<h3><SPAN name="CHAPTER_XVIII" id="CHAPTER_XVIII"></SPAN>CHAPTER XVIII<br/><br/> SUBSEQUENT ATLANTIC LINES</h3>
<p>As a natural sequence other Atlantic cables followed in course of time.</p>
<p>Thus in 1869 France was put into direct telegraphic communication with
America by means of a cable from Brest to the island of St. Pierre,<span class="pgnum"><SPAN name="page_213" id="page_213"></SPAN>{213}</span> and
another from St. Pierre to Sydney, U.S.A.<SPAN name="FNanchor_70_70" id="FNanchor_70_70"></SPAN><SPAN href="#Footnote_70_70" class="fnanchor">[70]</SPAN> The former length was
manufactured by the Telegraph Construction and Maintenance Company, and
the latter by Mr. W. T. Henley. The Telegraph Construction Company were
the contractors for laying the whole cable on behalf of the French
Atlantic Cable Company (Société du Câble Trans-Atlantique Français).<SPAN name="FNanchor_71_71" id="FNanchor_71_71"></SPAN><SPAN href="#Footnote_71_71" class="fnanchor">[71]</SPAN></p>
<p>This work was successfully accomplished from the Great Eastern (Captain
Robert Halpin) by the same staff as had laid the 1866 cable. Owing to
the route, this line was materially longer than the previous Atlantic
cables, its length (from Brest to St. Pierre) being as much as 2,685
nautical miles. The working-speed attained on the French Atlantic cable
was ten and a half words per minute. The conductor of the Brest-St.
Pierre section was composed of seven copper wires stranded together,
weighing 400 pounds per nautical mile, covered with a gutta-percha
insulator of the same weight. The core of the St. Pierre-Sydney section
was made up as follows: Copper = 107 pounds per nautical mile;
gutta-percha = 150 pounds per nautical mile. Like the previous lines,
this cable has been “down,” electrically speaking, for some years. It
proved a very costly one in repairs, one expedition alone having run
into as much as £95,000.</p>
<p>In 1873 the Direct United States Cable Company<span class="pgnum"><SPAN name="page_214" id="page_214"></SPAN>{214}</span> was formed, being the
first competitor—from this country—with the “Anglo-American”
Company.<SPAN name="FNanchor_72_72" id="FNanchor_72_72"></SPAN><SPAN href="#Footnote_72_72" class="fnanchor">[72]</SPAN> Messrs. Siemens Brothers, who had taken an active part in
the promotion of the scheme, were the contractors, both for manufacture
and for submersion. It was, indeed, the first really important length
with which this firm had been concerned as manufacturers. The laying was
attended with complete success, and the line opened to the public in
1875. Later on, in 1877, the “Direct United States” Company was
reconstructed, their system entering into the “pool” or “joint purse.”
The latter was established shortly after the 1869 Atlantic cable had
been laid, constituting one great financial combination.</p>
<p>In 1879 another French company was formed to establish independent
communication between France and the rest of the European Continent on
the one hand, and the United States of America on the other. The, to
English ears and lips, somewhat cumbersome title of this concern was La
Compagnie Française du Télégraphe de Paris à<span class="pgnum"><SPAN name="page_215" id="page_215"></SPAN>{215}</span> New York, but it soon
became styled in England the “P. Q. Company,” after M. Pouyer-Quertier,
its presiding genius. The cable was made and laid in the same year by
Messrs. Siemens Brothers, though the scheme had taken three years to
reach contract point. The “P. Q.” Company in 1894 amalgamated with La
Société Française des Télégraphes Sous-marins, under the title of La
Compagnie Française des Câbles Télégraphiques.</p>
<p>In 1881 an American company was formed, under the guidance of the late
Mr. Jay Gould, entitled The American Telegraph and Cable Company, with a
view to partaking in the profits of transatlantic telegraphy by
establishing another line of communication between the United States and
Great Britain, and thence to the rest of Europe. This cable was also
constructed and laid (in the course of that year) by Messrs. Siemens
Brothers, who were part promoters of the enterprise, as well as another
cable for the same system in the following year, 1882. This company’s
cables are leased by the Western Union Telegraph Company, which was
practically Jay Gould’s property, and remained so up to close on the
time of his death, a few years ago. In 1883 the above system entered the
“Pool”—the happy destination for which, maybe, it was originally
launched into existence.</p>
<p>A fresh competitor arrived in 1884 in the person of the Commercial Cable
Company. Two cables were laid across the Atlantic for this company in
the same year, its promoters wisely foreseeing that, in view of the
continual chance of a breakdown, this was the only way in which they
could safely attempt to compete with their more<span class="pgnum"><SPAN name="page_216" id="page_216"></SPAN>{216}</span> firmly established
rivals. The “Commercial” Company was mainly promoted by two American
millionaires, Mr. J. W. Mackay, the celebrated New York financier, and
Mr. Gordon Bennett, the proprietor of the New York Herald; with them
were associated Messrs. Siemens Brothers, who afterward became the
contractors for the enterprise. These cables, like the Jay Gould lines,
stretch from the extreme southwest point of Ireland (which is connected
by special cable with England) to Nova Scotia, and thence to the United
States, one of them direct to New York. The system is directly connected
with that of the Canadian Pacific Railroad Company, thus affording ready
communication with the Dominion.</p>
<p>Neither the “Commercial” Company’s system nor that of the Compagnie
Française des Câbles Télégraphiques is at present in the “Atlantic
Pool.”</p>
<p>In 1894 yet two more additions were made to the list of Atlantic
cables—one on behalf of the Commercial Cable Company, and the other for
the “Anglo-American” Company. The new “Commercial” line was constructed
and laid by Messrs. Siemens Brothers, and the “Anglo” cable by the
Telegraph Construction Company. Fig. 43 shows the type adopted for the
deepest water of the latter, and Fig. 44 that for the shore ends. Here
the wires, besides being of a very large gauge, are applied with an
extremely short lay (hence the elliptic appearance, though circular in
reality), in order to increase the weight of iron, and thereby avoid
shifting and abrasion. This type is now in constant use where rocks,
ice-floes, strong currents, or rough weather are experienced. Special<span class="pgnum"><SPAN name="page_217" id="page_217"></SPAN>{217}</span>
arrangements were made in the design of both these cables to meet the
requirements of increased speed. Since the successful application to
submarine cables of various modifications of Wheatstone’s automatic
transmitter, the limit to the speed attainable only depends, practically
speaking, upon the type of cable employed. On these principles the core
of the new “Commercial” cable was composed of a copper conductor
weighing 500 pounds per nautical mile, covered with a gutta-percha
insulating-sheath weighing 320 pounds per nautical mile, while the new
“Anglo” has a core with conductor weighing 650 pounds per nautical mile,
and gutta-percha insulator 400 pounds per nautical mile, involving a
completed cable (main type) nearly double the weight of previous
corresponding lines.</p>
<p><SPAN name="ill_43" id="ill_43"></SPAN></p>
<p class="figcenter">
<SPAN href="images/ill_pg_217a_lg.jpg">
<br/>
<ANTIMG class="enlargeimage" src="images/enlarge-image.jpg" alt="" width-obs="18" height-obs="14" />
<br/>
<ANTIMG src="images/ill_pg_217a_sml.jpg" width-obs="95" height-obs="99" alt="Fig. 43.—Anglo-American Atlantic Cable (1894): deep-sea type." /></SPAN>
<br/>
<span class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig.</span> 43.—Anglo-American Atlantic Cable (1894): deep-sea
type.</span></p>
<p><SPAN name="ill_44" id="ill_44"></SPAN></p>
<p class="figcenter">
<SPAN href="images/ill_pg_217b_lg.jpg">
<br/>
<ANTIMG class="enlargeimage" src="images/enlarge-image.jpg" alt="" width-obs="18" height-obs="14" />
<br/>
<ANTIMG src="images/ill_pg_217b_sml.jpg" width-obs="94" height-obs="92" alt="Fig. 44.—Shore-end of the 1894 “Anglo” Cable. Reduced size." /></SPAN>
<br/>
<span class="caption"><span class="smcap">Fig.</span> 44.—Shore-end of the 1894 “Anglo” Cable. Reduced
size.</span></p>
<p>The actual speed obtained by automatic transmission with the latter
cable is as high as forty-seven (or even up to fifty) five-letter words
per minute. On the previous, lighter, Atlantic cores twenty-five to
twenty-eight words per minute was the usual maximum speed attainable;
the former,<span class="pgnum"><SPAN name="page_218" id="page_218"></SPAN>{218}</span> say, by average transmission and average receiving, and the
latter by automatic transmission—other circumstances corresponding.
Practically all submarine cables between important points—and certainly
all those across the Atlantic—are now “duplexed”—a system of
electrical working (instituted by Messrs. Muirhead in 1875) which
enables messages to be sent in both directions at the same time. The
result of this is nowadays to practically double the carrying capacity
and earning power of the line, the effective speed in either direction
remaining virtually the same as in “simplex” working, provided the cable
is in good condition.<SPAN name="FNanchor_73_73" id="FNanchor_73_73"></SPAN><SPAN href="#Footnote_73_73" class="fnanchor">[73]</SPAN> The armor of this cable (Fig. 43) is also a
good example of present-day practise, each wire (usually covered with
compounded tape) butting against the next; this is found to be the most
durable form for a deep-sea cable.</p>
<p>In 1898 another French Atlantic line of a similar type to the above was
laid. This involved the longest Atlantic cable-section in existence,
i.e., 3,174 nautical miles, from Brest to Cape Cod, and was the first
Atlantic line made and laid by Frenchmen, with the active assistance, as
regards laying, of the Silvertown Company.</p>
<p>Recently, too, a German Atlantic cable has been laid by the Telegraph
Construction Company from Emden to the Azores, and hence to New York.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The various proprietary companies here named have had duplicating lines
laid for them from<span class="pgnum"><SPAN name="page_219" id="page_219"></SPAN>{219}</span> time to time, but these it is not necessary to
further allude to.</p>
<p>Neither has it been thought necessary to give particulars regarding the
methods of construction, laying, testing or working of any of these
later lines following on the pioneer undertakings, except where special
novelties were introduced. For similar reasons—and seeing that the
responsibility of these later lines rested with contractors—the names
of their permanent staff acting for them have not been introduced.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />