked old, but they may not have been more than
fifty. The woman's gray hair hung loose about her face; she was
kneeling in a praying position in her bed. Perhaps it was the Three Kings
she was expecting. This was the night when they were supposed to come,
riding out of the East to leave their presents at the doors of the needy,
just as twenty centuries ago they had tapped on the door of a stable in
Bethlehem and found the Christ-Child in his poverty, asleep upon his
mother's breast.</p>
<p>We gazed round the little room. It was speckless. All the rooms which we
visited in this colony were. The people might be dying of starvation, but
they were determined to die cleanly. That is the difference between your
peasant and your city-dweller. One missed the abominable smells which
accompany destitution in Warsaw. These people had the native gentleness of
a race which has always been self-respecting, inventing their own music
and poetry, and owning their little plot of land. They were not going to
become disrespecting now.</p>
<p>Our host was a Pole—an exception to the community, most of whom were
White Russians. He told his story simply. Before the war he had owned
three acres, two cows and a team of horses. He had had a son who had gone
to America and had been in the habit of sending him money. When the
Russian armies were driven out of Poland by the Germans, he had been
forced to move back into Russia. His farm had been cut up into trenches,
as we could see for ourselves. After the Armistice he had returned to find
a rubbish-heap, full of foulness. He had set to work with the little money
he had to buy a horse and implements; then last summer had come the
Bolshevist invasion, eating up everything like a plague of locusts. Now he
had nothing. One could not fill in trenches and level a land blown about
by shells without implements, merely with one's naked hands. And
worst of all, during his long exile, he had lost touch with his son in
America. Probably the son thought him dead. If he could only discover his
son's address, everything might yet be well. So perhaps it wasn't
for the Three Kings that the old mother had been listening so intently,
when she had heard our footsteps in the mud and our sudden tap. As I had
expected, the moment we departed the candle was blown out.</p>
<p>We came to another hut. This time they were White Russians. Outside the
door the Soltys, or head-man of the village, joined us. Inside we found a
family of seven children and a mother who was a widow. Her husband had
died of typhus, but it was more true to call it starvation, she said. Here
they had no candles, so they lit shavings of wood. Again, in spite of the
poverty, everything was proudly speckless. An oven of baked mud had been
built in one corner and the top of it afforded two of the children with a
bed. And what pretty children they were, from the baby to the eldest who
was a girl of seventeen! The walls were decorated with branches of spruce
in case the Three Kings should come.</p>
<p>The story was the same as the last. They had been prosperous, owning their
little farm and earning extra in the summer by hiring themselves to the
big estates. Then the German invasion had driven them into exile and on
their return they had found the industry of centuries blotted out. How did
they live, we asked. The American kitchen took care of the children. All
the children in the village would have died the Soltys said, if the
Americans had not come to their rescue. In this particular family the girl
of seventeen and a son of fifteen were the main supports. The boy was not
present; he slept with the pony—their only possession—to
prevent its being stolen. The boy and girl travelled the country in the
spring and summer, hiring themselves and taking flour in payment. Very
often they were cheated by the farmers, who after weeks of work would turn
them adrift with nothing. And then, of course, there was the trouble of
bringing the flour back—a hundred miles sometimes, from far outside
the devastated areas—carrying it. They spoke uncomplainingly, merely
stating facts. The girl of seventeen, who took these risks and journeys,
kept smiling and nodding her confirmation. The children peeped at us from
behind the mud furnace like startled rabbits.</p>
<p>The last family that we visited had been rich by peasant standards. They
had owned forty acres, three teams of horses, six cows, many pigs and
geese and hens. All that they had found on their return from exile was
forty acres of polluted mud. The household consisted of a grandfather,
with a white beard and a shock of black curly hair. He had the eye of a
hawk and the face of an intellectual. There was his wife, the grandmother,
a lean woman with a humorous mouth and eyes which held you at bay with a
veiled defiance. There was their daughter, a widow, very little and meek.
And then there were her four children.</p>
<p>“You must not judge us as you see us now,” the old man said.
“You should have seen us once with all our cattle. Should I live as
I do, if I could help it?”</p>
<p>The furnace threw out a ruddy glow. On the hot stones four little cakes
were baking, which the four little boys regarded with popping eyes.
“They are the cakes of the Three Kings,” the grandmother
explained; “they are filled with poppy-seeds. I travelled a long way
to get the flour, and I worked and worked. And then I was afraid that I
would be robbed on the lonely roads before ever I got it back.”</p>
<p>We asked them what they usually ate. Oh, anything and often nothing. Did
they ever bake any of this acorn bread? They wished they could, but they
hadn't any acorns.</p>
<p>And so through the night of the festival of the Three Kings we drove back
across the desolate battlefields. At Kovel we said good-bye to Christine
Zduleczna. We left her in her mouldy room, in the dingy den of the
Bellevue, which looks more like a thieves' kitchen than a hotel. She
parted with us with a cheery smile—she loved her people and her
work. If she had her choice, while the need was so great, she wouldn't
be anywhere else. But I, for one, felt a coward in leaving her alone to
carry such a burden.</p>
<p>We struck the bleak, interminable road which leads through Brest-Litovsk
to civilisation. Our lamps as we parted the wall of darkness, picked out
the crosses of silver birch, the black and white verst poles, the
graveyards and the humpy ruined houses. They revealed them to us one by
one, beckoning them out of oblivion, making each tragedy seem separate and
the more significant. It was bitterly cold. We huddled closer and shivered
in our rugs and furs. Sometimes we dozed in a nodding fashion. But
whenever we roused, like figures of grief on a frieze of blackness, we saw
the straggling forms of outcast travellers, their feet swathed in rags,
journeying in search of bread. Very often they were boys and girls, above
the age of fourteen whom so far the American Relief has not had sufficient
funds to rescue. They were journeying in quest of bread on the night, when
according to tradition, the Three Kings should have been riding from the
East to bring them help.</p>
<p><br/><br/></p>
<hr />
<p><SPAN name="link2HCH0017" id="link2HCH0017"> </SPAN></p>
<br/>
<h2> CHAPTER XVII—DOES POLAND WANT PEACE? </h2>
<p class="pfirst">
<span class="dropcap" style="font-size: 4.00em">D</span>oes Poland want
peace? It is a question which has to be answered in the affirmative if
either philanthropists or nations are going to interest themselves in
restoring Poland to a sound financial footing. In order to obtain an
authoritative answer, I approached Prince Sapieha, the Polish Minister of
Foreign Affairs. Rather to my amazement he was not at all elusive, but
gave me the most convincing Arguments for Poland's peace desires
that I have yet heard.</p>
<p>“The trouble with Poland,” he said, “is that she lies
between Russia and Germany. That is not her fault; it is the way it
happens. Our nation is in a place where it is not wanted; but you may take
it from me that we are not going to get out. Germany has an
over-population which increases every year by leaps and bounds. It was her
overpopulation that produced the war; she wanted England's colonies
and more European territory. She simply had to have room to expand. The
Allies have confiscated her merchant marine, broken her military strength
and taken away even the colonies that she already had. But they have not
taken away her enormous birth-rate, so the problem of what to do with her
surplus population is more pressing than ever. Her only possible direction
for expansion is eastwards into Russia, which would probably be for Russia's
benefit. Unfortunately we stand in the way; anything that would destroy us
is to her advantage. It is not to her interest that we should have peace;
therefore she tries to lower our prestige and depress our exchange by
spreading the rumour that we have imperialistic ambitions. If she can get
Upper Silesia to believe this, the vote of the plebiscite will go against
us and she will acquire some of the richest coal-fields in Europe.</p>
<p>“As regards Russia, the problem is historic rather than economic.
Before the partitioning of Poland much that is now Russian was Polish. Two
hundred years have gone by and today the racial claims are about equally
divided. We have acknowledged this fact at Riga, where peace with the
Bolshevists is nearly concluded. We have divided the debatable territory
into two halves as fairly as we know how. If the Bolshevists desire peace,
we shall give them no reason for altering their minds. And they should
mean it, if internal conditions count for anything, for they are exhausted
and their armies, though greater than ours in number, are far inferior in
fighting qualities. I can assure you with absolute sincerity that we are
losing no chance of arranging trade treaties and making all the neighbours
along our borders our friends. We hope and believe that they are as sick
of bloodshed as we are.</p>
<p>“But merely to remove the provocations that led to bloodshed will
not bring peace. Poland can have no peace till she has regained prosperity
and her people have ceased to starve. What I want to say to the world is
that there is no reason why we should starve; we have everything within
our frontiers that could make us a rich nation. Before the war Poland,
partitioned as she was, was self-supporting. And don't let anyone
think that we are starving because we like it. Seventy per cent, of our
cattle have been carried off by the Russian, German, Austrian and
Bolshevist invasions. The machinery in our factories has been demolished
or looted. Our agricultural implements have been stolen or destroyed. I
think of the Polish People as the landowner of a valuable estate without
the capital to work it. What does the landowner do? He keeps on pawning
this and that and, in sheer desperation, gambles with the results.</p>
<p>“No big financier will lend money to a gambler. But suppose the
landowner gives such proofs that he has ceased to gamble that the
financier will let him have a mortgage. He starts to work and buys
implements; in a few years his estate pays sufficiently to redeem the
mortgage. It is clear of debt and the landowner becomes happy.</p>
<p>“We had to fight to defend ourselves, still I can understand that we
may have been regarded as gamblers. We have had wars on five fronts. On
four of them we have peace already; the fifth peace is being concluded. We
are trying to prove in every way that our only desire is to get to work.
But it is physically impossible to accomplish that without outside help.</p>
<p>“There are four things that we require if life, liberty and the
pursuit of happiness are to be ours. First, we need the belief of the
world in our sincerity, when we say that we do want peace. Second, we need
credits of food-stuffs to regenerate our workers' debilitated
bodies. Third, we need food-stuffs in sufficient quantities to accomplish
this purpose. From the statesmanly point of view mere doles are of no good
to us. We need to have enough to eat for at least six months; after that
we shall be strong to produce for ourselves. After that you will hear no
more of Poland going Bolshevist. Bolshevism is the last hope of the man
with the empty stomach. And lastly, we need financial assistance to repair
our damaged machinery and to make our industries buzz. We want experts to
come to Poland to look over our investment opportunities. The
opportunities are here and our people are willing. We want to buzz and to
pull our weight in the world.”</p>
<p>“Your Excellency,” I said, “as regards Poland's
desire for peace you have convinced me. But do the Bolshevists intend to
let you have peace, despite their conferences at Riga? Everybody's
talking of a drive in the spring which is intended to wipe Poland off the
map.”</p>
<p>He stood for a minute silent. He seemed to be searching for a more
clenching argument, which had escaped his memory. Then he smiled gravely
and held out his hand. “I have an estate beyond Grodno,” he
said. “It is directly in the line of a Bolshevist attack. Three
separate invasions have picked it bare. There's scarcely anything
but the land left. At the present moment I am rebuilding it, putting in
implements and re-stocking it with cattle. As a man in the know, a
Minister of Foreign Affairs, should I do that if I had the least doubt
that our peace with Bolshevism would prove lasting?”</p>
<p><br/><br/></p>
<hr />
<p><SPAN name="link2HCH0018" id="link2HCH0018"> </SPAN></p>
<br/>
<h2> CHAPTER XVIII—THE PROBLEM OF DANTZIG </h2>
<p class="pfirst">
<span class="dropcap" style="font-size: 4.00em">D</span>antzig's
problem is similar to the problems of the whole of Central Europe; it
arises out of the arbitrary creation of new frontiers. To sit in Paris
with a blue pencil and scrawl lines on a map was a simple task; to have to
dwell within those lines, despite their violation of economic laws, and
make a livelihood, has proved less easy. It is one thing to declare
Dantzig a free-port; it is another to persuade her neighbours to use her.
It is possible that in making Dantzig free, the Peace Conference has only
made her free to starve.</p>
<p>Here is the situation. Dantzig, as she is today, consists of seven hundred
and fifty square miles of territory, and a population of 350,000 souls.
Her former industries were shipping, ship-building and the manufacture of
armaments. For the latter purposes, while the war was on, the Germans
imported thousands of workmen, many of whom still remain. The manufacture
of armaments is now forbidden. There is no demand for ship-building.
Ocean-going traffic is at a halt; the nations in whose interests the
free-port was constituted are either bankrupt or anxious to develop their
own harbours. Poland, who was expected to be her largest employer, is too
busy with the Bolshevists to be a producer; hence she has nothing to ship.
When she does begin to produce, it is on the boards that she may avoid
Dantzig. She acquired a distaste for free-ports last summer when the
Dantzig longshoremen refused to unload her munitions. She is already
flirting with two alternatives. Germany is coaxing her to adopt Stettin as
her outlet; she herself is inclined to build docks of her own on the
seaboard of the Polish Corridor.</p>
<p>Meanwhile Dantzig is idle. She has no industries to keep her going. Her
agriculture is too limited to support her population. Her neighbours
cannot send her food-stuffs; their own needs are too pressing. If times
were normal, Poland might be willing to feed her; but Poland herself is
only being kept alive by the relief brought in from America. When the
free-port was created, a clause was inserted in the Peace Treaty, obliging
Poland to act as Dantzig's larder. One of the demands was that
Poland should provide the free-port with five hundred tons of flour weekly
at a stipulated price. The price named was so insufficient that the flour
sent to Dantzig costs Poland twice as much, not reckoning the unloading,
as the price which Dantzig pays for it. All of it has to be imported from
America.</p>
<p>In 1914 the daily consumption of milk in Dantzig was 50,000 litres, most
of which was Polish. Today the maximum she is able to obtain is 10,000
litres and the minimum 4,000. As a consequence babies are the sufferers. I
visited ward after ward filled with tiny mites made hideous with rickets.
The hospital was so overcrowded and diminished in its resources that it
possessed no change of linen. While the rags are washed the little
patients go naked. What this means in the sanitary conditions of a babies'
hospital can be best imagined. You may see children of six months who have
not gained beyond their birth-weight.</p>
<p>In Vienna, where similar conditions prevail, I saw a four year old child
who weighed only nineteen pounds.</p>
<p>It is the children, always the children who are the victims, no matter in
which country you investigate. When we fought, we believed that it was we
who paid the price; but the bill of pain which we settled in the trenches
is as nothing to the account which is being rendered to the younger
generation. Of the Dantzig children below the age of fifteen who have been
medically examined, more than half are under-nourished and of this half
only a third are being cared for by the joint efforts of the American
Children's Relief and the Society of Friends. Here are the exact
figures. One quarter of the children examined is normal. One quarter is
badly under-nourished. And one half is sufficiently below the standard to
warrant extra feeding. An important fact of the situation is that the
majority of the starving children belong to the middle-classes. During the
war and until recently the workmen have received special rations to induce
them to labour. In addition to this their wages have followed the rise in
costs, whereas the salaries of clerks, officials and professional people
have been comparatively stationary. The middle-classes are not unionized
so they cannot attract attention to their grievances by strikers'
methods.</p>
<p>Dantzig's future is distinctly gloomy. Germany has her own Baltic
ports to encourage. Poland is her sole hope of prosperity and Poland is in
bitter want herself. Moreover, if Poland recovers, which may take years,
she may prefer to construct her own harbour—that is to say, if she
does not yield to the inducements held out by Stettin.</p>
<p>The muddle is economic and racial. But such a statement leads to no
solution. The fact remains that before she was commanded to be nobody's
property her harbours were thriving. Today, as far as one can see, all
that her freedom means is that her harbours are free to stand empty and
her children are at liberty to die of hunger. No doubt the gentleman in
Paris with the blue pencil had the handsomest of intentions, but he
collided head-on with economic forces which it was his business to have
apprehended. Whoever he was, he has made good his escape, while the
children, as usual, pay the penalty.</p>
<p><br/><br/></p>
<hr />
<p><SPAN name="link2HCH0019" id="link2HCH0019"> </SPAN></p>
<br/>
<h2> CHAPTER XIX—YOUNG GERMANY </h2>
<p class="pfirst">
<span class="dropcap" style="font-size: 4.00em">T</span>he youth of
Germany have established an invisible system of trenches in every home,
every school, every university. Though they may not know it and would
perhaps disown it, they are banded together to withstand that same
intolerance of autocracy which hurried lovers of freedom from the ends of
the earth that it might be crushed on the Western Front.</p>
<p>These new armies which are re-winning the old battle Have given themselves
a name; they call themselves the Freie Deutsche Jugend—the Free
Youth of Germany. Their ranks are made up of girls as well as boys. In
isolated instances they are organised, but for the most part they are
knights-errant. I asked a young man today how he had been elected to the
companionship. He looked troubled, not grasping my meaning. After further
explanation he smiled. He had elected himself. That was the way it was
done. One felt in his heart that he ought to be free. He talked with some
friends. Then he joined the movement.</p>
<p>The Free Youth of Germany range in age from mere children to University
students. They are against tyranny in every form, against meaningless
conventions, against conscription, against war, against inherited hates,
against all traditions and institutions which hamper and curtail their
self-expression and capacity for self-development. If you ask them to
formulate their doctrine, they grow vague. Each one answers in terms of
his or her personal idealism and disillusionment. They want to be happy—that
is what it amounts to and they have never been happy. They are determined
to be happy at all costs. The world of grown people has proved itself
cruel. They will have nothing to do with it. They refuse to accept its
authority. They will build society afresh. They make these confessions
with a haughtiness which is as ridiculous as it is pathetic. Because you
are older, they address you as an enemy. For fear you should laugh, they
over-emphasize and grow visionary and grandiloquent. From time immemorial,
they tell you, the youth of all countries has been hectored and abused;
they are going to harness the youth of every race in a titanic effort to
correct the injustice of human affairs.</p>
<p>Humanitarians at the duckling stage, a cynic might call them, and then add
as his verdict, “They'll grow out of that.” God forbid
that they should; their attempt to break chains is the most hopeful sign
in Central Europe. Consider the experience of life they have had. Those of
them who are old enough can remember pre-war Germany, with its harsh
demands of unquestioning obedience. The military idea permeated
everything. Force was the argument that was most respected—force in
the home, the school, the university. A child was drilled from the cradle
to the grave. As with a private in the army, it was a crime to answer
back. His business was not to think, but to obey. Fear of punishment was
the spur of all his endeavours. He was gorged with knowledge that he might
prove efficient. Life was a battle, which called for efficiency rather
than kindness. A home was a miniature headquarters mess in which the
father was the general and the mother his adjutant.</p>
<p>Then came the assault upon civilisation, to which all these sacrifices of
liberty had been the preface. The children of Germany were still further
despoiled. Their formative years were embittered in an atmosphere of
harrowing uncertainties. Every day was irritable with dreads and gray with
unrelieved privations. There was never an hour from which the knowledge of
horror was absent. The Armistice for a moment seemed to promise freedom,
but the peace terms sentenced them to a life-time of servitude. Can you
wonder that they refuse to be associated with the unwisdom of their
elders? They have seized on the dream of a new generosity. They believe
that in the eyes of all youth there are visions. They will appeal over the
heads of adults to the youth of the nations for friendship. “We
children were never enemies,” they say. “We did not make the
war. We were the victims of it. We were not consulted.” They insist,
with impotent passion, that the fathers' sins shall not be visited
upon their generation. “We want to be young,” they plead.
“We have never been young. We have only been little.”</p>
<p>“Poor kiddies!” is one's first comment. But their
demands are not to be dismissed so cavalierly. The Free Youth have already
commenced a revolution—it is a revolution of ideas—ideas in
the main which have not become articulate. But these child enthusiasts
will be men and women soon. They will have to be heard. No one can foresee
to what lengths their yearning for freedom may carry them. It should be
the business of the Allies to show them sympathy and give them direction.</p>
<p>There are three points in their movement which deserve to be made
emphatic. The first is that they are absolutely correct in their assertion
that the children of the Allies were never at war with the children of
Germany. The second is that the Free Youth of Germany are fighting for
precisely the same ideals for which the Allies fought, and are doing their
fighting on German soil where it will be most effective. The third is that
they are showing a spirit of regeneration which, if it is encouraged, will
become the national spirit of tomorrow. For the safety of the world, if
for no less selfish reason, their movement deserves the Allies'
consideration. A part of their ideal has already found expression in the
new German Constitution, which was passed two months after the signing of
the Peace Treaty. The clause is number 148 and reads, “Our schools
must educate our children not only in a spirit of patriotism, but also in
a spirit of international reconciliation.” As Dr. Simon, the
Minister of Foreign Affairs, said when he pointed it out to me, “That
wasn't so bad as a beginning when only two months had elapsed since
our humiliation at Versailles.”</p>
<p>All the American and British relief work done in Germany is being
concentrated on the youth. For the American Relief the Society of Friends
are the dispensers. The work starts constructively with the unborn.
Feeding stations have been established at which under-nourished expectant
mothers attend daily. The main reasons for their undernourishment are the
scarcity of work and, before that, the blockade. One of them told me that
her husband had had nothing to do for six months. How did they live? On
their unemployment pay. But hadn't her husband been in the war and
didn't he receive a pension? Yes. He had been in the war for four
years. But he received no pension, for, alas, he had not been badly
wounded.</p>
<p>At the present moment 600,000 children are being fed at American Relief
Stations, which the Friends are operating; but there are at least 400,000
more who ought to be included. Whether they are included depends on what
funds are forthcoming within the next few months.</p>
<p>The schemes for saving the youth of Germany are exceedingly thorough.
Starting with the unborn child, they finish with the student at the
University. By far the larger part of the funds for the student feeding
are contributed by Great Britain. They are administered by a personnel
made up of the British and American Society of Friends.</p>
<p>The thirst for learning since the close of the war has become abnormal.
Students attending the universities are one-third in excess of the
capacity. They are young men and women drawn from every class and welded
together by an almost painful enthusiasm for democracy. The sacrifices
which they make to gain an education sometimes reach the point of
martyrdom. One girl, who is by no means exceptional, attends her lectures
by day and scrubs floors as a charwoman by night. If it were not for the
one substantial meal in the twenty-four hours which the Friends provide,
she would collapse. It is to such people that the American and British
Friends are ministering. They realise that, if there is ever to be peace
between the sons and daughters of the nations who fought, the peace must
commence in the heart.</p>
<p>Very naturally while middle-aged Germany is caviling over reparations and
eluding engagements, the charitably disposed publics of the Allies are
unwilling to respond to appeals for help. Their old war hatreds have no
sooner shown signs of subsiding than some new cause is given by Berlin for
suspicion and offence. In spite of this, the point which cannot be made
too emphatic is that it is middle-aged Germany, the contriver of the war,
which is creating these offences. Young Germany is no party to them. It is
just that a distinction should be made between the new and the old. The
new is fighting our battle for us. In the universities it is fighting the
professors who insist on teaching reactionary doctrines. The students
being young, are sick and tired of the glorification of the old, bad past.
They insist on starting with today and looking forward. If we desire it,
we can have them for our friends.</p>
<p>Not to desire it would be a crime which is unpardonable. We fought a war
which we said was to be the last; if through our lack of generous response
we fling the youth of Germany back into the arms of the reactionaries, we
are preparing a future war. Quite apart from decency and humanity, it is
statesmanly and economic to hold out hopes of magnanimity. If we hoard
foodstuffs today and insist on a policy of revenge, we shall be expending
tomorrow on shells a thousand times the money we have saved. The rejected
idealist is the least forgiving antagonist and the Free Youth of Germany
are a volcano of idealism. They deserve our sympathy. They sincerely want
to be our friends. They have rejected their own elders and look to us for
guidance. They are young birds who have been wounded. They have never
spread their wings. In listening to their talk, all the time one has the
picture of fledglings trying to lift themselves from the ground. To
destroy a bad world was necessary; but to help build a good one is braver.
As far as young Germany is concerned, the hour is ripe for relenting. If
we allow it to escape us, it will not be ourselves, but our children who
will have to bear the consequences.</p>
<p><br/><br/></p>
<hr />
<p><SPAN name="link2HCH0020" id="link2HCH0020"> </SPAN></p>
<br/>
<h2> CHAPTER XX—NEITHER PEACE NOR WAR </h2>
<p class="pfirst">
<span class="dropcap" style="font-size: 4.00em">T</span>he words are
Trotsky's. They were his verdict on the humiliating Peace which
Russia was compelled to accept at the hands of Germany. You may see them
scrawled on the wall of the old Jesuit College at Brest-Litovsk where the
Peace was signed: “Neither Peace Nor War. Trotsky.” If they
were true of the Peace of Brest-Litovsk, they are equally true of the
Peace which has befallen Central Europe as the crowning achievement of the
war which was to end all wars. It is not stating matters too strongly to
say that up to date Peace had caused at least as much misery as the four
years' fury of embattled armies. But there is this difference: the
heavier portion of the present misery is being borne by women and
children.</p>
<p>As one who was a combatant, I think I know what urged the fighting-man to
his sacrifice. He considered his own welfare as of paltry consequence if,
by foregoing it, he could help to create a social order which would be
more righteous. He gladly took his chance of wounds and annihilation,
believing that his pain was the purchase-price of a future and enduring
happiness. A tour through contemporary Central Europe would leave him
sadly disillusionized. The victory, which his idealism made possible, has
been turned to a cruel use—a use which he never intended and for
which he would certainly never have agonised. Killing men in fight is
comparatively decent and an essential accompaniment of the technique of
war; butchering their families with slow starvation by the Peace that
comes after is revolting and savage.</p>
<p>And whose is the fault? Part of it belongs to the enemy nations themselves
who perpetrated the crime of war and, when they found that they were
losing, fought themselves to such a point of exhaustion that they were
left with no power of recuperation. Part of it belongs to the internal
race-hatreds which were only kept in check by the economic interdependence
of the old Austro-Hungarian Empire. Part of it belongs to a Peace of
Idealism imposed upon peoples historically unprepared for it and imposed
at a time when they found themselves on the brink of insolvency. The only
chance that such a Peace had of achieving the pacification that was
intended, was by the Allies taking control of Central Europe and
constituting themselves sole arbiters of administration until the newly
created nations were sufficiently balanced to function for themselves. But
in the final analysis the fault was yours and mine—we who are the
plain people of the Allied Nations.</p>
<p>It is more fashionable to lay the blame on a group of elderly statesmen
who met in Paris to arrange the pacification. They were the leaders who
had piloted their nations to triumph—men of unstained integrity who,
having survived incredible anxieties, had the right to be more war-jaded
than any of their countrymen. They met at a time when the nerves of both
conquerors and defeated had reached the breaking-point. They had no sooner
assembled than the clamour arose, “Make haste. Make haste.”
Overnight they were compelled to attempt solutions for race-problems which
had eluded astuter minds than theirs for centuries. They were forced to
decide the fates of nations whose language they could not speak, whose
lands they had not visited, whose geography was unfamiliar to them and
whose very histories they were not given time to study. They were not
permitted to consecrate to peace a hundredth part of the industry that
victory had required. As a consequence, in order to abbreviate debates,
they cleared the room of critics and carved up the map of Europe behind
closed doors. They were good men, animated by a desire to help humanity.
Civilisation was crumbling while they delayed. The loud boom of threatened
ruin thundered through their council-chamber like the cracking of Arctic
ice.</p>
<p>It was not their reparation clauses that did the damage. The reparation
clauses were just. The least you can ask of a boy who flings a stone is
that he shall replace the pane which he smashed. The damage was done by
clauses conceived in the finest spirit of altruism, but with no practical
knowledge of what was possible. You may pitch your ideals so high that you
render them useless. The weakness of the Peace Treaty lay in the fact that
its framers had to rely on books and hearsay for information which, to be
accurate, ought to have been obtained by first-hand investigation. And
they were not business men. They were journalists, professors and
oratorical inspirers; whereas their task from first to last was a
reorganizing of the world's big business. When the doors were flung
wide on their deliberations, they presented humanity with exactly what we
might have expected—a paper peace. It was a noble performance for
the time it had taken. It read beautifully, but in practice large portions
of it have proved wholly unworkable and have produced an economic
stagnation which is neither peace nor war. It is fair to state, however,
that whether because of or in spite of it, Europe has shown a marked
improvement in the last two years.</p>
<p>Recriminations are cowardly. The mistakes of the Peace Treaty were the
direct result of our culpable indifference. We displayed little interest
in what our pacifiers were doing. World-happenings no longer concerned us.
Few of us troubled to read the terms when they were published. We had
become provincial and were concentrating all our energies on our personal
futures. Things being as they were, it is probable that no group of men,
differently selected, could have done better. In the spring of 1919 we
were not ripe for peace. Most decidedly we were not ripe for altruism. We
were spendthrift philanthropists in dread of our creditors. We were too
panic-stricken to be considerate, too needy to be magnanimous, too
unfortunate to have pity on the unhappiness of the peoples who had caused
our embarrassment. If the elderly statesmen made too much haste in Paris,
it was we who urged them to hurry. The paper peace was the common people's
doing quite as much as it was theirs. By the same token the starvation of
five million children in Central Europe is our doing. And the righting of
the disaster which our indifference made possible, should be ours.</p>
<p>What do the peoples whom our Peace has tortured, have to say about it?
Their criticism is summed up in one word—hypocrisy. They say that we
employed the language of the Beatitudes, while we cast lots for their
raiment. They say—though certainly they exaggerate—that they
would not have minded so much if we had been boldly ruthless; what they
can't forgive is our high-flown talk of democracy and justice at the
very moment when we were condemning them to generations of servitude. They
accuse us of having paid our debts out of their pockets in a manner which
had nothing to do with reparations. A case in point was the reward that
was allotted to Roumania for having come in on the side of the Allies. The
Russian Front was crumbling. For the Allies it was the blackest hour.
Something had to be done to create a diversion; if the diversion had not
been created, we might have been in the condition that Central Europe is
in today. Roumania offered to join us if, in the event of victory, we
would concede to her certain territories. As Admiral Horthy, the Governor
of what is left of Hungary, said to me, “Your very lives were at
stake. You would have promised Roumania the whole of Hungary at that
moment if she had asked for it. I, for one, would not have blamed you.
What I blame is not that you kept your promise after you had won the war,
but that you stole from us in the name of idealism, disguising your theft
with a lot of talk about self-determination. You paid your debt by handing
over Transylvania, which was Hungary's granary and absolutely
essential to our economic regeneration. We are a trunk of a nation now,
shorn of our arms and legs. We cannot rise from the ground or stir. You
have spared us our head, so we lie on our back and think, and die by
inches.”</p>
<p>What is it that the Peace has really done to Europe? It has created a
dozen Alsace-Lorraines by taking away territory from one people and
bestowing it on another. It has manufactured new nations, with new paper
currencies, negligible reserves, experimental constitutions and no
previous experience to guide them in the restraints of self-government. It
has multiplied frontiers and spun a spider-web of tariff-walls. It has
fenced in the local hatreds which it was intended to abolish, so that they
grow savage like dogs perpetually chained. It has established free-ports
for the use of mixed populations who are too distrustful to use them. It
has entrusted to plebiscites the deciding of their own fates, with the
result that they have become hot-beds for the hostile propaganda of rival
claimants. It has so lopped and changed the political landscape that
railroads now converge on cities which have ceased to serve their purpose.
Vienna, the great pre-war middle-man city of Central Europe, is a case in
point. Today it stands isolated and unself-supporting in the scrubby patch
of tillage which is the new Austria. Its currency is so unredeemable and
varying in value that even Austrians prefer to make their contracts in
terms of a foreign currency which is stable. Their neighbours refuse to
accept it and hoard their goods within their own borders. Their goods have
a tangible value, which the paper money of Austria has not. But the
railroads still converge on Vienna. The case is similar throughout
partitioned Europe. Money is a commodity in which to speculate; it is no
longer a medium of barter. When you cross the border from Czecho-Slovakia
into Poland, you have to pay your train-fare in French francs. Polish
marks are refused, although you are already on Polish soil. When nations
show this distrust of their own issue, they can scarcely expect other
nations to accept it. At all the frontiers you are searched by officials
of the country from which you are departing, to make sure that you are not
carrying away too much of their worthless currency. If you are, it is
confiscated. The amount that you are allowed to carry is utterly
inadequate. It is impossible to travel unless you are a person of
sufficient standing to purchase a letter of credit. As a consequence of
these restrictions, trade has ceased to circulate and raw materials, which
would mean life if trade-confidence were restored, lie hoarded in idle
accumulations.</p>
<p>Which brings one to the question of transportation, which lies at the
heart of the mischief. So great is the bitterness occasioned by the
transfer of territories, with the multiplying of frontiers and hostile
tariff-walls, that every nation is at enmity with its neighbours and
determined at all costs not to co-operate. One irritating way in which
they show their venom is by refusing to return freight-cars which come
across their frontiers. Very naturally no freight-cars come across. Goods
which are being exported, are unloaded at the border and then re-loaded
into cars of the country through which they are to travel. The belief in
honesty has perished; the carving up of Europe is largely to blame for it.</p>
<p>And what is the solution? The nations who have been most despoiled say,
“War.” They have neither peace nor war at present; war would
give them the chance to snatch back some of the territory that has been
filched from them. The disaster of a neighbour might prove to be their
opportunity. If they missed their chance, they could not be worse off.
They are starving by inches. I never believed that it was possible for so
many people to be so hungry and still to go on living. After a certain
point of agony has been reached, when the majority of the population
possesses nothing, Bolshevism with all its brutal crudities will be
welcome. Bolshevism practises at least one principle of social justice: in
crises of destitution it sweeps aside property rights and insists that the
citizens who have shall share. Day by day, as the tide of hunger rises,
sane thinking is being overwhelmed. The goal towards which Central Europe
is driving is undoubtedly Bolshevism.</p>
<p>But there <i>is</i> another solution, besides war and Bolshevism, which
has not yet been tested—peace. Not the “near” peace and
the paper peace of Paris; but the practical peace, tempered with
magnanimity, which was the peace we were promised when we fought, and the
only peace that any decent man intended.</p>
<p>As a preface to such a peace it is necessary to prevent people from
starving. The American Relief Administration is trying to keep pace with
the strides of famine. The British Save the Children Fund, is
concentrating on Austria. The American and British Society of Friends are
operating in Germany. Many of the neutral countries are doing something.
We are all doing something and none of us are doing enough. For the moment
all of us are trying to save children because, whoever else was guilty,
they at least were innocent of offence. The effort is finely conceived and
states-manly; children whose lives you have rescued will always be your
friends. It is one way of wiping out animosities. Whatever happens to the
League of Nations you are making sure of a League of Grateful Children.
But there is something cruel in leaving their parents to die of hunger.
None of us who has a surplus, whatever his nationality, should be able to
rest easy in his bed, till the nations who starve have been nourished.</p>
<p>The first essential of peace is that Central Europe should be supplied
with food-stuffs. The second is that she should be allowed credits, so
that her currencies may be restored to an actual value, the third is that
her flow of transportation should be assured. The fourth is that she
should be compelled to break down her internal tariff-walls which we,
through our short-sightedness, enabled her to set up.</p>
<p>The answer to this is that no government will be prepared to allow credits
to a Central Europe which acts spitefully among its component members and
so adds daily to its own tribulations. But as regards the spitefulness, if
we condemn it too much, we become like Pontius Pilate washing his hands.
The spitefulness existed racially before the war and helped to bring the
war about; but we, the Allies, are responsible for its most recent and
intense development. Our Peace partitioned economic entities, which had
proved workable, and substituted in their place a series of political
experiments. These experiments, when imposed upon social and financial
conditions which were already shaky, instead of restoring equilibrium,
precipitated insolvency. It was as though in trying to rescue a boat-load
of shipwrecked mariners, we had collided and, instead of accomplishing the
good we had intended, had flung them all into the water. Their instinct
for self-preservation comes uppermost. They drown one another as they
struggle for a hold on the upturned boat. It was our clumsiness that upset
them, so we are scarcely in a position to condemn. If we had wanted to
impose our peace experiments, there was only one safe way in which to do
it. We should have taken control of partitioned Europe and made ourselves
responsible for its new countries, till they were sufficiently stabilised
to function for themselves.</p>
<p>Their dire necessity has again given us this opportunity. They must be fed
and set to work; if not, the anarchy and distress which are now confined
within their borders, will spread like a disease throughout the world.
There is no time to lose. It is no longer a case of philanthropy; it is a
case of safeguarding our own social health. In return for food-stuffs and
credits we must make our conditions; the conditions are that we must be
allowed to take control of the entire internal economy of our creditors.
There should be no food-stuffs or credits for any country which will not
permit the Allies' Director to administer their railroads. The
Allies' Director should be in every case an American, since America
alone is above suspicion in Europe and has no political axe to grind. The
Director in each country would be absolute in the matter of distribution
and transport, and would see to it that out-going freight-cars were not
unloaded at his frontier and that freight-cars which had entered his
territory were returned.</p>
<p>Central Europe at the moment is insane with hunger. She is capable of any
folly. She is scarcely to be held accountable for her actions. If she is
not fed, revolution will spring up in every direction and no one can say
where it will end. Every month we delay brings the menace nearer. The
Atlantic Ocean will prove to be no barrier.</p>
<p>She wants the peace which we promised and have withheld. If we withhold it
much longer, she will be forced to accept the other alternative. There are
only two roads which she can travel; the road of peace or of war. The road
of war means Bolshevism. Our settlement at Paris has decided nothing. She
has neither peace nor war at present.</p>
<h3> THE END </h3>
<div style="height: 6em;">
<br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/></div>
<SPAN name="endofbook"></SPAN>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />