<h2><SPAN name="CHAPTER_III" id="CHAPTER_III"></SPAN>CHAPTER III.</h2>
<p class="subheader">THE “SAROS” AND THE PERIODICITY OF
ECLIPSES.</p>
<p class="newchapter"><span class="firstword">To</span> bring about an eclipse of the Sun, two things
must combine: (1) the Moon must be at or near
one of its Nodes; and (2), this must be at a time
when the Moon is also in “Conjunction” with<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_19" id="Page_19">[19]</SPAN></span>
the Sun. Now the Moon is in Conjunction with
the Sun (= “New Moon”) 12 or 13 times in a
year, but the Sun only passes through the Nodes
of the Moon’s orbit twice a year. Hence an
eclipse of the Sun does not and cannot occur at
every New Moon, but only occasionally. An <i>exact</i>
coincidence of Earth, Moon, and Sun, in a straight
line at a Node is not necessary to ensure an
eclipse of the Sun. So long as the Moon is
within about 18½° of its Node, with a latitude
of not more than 1° 34′, an eclipse <i>may</i> take
place. If, however, the distance is less than
15¼° and the latitude less than 1° 23′ an eclipse
<i>must</i> take place, though between these limits<SPAN name="FNanchor_4_4" id="FNanchor_4_4"></SPAN><SPAN href="#Footnote_4_4" class="fnanchor">[4]</SPAN> the
occurrence of an eclipse is uncertain and depends
on what are called the “horizontal parallaxes” and
the “apparent semi-diameters” of the two bodies
at the moment of conjunction, in other words,
on the nearness or “far-offness” of the bodies
in question. Another complication is introduced
into these matters by reason of the fact that the
Nodes of the Moon’s orbit do not occupy a fixed
position, but have an annual retrograde motion
of about 19¼°, in virtue of which a complete
revolution of the Nodes round the ecliptic is accomplished
in 18 years 218⅞ days (= 18.5997 years).</p>
<p>The backward movement of the Moon’s Nodes
combined with the apparent motion of the Sun in
the ecliptic causes the Moon in its monthly course
round the Earth to complete a revolution with
respect to its Nodes in a less time (27.2 days) than
it takes to get back to Conjunction with the Sun<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_20" id="Page_20">[20]</SPAN></span>
(29.5 days); and a curious consequence, as we shall
see directly, flows from these facts and from one
other fact. The other fact is to the Sun starting
coincident with one of the Moon’s Nodes, returns
on the Ecliptic to the same Node in 346.6 days.
The first named period of 27.2 days is called the
“<i>Nodical</i> Revolution of the Moon” or “Draconic
Month,” the other period of 29.5 days is called
the “<i>Synodical</i> Revolution of the Moon.” Now
the curious consequence of these figures being
what they are is that 242 Draconic Months,
223 Lunations, and 19 Returns of the Sun to one
and the same Node of the Moon’s orbit, are all
accomplished in the same time within 11 hours.
Thus (ignoring refinements of decimals):—</p>
<table class="periods">
<tr><th></th><th>Days</th><th></th><th>Days.</th><th></th><th>Years.</th><th>Days.</th><th>Hours.</th></tr>
<tr><td class="right">242 times</td><td class="right">27.2</td><td>=</td><td>6585.36</td><td>=</td><td class="center">18</td><td class="center">10</td><td class="right" style="padding-right: 1.3ex">8½</td></tr>
<tr><td class="right">223 times</td><td class="right">29.5</td><td>=</td><td>6585.32</td><td>=</td><td class="center">18</td><td class="center">10</td><td class="right" style="padding-right: 1.3ex">7¾</td></tr>
<tr><td class="right">19 times</td><td class="right">346.6</td><td>=</td><td>6585.78</td><td>=</td><td class="center">18</td><td class="center">10</td><td class="right" style="padding-right: 1.3ex">18¾</td></tr>
</table>
<p>The interpretation to be put upon these coincidences
is this: that supposing Sun and Moon to
start together from a Node they would, after the
lapse of 6585 days and a fraction, be found again
together very near the same Node. During the
interval there would have been 223 New and
Full Moons. The exact time required for 223
Lunations is such that in the case supposed the
223rd conjunction of the two bodies would
happen a little before they reached the Node;
their distance therefrom would be 28′ of arc. And
the final fact is that eclipses recur in almost, though
not quite, the same regular order every 6585⅓
days, or more exactly, 18 years, 10 days, 7 hours,
42 minutes.<SPAN name="FNanchor_5_5" id="FNanchor_5_5"></SPAN><SPAN href="#Footnote_5_5" class="fnanchor">[5]</SPAN> This is the celebrated Chaldean<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_21" id="Page_21">[21]</SPAN></span>
“<span class="smcap">Saros</span>,” and was used by the ancients (and
can still be used by the moderns in the way of
a pastime) for the prediction of eclipses alike of
the Sun and of the Moon.</p>
<p class="newsection">At the end of a Saros period, starting from any
date that may have been chosen, the Moon will
be in the same position with respect to the Sun,
nearly in the same part of the heavens, nearly in
the same part of its orbit, and very nearly indeed
at the same distance from its Node as at the date
chosen for the <i>terminus a quo</i> of the Saros. But
there are trifling discrepancies in the case (the
difference of about 11 hours between 223 lunations
and 19 returns of the Sun to the Moon’s Node is
one) and these have an appreciable effect in disturbing
not so much the sequence of the eclipses
in the next following Saros as their magnitude
and visibility at given places on the Earth’s
surface. Hence, a more accurate succession will
be obtained by combining 3 Saros periods, making
54 years, 31 days; while, best of all, to secure
an almost perfect repetition of a series of eclipses
will be a combination of 48 Saroses, making 865
years for the Moon; and of about 70 Saroses, or
more than 1200 years for the Sun.</p>
<p>These considerations are leading us rather too
far afield. Let us return to a more simple condition
of things. The practical use of the Saros
in its most elementary conception is somewhat on
this wise. Given 18 or 19 old Almanacs ranging,
say, from 1880 to 1898, how can we turn to
account the information they afford us in order
to obtain from them information respecting the<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_22" id="Page_22">[22]</SPAN></span>
eclipses which will happen between 1899 and
1917? Nothing easier. Add 18<sup>y</sup> 10<sup>d</sup> 7<sup>h</sup> 42<sup>m</sup> to
the middle time of every eclipse which took place
between 1880 and 1898 beginning, say, with the
last of 1879 or the first of 1880, and we shall find
what eclipses will happen in 1898 and 17 following
years, as witness by way of example the
following table:—</p>
<table class="calculation" style="border-collapse: collapse">
<tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td style="vertical-align: bottom">d.</td><td style="vertical-align: bottom">h.</td><td style="vertical-align: bottom">m.</td><td>Error of Saros by<br/>Exact Calculation.</td></tr>
<tr><td class="center" style="padding-left: 3em; padding-right: 3em">Moon.</td><td class="right">1879</td><td>Dec.</td><td>28</td><td>4</td><td>26 p.m.</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td class="left" style="padding-bottom: 1ex">(Mag. 0.17)</td><td class="right">18</td><td></td><td>10</td><td>7</td><td>42</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td class="left line">(Mag. 0.16)</td><td class="right line">1898</td><td class="line">Jan.</td><td class="line">8</td><td class="line">12</td><td class="line">8 a.m.</td><td class="noline">(civil time) +3 m.</td></tr>
<tr><td> </td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>d.</td><td>h.</td><td>m.</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td class="center">Sun.</td><td class="right">1880</td><td>Jan.</td><td>11</td><td>10</td><td>48 p.m.</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td class="left" style="padding-bottom: 1ex">(Total)</td><td class="right">18</td><td></td><td>10</td><td>7</td><td>42</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td class="left line">(Total)</td><td class="right line">1898</td><td class="line">Jan.</td><td class="line">22</td><td class="line">6</td><td class="line">30 a.m.</td><td class="noline">(civil time) -1 h. 7 m.</td></tr>
<tr><td> </td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>d.</td><td>h.</td><td>m.</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td class="center">Moon.</td><td class="right">1880</td><td>June</td><td>22</td><td>1</td><td>50 p.m.</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td class="left" style="padding-bottom: 1ex">(Mag. Total)</td><td class="right">18</td><td></td><td>11</td><td>7</td><td>42</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td class="left line">(Mag. 0.93)</td><td class="right line">1898</td><td class="line">July</td><td class="line">3</td><td class="line">9</td><td class="line">32 p.m.</td><td class="noline">+35 m.</td></tr>
<tr><td> </td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>d.</td><td>h.</td><td>m.</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td class="center">Sun.</td><td class="right">1880</td><td>July</td><td>7</td><td>1</td><td>35 p.m.</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td class="left" style="padding-bottom: 1ex">(Mag. Annular)</td><td class="right">18</td><td></td><td>11</td><td>7</td><td>42</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td class="left line">(Mag. Annular)</td><td class="right line">1898</td><td class="line">July</td><td class="line">18</td><td class="line">9</td><td class="line">17 p.m.</td><td class="noline">+1 h. 10 m.</td></tr>
<tr><td> </td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>d.</td><td>h.</td><td>m.</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td class="center">Sun.</td><td class="right">1880</td><td>Dec.</td><td>2</td><td>3</td><td>11 a.m.</td><td>(civil time).</td></tr>
<tr><td class="left" style="padding-bottom: 1ex">(Mag. 0.04)</td><td class="right">18</td><td></td><td>11</td><td>7</td><td>42</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td class="left line">(Mag. 0.02)</td><td class="right line">1898</td><td class="line">Dec.</td><td class="line">13</td><td class="line">10</td><td class="line">53 a.m.</td><td class="noline">-1 h. 5 m.</td></tr>
<tr><td> </td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>d.</td><td>h.</td><td>m.</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td class="center">Moon.</td><td class="right">1880</td><td>Dec.</td><td>16</td><td>3</td><td>39 p.m.</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td class="left" style="padding-bottom: 1ex">(Mag. Total)</td><td class="right">18</td><td></td><td>11</td><td>7</td><td>42</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td class="left line">(Mag. Total)</td><td class="right line">1898</td><td class="line">Dec.</td><td class="line">27</td><td class="line">11</td><td class="line">21 p.m.</td><td class="noline">-13 m.</td></tr>
<tr><td> </td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>d.</td><td>h.</td><td>m.</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td class="center">Sun.</td><td class="right">1880</td><td>Dec.</td><td>31</td><td>1</td><td>45 p.m.</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td class="left" style="padding-bottom: 1ex">(Mag. 0.71)</td><td class="right">18</td><td></td><td>11</td><td>7</td><td>42</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td class="left line">(Mag. 0.72)</td><td class="right line">1899</td><td class="line">Jan.</td><td class="line">11</td><td class="line">9</td><td class="line">27 p.m.</td><td class="noline">-1 h. 11 m.</td></tr>
</table>
<p><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_23" id="Page_23">[23]</SPAN></span>There having been 5 recurrences of Feb. 29
between Dec. 1879 and Jan. 1899, 5 leap years
having intervened, we have to add an extra
day to the Saros period in the later part of the
above Table.<SPAN name="FNanchor_6_6" id="FNanchor_6_6"></SPAN><SPAN href="#Footnote_6_6" class="fnanchor">[6]</SPAN></p>
<p>Let us make another start and see what we can
learn from the eclipses, say, of 1883.</p>
<table class="calculation" style="border-collapse: collapse">
<tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td style="vertical-align: bottom">d.</td><td style="vertical-align: bottom">h.</td><td style="vertical-align: bottom">m.</td><td>Error of Saros by<br/>Exact Calculation.</td></tr>
<tr><td class="center" style="padding-left: 3em; padding-right: 3em">Moon</td><td class="right">1883</td><td>April</td><td>22</td><td>11</td><td>39 a.m.</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td class="left" style="padding-bottom: 1ex">(Mag. 0.8)</td><td class="right">18</td><td></td><td>11</td><td>7</td><td>42</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td class="left line">(Mag. Penumbral)</td><td class="right line">1901</td><td class="line">May</td><td class="line">3</td><td class="line">7</td><td class="line">21 p.m.</td><td class="noline">+51 m.</td></tr>
<tr><td> </td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>d.</td><td>h.</td><td>m.</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td class="center">Sun</td><td class="right">1883</td><td>May</td><td>6</td><td>9</td><td>45 p.m.</td><td>Visible, Philippines.</td></tr>
<tr><td class="left" style="padding-bottom: 1ex">(Mag. Total)</td><td class="right">18</td><td></td><td>11</td><td>7</td><td>42</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td class="left line">(Mag. Total)</td><td class="right line">1901</td><td class="line">May</td><td class="line">18</td><td class="line">5</td><td class="line">27 a.m.</td><td class="noline">(civil time). -2 m.</td></tr>
<tr><td> </td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>d.</td><td>h.</td><td>m.</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td class="center">Moon</td><td class="right">1883</td><td>Oct.</td><td>16</td><td>6</td><td>54 a.m.</td><td>Visible, California.</td></tr>
<tr><td class="left" style="padding-bottom: 1ex">(Mag. 0.28)</td><td class="right">18</td><td></td><td>11</td><td>7</td><td>42</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td class="left line">(Mag. 0.23)</td><td class="right line">1901</td><td class="line">Oct.</td><td class="line">27</td><td class="line">2</td><td class="line">36 p.m.</td><td class="noline">-39 m.</td></tr>
<tr><td> </td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>d.</td><td>h.</td><td>m.</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td class="center">Sun</td><td class="right">1883</td><td>Oct.</td><td>30</td><td>11</td><td>37 p.m.</td><td>Visible, N. Japan.</td></tr>
<tr><td class="left" style="padding-bottom: 1ex">(Mag. Annular)</td><td class="right">18</td><td></td><td>11</td><td>7</td><td>42</td><td></td></tr>
<tr><td class="left line">(Mag. Annular)</td><td class="right line">1901</td><td class="line">Nov.</td><td class="line">11</td><td class="line">7</td><td class="line">19 a.m.</td><td class="noline">(civil time) +1 m.</td></tr>
</table>
<p>The foregoing does not by any means exhaust
all that can be said respecting the Saros even on
the popular side.</p>
<p>If the Saros comprised an exact number of
days, each eclipse of a second Saros series would
be visible in the same regions of the Earth as the<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_24" id="Page_24">[24]</SPAN></span>
corresponding eclipse in the previous series. But
since there is a surplus fraction of nearly one-third
of a day, each subsequent eclipse will be visible
in another region of the Earth, which will be
roughly a third of the Earth’s circumference in
longitude backwards (<i>i.e.</i> about 120° to the W.),
because the Earth itself will be turned on its
axis one-third forwards.</p>
<p>After what has been said as to the Saros and its
use it might be supposed that a correct list of eclipses
for 18.03 years would suffice for all ordinary purposes
of eclipse prediction, and that the sequence
of eclipses at any future time might be ascertained
by adding to some one eclipse which had already
happened so many Saros periods as might embrace
the years future whose eclipses it was
desired to study. This would be true in a sense,
but would not be literally and effectively true,
because corresponding eclipses do not recur exactly
under the same conditions, for there are small
residual discrepancies in the times and circumstances
affecting the real movements of the Earth
and Moon and the apparent movement of the
Sun which, in the lapse of years and centuries,
accumulate sufficiently to dislocate what otherwise
would be exact coincidences. Thus an
eclipse of the Moon which in <small>A.D.</small> 565 was of
6 digits<SPAN name="FNanchor_7_7" id="FNanchor_7_7"></SPAN><SPAN href="#Footnote_7_7" class="fnanchor">[7]</SPAN> was in 583 of 7 digits, and in 601
nearly 8. In 908 the eclipse became total, and
remained so for about twelve periods, or until
1088. This eclipse continued to diminish until
the beginning of the 15th century, when it
disappeared in 1413. Let us take now the life<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_25" id="Page_25">[25]</SPAN></span>
of an eclipse of the Sun. One appeared at the
North Pole in June <small>A.D.</small> 1295, and showed itself
more and more towards the S. at each subsequent
period. On August 27, 1367, it made its
first appearance in the North of Europe; in 1439
it was visible all over Europe; in 1601, being
its 19th appearance, it was central and annular
in England; on May 5, 1818, it was visible in
London, and again on May 15, 1836. Its three next
appearances were on May 26, 1854, June 6,
1872, and June 17, 1890. At its 39th appearance,
on August 10, 1980, the Moon’s shadow
will have passed the equator, and as the eclipse
will take place nearly at midnight (Greenwich
M.T.), the phenomenon will be invisible in
Europe, Africa, and Asia. At every succeeding
period the central line of the eclipse will lie more
and more to the S., until finally, on September
30, 2665, which will be its 78th appearance, it
will vanish at the South Pole.<SPAN name="FNanchor_8_8" id="FNanchor_8_8"></SPAN><SPAN href="#Footnote_8_8" class="fnanchor">[8]</SPAN></p>
<p>The operation of the Saros effects which
have been specified above, may be noticed in
some of the groups of eclipses which have been
much in evidence (as will appear from a subsequent
chapter), during the second half of the
19th century. The following are two noteworthy
Saros groups of Solar eclipses:—</p>
<table style="border-collapse: collapse" class="sarosgroups">
<tr><td>1842</td><td class="right lr">July 8.</td><td class="ll">1850</td><td class="right">Aug. 7.</td></tr>
<tr><td>1860</td><td class="right lr">" 18.</td><td class="ll">1868</td><td class="right">" 17.</td></tr>
<tr><td>1878</td><td class="right lr" >" 29.</td><td class="ll">1886</td><td class="right">" 29.</td></tr>
<tr><td>1896</td><td class="right lr">Aug. 9.</td><td class="ll">1904</td><td class="right">Sept. 9.</td></tr>
</table>
<p><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_26" id="Page_26">[26]</SPAN></span>If the curious reader will trace, by means of
the <i>Nautical Almanac</i> (or some other Almanac
which deals with eclipses in adequate detail), the
geographical distribution of the foregoing eclipses
on the Earth’s surface, he will see that they fulfil
the statement made on p. 24 (<i>ante</i>), that a Saros
eclipse when it reappears, does so in regions of
the Earth averaging 120° of longitude to the W.
of those in which it had, on the last preceding
occasion, been seen; and also that it gradually
works northwards or southwards.</p>
<p>But a given Saros eclipse in its successive
reappearances undergoes other transformations
besides that of Terrestrial longitude. These are
well set forth by Professor Newcomb<SPAN name="FNanchor_9_9" id="FNanchor_9_9"></SPAN><SPAN href="#Footnote_9_9" class="fnanchor">[9]</SPAN>:—</p>
<p>“Since every successive recurrence of such an
eclipse throws the conjunction 28′ further toward
the W. of the node, the conjunction must, in
process of time, take place so far back from the
node that no eclipse will occur, and the series
will end. For the same reason there must be
a commencement to the series, the first eclipse
being E. of the node. A new eclipse thus
entering will at first be a very small one, but
will be larger at every recurrence in each Saros.
If it is an eclipse of the Moon, it will be total
from its 13th until its 36th recurrence. There
will be then about 13 partial eclipses, each of
which will be smaller than the last, when they
will fail entirely, the conjunction taking place<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_27" id="Page_27">[27]</SPAN></span>
so far from the node that the Moon does not
touch the Earth’s shadow. The whole interval
of time over which a series of lunar eclipses thus
extend will be about 48 periods, or 865 years.
When a series of solar eclipses begins, the penumbra
of the first will just graze the earth not
far from one of the poles. There will then be,
on the average, 11 or 12 partial eclipses of the
Sun, each larger than the preceding one, occurring
at regular intervals of one Saros. Then the
central line, whether it be that of a total or
annular eclipse, will begin to touch the Earth,
and we shall have a series of 40 or 50 central
eclipses. The central line will strike near one
pole in the first part of the series; in the equatorial
regions about the middle of the series, and
will leave the Earth by the other pole at the end.
Ten or twelve partial eclipses will follow, and
this particular series will cease.”</p>
<p>These facts deserve to be expanded a little.</p>
<p>We have seen that all eclipses may be grouped
in a series, and that 18 years or thereabouts is
the duration of each series, or Saros cycle. But
these cycles are themselves subject to cycles, so
that the Saros itself passes through a cycle of
about 64 Saroses before the conditions under which
any given start was made, come quite round again.
Sixty-four times 18 make 1152, so that the duration
of a Solar eclipse Great Cycle may be taken
at about 1150 years. The progression of such a
series across the face of the Earth is thus described
by Mrs. Todd, who gives a very clear
account of the matter:—</p>
<p>“The advent of a slight partial eclipse near<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_28" id="Page_28">[28]</SPAN></span>
either pole of the Earth will herald the
beginning of the new series. At each succeeding
return conformably to the Saros,
the partial eclipse will move a little further
towards the opposite pole, its magnitude
gradually increasing for about 200 years, but
during all this time only the lunar penumbra
will impinge upon the Earth. But when the
true shadow begins to touch, the obscuration
will have become annular or total near the pole
where it first appeared. The eclipse has now
acquired a track, which will cross the Earth
slightly farther from that pole every time it
returns, for about 750 years. At the conclusion
of this interval, the shadow path will have
reached the opposite pole; the eclipse will then
become partial again, and continue to grow
smaller and smaller for about 200 years additional.
The series then ceases to exist, its
entire duration having been about 1150 years.
The series of “great eclipses” of which two
occurred in 1865 and 1883, while others will
happen in 1901, 1919, 1937, 1955, and 1973,
affords an excellent instance of the northward
progression of eclipse tracks; and another series,
with totality nearly as great (1850, 1868, 1886,
1904, and 1922), is progressing slowly southwards.”</p>
<p>The word “Digit,” formerly used in connection
with eclipses, requires some explanation. The
origin of the word is obvious enough, coming as
it does from the Latin word <i>Digitus</i>, a finger.
But as human beings have only eight fingers and
two thumbs it is by no means clear how the word<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_29" id="Page_29">[29]</SPAN></span>
came to be used for twelfths of the disc of the
Sun or Moon instead of tenths. However, such
was the case; and when a 16th-century astronomer
spoke of an eclipse of six digits, he meant
that one-half of the luminary in question, be it
Sun or Moon, was covered. The earliest use
of the word “Digit” in this connection was to
refer to the twelfth part of the visible <i>surface</i>
of the Sun or Moon; but before the word went
out of use, it came to be applied to twelfths of the
visible <i>diameter</i> of the disc of the Sun or Moon,
which was much more convenient. However,
the word is now almost obsolete in both senses,
and partial eclipses, alike of the Sun and of the
Moon, are defined in decimal parts of the diameter
of the luminary—tenths or hundredths
according to the amount of precision which is
aimed at. Where an eclipse of the Moon is
described as being of more than 12 Digits or
more than 1.0 (= 1 diameter) it is to be understood
that the eclipse will be (or was) not only
total, but that the Moon will be (or was) immersed
in the Earth’s shadow with a more or
less considerable extent of shadow encompassing
it.</p>
<p>There are some further matters which require
to be mentioned connected with the periodicity of
eclipses. To use a phrase which is often employed,
there is such a thing as an “Eclipse Season,”
and what this is can only be adequately comprehended
by looking through a catalogue of eclipses
for a number of years arranged in a tabular form,
and by collating the months or groups of months
in which batches of eclipses occur. This is not<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_30" id="Page_30">[30]</SPAN></span>
an obvious matter to the casual purchaser of an
almanac, who, feeling just a slight interest in the
eclipses of a coming new year, dips into his new
purchase to see what those eclipses will be. A
haphazard glance at the almanacs of even two or
three successive years will probably fail to bring
home to him the idea that each year has its own
eclipse season in which eclipses may occur, and
that eclipses are not to be looked for save at two
special epochs, which last about a month each,
and which are separated from one another and
from the eclipse seasons of the previous and of
the following years by intervals of about six
months, within a few days more or less. Such,
however, is the case. A little thought will soon
make it clear why such should be the case. We
have already seen that the Moon’s orbit, like that
of every other planetary member of the Solar
System, has two crossing places with respect to
the ecliptic which are called “Nodes.” We know
also that the apparent motion of the Sun causes
that body to traverse the whole of the ecliptic in
the course of the year. The conjoint result of all
this is that the Moon passes through a Node
twice in every lunar month of 27 days, and
the Sun passes (apparently) through a Node
twice in every year. The first ultimate result of
these facts is that eclipses can only take place at
or near the nodal passages of the Moon and the
Sun, and that as the Sun’s nodal passages are
separated by six months in every case the average
interval between each set of eclipses, if there
is more than one, must in all cases be six months,
more or less by a few days, dependent upon the<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_31" id="Page_31">[31]</SPAN></span>
latitude and longitude of the Moon at or about
the time of its Conjunction or Opposition under
the circumstances already detailed. If the logic
of this commends itself to the reader’s mind, he
will see at once why eclipses or groups of eclipses
must be separated by intervals of about half an
ordinary year. Hence it comes about that, taking
one year with another, it may be said that we
shall always have a couple of principal eclipses
with an interval of half a year (say 183 days)
between each; and that on either side of these
dominant eclipses there will, or may be, a fortnight
before or a fortnight after, two other pairs
of eclipses with, in occasional years, one extra
thrown in. It is in this way that we obtain
what it has already been said dogmatically that
we do obtain; namely, always in one year two
eclipses, which must be both of the Sun, or any
number of eclipses up to seven, which number
will be unequally allotted to the Sun or to the
Moon according to circumstances.</p>
<p>Though it is roughly correct to say that the
two eclipse seasons of every year run to about a
month each, in length, yet it may be desirable to
be a little more precise, and to say that the limits
of time for solar eclipses cover 36 days (namely
18 days before and 18 days after the Sun’s nodal
passages); whilst in the case of the Moon, the
limits are the lesser interval of 23 days, being
11½ on either side of the Moon’s nodal passages.</p>
<p>We have already seen<SPAN name="FNanchor_10_10" id="FNanchor_10_10"></SPAN><SPAN href="#Footnote_10_10" class="fnanchor">[10]</SPAN> that the Moon’s nodes
are perpetually undergoing a change of place.
Were it not so, eclipses of the Sun and Moon<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_32" id="Page_32">[32]</SPAN></span>
would always happen year after year in the same
pair of months for us on the Earth. But the
operative effect of the shifting of the nodes is to
displace backwards the eclipse seasons by about
20 days. For instance in 1899 the eclipse seasons
fall in June and December. The middle of the
eclipse seasons for the next succeeding 20 or 30
years will be found by taking the dates of June
8 and December 2, 1899, and working the months
backwards by the amount of 19⅔ days for each
succeeding year. Thus the eclipse seasons in
1900 will fall in the months of May and
November; accordingly amongst the eclipses of
that year we shall find eclipses on May 28, June
13, and November 22.</p>
<p>Perhaps it would tend to the more complete
elucidation of the facts stated in the last half
dozen pages, if I were to set out in a tabular
form all the eclipses of a succession, say of half a
Saros or 9 years, and thus exhibit by an appeal
to the eye directly the grouping of eclipse seasons
the principles of which I have been endeavouring
to define and explain in words.</p>
<table class="seasons">
<tr><td>1894.</td><td>March</td><td class="right">21.</td><td class="right">☾</td><td rowspan="2"><span style="font-size: 200%">}</span></td><td rowspan="2" class="vcenter">March</td><td rowspan="2" class="vcenter right">29.</td><td rowspan="2" class="vcenter">*</td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td>April</td><td class="right">6.</td><td class="right">☉</td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td>Sept.</td><td class="right">15.</td><td class="right">☾</td><td rowspan="2"><span style="font-size: 200%">}</span></td><td rowspan="2" class="vcenter">Sept.</td><td rowspan="2" class="vcenter right">22.</td><td rowspan="2" class="vcenter">**</td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td>Sept.</td><td class="right">29.</td><td class="right">☉</td></tr>
<tr><td>1895.</td><td>March</td><td class="right">11.</td><td class="right">☾</td><td rowspan="2"><span style="font-size: 200%">}</span></td><td rowspan="2" class="vcenter">March</td><td rowspan="2" class="vcenter right">18.</td><td rowspan="2" class="vcenter">*</td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td>March</td><td class="right">26.</td><td class="right">☉</td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td>Aug.</td><td class="right">20.</td><td class="right">☉</td><td rowspan="3"><span style="font-size: 300%">}</span></td><td rowspan="3" class="vcenter">Sept.</td><td rowspan="3" class="vcenter right">4.</td><td rowspan="3" class="vcenter">**</td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td>Sept.</td><td class="right">4.</td><td class="right">☾</td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td>Sept.</td><td class="right">18.</td><td class="right">☉</td></tr>
<tr><td><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_33" id="Page_33">[33]</SPAN></span>1896.</td><td>Feb.</td><td class="right">13.</td><td class="right">☉</td><td rowspan="2"><span style="font-size: 200%">}</span></td><td rowspan="2" class="vcenter">Feb.</td><td rowspan="2" class="vcenter right">20.</td><td rowspan="2" class="vcenter">*</td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td>Feb.</td><td class="right">28.</td><td class="right">☾</td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td>Aug.</td><td class="right">9.</td><td class="right">☉</td><td rowspan="2"><span style="font-size: 200%">}</span></td><td rowspan="2" class="vcenter">Aug.</td><td rowspan="2" class="vcenter right">16.</td><td rowspan="2" class="vcenter">**</td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td>Aug.</td><td class="right">23.</td><td class="right">☾</td></tr>
<tr><td>1897.</td><td>Feb.</td><td class="right">1.</td><td class="right">☉</td><td></td><td>Feb.</td><td class="right">1.</td><td>*</td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td>July</td><td class="right">29.</td><td class="right">☉</td><td></td><td>July</td><td class="right">29.</td><td>**</td></tr>
<tr><td>1898.</td><td>Jan.</td><td class="right">7.</td><td class="right">☾</td><td rowspan="2"><span style="font-size: 200%">}</span></td><td rowspan="2" class="vcenter">Jan.</td><td rowspan="2" class="vcenter right">14.</td><td rowspan="2" class="vcenter">*</td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td>Jan.</td><td class="right">22.</td><td class="right">☉</td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td>July</td><td class="right">3.</td><td class="right">☾</td><td rowspan="2"><span style="font-size: 200%">}</span></td><td rowspan="2" class="vcenter">July</td><td rowspan="2" class="vcenter right">10.</td><td rowspan="2" class="vcenter">**</td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td>July</td><td class="right">18.</td><td class="right">☉</td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td>Dec.</td><td class="right">13.</td><td class="right">☉</td><td rowspan="3"><span style="font-size: 300%">}</span></td><td rowspan="3" class="vcenter">Dec.</td><td rowspan="3" class="vcenter right">27.</td><td rowspan="3" class="vcenter">*</td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td>Dec.</td><td class="right">27.</td><td class="right">☾</td></tr>
<tr><td>1899.</td><td>Jan.</td><td class="right">11.</td><td class="right">☉</td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td>June</td><td class="right">8.</td><td class="right">☉</td><td rowspan="2"><span style="font-size: 200%">}</span></td><td rowspan="2" class="vcenter">June</td><td rowspan="2" class="vcenter right">15.</td><td rowspan="2" class="vcenter">**</td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td>June</td><td class="right">23.</td><td class="right">☾</td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td>Dec.</td><td class="right">2.</td><td class="right">☉</td><td rowspan="2"><span style="font-size: 200%">}</span></td><td rowspan="2" class="vcenter">Dec.</td><td rowspan="2" class="vcenter right">9.</td><td rowspan="2" class="vcenter">*</td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td>Dec.</td><td class="right">16.</td><td class="right">☾</td></tr>
<tr><td>1900.</td><td>May</td><td class="right">28.</td><td class="right">☉</td><td rowspan="2"><span style="font-size: 200%">}</span></td><td rowspan="2" class="vcenter">June</td><td rowspan="2" class="vcenter right">5.</td><td rowspan="2" class="vcenter">**</td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td>June</td><td class="right">13.</td><td class="right">☾</td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td>Nov.</td><td class="right">22.</td><td class="right">☉</td><td></td><td>Nov.</td><td class="right">22.</td><td>*</td></tr>
<tr><td>1901.</td><td>May</td><td class="right">3.</td><td class="right">☾</td><td rowspan="2"><span style="font-size: 200%">}</span></td><td rowspan="2" class="vcenter">May</td><td rowspan="2" class="vcenter right">10.</td><td rowspan="2" class="vcenter">**</td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td>May</td><td class="right">18.</td><td class="right">☉</td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td>Oct.</td><td class="right">27.</td><td class="right">☾</td><td rowspan="2"><span style="font-size: 200%">}</span></td><td rowspan="2" class="vcenter">Nov.</td><td rowspan="2" class="vcenter right">3.</td><td rowspan="2" class="vcenter">*</td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td>Nov.</td><td class="right">11.</td><td class="right">☉</td></tr>
<tr><td>1902.</td><td>April</td><td class="right">8.</td><td class="right">☉</td><td rowspan="3"><span style="font-size: 300%">}</span></td><td rowspan="3" class="vcenter">April</td><td rowspan="3" class="vcenter right">22.</td><td rowspan="3" class="vcenter">**</td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td>April</td><td class="right">22.</td><td class="right">☾</td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td>May</td><td class="right">7.</td><td class="right">☉</td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td>Oct.</td><td class="right">17.</td><td class="right">☾</td><td rowspan="2"><span style="font-size: 200%">}</span></td><td rowspan="2" class="vcenter">Oct.</td><td rowspan="2" class="vcenter right">24.</td><td rowspan="2" class="vcenter">*</td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td>Oct.</td><td class="right">31.</td><td class="right">☉</td></tr>
</table>
<p>The Epochs in the last column which are
marked with stars (*) or (**) as the case may be,
represent corresponding nodes so that from any<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_34" id="Page_34">[34]</SPAN></span>
one single-star date to the next nearest single-star
date means an interval of one year less (on
an average) the 19⅔ days spoken of on p. 32 (<i>ante</i>).
A glance at each successive pair of dates will
quickly disclose the periodical retrogradation of
the eclipse epochs.</p>
<div class="footnotes"><p class="footnotetitle">Footnotes:</p>
<div class="footnote"><p><SPAN name="Footnote_4_4" id="Footnote_4_4"></SPAN><SPAN href="#FNanchor_4_4"><span class="label">[4]</span></SPAN> These limits are slightly different in the case of
eclipses of the Moon. (See p. 190, <i>post</i>.)</p>
</div>
<div class="footnote"><p><SPAN name="Footnote_5_5" id="Footnote_5_5"></SPAN><SPAN href="#FNanchor_5_5"><span class="label">[5]</span></SPAN> This assumes that 5 of these years are leap years.</p>
</div>
<div class="footnote"><p><SPAN name="Footnote_6_6" id="Footnote_6_6"></SPAN><SPAN href="#FNanchor_6_6"><span class="label">[6]</span></SPAN> If there are 5 leap years in the 18, the odd days will
be 10; if 4 they will be 11; if only 3 leap years (as from
1797 to 1815 and 1897 to 1915), the odd days to be added
will be 12.</p>
</div>
<div class="footnote"><p><SPAN name="Footnote_7_7" id="Footnote_7_7"></SPAN><SPAN href="#FNanchor_7_7"><span class="label">[7]</span></SPAN> See p. 28 (<i>post</i>) for an explanation of this word.</p>
</div>
<div class="footnote"><p><SPAN name="Footnote_8_8" id="Footnote_8_8"></SPAN><SPAN href="#FNanchor_8_8"><span class="label">[8]</span></SPAN> In Mrs. D. P. Todd’s interesting little book, <i>Total
Eclipses of the Sun</i> (Boston, U.S., 1894), which will be
several times referred to in this work, two maps will be
found, which will help to illustrate the successive northerly
or southerly progress of a series of Solar eclipses, during
centuries.</p>
</div>
<div class="footnote"><p><SPAN name="Footnote_9_9" id="Footnote_9_9"></SPAN><SPAN href="#FNanchor_9_9"><span class="label">[9]</span></SPAN> In his and Professor Holden’s <i>Astronomy for Schools
and Colleges</i>, p. 184.</p>
</div>
<div class="footnote"><p><SPAN name="Footnote_10_10" id="Footnote_10_10"></SPAN><SPAN href="#FNanchor_10_10"><span class="label">[10]</span></SPAN> See p. 19 (<i>ante</i>).</p>
</div>
</div>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />