<h2 id="id01924" style="margin-top: 4em">CHAPTER XXXIII.</h2>
<h5 id="id01925">REALISM.</h5>
<p id="id01926" style="margin-top: 2em">At the end of about a week or so, it became very generally known among
the mystic "Upper Ten" of artistic and literary circles, that Theos
Alwyn, the famous author of "Nourhalma" was, to put it fashionably, "in
town." According to the classic phrasing of a leading society journal,
"Mr. Theos Alwyn, the poet, whom some of our contemporaries erroneously
reported as dead, has arrived in London from his tour in the East. He
is for the present a guest of the Honorable Francis Villiers." The
consequence of this and other similar announcements was, that the
postman seemed never to be away from Villiers's door; and every time he
came he was laden with letters and cards of invitation, addressed, for
the most part, to Villiers himself, who, with something of dismay, saw
his study table getting gradually covered with accumulating piles of
society litter, such as is comprised in the various formal
notifications of dinners, dances, balls, soirees, "at homes," and all
the divers sorts of entertainment with which the English "s'amusent
moult tristement." Some of these invitations, less ceremonious, were in
form of pretty little notes from great ladies, who entreated their
"DEAR Mr. Villiers" to give them the "EXTREME honor and pleasure" of
his company at certain select and extra brilliant receptions where
Royalty itself would be represented, adding, as an earnest
postscript—"and DO bring the LION, you know, your VERY interesting
friend, Mr. Alwyn, with you!"—A good many such billets-doux were
addressed to Alwyn personally, and as he opened and read them he was
somewhat amused to see how many who had formerly been mere bowing
acquaintances were now suddenly, almost magically, transformed into
apparently eager, admiring, and devoted friends.</p>
<p id="id01927">"One would think these people really liked me for myself,"—he said one
morning, tossing aside a particularly gushing, pressing note from a
lady who was celebrated for the motley crowds she managed to squeeze
into her rooms, regardless of any one's comfort or convenience,—"And
yet, as the matter stands, they actually know nothing of me. I might be
a villain of the deepest dye, a kickable cad, or a coarse ruffian, but
so long as I have written a 'successful' book and am a 'somebody'—a
literary 'notable'—what matter my tastes, my morals, or my
disposition! If this sort of thing is Fame, all I can say is, that it
savors of very detestable vulgarity!"</p>
<p id="id01928">"Of course it does!"—assented Villiers-"But what else do you expect
from modern society? … What CAN you expect from a community which is
chiefly ruled by moneyed parvenus, BUT vulgarity? If you go to this
woman's place, for instance"—and he glanced at the note Alwyn had
thrown on the table,—"you will share the honors of the evening with
the famous man-milliner of Bond Street, an 'artist' in gowns, the
female upholsterer and house decorator, likewise an 'artist,'—the
ladies who 'compose' sonnets in Regent Street, also 'artists,—' and
chiefest among the motley crowd, perhaps, the so-called new 'Apostle'
of aestheticism, a ponderous gentleman who says nothing and does
nothing, and who, by reason of his stupendous inertia and taciturnity,
is considered the greatest 'gun' of all! … it's no use YOUR going
among such people,—in fact, no one who has any reverence left in him
for the TRUTH of Art CAN mix with those whose profession of it is a
mere trade and hypocritical sham. Such dunderheads would see no
artistic difference between Phidias and the man of to-day who hews out
and sets up a common marble mantel-piece! I'm not a fellow to moan over
the 'good old times,'—no, not a bit of it, for those good old times
had much in them that was decidedly bad,—but I wish progress would not
rob us altogether of refinement."</p>
<p id="id01929">"But society professes to be growing more and more cultured every day,"
observed Alwyn.</p>
<p id="id01930">"Oh, it PROFESSES! … yes, that's just the mischief of it. Its
professions are not worth a groat. It PROFESSES to be one thing while
anybody with eyes can see that it actually is another! The old style of
aristocrat and gentleman is dying out,—the new style is the horsey
lord, the betting Duke, the coal-dealing Earl, the stock-broking
Viscount! Trade is a very excellent thing,—a very necessary and
important thing,—but its influence is distinctly NOT refining. I have
the greatest respect for my cheesemonger, for instance (and he has an
equal respect for me, since he has found that I know the difference
between real butter and butterine), but all the same I don't want to
see him in Parliament. I am arrogant enough to believe that I, even I,
having studied somewhat, know more about the country's interest than he
does. I view it by the light of ancient and modern historical
evidence,—he views it according to the demand it makes on his cheese.
We may both be narrow and limited in judgment,—nevertheless, I think,
with all due modesty, that HIS judgment is likely to be more limited
than mine. But it's no good talking about it,—this dear old land is
given up to a sort of ignorant democracy, which only needs time to
become anarchy, . . and we haven't got a strong man among us who dares
speak out the truth of the inevitable disasters looming above us all.
And society is not only vulgar, but demoralized,—moreover, what is
worse is, that, aided by its preachers and teachers, it is sinking into
deeper depths of demoralization with every passing month and year of
time."</p>
<p id="id01931">Alwyn leaned hack in his chair thoughtfully, a sorrowful expression
clouding his face.</p>
<p id="id01932">"Surely things are not so bad as they seem, Villiers,"—he said
gently—"Are you not taking a pessimistic view of affairs?"</p>
<p id="id01933">"Not at all!" and Villiers, warming with his subject, walked up and
down the room excitedly … "Nor am I judging by the narrow observation
of any particular 'set' or circle. I look at the expressive visible
outcome of the whole,—the plainly manifest signs of the threatening
future. Of course there are ever so many good people,—earnest
people,—thinking people,—but they are a mere handful compared to the
overpowering millions opposed to them, and whose motto is 'Evil, be
thou my good.' Now you, for instance, are full of splendid ideas, and
lucid plans of check and reform,—you are seized with a passionate
desire to do something great for the world, and you are ready to speak
the truth fearlessly on all occasions. But just think of the enormous
task it would be to stir to even half an inch of aspiring nobleness,
the frightful mass of corruption in London to-day! In all trades and
professions it is the same story,—everything is a question of GAIN. To
begin with, look at the Church, the 'Pillar of the State!' There, all
sorts of worthless, incompetent men are hastily thrust into livings by
wealthy patrons who care not a jot as to whether they are morally or
intellectually fit for their sacred mission,—and a disgraceful
universal muddle is the result. From this muddle, which resembles a
sort of stagnant pool, emerge the strangest fungus-growths,—clergymen
who take to acting a 'miracle-play,' ostensibly for the purposes of
charity, but really to gratify their own tastes and leanings toward the
mummer's art,—all the time utterly regardless of the effect their
behavior is likely to have on the minds of the unthinking populace, who
are led by the newspapers, and who read therein bantering inquiries as
to whether the Church is coquetting with the Stage? whether the two are
likely to become one? and whether Religion will in the future occupy no
more serious consideration than the Drama? What is one to think, when
one sees clerical notabilities seated in the stalls of a theatre
complacently looking on at the representation of a 'society play'
degrading in plot, repulsive in detail, and in nearly every case having
to do with a married woman who indulges in a lover as a matter of
course,—a play full of ambiguous side hits and equivocal jests, which,
if the men of the Church were staunch to their vocation, they would be
the first to condemn. Why, I saw the other day, in a fairly reliable
journal, that some of these excellent 'divines' were going to start
'smoking sermons'—a sort of imitation of smoking concerts, I suppose,
which are vile enough, in all conscience,—but to mix up religious
matters with the selfish 'smoke mania' is viler still. I say that any
clergyman who will allow men to smoke in his presence, while he is
preaching sacred doctrine, is a coarse cad, and ought to be hounded out
of the Church!"</p>
<p id="id01934">He paused, his face flushing with vigorous, righteous wrath. Alwyn's
eyes grew dark with an infinite pain. His thoughts always fled back to
his Dream of Al-Kyris, with a tendency to draw comparisons between the
Past and the Present. The religion of that long-buried city had been
mere mummery and splendid outward show,—what was the religion of
London? He moved restlessly.</p>
<p id="id01935">"How all the warnings of history repeat themselves!" he said suddenly..
"An age of mockery, sham sentiment, and irreverence has always preceded
a downfall,—can it be possible that we are already receiving hints of
the downfall of England?"</p>
<p id="id01936">"Aye, not only of England, but of a good many other nations besides,"
said Villiers—"or if not actual downfall, change and terrific
upheaval. France and England particularly are the prey of the Demon of
Realism,—and all the writers who SHOULD use their pens to inspire and
elevate the people, assist in degrading them. When their books are not
obscene, they are blasphemous. Russia, too, joins in the cry of
Realism!—Realism! … Let us have the filth of the gutters, the
scourgings of dustholes, the corruption of graves, the odors of
malaria, the howlings of drunkards, the revellings of sensualists, . .
the worst side of the world in its vilest aspect, which is the only
REAL aspect of those who are voluntarily vile! Let us see to what a
reeking depth of unutterable shameless brutality man can fall if he
chooses—not as formerly, when it was shown to what glorious heights of
noble supremacy he could rise! For in this age, the heights are called
'transcendental folly'—and the reeking depths are called Realism!"</p>
<p id="id01937">"And yet what IS Realism really?" queried Alwyn.—"Does anybody know?
… It is supposed to be the actuality of everyday existence, without
any touch of romance or pathos to soften its frequently hideous
Commonplace; but the fact is, the Commonplace is not the Real. The
highest flights of imagination in the human being fail to grasp the
Reality of the splendors everywhere surrounding him,—and, viewed
rightly, Realism would become Romance and Romance Realism. We see a
ragged woman in the streets picking up scraps for her daily food, . .
that is what we may call realistic,—but we are not looking at the
ACTUAL woman, after all! We cannot see her Inner Self, or form any
certain comprehension of the possible romance or tragedy which that
Inner Self HAS experienced, or IS experiencing. We see the outer
Appearance of the woman, but what of that? … The REALISM of the
suffering creature's hidden history lies beyond us,—so far beyond us
that it is called ROMANCE, because it seems so impossible to fathom or
understand."</p>
<p id="id01938">"True, most absolutely true!" said Villiers emphatically—"But it is a
truth you will get very few to admit! … Everything to-day is in a
state of substantiality and sham;—we have even sham Realism, as well
as sham sentiment, sham religion, sham art, sham morality. We have a
Parliament that sits and jabbers lengthy platitudes that lead to
nothing, while Army and Navy are slowly slipping into a state of
helpless desuetude, and the mutterings of discontented millions are
almost unregarded; the spectre of Revolution, assuming somewhat of the
shape in which it appalled the French in 1789, is dimly approaching in
the distance, . . even our London County Council hears the far-off,
faint shadow of a very prosaic resemblance to the National Assembly of
that era, . . and our weak efforts to cure cureless grievances, and to
deafen our ears to crying evils, are very similar to the clumsy
attempts made by Louis XVI. and his partisans to botch up a terribly
bad business. Oh, the people, the people! … They are unquestionably
the flesh, blood, bone, and sinew of the country,—and the English
people, say what sneerers will to the contrary, are a GOOD
people,—patient, plodding, forbearing, strong, and, on the whole, most
equable-tempered,—but their teachers teach them wrongly, and confuse
their brains instead of clearing them, and throw a weight of Compulsory
Education at their heads, without caring how they may use it, or how
such a blow from the clenched fist of Knowledge may stupefy and
bewilder them, . . and the consequence is that now, were a strong man
to arise, with a lucid brain, an eloquent power of expressing truth, a
great sympathy with his kind, and an immense indifference to his own
fate in the contest, he could lead this vast, waiting, wandering,
growling, hydra-headed London wheresoever he would!"</p>
<p id="id01939">"What an orator you are, Villiers!".. said Alwyn, with a half-smile. "I
never heard you come out so strongly before!"</p>
<p id="id01940">"My dear fellow," replied Villiers, in a calmer tone—"it's enough to
make any man with warm blood in his veins FEEL! Everywhere signs of
weakness, cowardice, compromise, hesitation, vacillation, incompetency,
and everywhere, in thoughtful minds, the keen sense of a Fate advancing
like the giant in the seven-leagued boots, at huge strides every day.
The ponderous Law and the solid Police hem us in on each side, as
though the nation were a helpless infant, toddling between two portly
nurses,—we dare not denounce a scoundrel and liar, but must needs put
up with him, lest we should be involved in an action for libel; and we
dare not knock down a vulgar bully, lest we should be given in charge
for assault. Hence, liars, and scoundrels, and vulgar bullies abound,
and men skulk and grin, and play the double-face, till they lose all
manfulness. Society sits smirking foolishly on the top of a smouldering
volcano,—and the chief Symbols of greatness among us, Religion, Poesy,
Art, are burning as feebly as tapers in the catacombs, . . the Church
resembles a drudge, who, tired of routine, is gradually sinking into
laziness and inertia, . . and the Press! … ye gods! … the Press!"</p>
<p id="id01941">Here speech seemed to fail him,—he threw himself into a chair, and, to
relieve his mind, kicked away the advertisement sheet of the morning's
newspaper with so much angry vehemence that Alwyn laughed outright.</p>
<p id="id01942">"What ails you now, Villiers?" he demanded mirthfully.. "You are a
regular fire-eater—a would-be Crusader against a modern Saracen host!
Why are you choked with such seemingly unutterable wrath! … what of
the Press? … it is at any rate free."</p>
<p id="id01943">"Free!" cried Villiers, sitting bolt upright and shooting out the word
like a bullet from a gun,—"Free? … the Press? It is the veriest
bound slave that was ever hampered by the chains of party
prejudice,—and the only attempt at freedom it ever makes in its lower
grades is an occasional outbreak into scurrility! And yet think what a
majestic power for good the true, REAL Liberty of the Press might wield
over the destinies of nations! Broadly viewed, the Press should be the
strong, practical, helping right hand of civilization, dealing out
equal justice, equal sympathy, equal instruction,—it should be the
fosterer of the arts and sciences,—the everyday guide of the morals
and culture of the people,—it should not specially advocate any cause
save Honor,—it should be as far as possible the unanimous voice of the
Nation. It SHOULD be,—but what IS it? Look round and judge for
yourself. Every daily paper panders more or less to the lowest tastes
of the mob,—while if the higher sentiments of man are not actually
sneered at, they are made a subject for feeble surprise, or vapid
'gush.' An act of heroic unselfishness meets with such a cackling
chorus of amazed, half-bantering approval from the leading-article
writers, that one is forced to accept the suggestion implied,—namely
that to BE heroic or unselfish is evidently an outbreak of noble
instinct that is entirely unexpected and remarkable,—nay, even
eccentric and inexplicable! The spirit of mockery pervades
everything,—and while the story of a murder is allowed to occupy three
and four columns of print, the account of some great scientific
discovery, or the report of some famous literary or artistic
achievement is squeezed into a few lukewarm and unsatisfactory lines. I
have seen a female paragraphist's idiotic description of an actress's
gown allowed to take more space in a journal than the review of a
first-class book! Moreover, if an honest man, desirous of giving vent
to an honest opinion on some crying abuse of the day, were to set forth
that opinion in letter form and try to get it published in a leading
and important newspaper, the chances are ten to one that it would never
he inserted, unless he happened to know the editor, or one of the
staff, and perhaps not even then, because, mark you! his opinion MUST
be in accordance with the literary editor's opinion, or it will be
considered of no value to the world! Consider THAT gigantic absurdity!
… consider, that when we read our newspapers we are not learning the
views of Europe on a certain point,—we are absorbing the ideas of the
EDITOR, to whom everything must be submitted before insertion in the
oracular columns we pin our faith on! Thus it is that
criticism,—literary criticism, at any rate,—is a lost art,—YOU know
that. A man must either be dead (or considered dead) or in a 'clique'
to receive any open encouragement at all from the so-called 'crack'
critics. And the cliquey men are generally such stupendous bigots for
their own particular and restricted form of 'style.' Anything new they
hate,—anything daring they treat with ridicule. Some of them have no
hesitation in saying they prefer Matthew Arnold (remember he's dead!)
to Tennyson and Swinburne (as yet living).. while, as a fact, if we are
to go by the high standards of poetical art left us by Shakespeare,
Keats, Shelley, and Byron, Matthew Arnold is about the very tamest,
most unimaginative, bald bard that ever kindled a lucifer match of
verse and fancied it the fire of Apollo! It's utterly impossible to get
either a just or broad view of literature out of cliques,—and the
Press, like many of our other 'magnificent' institutions, is working
entirely on a wrong system. But who is going to be wise, or strong, or
diplomatic enough to reform it? … No one, at present,—and we shall
jog along, and read up the details of vice in our dailies and weeklies,
till we almost lose the savor of virtue, and till the last degraded end
comes of it all, and blatant young America thrones herself on the
shores of Britain and sends her eagle screech of conquest echoing over
Old World and New."</p>
<p id="id01944">"Don't think it, Villiers!" exclaimed Alwyn impetuously.. "There is a
mettle in the English that will never be conquered!"</p>
<p id="id01945">Villiers shrugged his shoulders. "We will hope so, my dear boy!" he
said resignedly. "But the 'mettle' under bad government, with bad
weapons, and more or less untried ships, can scarcely be blamed if it
should not be able to resist a tremendous force majeure. Besides, all
the Parliaments in the world cannot upset the laws of the universe. If
things are false and corrupt, they MUST be swept away,—Nature will not
have them,—she will transmute and transform them somehow, no matter at
what cost. It is the cry of the old Prophets over again,—'Because ye
have not obeyed God's Law, therefore shall ye meet with destruction.'
Egoism is certainly NOT God's Law, and we shall have to return on our
imagined progressive steps, and be beaten with rods of affliction, till
we understand what His Law IS. It is, for one thing, the wheel that
keeps this Universe going—OUR laws are no use whatever in the
management of His sublime cosmos! Nations, like individuals, are
punished for their own wilful misdeeds—the punishment may be tardy,
but sure as death it comes. And I fancy America will be our 'scourge in
the Lord's hand'—as the Bible hath it. That pretty, dollar-crusted
young Republican wants an aristocracy, . . she will engraft it on the
old roots here,—in fact, she has already begun to engraft it. It is
even on the cards that she may need a Monarchy—if she does, she will
plant it.. HERE! Then it will be time for Englishmen to adopt another
country, and forget, if they can, their own disgraced nationality. And
yet, if, as Shakespeare says, England were to herself but true,—if she
had great statesmen as of yore,—intellectual, earnest,
self-abnegating, fearless, unhesitating workers, who would devote
themselves heart and soul to her welfare, she might gather, not only
her Colonies, but America also, to her knee, as a mother gathers
children, and the most magnificent Christian Empire the world has ever
seen might rise up, a supreme marvel of civilization and union that
would make all other nations wonder and revere. But the selfishness of
the day, and the ruling passion of gain, are the fatal obstructions in
the path of such a desirable millennium."</p>
<p id="id01946">He ended abruptly—he had unburdened his mind to one who he knew
understood him and sympathized with him, and he turned to the perusal
of some letters just received.</p>
<p id="id01947">The two friends were sitting that morning in the breakfast-room,—a
charming little octagonal apartment, looking out on a small, very small
garden, which, despite the London atmosphere, looked just now very
bright with tastefully arranged parterres of white and yellow crocuses,
mingled with the soft blue of the dainty hepatica,—that frank-faced
little blossom which seems to express such an honest confidence in the
goodness of God's sky. A few sparrows of dissipated appearance were
bathing their sooty plumes in a pool of equally sooty water left in the
garden as a token of last night's rain, and they splashed and twittered
and debated and fussed with each other concerning their ablutions, with
almost as much importance as could have been displayed by the
effeminate Romans of the Augustan era when disporting themselves in
their sumptuous Thermae. Alwyn's eyes rested on them unseeingly,—his
thoughts were very far away from all his surroundings. Before his
imagination rose a Gehenna-like picture of the world in which he had to
live,—the world of fashion and form and usage,—the world he was to
try and rouse to a sense of better things. A Promethean task indeed! to
fill human life with new symbols of hope,—to set up a white standard
of faith amid the swift rushing on and reckless tramping down of
desperate battle,—to pour out on all, rich or poor, worthy or
unworthy, the divine-born balm of Sympathy, which, when given freely
and sincerely from man to man, serves often as a check to vice—a
silent, yet all eloquent, rebuke to crime,—and can more easily instill
into refractory intelligences things of God and desires for good, than
any preacher's argument, no matter how finely worded. To touch the big,
wayward, BETTER heart of Humanity! … could he in very truth do it?
… Or was the work too vast for his ability? Tormented by various
cross-currents of feeling, he gave vent to a troubled sigh and looked
dubiously at his friend.</p>
<p id="id01948">"In such a state of things as you describe, Villiers," he aid, "what a
useless unit <i>I</i> am! A Poet!—who wants me in this age of Sale and
Barter? … Is not a producer of poems always considered more or less
of a fool nowadays, no matter how much his works may be in fashion for
the moment? I am sure, in spite of the success of 'Nourhalma,' that the
era of poetry has passed; and, moreover, it certainly seems to have
given place to the very baldest and most unbeauteous forms of prose!
As, for instance, if a book is written which contains what is called
'poetic prose' the critics are all ready to denounce it as 'turgid,'
'overladen,' 'strained for effect,' and 'hysterical sublime.' Heine's
Reisebilder, which is one of the most exquisite poems in prose ever
given to the world, is nearly incomprehensible to the majority of
English minds; so much so, indeed, that the English translators in
their rendering of it have not only lost the delicate glamour of its
fairy-like fancifulness, but have also blunted all the fine points of
its dazzling sarcasm and wealth of imagery. It is evident enough that
the larger mass of people prefer mediocrity to high excellence, else
such a number of merely mediocre works of art would not, and could not,
be tolerated. And as long as mediocrity is permitted to hold ground, it
is almost an impossibility to do much toward raising the standard of
literature. The few who love the best authors are as a mere drop in the
ocean of those who not only choose the worst, but who also fail to see
any difference between good and bad."</p>
<p id="id01949">"True enough!" assented Villiers,—"Still the 'few' you speak of are
worth all the rest. For the 'few' Homer wrote,—Plato, Marcus Aurelius,
Epictetus,—and the 'few' are capable of teaching the majority, if they
will only set about it rightly. But at present they are setting about
it wrongly. All children are taught to read, but no child is guided in
WHAT to read. This is like giving a loaded gun to a boy and saying,
'Shoot away! … No matter in which direction you point your aim, . .
shoot yourself if you like, and others too,—anyhow, you've GOT the
gun!' Of course there are a few fellows who have occasionally drawn up
a list of books as suitable for everybody's perusal,—but then these
lists cannot be taken as true criterions, as they all differ from one
another as much as church sects. One would-be instructor in the art of
reading says we ought all to study 'Tom Jones'—now I don't see the
necessity of THAT! And, oddly enough, these lists scarcely ever include
the name of a poet,—which is the absurdest mistake ever made. A
liberal education in the highest works of poesy is absolutely necessary
to the thinking abilities of man. But, Alwyn, YOU need not trouble
yourself about what is good for the million and what isn't, . .
whatever you write is sure to be read NOW—you've got the ear of the
public,—the 'fair, large ear' of the ass's head which disguises Bottom
the Weaver, who frankly says of himself, 'I am such a tender ass, if my
hair do but tickle me, I must scratch!'"</p>
<p id="id01950">Alwyn smiled. He was thinking of what his Shadow-Self had said on this
very subject—"A book or poem, to be great, and keep its greatness
hereafter, must be judged by the natural instinct of PEOPLES. This
world-wide decision has never yet been, and never will be, hastened by
any amount of written criticism,—it is the responsive beat of the
enormous Pulse of Life that thrills through all mankind, high and low,
gentle and simple,—its great throbs are slow and solemnly measured,
yet if once it answers to a Poet's touch, that Poet's name is made
glorious forever!" He.. in the character of Sah-luma.. had seemed to
utter these sentiments many ages ago,—and now the words repeated
themselves in his thoughts with a new and deep intensity of meaning.</p>
<p id="id01951">"Of course," added Villiers suddenly—"you must expect plenty of
adverse criticism now, as it is known beyond all doubt that you are
alive and able to read what is written concerning you,—but if you once
pay attention to critics, you may as well put aside pen altogether, as
it is the business of these worthies never to be entirely satisfied
with anything. Even Shelley and Byron, in the critical capacity, abused
Keats, till the poor, suffering youth, who promised to be greater then
either of them, died of a broken heart as much as disease. This sort of
injustice will go on to the end of time, or till men become more
Christianized than Paul's version of Christianity has ever yet made
them."</p>
<p id="id01952">Here a knock at the door interrupted the conversation. The servant
entered, bringing a note gorgeously crested and coroneted in gold.
Villiers, to whom it was addressed, opened and read it.</p>
<p id="id01953">"What shall we do about this?" he asked, when his man had retired. "It
is an invitation from the Duchess de la Santoisie. She asks us to go
and dine with her next week,—a party of twenty—reception afterward. I
think we'd better accept,—what do you say?"</p>
<p id="id01954">Alwyn roused himself from his reverie. "Anything to please you, my dear
boy!" he answered cheerfully—"But I haven't the faintest idea who the
Duchess de la Santoisie is!"</p>
<p id="id01955">"No? … Well, she's an Englishwoman who has married a French Duke. He
is a delightful old fellow, the pink of courtesy, and the model of
perfect egotism. A true Parisian, and of course an atheist,—a very
polished atheist, too, with a most charming reliance on his own
infallibility. His wife writes novels which have a SLIGHT leaning
toward Zolaism,—she is an extremely witty woman sarcastic, and
cold-blooded enough to be a female Robespierre, yet, on the whole,
amusing as a study of what curious nondescript forms the feminine
nature can adopt unto itself, if it chooses. She has an immense respect
for GENIUS,—mind, I say genius advisedly, because she really is one of
those rare few who cannot endure mediocrity. Everything at her house is
the best of its kind, and the people she entertains are the best of
theirs. Her welcome of you will be at any rate a sincerely admiring
one,—and as I think, in spite of your desire for quiet, you will have
to show yourself somewhere, it may as well be there."</p>
<p id="id01956">Alwyn looked dubious, and not at all resigned to the prospect of
"showing himself."</p>
<p id="id01957">"Your description of her does not strike me as particularly
attractive,"—he said—"I cannot endure that nineteenth-century
hermaphroditic production, a mannish woman."</p>
<p id="id01958">"Oh but she isn't altogether mannish,"—declared Villiers, . .<br/>
"Besides, I mustn't forget to add, that she is extremely beautiful."<br/></p>
<p id="id01959">Alwyn shrugged his shoulders indifferently. His friend noticed the
gesture and laughed.</p>
<p id="id01960">"Still impervious to beauty, old boy?"—he said gayly—"You always
were, I remember!"</p>
<p id="id01961">Alwyn flushed a little, and rose from his chair.</p>
<p id="id01962">"Not always,"—he answered steadily,—"There have been times in my life
when the beauty of women,—mere physical beauty—has exercised great
influence over me. But I have lately learned how a fair face may
sometimes mask a foul mind,—and unless I can see the SUBSTANCE of Soul
looking through the SEMBLANCE of Body, then I know that the beauty I
SEEM to behold is mere Appearance, and not Reality. Hence, unless your
beautiful Duchess be like the 'King's daughter' of David's psalm, 'all
glorious WITHIN'—her APPARENT loveliness will have no charm for
me!—Now"—and he smiled, and spoke in a less serious tone.. "if you
have no objection, I am off to my room to scribble for an hour or so.
Come for me if you want me—you know I don't in the least mind being
disturbed."</p>
<p id="id01963">But Villiers detained him a moment, and looked inquisitively at him
full in the eyes.</p>
<p id="id01964">"You've got some singular new attraction about you, Alwyn,"—he said,
with a strange sense of keen inward excitement as he met his friend's
calm yet flashing glance,—"Something mysterious, . . something that
COMPELS! What is it? … I believe that visit of yours to the Ruins of
Babylon had a more important motive than you will admit, . . moreover..
I believe you are in love!"</p>
<p id="id01965">"IN love!"—Alwyn laughed a little as he repeated the words.. "What a
foolish term that is when you come to think of it! For to be IN love
suggests the possibility of getting OUT again,—which, if love be true,
can never happen. Say that I LOVE!—and you will be nearer the mark!
Now don't look so mystified, and don't ask me any more questions just
now—to-night, when we are sitting together in the library, I'll tell
you the whole story of my Babylonian adventure!"</p>
<p id="id01966">And with a light parting wave of the hand he left the room, and
Villiers heard him humming a tune softly to himself as he ascended the
stairs to his own apartments, where, ever since he arrived, he had made
it his custom to do two or three hours' steady writing every morning.
For a moment or so after he had gone Villiers stood lost in thought,
with knitted brows and meditative eyes, then, rousing himself, he went
on to his study, and sitting down at his desk wrote an answer to the
Duchess de la Santoisie accepting her invitation.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />