<h2><SPAN name="chap36"></SPAN>CHAPTER XXXVI.<br/> The Pall Mall Gazette</h2>
<p>Considerable success at first attended the new journal. It was generally
stated, that an influential political party supported the paper; and great
names were cited amongst the contributors to its columns. Was there any
foundation for these rumours? We are not at liberty to say whether they were
ill-founded; but this much we may divulge, that an article upon foreign policy,
which was generally attributed to a noble Lord, whose connexion with the
Foreign Office is very well known, was in reality composed by Captain Shandon,
in the parlour of the Bear and Staff public-house near Whitehall Stairs,
whither the printer’s boy had tracked him, and where a literary ally of
his, Mr. Bludyer, had a temporary residence; and that a series of papers on
finance questions, which were universally supposed to be written by a great
Statesman of the House of Commons, were in reality composed by Mr. George
Warrington of the Upper Temple.</p>
<p>That there may have been some dealings between the Pall Mall Gazette and this
influential party, is very possible, Percy Popjoy (whose father, Lord Falconet,
was a member of the party) might be seen not unfrequently ascending the stairs
to Warrington’s chambers; and some information appeared in the paper
which it gave a character, and could only be got from very peculiar sources.
Several poems, feeble in thought, but loud and vigorous in expression, appeared
in the Pall Mall Gazette, with the signature of “P. P.”; and it
must be owned that his novel was praised in the new journal in a very
outrageous manner.</p>
<p>In the political department of the paper Mr. Pen did not take any share; but he
was a most active literary contributor. The Pall Mall Gazette had its offices,
as we have heard, in Catherine Street, in the Strand, and hither Pen often came
with his manuscripts in his pocket, and with a great deal of bustle and
pleasure; such as a man feels at the outset of his literary career, when to see
himself in print is still a novel sensation, and he yet pleases himself to
think that his writings are creating some noise in the world.</p>
<p>Here it was that Mr. Jack Finucane, the sub-editor, compiled with paste and
scissors the Journal of which he was supervisor. With an eagle eye he scanned
all the paragraphs of all the newspapers which had anything to do with the
world of fashion over which he presided. He didn’t let a death or a
dinner-party of the aristocracy pass without having the event recorded in the
columns of his Journal; and from the most recondite provincial prints, and
distant Scotch and Irish newspapers, he fished out astonishing paragraphs and
intelligence regarding the upper classes of society. It was a grand, nay, a
touching sight, for a philosopher, to see Jack Finucane, Esquire, with a plate
of meat from the cookshop and glass of porter from the public-house, for his
meal, recounting the feasts of the great as if he had been present at them; and
in tattered trousers and dingy shirt-sleeves, cheerfully describing and
arranging the most brilliant fêtes of the world of fashion. The incongruity of
Finucane’s avocation, and his manners and appearance amused his new
friend Pen. Since he left his own native village, where his rank probably was
not very lofty, Jack had seldom seen any society but such as used the parlour
of the taverns which he frequented, whereas from his writing you would have
supposed that he dined with ambassadors, and that his common lounge was the
bow-window of White’s. Errors of description, it is true, occasionally
slipped from his pen; but the Ballinafad Sentinel, of which he was own
correspondent, suffered by these, not the Pall Mall Gazette, in which Jack was
not permitted to write much, his London chiefs thinking that the scissors and
the paste were better wielded by him than the pen.</p>
<p>Pen took a great deal of pains with the writing of his reviews, and having a
pretty fair share of desultory reading, acquired in the early years of his life
an eager fancy and a keen sense of fun, his articles pleased his chief and the
public, and he was proud to think that he deserved the money which he earned.
We may be sure that the Pall Mall Gazette was taken in regularly at Fairoaks,
and read with delight by the two ladies there. It was received at Clavering
Park, too, where we know there was a young lady of great literary tastes; and
old Doctor Portman himself, to whom the widow sent her paper after she had got
her son’s articles by heart, signified his approval of Pen’s
productions, saying that the lad had spirit, taste, and fancy, and wrote, if
not like a scholar, at any rate like a gentleman.</p>
<p>And what was the astonishment and delight of our friend Major Pendennis, on
walking into one of his clubs, the Regent, where Wenham, Lord Falconet, and
some other gentlemen of good reputation and fashion were assembled, to hear
them one day talking over a number of the Pall Mall Gazette, and of an article
which appeared in its columns, making some bitter fun of the book recently
published by the wife of a celebrated member of the opposition party. The book
in question was a Book of Travels in Spain and Italy, by the Countess of
Muffborough, in which it was difficult to say which was the most wonderful, the
French or the English, in which languages her ladyship wrote indifferently, and
upon the blunders of which the critic pounced with delightful mischief. The
critic was no other than Pen: he jumped and danced round about his subject with
the greatest jocularity and high spirits: he showed up the noble lady’s
faults with admirable mock gravity and decorum. There was not a word in the
article which was not polite and gentlemanlike; and the unfortunate subject of
the criticism was scarified and laughed at during the operation. Wenham’s
bilious countenance was puckered up with malign pleasure as he read the
critique. Lady Muffborough had not asked him to her parties during the last
year. Lord Falconet giggled and laughed with all his heart; Lord Muffborough
and he had been rivals ever since they began life; and these complimented Major
Pendennis, who until now had scarcely paid any attention to some hints which
his Fairoaks correspondence threw out of “dear Arthur’s constant
and severe literary occupations, which I fear may undermine the poor
boy’s health,” and had thought any notice of Mr. Pen and his
newspaper connexions quite below his dignity as a Major and a gentleman.</p>
<p>But when the oracular Wenham praised the boy’s production; when Lord
Falconet, who had had the news from Percy Popjoy, approved of the genius of
young Pen; when the great Lord Steyne himself, to whom the Major referred the
article, laughed and sniggered over it, swore it was capital, and that the
Muffborough would writhe under it, like a whale under a harpoon, the Major, as
in duty bound, began to admire his nephew very much, said, “By gad, the
young rascal had some stuff in him, and would do something; he had always said
he would do something;” and with a hand quite tremulous with pleasure,
the old gentleman sate down to write to the widow at Fairoaks all that the
great folks had said in praise of Pen; and he wrote to the young rascal, too,
asking when he would come and eat a chop with his old uncle, and saying that he
was commissioned to take him to dinner at Gaunt House, for Lord Steyne liked
anybody who could entertain him, whether by his folly, wit, or by his dulness,
by his oddity, affectation, good spirits, or any other quality. Pen flung his
letter across the table to Warrington: perhaps he was disappointed that the
other did not seem to be much affected by it.</p>
<p>The courage of young critics is prodigious: they clamber up to the
judgment-seat, and, with scarce a hesitation, give their opinion upon works the
most intricate or profound. Had Macaulay’s History or Herschel’s
Astronomy been put before Pen at this period, he would have looked through the
volumes, meditated his opinion over a cigar, and signified his august approval
of either author, as if the critic had been their born superior and indulgent
master and patron. By the help of the Biographie Universelle or the British
Museum, he would be able to take a rapid resume of a historical period, and
allude to names, dates, and facts, in such a masterly, easy way, as to astonish
his mamma at home, who wondered where her boy could have acquired such a
prodigious store of reading and himself, too, when he came to read over his
articles two or three months after they had been composed, and when he had
forgotten the subject and the books which he had consulted. At that period of
his life, Mr. Pen owns that he would not have hesitated, at twenty-four
hours’ notice, to pass his opinion upon the greatest scholars, or to give
a judgment upon the Encyclopaedia. Luckily he had Warrington to laugh at him
and to keep down his impertinence by a constant and wholesome ridicule, or he
might have become conceited beyond all sufferance; for Shandon liked the dash
and flippancy of his young aide-de-camp, and was, indeed, better pleased with
Pen’s light and brilliant flashes, than with the heavier metal which his
elder coadjutor brought to bear.</p>
<p>But though he might justly be blamed on the score of impertinence and a certain
prematurity of judgment, Mr. Pen was a perfectly honest critic; a great deal
too candid for Mr. Bungay’s purposes, indeed, who grumbled sadly at his
impartiality. Pen and his chief, the Captain, had a dispute upon this subject
one day. “In the name of common-sense, Mr. Pendennis,” Shandon
asked, “what have you been doing—praising one of Mr. Bacon’s
books? Bungay has been with me in a fury this morning at seeing a laudatory
article upon one of the works of the odious firm over the way.”</p>
<p>Pen’s eyes opened with wide astonishment. “Do you mean to
say,” he asked, “that we are to praise no books that Bacon
publishes: or that, if the books are good, we are to say they are bad?”</p>
<p>“My good young friend—for what do you suppose a benevolent
publisher undertakes a critical journal, to benefit his rival?” Shandon
inquired.</p>
<p>“To benefit himself certainly, but to tell the truth too,” Pen
said, “ruat coelum, to tell the truth.”</p>
<p>“And my prospectus,” said Shandon, with a laugh and a sneer;
“do you consider that was a work of mathematical accuracy of
statement?”</p>
<p>“Pardon me, that is not the question,” Pen said “and I
don’t think you very much care to argue it. I had some qualms of
conscience about that same prospectus, and debated the matter with my friend
Warrington. We agreed, however,” Pen said, laughing “that because
the prospectus was rather declamatory and poetical, and the giant was painted
upon the show-board rather larger than the original, who was inside the
caravan; we need not be too scrupulous about this trifling inaccuracy, but
might do our part of the show, without loss of character or remorse of
conscience. We are the fiddlers, and play our tunes only; you are the
showman.”</p>
<p>“And leader of the van,” said Shandon. “Well, I am glad that
your conscience gave you leave to play for us.”</p>
<p>“Yes, but,” said Pen, with a fine sense of the dignity of his
position, “we are all party men in England, and I will stick to my party
like a Briton. I will be as good-natured as you like to our own side, he is a
fool who quarrels with his own nest; and I will hit the enemy as hard as you
like—but with fair play, Captain, if you please. One can’t tell all
the truth, I suppose; but one can tell nothing but the truth; and I would
rather starve, by Jove, and never earn another penny by my pen” (this
redoubted instrument had now been in use for some six weeks, and Pen spoke of
it with vast enthusiasm and respect) “than strike an opponent an unfair
blow, or, if called upon to place him, rank him below his honest desert.”</p>
<p>“Well, Mr. Pendennis, when we want Bacon smashed, we must get some other
hammer to do it,” Shandon said, with fatal good-nature; and very likely
thought within himself, “A few years hence perhaps the young gentleman
won’t be so squeamish.” The veteran Condottiere himself was no
longer so scrupulous. He had fought and killed on so many a side for many a
year past, that remorse had long left him. “Gad,” said he,
“you’ve a tender conscience, Mr. Pendennis. It’s the luxury
of all novices, and I may have had one once myself; but that sort of bloom
wears off with the rubbing of the world, and I’m not going to the trouble
myself of putting on an artificial complexion, like our pious friend Wenham, or
our model of virtue, Wagg.”</p>
<p>“I don’t know whether some people’s hypocrisy is not better,
Captain, than others’ cynicism.”</p>
<p>“It’s more profitable, at any rate,” said the Captain, biting
his nails. “That Wenham is as dull a quack as ever quacked: and you see
the carriage in which he drove to dinner. Faith, it’ll be a long time
before Mrs. Shandon will take a drive in her own chariot. God help her, poor
thing!” And Pen went away from his chief, after their little dispute and
colloquy, pointing his own moral to the Captain’s tale, and thinking to
himself, “Behold this man, stored with genius, wit, learning, and a
hundred good natural gifts: see how he has wrecked them, by paltering with his
honesty, and forgetting to respect himself. Wilt thou remember thyself, O Pen?
thou art conceited enough! Wilt thou sell thy honour for a bottle? No, by
heaven’s grace, we will be honest, whatever befalls, and our mouths shall
only speak the truth when they open.”</p>
<p>A punishment, or, at least, a trial, was in store for Mr. Pen. In the very next
number of the Pall Mall Gazette, Warrington read out, with roars of laughter,
an article which by no means amused Arthur Pendennis, who was himself at work
with a criticism for the next week’s number of the same journal; and in
which the Spring Annual was ferociously maltreated by some unknown writer. The
person of all most cruelly mauled was Pen himself. His verses had not appeared
with his own name in the Spring Annual, but under an assumed signature. As he
had refused to review the book, Shandon had handed it over to Mr. Bludyer, with
directions to that author to dispose of it. And he had done so effectually. Mr.
Bludyer, who was a man of very considerable talent, and of a race which, I
believe, is quite extinct in the press of our time, had a certain notoriety in
his profession, and reputation for savage humour. He smashed and trampled down
the poor spring flowers with no more mercy than a bull would have on a
parterre; and having cut up the volume to his heart’s content, went and
sold it at a bookstall, and purchased a pint of brandy with the proceeds of the
volume.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />