<h2>REAL CHILDHOOD</h2>
<p>The world is old because its history is made up of successive childhoods
and of their impressions. Your hours when you were six were the
enormous hours of the mind that has little experience and constant and
quick forgetfulness. Therefore when your mother’s visitor
held you so long at his knee, while he talked to her the excited gibberish
of the grown-up, he little thought what he forced upon you; what the
things he called minutes really were, measured by a mind unused; what
passive and then what desperate weariness he held you to by his slightly
gesticulating hands that pressed some absent-minded caress, rated by
you at its right value, in the pauses of his anecdotes. You, meanwhile,
were infinitely tired of watching the play of his conversing moustache.</p>
<p>Indeed, the contrast of the length of contemporary time (this pleonasm
is inevitable) is no small mystery, and the world has never had the
wit fully to confess it.</p>
<p>You remembered poignantly the special and singular duration of some
such space as your elders, perhaps, called half-an-hour—so poignantly
that you spoke of it to your sister, not exactly with emotion, but still
as a dreadful fact of life. You had better instinct than to complain
of it to the talkative, easy-living, occupied people, who had the management
of the world in their hands—your seniors. You remembered
the duration of some such separate half-hour so well that you have in
fact remembered it until now, and so now, of course, will never forget
it.</p>
<p>As to the length of Beethoven, experienced by you on duty in the
drawing room, it would be curious to know whether it was really something
greater than Beethoven had any idea of. You sat and listened,
and tried to fix a passage in your mind as a kind of half-way mark,
with the deliberate provident intention of helping yourself through
the time during a future hearing; for you knew too well that you would
have to bear it all again. You could not do the same with sermons,
because, though even more fatiguing, they were more or less different
each time.</p>
<p>While your elders passed over some particularly tedious piece of
road—and a very tedious piece of road existed within short distance
of every house you lived in or stayed in—in their usual state
of partial absence of mind, you, on the contrary, perceived every inch
of it. As to the length of a bad night, or of a mere time of wakefulness
at night, adult words do not measure it; they hardly measure the time
of merely waiting for sleep in childhood. Moreover, you were tired
of other things, apart from the duration of time—the names of
streets, the names of tradesmen, especially the <i>fournisseurs</i>
of the household, who lived in them.</p>
<p>You were bored by people. It did not occur to you to be tired
of those of your own immediate family, for you loved them immemorially.
Nor were you bored by the newer personality of casual visitors, unless
they held you, as aforesaid, and made you so listen to their unintelligible
voices and so look at their mannered faces that they released you an
older child than they took you prisoner. But—it is a reluctant
confession—you were tired of your relations; you were weary of
their bonnets. Measured by adult time, those bonnets were, it
is to be presumed, of no more than reasonable duration; they had no
more than the average or common life. You have no reason, looking
back, to believe that your great-aunts wore bonnets for great and indefinite
spaces of time. But, to your sense as a child, long and changing
and developing days saw the same harassing artificial flowers hoisted
up with the same black lace. You would have had a scruple of conscience
as to really disliking the face, but you deliberately let yourself go
in detesting the bonnet. So with dresses, especially such as had
any little misfit about them. For you it had always existed, and
there was no promise of its ceasing. You seemed to have been aware
of it for years. By the way, there would be less cheap reproving
of little girls for desiring new clothes if the censors knew how immensely
old their old clothes are to them.</p>
<p>The fact is that children have a simple sense of the unnecessary
ugliness of things, and that—apart from the effects of <i>ennui</i>—they
reject that ugliness actively. You have stood and listened to
your mother’s compliments on her friend’s hat, and have
made your mental protest in very definite words. You thought it
hideous, and hideous things offended you then more than they have ever
offended you since. At nine years old you made people, alas! responsible
for their faces, as you do still in a measure, though you think you
do not. You severely made them answer for their clothes, in a
manner which you have seen good reason, in later life, to mitigate.
Upon curls, or too much youthfulness in the aged, you had no mercy.
To sum up the things you hated inordinately, they were friskiness of
manner and of trimmings, and curls combined with rather bygone or frumpish
fashions. Too much childish dislike was wasted so.</p>
<p>But you admired some things without regard to rules of beauty learnt
later. At some seven years old you dwelt with delight upon the
contrast of a white kid glove and a bright red wrist. Well, this
is not the received arrangement, but red and white do go well together,
and their distribution has to be taught with time. Whose were
the wrist and glove? Certainly some one’s who must have
been distressed at the <i>bouquet</i> of colour that you admired.
This, however, was but a local admiration. You did not admire
the girl as a whole. She whom you adored was always a married
woman of a certain age; rather faded, it might be, but always divinely
elegant. She alone was worthy to stand at the side of your mother.
You lay in wait for the border of her train, and dodged for a chance
of holding her bracelet when she played. You composed prose in
honour of her and called the composition (for reasons unknown to yourself)
a “catalogue.” She took singularly little notice of
you.</p>
<p>Wordsworth cannot say too much of your passion for nature.
The light of summer morning before sunrise was to you a spiritual splendour
for which you wanted no name. The Mediterranean under the first
perceptible touch of the moon, the calm southern sea in the full blossom
of summer, the early spring everywhere, in the showery streets, in the
fields, or at sea, left old childish memories with you which you try
to evoke now when you see them again. But the cloudy dusk behind
poplars on the plains of France, the flying landscape from the train,
willows, and the last of the light, were more mournful to you then than
you care to remember now. So were the black crosses on the graves
of the French village; so were cypresses, though greatly beloved.</p>
<p>If you were happy enough to be an internationally educated child,
you had much at heart the heart of every country you knew. You
disliked the English accent of your compatriots abroad with a scorn
to which, needless to say, you are not tempted now. You had shocks
of delight from Swiss woods full of lilies of the valley, and from English
fields full of cowslips. You had disquieting dreams of landscape
and sun, and of many of these you cannot now tell which were visions
of travel and which visions of slumber. Your strong sense of place
made you love some places too keenly for peace.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />