<h3><SPAN name="ANNUS_MIRABILIS" id="ANNUS_MIRABILIS"></SPAN>ANNUS MIRABILIS.</h3>
<p class="nind"><span class="letra">
<ANTIMG src="images/ill_T.png" width-obs="100" height-obs="105" alt="T" title="T" /></span>HIS year, the centenary of the opening of our national constitutional
epoch, will be a Washington year. As on a saint's day there is a special
service in his honor, so through all this year there will be especial
remembrance of Washington, and natural self-congratulation that in him
we have a glory beyond that of other nations. The last striking tribute
to him is also most timely, for it is that of Mr. Bryce in his "American
Commonwealth," whose publication happily coincided with the opening of
this <i>annus mirabilis</i>. He says, in speaking of Hamilton's death, "One
cannot note the disappearance of this brilliant figure, to Europeans the
most interesting in the earlier history of the republic, without the
remark that his countrymen seem to have never, either in his lifetime or
afterward, duly recognized<SPAN name="page_175" id="page_175"></SPAN> his splendid gifts." The explanation of this
seeming want of appreciation is, however, very characteristic, for it
lies in the instinctive American regard for morality.</p>
<p>Mr. Bryce touches it when he proceeds: "Washington, indeed, is a far
more perfect character. Washington stands alone and unapproachable, like
a snow-peak rising above its fellows into the clear air of morning, with
a dignity, constancy, and purity which have made him the ideal type of
civic virtue to succeeding generations. No greater benefit could have
befallen the republic than to have such a type set from the first before
the eye and mind of the people." That benefit is incalculable, and it
will be acknowledged with every form of stately ceremonial and of
eloquent enthusiasm during this year.</p>
<p>The great event of 1789 was Washington's inauguration as President, and
it is the most important event in the annals of the city. The
cosmopolitan character of the city from its settlement and in the early
time of the little town,<SPAN name="page_176" id="page_176"></SPAN> when it was said that more than a dozen
different languages were spoken in its streets, down to the present,
when it is the third or fourth city in size upon the globe, has always
checked the sentiment of local pride which is so great a force in the
development of a community. Among all the original States New York has
seemed to care least for its significant events and its great men. That
the Revolution was tactically largely a contest for the control of the
Hudson, that the contest culminated at Saratoga, and that the new
national order which resulted from the Revolution began in the city of
New York, are facts which are known, indeed, but which have not grown
into a proud tradition universally cherished and constantly repeated and
celebrated like similar great events in New England.</p>
<p>This year, however, the last event, Washington's inauguration, will be
the occasion of a great national observance. The President and cabinet,
Senators and Representatives and judges, distinguished delegates from
every State, will attend,<SPAN name="page_177" id="page_177"></SPAN> and there will be religious and oratorical
exercises and civil and military display. One fact, indeed, invests such
a celebration with especial triumph. It is that while the government
which was organized a hundred years ago was unprecedented in form and
wholly untried in the experience of states, and while it was regarded
with interest but with incredulity as essentially unequal to the great
shocks of fate to which other states have succumbed, it has passed,
within the century, not only unshaken but strengthened, through the most
tremendous and prolonged ordeal to which such a government could be
submitted.</p>
<p>Chief among its extraordinary good fortunes at its organization was that
of the presence of a man without whom at that time its establishment
would have been hardly possible. The French Minister at the time of the
inauguration wrote home to his government that it was the universal
confidence in Washington which secured assent to the Constitution. John
Lamb, who was unfriendly to the Constitution, told Hamilton in<SPAN name="page_178" id="page_178"></SPAN> Wall
Street that only his faith in Washington overcame his repugnance to it.
The hour had plainly come for union, but except for the man it is
probable that union would not then have been effected.</p>
<p>The value of Washington to his country transcends that of any other man
to any land. Take him from the Revolution, and all the fervor of the
Sons of Liberty would seem to have been a wasted flame. Take him from
the constitutional epoch, and the essential condition of union, personal
confidence in a leader, would have been wanting. Franklin, when the work
of the Constitutional Convention was completed, said that until then he
had not been sure whether the sun depicted above the President's chair
was a rising or a setting sun, but now his doubt was solved. Yet it was
not the symbolic figure above the chair, it was the man within it, which
should have forecast the great result to that sagacious mind.</p>
<p>From the moment that independence was secured no man in America saw
more<SPAN name="page_179" id="page_179"></SPAN> clearly the necessity of national union, or defined more wisely
and distinctly the reasons for it. He is the chief illustration in a
popular government of a great leader who was not also a great orator.
Perhaps that fact gave a solid force to his influence by depriving all
his expressions of a rhetorical character, and preserving in them
throughout a simplicity and moderation which deepened the impression of
his comprehensive sagacity. He was felt as both an inspiring and a
sustaining power in the preliminary movement for union, and by natural
selection he was both President of the Convention and the head of the
government which it instituted. John Adams was Vice-President, and
Hamilton and Jefferson were in the cabinet. After Washington himself,
they were the three most eminent figures in the country. But it is not
possible to conceive any one of them organizing and establishing the new
system without controversy which would have rent it asunder.</p>
<p>Indeed this year commemorates the<SPAN name="page_180" id="page_180"></SPAN> auspicious beginning of the most
arduous task which devolved upon Washington, and which transcends that
to which any other man in history has been called. Yet how little in his
performance of that task his countrymen would change! During the course
of the century they have been divided largely upon views of the
Constitution and upon principles of administration, and have engaged in
a long and momentous civil war, but they would certainly not desire that
any chief act of Washington's administration should have been other than
it was. He acted without precedent, but with the calm majesty of
rectitude, and although the serpent of party spirit struck at him as he
retired, no honest partisan to-day either distrusts his motives or
doubts his wisdom.</p>
<p>It is a benignant fortune that so great a celebration as that of this
year is an act of homage to so great a man. It was his happiness to know
the affectionate reverence in which he was held. The memoirs and letters
of the time<SPAN name="page_181" id="page_181"></SPAN> show that Washington's was not a tardy and posthumous
greatness, but that those who knew him best honored him most, and that
America was conscious of the worth of her chief citizen. One of the most
striking contemporary personal tributes to him is that of John Bernard,
the English actor, who was in this country at the close of the last
century, and who met Washington near the end of his life, by chance and
without knowing him, near Mount Vernon.</p>
<p>Bernard had paid a visit to a friend upon the banks of the Potomac, and
was returning upon horseback to Alexandria behind a chaise which seemed
to be in difficulties, and was presently upset. The actor hastened to
the rescue simultaneously with another horseman, and after some
exertions they succeeded in placing the occupants of the chaise—a man
and woman, who were fortunately not injured—again upon their way. After
their departure Bernard's companion politely offered to dust his coat,
and in returning the favor Bernard made a close survey of his
companion.<SPAN name="page_182" id="page_182"></SPAN></p>
<div class="blockquot"><p>"He was a tall, erect, well-made man, evidently advanced in years,
but who seemed to have retained all the vigor and elasticity
resulting from a life of temperance and exercise. His dress was a
blue coat buttoned to his chin and buckskin breeches. Though the
instant he took off his hat I could not avoid the recognition of
familiar lineaments—which, indeed, I was in the habit of seeing on
every sign-post and on every fire-place—still I failed to identify
him."</p>
</div>
<p>Washington recognized Bernard as the actor whom he had "had the pleasure
of seeing perform" in Philadelphia during the previous winter, and after
some pleasant chat an invitation to ride with him to Mount Vernon, only
a mile distant, revealed to Bernard the name of his companion. He was
profoundly impressed, and upon reaching Mount Vernon they found that
Mrs. Washington was indisposed, and the General ordered refreshments
into a little parlor looking upon the Potomac.</p>
<p>At some length his guest describes the commanding presence of
Washington, in which "a feeling of awe and veneration stole over you."
During a conversation<SPAN name="page_183" id="page_183"></SPAN> of an hour and a half "he touched on every topic
that I brought before him with an even current of good sense, if he
embellished it with little wit or verbal elegance."</p>
<div class="blockquot"><p>"When I mentioned to him the difference I perceived between the
inhabitants of New England and of the Southern States, he remarked:
'I esteem those people greatly; they are the stamina of the Union,
and its greatest benefactors. They are continually spreading
themselves, too, to settle and enlighten less favored quarters. Dr.
Franklin is a New-Englander.' When I remarked that his observations
were flattering to my country, he replied, with great good-humor:
'Yes, yes, Mr. Bernard, but I consider your country the cradle of
free principles, not their arm-chair. Liberty in England is a sort
of idol; people are bred up in the belief and love of it, but see
little of its doings. They walk about freely, but then it is
between high walls; and the error of its government was in
supposing that after a portion of their subjects had crossed the
sea to live upon a common, they would permit their friends at home
to build up those walls about them.'</p>
<p>"A black coming in at this moment with a jug of spring-water, I
could not repress a smile, which the General at once interpreted.
'This<SPAN name="page_184" id="page_184"></SPAN> may seem a contradiction,' he continued, 'but I think you
must perceive that it is neither a crime nor an absurdity. When we
profess, as our fundamental principle, that liberty is the
inalienable right of every man, we do not include madmen or idiots;
liberty in their hands would become a scourge. Till the mind of the
slave has been educated to perceive what are the obligations of a
state of freedom, and not to confound a man's with a brute's, the
gift would insure its abuse. We might as well be asked to pull down
our old warehouses before trade has increased to demand enlarged
new ones. Both houses and slaves were bequeathed to us by
Europeans, and time alone can change them—an event, sir, which,
you may believe me, no man desires more heartily than I do. Not
only do I pray for it on the score of human dignity, but I can
clearly foresee that nothing but the rooting out of slavery can
perpetuate the existence of our Union, by consolidating it in a
common bond of principle.'"</p>
</div>
<p>At the end of a century which has vindicated his view so nobly and so
completely it is pleasant to read these words, and in this new and vivid
glimpse of our Washington to find only a stronger title to our
veneration. Bernard recalls the words of De Chastellux:<SPAN name="page_185" id="page_185"></SPAN></p>
<div class="blockquot"><p>"The great characteristic of Washington is the perfect union which
seems to subsist between his moral and physical qualities, so that
the selection of one would enable you to judge of all the rest. If
you are presented with medals of Trajan or Cæsar, the features will
lead you to inquire the proportions of their persons; but if you
should discover in a heap of ruins the leg or arm of an antique
Apollo, you would not be curious about the other parts, but content
yourself with the assurance that they were all conformable to those
of a god."</p>
</div>
<p><SPAN name="page_186" id="page_186"></SPAN></p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />