<h2>EXPRESSION</h2>
<p>Strange to say, the eyes of children, whose minds are so small, express
intelligence better than do the greater number of adult eyes.
David Garrick’s were evidently unpreoccupied, like theirs.
The look of intelligence is outward—frankly directed upon external
things; it is observant, and therefore mobile without inner restlessness.
For restless eyes are the least observant of all—they move by
a kind of distraction. The looks of observant eyes, moving with
the living things they keep in sight, have many pauses as well as flights.
This is the action of intelligence, whereas the eyes of intellect are
detained or darkened.</p>
<p>Rational perception, with all its phases of humour, are best expressed
by a child, who has few second thoughts to divide the image of his momentary
feeling. His simplicity adds much to the manifestation of his
intelligence. The child is the last and lowest of rational creatures,
for in him the “rational soul” closes its long downward
flight with the bright final revelation.</p>
<p>He has also the chief beauty of the irrational soul of the mind,
that is, of the lower animal—which is singleness. The simplicity,
the integrity, the one thing at a time, of a good animal’s eyes
is a great beauty, and is apt to cause us to exaggerate our sense of
their expressiveness. An animal’s eyes, at their best, are
very slightly expressive; languor or alertness, the quick expectation,
even the aloofness of doubt they are able to show, but the showing is
mechanical; the human sentiment of the spectator adds the rest.</p>
<p>All this simplicity the child has, at moments, with the divisions
and delicacies of the rational soul, also. His looks express the
first, the last, and the clearest humanity. He is the first by
his youth and the last by his lowliness. He is the beginning and
the result of the creation of man.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />