<h2>CHAPTER XXVIII—ENGLAND UNDER HENRY THE EIGHTH</h2>
<h3>PART THE SECOND</h3>
<p>The Pope was thrown into a very angry state of mind when he
heard of the King’s marriage, and fumed exceedingly.
Many of the English monks and friars, seeing that their order was
in danger, did the same; some even declaimed against the King in
church before his face, and were not to be stopped until he
himself roared out ‘Silence!’ The King, not
much the worse for this, took it pretty quietly; and was very
glad when his Queen gave birth to a daughter, who was christened
<span class="smcap">Elizabeth</span>, and declared Princess of
Wales as her sister Mary had already been.</p>
<p>One of the most atrocious features of this reign was that
Henry the Eighth was always trimming between the reformed
religion and the unreformed one; so that the more he quarrelled
with the Pope, the more of his own subjects he roasted alive for
not holding the Pope’s opinions. Thus, an unfortunate
student named John Frith, and a poor simple tailor named Andrew
Hewet who loved him very much, and said that whatever John Frith
believed <i>he</i> believed, were burnt in Smithfield—to
show what a capital Christian the King was.</p>
<p>But, these were speedily followed by two much greater victims,
Sir Thomas More, and John Fisher, the Bishop of Rochester.
The latter, who was a good and amiable old man, had committed no
greater offence than believing in Elizabeth Barton, called the
Maid of Kent—another of those ridiculous women who
pretended to be inspired, and to make all sorts of heavenly
revelations, though they indeed uttered nothing but evil
nonsense. For this offence—as it was pretended, but
really for denying the King to be the supreme Head of the
Church—he got into trouble, and was put in prison; but,
even then, he might have been suffered to die naturally (short
work having been made of executing the Kentish Maid and her
principal followers), but that the Pope, to spite the King,
resolved to make him a cardinal. Upon that the King made a
ferocious joke to the effect that the Pope might send Fisher a
red hat—which is the way they make a cardinal—but he
should have no head on which to wear it; and he was tried with
all unfairness and injustice, and sentenced to death. He
died like a noble and virtuous old man, and left a worthy name
behind him. The King supposed, I dare say, that Sir Thomas
More would be frightened by this example; but, as he was not to
be easily terrified, and, thoroughly believing in the Pope, had
made up his mind that the King was not the rightful Head of the
Church, he positively refused to say that he was. For this
crime he too was tried and sentenced, after having been in prison
a whole year. When he was doomed to death, and came away
from his trial with the edge of the executioner’s axe
turned towards him—as was always done in those times when a
state prisoner came to that hopeless pass—he bore it quite
serenely, and gave his blessing to his son, who pressed through
the crowd in Westminster Hall and kneeled down to receive
it. But, when he got to the Tower Wharf on his way back to
his prison, and his favourite daughter, <span class="smcap">Margaret Roper</span>, a very good woman, rushed
through the guards again and again, to kiss him and to weep upon
his neck, he was overcome at last. He soon recovered, and
never more showed any feeling but cheerfulness and courage.
When he was going up the steps of the scaffold to his death, he
said jokingly to the Lieutenant of the Tower, observing that they
were weak and shook beneath his tread, ‘I pray you, master
Lieutenant, see me safe up; and, for my coming down, I can shift
for myself.’ Also he said to the executioner, after
he had laid his head upon the block, ‘Let me put my beard
out of the way; for that, at least, has never committed any
treason.’ Then his head was struck off at a
blow. These two executions were worthy of King Henry the
Eighth. Sir Thomas More was one of the most virtuous men in
his dominions, and the Bishop was one of his oldest and truest
friends. But to be a friend of that fellow was almost as
dangerous as to be his wife.</p>
<p>When the news of these two murders got to Rome, the Pope raged
against the murderer more than ever Pope raged since the world
began, and prepared a Bull, ordering his subjects to take arms
against him and dethrone him. The King took all possible
precautions to keep that document out of his dominions, and set
to work in return to suppress a great number of the English
monasteries and abbeys.</p>
<p>This destruction was begun by a body of commissioners, of whom
Cromwell (whom the King had taken into great favour) was the
head; and was carried on through some few years to its entire
completion. There is no doubt that many of these religious
establishments were religious in nothing but in name, and were
crammed with lazy, indolent, and sensual monks. There is no
doubt that they imposed upon the people in every possible way;
that they had images moved by wires, which they pretended were
miraculously moved by Heaven; that they had among them a whole
tun measure full of teeth, all purporting to have come out of the
head of one saint, who must indeed have been a very extraordinary
person with that enormous allowance of grinders; that they had
bits of coal which they said had fried Saint Lawrence, and bits
of toe-nails which they said belonged to other famous saints;
penknives, and boots, and girdles, which they said belonged to
others; and that all these bits of rubbish were called Relics,
and adored by the ignorant people. But, on the other hand,
there is no doubt either, that the King’s officers and men
punished the good monks with the bad; did great injustice;
demolished many beautiful things and many valuable libraries;
destroyed numbers of paintings, stained glass windows, fine
pavements, and carvings; and that the whole court were ravenously
greedy and rapacious for the division of this great spoil among
them. The King seems to have grown almost mad in the ardour
of this pursuit; for he declared Thomas à Becket a
traitor, though he had been dead so many years, and had his body
dug up out of his grave. He must have been as miraculous as
the monks pretended, if they had told the truth, for he was found
with one head on his shoulders, and they had shown another as his
undoubted and genuine head ever since his death; it had brought
them vast sums of money, too. The gold and jewels on his
shrine filled two great chests, and eight men tottered as they
carried them away. How rich the monasteries were you may
infer from the fact that, when they were all suppressed, one
hundred and thirty thousand pounds a year—in those days an
immense sum—came to the Crown.</p>
<p>These things were not done without causing great discontent
among the people. The monks had been good landlords and
hospitable entertainers of all travellers, and had been
accustomed to give away a great deal of corn, and fruit, and
meat, and other things. In those days it was difficult to
change goods into money, in consequence of the roads being very
few and very bad, and the carts, and waggons of the worst
description; and they must either have given away some of the
good things they possessed in enormous quantities, or have
suffered them to spoil and moulder. So, many of the people
missed what it was more agreeable to get idly than to work for;
and the monks who were driven out of their homes and wandered
about encouraged their discontent; and there were, consequently,
great risings in Lincolnshire and Yorkshire. These were put
down by terrific executions, from which the monks themselves did
not escape, and the King went on grunting and growling in his own
fat way, like a Royal pig.</p>
<p>I have told all this story of the religious houses at one
time, to make it plainer, and to get back to the King’s
domestic affairs.</p>
<p>The unfortunate Queen Catherine was by this time dead; and the
King was by this time as tired of his second Queen as he had been
of his first. As he had fallen in love with Anne when she
was in the service of Catherine, so he now fell in love with
another lady in the service of Anne. See how wicked deeds
are punished, and how bitterly and self-reproachfully the Queen
must now have thought of her own rise to the throne! The
new fancy was a <span class="smcap">Lady Jane Seymour</span>; and
the King no sooner set his mind on her, than he resolved to have
Anne Boleyn’s head. So, he brought a number of
charges against Anne, accusing her of dreadful crimes which she
had never committed, and implicating in them her own brother and
certain gentlemen in her service: among whom one Norris, and Mark
Smeaton a musician, are best remembered. As the lords and
councillors were as afraid of the King and as subservient to him
as the meanest peasant in England was, they brought in Anne
Boleyn guilty, and the other unfortunate persons accused with
her, guilty too. Those gentlemen died like men, with the
exception of Smeaton, who had been tempted by the King into
telling lies, which he called confessions, and who had expected
to be pardoned; but who, I am very glad to say, was not.
There was then only the Queen to dispose of. She had been
surrounded in the Tower with women spies; had been monstrously
persecuted and foully slandered; and had received no
justice. But her spirit rose with her afflictions; and,
after having in vain tried to soften the King by writing an
affecting letter to him which still exists, ‘from her
doleful prison in the Tower,’ she resigned herself to
death. She said to those about her, very cheerfully, that
she had heard say the executioner was a good one, and that she
had a little neck (she laughed and clasped it with her hands as
she said that), and would soon be out of her pain. And she
<i>was</i> soon out of her pain, poor creature, on the Green
inside the Tower, and her body was flung into an old box and put
away in the ground under the chapel.</p>
<p>There is a story that the King sat in his palace listening
very anxiously for the sound of the cannon which was to announce
this new murder; and that, when he heard it come booming on the
air, he rose up in great spirits and ordered out his dogs to go
a-hunting. He was bad enough to do it; but whether he did
it or not, it is certain that he married Jane Seymour the very
next day.</p>
<p>I have not much pleasure in recording that she lived just long
enough to give birth to a son who was christened <span class="smcap">Edward</span>, and then to die of a fever: for, I
cannot but think that any woman who married such a ruffian, and
knew what innocent blood was on his hands, deserved the axe that
would assuredly have fallen on the neck of Jane Seymour, if she
had lived much longer.</p>
<p>Cranmer had done what he could to save some of the Church
property for purposes of religion and education; but, the great
families had been so hungry to get hold of it, that very little
could be rescued for such objects. Even <span class="smcap">Miles Coverdale</span>, who did the people the
inestimable service of translating the Bible into English (which
the unreformed religion never permitted to be done), was left in
poverty while the great families clutched the Church lands and
money. The people had been told that when the Crown came
into possession of these funds, it would not be necessary to tax
them; but they were taxed afresh directly afterwards. It
was fortunate for them, indeed, that so many nobles were so
greedy for this wealth; since, if it had remained with the Crown,
there might have been no end to tyranny for hundreds of
years. One of the most active writers on the Church’s
side against the King was a member of his own family—a sort
of distant cousin, <span class="smcap">Reginald Pole</span> by
name—who attacked him in the most violent manner (though he
received a pension from him all the time), and fought for the
Church with his pen, day and night. As he was beyond the
King’s reach—being in Italy—the King politely
invited him over to discuss the subject; but he, knowing better
than to come, and wisely staying where he was, the King’s
rage fell upon his brother Lord Montague, the Marquis of Exeter,
and some other gentlemen: who were tried for high treason in
corresponding with him and aiding him—which they probably
did—and were all executed. The Pope made Reginald
Pole a cardinal; but, so much against his will, that it is
thought he even aspired in his own mind to the vacant throne of
England, and had hopes of marrying the Princess Mary. His
being made a high priest, however, put an end to all that.
His mother, the venerable Countess of Salisbury—who was,
unfortunately for herself, within the tyrant’s
reach—was the last of his relatives on whom his wrath
fell. When she was told to lay her grey head upon the
block, she answered the executioner, ‘No! My head
never committed treason, and if you want it, you shall seize
it.’ So, she ran round and round the scaffold with
the executioner striking at her, and her grey hair bedabbled with
blood; and even when they held her down upon the block she moved
her head about to the last, resolved to be no party to her own
barbarous murder. All this the people bore, as they had
borne everything else.</p>
<p>Indeed they bore much more; for the slow fires of Smithfield
were continually burning, and people were constantly being
roasted to death—still to show what a good Christian the
King was. He defied the Pope and his Bull, which was now
issued, and had come into England; but he burned innumerable
people whose only offence was that they differed from the
Pope’s religious opinions. There was a wretched man
named <span class="smcap">Lambert</span>, among others, who was
tried for this before the King, and with whom six bishops argued
one after another. When he was quite exhausted (as well he
might be, after six bishops), he threw himself on the
King’s mercy; but the King blustered out that he had no
mercy for heretics. So, <i>he</i> too fed the fire.</p>
<p>All this the people bore, and more than all this yet.
The national spirit seems to have been banished from the kingdom
at this time. The very people who were executed for
treason, the very wives and friends of the ‘bluff’
King, spoke of him on the scaffold as a good prince, and a gentle
prince—just as serfs in similar circumstances have been
known to do, under the Sultan and Bashaws of the East, or under
the fierce old tyrants of Russia, who poured boiling and freezing
water on them alternately, until they died. The Parliament
were as bad as the rest, and gave the King whatever he wanted;
among other vile accommodations, they gave him new powers of
murdering, at his will and pleasure, any one whom he might choose
to call a traitor. But the worst measure they passed was an
Act of Six Articles, commonly called at the time ‘the whip
with six strings;’ which punished offences against the
Pope’s opinions, without mercy, and enforced the very worst
parts of the monkish religion. Cranmer would have modified
it, if he could; but, being overborne by the Romish party, had
not the power. As one of the articles declared that priests
should not marry, and as he was married himself, he sent his wife
and children into Germany, and began to tremble at his danger;
none the less because he was, and had long been, the King’s
friend. This whip of six strings was made under the
King’s own eye. It should never be forgotten of him
how cruelly he supported the worst of the Popish doctrines when
there was nothing to be got by opposing them.</p>
<p>This amiable monarch now thought of taking another wife.
He proposed to the French King to have some of the ladies of the
French Court exhibited before him, that he might make his Royal
choice; but the French King answered that he would rather not
have his ladies trotted out to be shown like horses at a
fair. He proposed to the Dowager Duchess of Milan, who
replied that she might have thought of such a match if she had
had two heads; but, that only owning one, she must beg to keep it
safe. At last Cromwell represented that there was a
Protestant Princess in Germany—those who held the reformed
religion were called Protestants, because their leaders had
Protested against the abuses and impositions of the unreformed
Church—named <span class="smcap">Anne of Cleves</span>, who
was beautiful, and would answer the purpose admirably. The
King said was she a large woman, because he must have a fat
wife? ‘O yes,’ said Cromwell; ‘she was
very large, just the thing.’ On hearing this the King
sent over his famous painter, Hans Holbein, to take her
portrait. Hans made her out to be so good-looking that the
King was satisfied, and the marriage was arranged. But,
whether anybody had paid Hans to touch up the picture; or whether
Hans, like one or two other painters, flattered a princess in the
ordinary way of business, I cannot say: all I know is, that when
Anne came over and the King went to Rochester to meet her, and
first saw her without her seeing him, he swore she was ‘a
great Flanders mare,’ and said he would never marry
her. Being obliged to do it now matters had gone so far, he
would not give her the presents he had prepared, and would never
notice her. He never forgave Cromwell his part in the
affair. His downfall dates from that time.</p>
<p>It was quickened by his enemies, in the interests of the
unreformed religion, putting in the King’s way, at a state
dinner, a niece of the Duke of Norfolk, <span class="smcap">Catherine Howard</span>, a young lady of
fascinating manners, though small in stature and not particularly
beautiful. Falling in love with her on the spot, the King
soon divorced Anne of Cleves after making her the subject of much
brutal talk, on pretence that she had been previously betrothed
to some one else—which would never do for one of his
dignity—and married Catherine. It is probable that on
his wedding day, of all days in the year, he sent his faithful
Cromwell to the scaffold, and had his head struck off. He
further celebrated the occasion by burning at one time, and
causing to be drawn to the fire on the same hurdles, some
Protestant prisoners for denying the Pope’s doctrines, and
some Roman Catholic prisoners for denying his own
supremacy. Still the people bore it, and not a gentleman in
England raised his hand.</p>
<p>But, by a just retribution, it soon came out that Catherine
Howard, before her marriage, had been really guilty of such
crimes as the King had falsely attributed to his second wife Anne
Boleyn; so, again the dreadful axe made the King a widower, and
this Queen passed away as so many in that reign had passed away
before her. As an appropriate pursuit under the
circumstances, Henry then applied himself to superintending the
composition of a religious book called ‘A necessary
doctrine for any Christian Man.’ He must have been a
little confused in his mind, I think, at about this period; for
he was so false to himself as to be true to some one: that some
one being Cranmer, whom the Duke of Norfolk and others of his
enemies tried to ruin; but to whom the King was steadfast, and to
whom he one night gave his ring, charging him when he should find
himself, next day, accused of treason, to show it to the council
board. This Cranmer did to the confusion of his
enemies. I suppose the King thought he might want him a
little longer.</p>
<p>He married yet once more. Yes, strange to say, he found
in England another woman who would become his wife, and she was
<span class="smcap">Catherine Parr</span>, widow of Lord
Latimer. She leaned towards the reformed religion; and it
is some comfort to know, that she tormented the King considerably
by arguing a variety of doctrinal points with him on all possible
occasions. She had very nearly done this to her own
destruction. After one of these conversations the King in a
very black mood actually instructed <span class="smcap">Gardiner</span>, one of his Bishops who favoured
the Popish opinions, to draw a bill of accusation against her,
which would have inevitably brought her to the scaffold where her
predecessors had died, but that one of her friends picked up the
paper of instructions which had been dropped in the palace, and
gave her timely notice. She fell ill with terror; but
managed the King so well when he came to entrap her into further
statements—by saying that she had only spoken on such
points to divert his mind and to get some information from his
extraordinary wisdom—that he gave her a kiss and called her
his sweetheart. And, when the Chancellor came next day
actually to take her to the Tower, the King sent him about his
business, and honoured him with the epithets of a beast, a knave,
and a fool. So near was Catherine Parr to the block, and so
narrow was her escape!</p>
<p>There was war with Scotland in this reign, and a short clumsy
war with France for favouring Scotland; but, the events at home
were so dreadful, and leave such an enduring stain on the
country, that I need say no more of what happened abroad.</p>
<p>A few more horrors, and this reign is over. There was a
lady, <span class="smcap">Anne Askew</span>, in Lincolnshire, who
inclined to the Protestant opinions, and whose husband being a
fierce Catholic, turned her out of his house. She came to
London, and was considered as offending against the six articles,
and was taken to the Tower, and put upon the rack—probably
because it was hoped that she might, in her agony, criminate some
obnoxious persons; if falsely, so much the better. She was
tortured without uttering a cry, until the Lieutenant of the
Tower would suffer his men to torture her no more; and then two
priests who were present actually pulled off their robes, and
turned the wheels of the rack with their own hands, so rending
and twisting and breaking her that she was afterwards carried to
the fire in a chair. She was burned with three others, a
gentleman, a clergyman, and a tailor; and so the world went
on.</p>
<p>Either the King became afraid of the power of the Duke of
Norfolk, and his son the Earl of Surrey, or they gave him some
offence, but he resolved to pull <i>them</i> down, to follow all
the rest who were gone. The son was tried first—of
course for nothing—and defended himself bravely; but of
course he was found guilty, and of course he was executed.
Then his father was laid hold of, and left for death too.</p>
<p>But the King himself was left for death by a Greater King, and
the earth was to be rid of him at last. He was now a
swollen, hideous spectacle, with a great hole in his leg, and so
odious to every sense that it was dreadful to approach him.
When he was found to be dying, Cranmer was sent for from his
palace at Croydon, and came with all speed, but found him
speechless. Happily, in that hour he perished. He was
in the fifty-sixth year of his age, and the thirty-eighth of his
reign.</p>
<p>Henry the Eighth has been favoured by some Protestant writers,
because the Reformation was achieved in his time. But the
mighty merit of it lies with other men and not with him; and it
can be rendered none the worse by this monster’s crimes,
and none the better by any defence of them. The plain truth
is, that he was a most intolerable ruffian, a disgrace to human
nature, and a blot of blood and grease upon the History of
England.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />