<p><SPAN name="link2H_4_0017" id="link2H_4_0017"></SPAN></p>
<br/>
<h2> THE CRIME 1920. </h2>
<p>On a bleak wet stormy afternoon at the outset of last year’s Spring, I was
in a cottage, all alone, and knowing that I must be all alone till
evening. It was a remote cottage, in a remote county, and had been ‘let
furnished’ by its owner. My spirits are easily affected by weather, and I
hate solitude. And I dislike to be master of things that are not mine. ‘Be
careful not to break us,’ say the glass and china. ‘You’d better not spill
ink on me,’ growls the carpet. ‘None of your dog’s-earing, thumb-marking,
back-breaking tricks here!’ snarl the books.</p>
<p>The books in this cottage looked particularly disagreeable—horrid
little upstarts of this and that scarlet or cerulean ‘series’ of
‘standard’ authors. Having gloomily surveyed them, I turned my back on
them, and watched the rain streaming down the latticed window, whose panes
seemed likely to be shattered at any moment by the wind. I have known men
who constantly visit the Central Criminal Court, visit also the scenes
where famous crimes were committed, form their own theories of those
crimes, collect souvenirs of those crimes, and call themselves
Criminologists. As for me, my interest in crime is, alas, merely morbid. I
did not know, as those others would doubtless have known, that the
situation in which I found myself was precisely of the kind most conducive
to the darkest deeds. I did but bemoan it, and think of Lear in the hovel
on the heath. The wind howled in the chimney, and the rain had begun to
sputter right down it, so that the fire was beginning to hiss in a very
sinister manner. Suppose the fire went out! It looked as if it meant to. I
snatched the pair of bellows that hung beside it. I plied them vigorously.
‘Now mind!—not too vigorously. We aren’t yours!’ they wheezed. I
handled them more gently. But I did not release them till they had secured
me a steady blaze.</p>
<p>I sat down before that blaze. Despair had been warded off. Gloom, however,
remained; and gloom grew. I felt that I should prefer any one’s thoughts
to mine. I rose, I returned to the books. A dozen or so of those which
were on the lowest of the three shelves were full-sized, were octavo,
looked as though they had been bought to be read. I would exercise my
undoubted right to read one of them. Which of them? I gradually decided on
a novel by a well-known writer whose works, though I had several times had
the honour of meeting her, were known to me only by repute.</p>
<p>I knew nothing of them that was not good. The lady’s ‘output’ had not been
at all huge, and it was agreed that her ‘level’ was high. I had always
gathered that the chief characteristic of her work was its great
‘vitality.’ The book in my hand was a third edition of her latest novel,
and at the end of it were numerous press-notices, at which I glanced for
confirmation. ‘Immense vitality,’ yes, said one critic. ‘Full,’ said
another, ‘of an intense vitality.’ ‘A book that will live,’ said a third.
How on earth did he know that? I was, however, very willing to believe in
the vitality of this writer for all present purposes. Vitality was a thing
in which she herself, her talk, her glance, her gestures, abounded. She
and they had been, I remembered, rather too much for me. The first time I
met her, she said something that I lightly and mildly disputed. On no
future occasion did I stem any opinion of hers. Not that she had been
rude. Far from it. She had but in a sisterly, brotherly way, and yet in a
way that was filially eager too, asked me to explain my point. I did my
best. She was all attention. But I was conscious that my best, under her
eye, was not good. She was quick to help me: she said for me just what I
had tried to say, and proceeded to show me just why it was wrong. I smiled
the gallant smile of a man who regards women as all the more adorable
because logic is not their strong point, bless them! She asked—not
aggressively, but strenuously, as one who dearly loves a joke—what I
was smiling at. Altogether, a chastening encounter; and my memory of it
was tinged with a feeble resentment. How she had scored! No man likes to
be worsted in argument by a woman. And I fancy that to be vanquished by a
feminine writer is the kind of defeat least of all agreeable to a man who
writes. A ‘sex war,’ we are often told is to be one of the features of the
world’s future—women demanding the right to do men’s work, and men
refusing, resisting, counter-attacking. It seems likely enough. One can
believe anything of the world’s future. Yet one conceives that not all
men, if this particular evil come to pass, will stand packed shoulder to
shoulder against all women. One does not feel that the dockers will be
very bitter against such women as want to be miners, or the plumbers frown
much upon the would-be steeple-jills. I myself have never had my sense of
fitness jarred, nor a spark of animosity roused in me, by a woman
practising any of the fine arts—except the art of writing. That she
should write a few little poems or pensées, or some impressions of a trip
in a dahabieh as far as (say) Biskra, or even a short story or two, seems
to me not wholly amiss, even though she do such things for publication.
But that she should be an habitual, professional author, with a passion
for her art, and a fountain-pen and an agent, and sums down in advance of
royalties on sales in Canada and Australia, and a profound knowledge of
human character, and an essentially sane outlook, is somehow incongruous
with my notions—my mistaken notions, if you will—of what she
ought to be.</p>
<p>‘Has a profound knowledge of human character, and an essentially sane
outlook’ said one of the critics quoted at the end of the book that I had
chosen. The wind and the rain in the chimney had not abated, but the fire
was bearing up bravely. So would I. I would read cheerfully and without
prejudice. I poked the fire and, pushing my chair slightly back, lest the
heat should warp the book’s covers, began Chapter I. A woman sat writing
in a summer-house at the end of a small garden that overlooked a great
valley in Surrey. The description of her was calculated to make her very
admirable—a thorough woman, not strictly beautiful, but likely to be
thought beautiful by those who knew her well; not dressed as though she
gave much heed to her clothes, but dressed in a fashion that exactly
harmonised with her special type. Her pen ‘travelled’ rapidly across the
foolscap, and while it did so she was described in more and more detail.
But at length she came to a ‘knotty point’ in what she was writing. She
paused, she pushed back the hair from her temples, she looked forth at the
valley; and now the landscape was described, but not at all exhaustively,
it, for the writer soon overcame her difficulty, and her pen travelled
faster than ever, till suddenly there was a cry of ‘Mammy!’ and in rushed
a seven-year-old child, in conjunction with whom she was more than ever
admirable; after which the narrative skipped back across eight years, and
the woman became a girl, giving as yet no token of future eminence in
literature but—I had an impulse which I obeyed almost before I was,
conscious of it.</p>
<p>Nobody could have been more surprised than I was at what I had done—done
so neatly, so quietly and gently. The book stood closed, upright, with its
back to me, just as on a book-shelf, behind the bars of the grate. There
it was. And it gave forth, as the flames crept up the blue cloth sides of
it, a pleasant though acrid smell. My astonishment had passed, giving
place to an exquisite satisfaction. How pottering and fumbling a thing was
even the best kind of written criticism! I understood the contempt felt by
the man of action for the man of words. But what pleased me most was that
at last, actually, I, at my age, I of all people, had committed a crime—was
guilty of a crime. I had power to revoke it. I might write to my
bookseller for an unburnt copy, and place it on the shelf where this one
had stood—this gloriously glowing one. I would do nothing of the
sort. What I had done I had done. I would wear forever on my conscience
the white rose of theft and the red rose of arson. If hereafter the owner
of this cottage happened to miss that volume—let him! If he were
fool enough to write to me about it, would I share my grand secret with
him? No. Gently, with his poker, I prodded that volume further among the
coals. The all-but-consumed binding shot forth little tongues of bright
colour—flamelets of sapphire, amethyst, emerald. Charming! Could
even the author herself not admire them? Perhaps. Poor woman!—I had
scored now, scored so perfectly that I felt myself to be almost a brute
while I poked off the loosened black outer pages and led the fire on to
pages that were but pale brown.</p>
<p>These were quickly devoured. But it seemed to me that whenever I left the
fire to forage for itself it made little headway. I pushed the book over
on its side. The flames closed on it, but presently, licking their lips,
fell back, as though they had had enough. I took the tongs and put the
book upright again, and raked it fore and aft. It seemed almost as thick
as ever. With poker and tongs I carved it into two, three sections—the
inner pages flashing white as when they were sent to the binders. Strange!
Aforetime, a book was burnt now and again in the market-place by the
common hangman. Was he, I wondered, paid by the hour? I had always
supposed the thing quite easy for him—a bright little, brisk little
conflagration, and so home. Perhaps other books were less resistant than
this one? I began to feel that the critics were more right than they knew.
Here was a book that had indeed an intense vitality, and an immense
vitality. It was a book that would live—do what one might. I vowed
it should not. I subdivided it, spread it, redistributed it. Ever and anon
my eye would be caught by some sentence or fragment of a sentence in the
midst of a charred page before the flames crept over it. Always loathed
you, but, I remember; and think Tolstoi was right. Who had always loathed
whom? And what, what, had Tolstoi been right about? I had an absurd but
genuine desire to know. Too late! Confound the woman!—she was
scoring again. I furiously drove her pages into the yawning crimson jaws
of the coals. Those jaws had lately been golden. Soon, to my horror, they
seemed to be growing grey. They seemed to be closing—on nothing.
Flakes of black paper, full-sized layers of paper brown and white, began
to hide them from me altogether. I sprinkled a boxful of wax matches. I
resumed the bellows. I lunged with the poker. I held a newspaper over the
whole grate. I did all that inspiration could suggest, or skill
accomplish. Vainly. The fire went out—darkly, dismally, gradually,
quite out.</p>
<p>How she had scored again! But she did not know it. I felt no bitterness
against her as I lay back in my chair, inert, listening to the storm that
was still raging. I blamed only myself. I had done wrong. The small room
became very cold. Whose fault was that but my own? I had done wrong
hastily, but had done it and been glad of it. I had not remembered the
words a wise king wrote long ago, that the lamp of the wicked shall be put
out, and that the way of trangressors is hard.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />