<SPAN name="chap10"></SPAN>
<P CLASS="noindent">
{139}</p>
<h3> CHAPTER X </h3>
<h3> THE MASSACRES </h3>
<p>The event of the 20th of June was like lightning flashing in darkness.
Instantly people saw where they were. Moderate, loyal, reasonable men,
startled at the danger of the King, smarting at the indignity he had
suffered, fearful of mob rule and mob violence, rallied to the throne,
signed petitions protesting against the event. Louis himself,
realizing that his life was in jeopardy, made appeals both to the
assembly and to his people.</p>
<p>The first reply to the King's appeal, unsolicited and unappreciated,
came from La Fayette. On receiving news of the event of the 20th he
left his headquarters and reached Paris on the 28th. He appealed to
the assembly and rallied the centre, still responsive if a leader could
be found. He then began to concert measures for getting control of the
city by means of the national guards. At this point, however, his
scheme failed. The Court {140} would not support him, the King too
prudent, the Queen too impolitic. Marie Antoinette herself, it is
said, in her rancorous dislike of La Fayette, gave Pétion the secret as
to his contemplated use of the national guards; and this proved fatal.
Checked by the action of the mayor and the Jacobins, unsupported by the
Tuileries, La Fayette had to abandon his efforts.</p>
<p>Another attempt followed. The Department of the Seine, presided by La
Rochefoucauld, tried to assert its constitutional authority over the
great city situated within its limits. It voted the suspension of
Pétion, mayor of Paris, and of Manuel, his procureur, for dereliction
of duty in failing to maintain order on the 20th of June.</p>
<p>The action of La Rochefoucauld in suspending Pétion took place on the
7th of July, a moment at which the advance of the Duke of Brunswick was
momentarily expected and at which the national excitement was tending
to overpower the royalist reaction. This reaction was now checked.
The Jacobins were resolved to use mob pressure to whatever extent was
necessary for accomplishing their purpose. On the 11th they passed
through the assembly a declaration that the country was in danger, and
two days later imposed a vote quashing the {141} action of the
Department and reinstating Pétion.</p>
<p>The ferment now blended inextricably the war fever and the action
against the King. Volunteers were enrolling for the army. National
guards were being summoned from the provinces to renew the federation
of 1791, and the violent section of the agitators saw in these national
guards the means for pushing over the royal authority. A demonstration
better organized than that of the 20th of June, and armed, could rid
France of the Bourbon incubus. Preparations for such a demonstration
were at once taken in hand.</p>
<p>Among the provincial troops now assembled in or marching towards Paris,
there was no body more remarkable than the battalion of the 300
Marseillais. Like a whirlwind of patriotic emotion they swept through
France, dragging the cannon with which they meant to knock at the gates
of the Tuileries, chanting Rouget's new song forever to be associated
with the name of their own city. These Marseillais were red-hot
republicans, and in judging the political situation of that moment this
constitutes one of the salient points. The Parisian patriots were on
the whole far less republican than those of the provinces. {142} Among
the men who were organizing the new demonstration the greater part
meant nothing more than ridding themselves of Louis, of an executive
officer whom they regarded as treacherous and as secretly in league
with the enemy. What should come after him they did not much consider.
In the forming of this state of opinion the individual action of
Robespierre had played a great part. Robespierre, who feared in war
the opportunity for the soldier, saw in republicanism merely the
triumph of a Cromwell; to him La Fayette was a tangible danger, the
word <i>republic</i> an empty formula. And so, with an influence still
widening, despite his opposition to the war, he steadily preached the
doctrine that the form of government was nothing so long as civil,
social and political equality were secured.</p>
<p>At the parade held on the 14th of July,—the Marseillais had not yet
arrived,—there were no cries of <i>Vive le roi</i>, and none of, <i>Vive la
république</i>, but <i>Vive la nation</i> was the adopted formula. Yet at the
same moment Billaud-Varennes, one of the most advanced of the Jacobins,
was addressing the Club in favour of a republic; and the <i>fédérés</i>
formed a central committee which on the 17th petitioned the {143}
assembly for the suspension of the King. To support the movement
further the section committees were decreed in continuous session, and
came under the control of the organization.</p>
<p>On the 30th of July, Brunswick crossed the frontier; the advance of his
columns was heralded by a proclamation or manifesto. In this document
he announced to the people of France that he entered the country as the
ally of their sovereign, and with the purpose of visiting on Paris an
"exemplary and never-to-be-forgotten vengeance … military execution
and total subversion," and of bringing "the guilty rebels to the death
they have deserved." Copies of the manifesto reached Paris on the 3rd
of August, with immediate effect. To Louis the Prussian general's
utterances appeared so incredible that they were promptly disavowed as
a forgery. To the people they confirmed the suspicion that had been
rankling for three long years, that had been envenomed by all the
poison of Marat. A howl of execration arose, a howl not against
Brunswick but against the inmates of the Tuileries; and in that howl
the voices of the Marseillais, who had just reached the city, were
raised loudest.</p>
<p>{144} The inevitable result followed in just one week, a week spent in
preparations by the popular leaders. At one o'clock in the morning of
the 10th of August delegates from the sections met at the Hotel de
Ville and assumed control of the city. This body was joined by Danton,
Marat and Hébert, among others, and of these Danton more than anyone
else represented the driving power. Orders were given for ringing the
tocsin. All Paris knew the movement was coming, and understood the
signal.</p>
<p>At the Tuileries preparations for resistance had been made. The
Marquis de Mandat took charge of the defence. He had about 1,500
well-disposed national guards from the western or middle class
districts, and about 1,000 excellent Swiss infantry of the King's
household troops. These he posted to good advantage, guarding the
palace and the bridges over the Seine to the south. For a while all
went well. The insurrection began slowly; and when it did roll up as
far as the bridges Mandat's musketry held it easily at bay.</p>
<p>The insurrectional Commune now realized that Mandat was a considerable
obstacle and set to work to remove him. In his official station as a
national guard commander he was {145} under the jurisdiction of the
mayor, so Pétion was made to write, ordering him to report at the Hotel
de Ville. Mandat declined to obey. The attack still hung fire. The
order was repeated. Mandat, this time, weakly allowed himself to be
persuaded into compliance. He proceeded to the Hotel de Ville,—and
was butchered on the stairs by a band of insurgents.</p>
<p>After the defence had lost its general, and with daylight over the
scene, events moved fast. The national guards at the palace could not
be kept to their posts in the absence of their chief and in presence of
the swelling numbers of the attackers. The defence of the bridges had
to be given up and the Swiss withdrew into the palace. A lull followed
while the insurrection gathered up its strength for the attack on the
Tuileries itself.</p>
<p>During that lull, at half past eight, Louis, with his family, left the
palace. He believed resistance useless; he feared a massacre might
occur; he was averse as ever to bloodshed; and so was persuaded that
his best course would be to seek refuge in the assembly.</p>
<p>Just as Louis left, the real attack was delivered on the palace. The
Swiss replied with musketry, sallied out, charged the insurgents {146}
and drove them across the Carrousel; then they returned, and presently
received a written order from the King bidding them not to fire. This
momentarily paralyzed the defence. The insurgents, led by the
provincial <i>fédérés</i>, were not yet beaten, but flowed back once more to
the attack. Some field pieces which they had, breached the palace
doors, a sharp struggle followed, and soon the insurgents had got a
foothold. What followed was a massacre. Many of the Swiss were cut
down in the corridors and rooms of the palace. Others were mown down
by musketry trying to escape across the Tuileries gardens. A few got
away and sought refuge in a near-by church, but were there overtaken by
the popular fury, and butchered. The rage of the people was unbridled,
and success turned it into ferocity, even bestiality. The bodies of
the Swiss were mutilated in an atrocious fashion.</p>
<p>While the triumphant insurgents were sacking the palace and committing
their barbarities on the unfortunate Swiss, Louis and his family
remained unmolested in the assembly. They were to remain there for
three days while their fate was being decided, temporary accommodation
being found for them. The situation was really this, that no party was
yet {147} quite prepared for the destruction of the King himself, only
of the royal power. The assembly which, a year earlier, had assumed
the position that the King was necessary to the constitution had now
virtually abandoned it, and the Commune, while going much further than
the assembly, was not yet ready to strike Louis. But it did claim the
custody of the royal family, and that, after a three days' struggle,
the assembly conceded. On the 13th of August the royal family went to
imprisonment in the Temple, a small mediaeval dungeon in the central
quarter of Paris.</p>
<p>Only about three hundred members of the assembly were present to face
the storm when Louis sought refuge in its midst. Vergniaud was
president. Presently the Commune sent a request that the assembly
should depose the King. Vergniaud thereupon proposed a middle course;
the assembly could suspend the King from his functions and call
together a convention to solve the constitutional question that the
suspension of the Executive presented; in the meanwhile ministers
elected by the assembly should constitute a provisional Executive
Council. These proposals were carried, and the Executive Council was
elected; it contained most of the members of the {148} Brissotin
ministry, but with a new member. At the head of the poll was Danton,
and Danton was made Minister of Justice.</p>
<p>Danton now clearly appears as the man of the situation. The people had
triumphed, and Danton was the statesman of the people. He bridged the
gap between the Commune and the assembly. He gave rein to the popular
fury and to the destruction of every anti-popular influence, and he
attempted, by placing himself at the head of the flood, to direct it
against the great external danger that menaced France.</p>
<p>On the 11th of August the assembly decreed that universal suffrage
should be put in force for the elections to the convention. Large
police powers were voted to the Commune, which Robespierre now joined;
and laws were passed aimed against those suspected of being in sympathy
with the advancing army or with Louis. The <i>appel nominal</i> was placed
in force in many of the sections, and Danton put the machinery of his
ministry at work to reinforce these measures, to convert them to use
for terrorizing the moderates, for satisfying the popular suspicions
against the aristocrats, for weighing on the elections. The primaries
were to begin on the 27th of August, those for Paris {149} on the 2d of
September; the meeting of electors for nominating the deputies of Paris
was to take place on the 5th of September.</p>
<p>Meanwhile Brunswick's columns were making steady, methodical progress
through the hills of Lorraine, through the frontier belt of fortresses.
The French armies in their front were weak in numbers, even weaker in
leadership. La Fayette, who had attempted to reaffirm the constitution
on hearing of the event of the 10th of August, deemed it prudent to
ride over the frontier when commissioners of the assembly reached his
camp; he was seized as a prisoner by the allies to remain their captive
for many years. On the 20th the Prussian guns opened on Longwy; on the
23rd it surrendered. On the 30th the siege of Verdun was begun, Verdun
which Louis had so nearly reached the year before. It was generally
known that the fortress could not stand more than a few days. Between
it and Paris there was only the Argonne, a few miles of hilly passes,
and then 100 miles of open country.</p>
<p>The steady advance of Brunswick drove Paris into a state approaching
delirium. On the news of the fall of Longwy reaching the city, the
extremists, their appetites whetted by {150} the butchery of the Swiss,
began to plot a massacre of the political prisoners, of the royalists,
of the suspect. On the 28th of August Danton, riding on the wings of
the storm, asked power from the Commune to carry out domiciliary visits
for the purpose of arresting suspects. This power was granted, and in
three days the prisons were filled to overflowing, priests and persons
of title being specially singled out for arrest.</p>
<p>By the 1st of September Paris was ready to answer the Duke of
Brunswick, was ready for the stroke that was to destroy the
anti-revolutionists, that was to strike terror to the hearts of all
enemies of the people. But the awfulness of the deed delayed its
execution. The day passed in high-wrought excitement; at any moment
news might arrive of the fall of Verdun,—that might be the signal for
the explosion of the popular fury.</p>
<p>On the 2d there was still no news of Verdun, but the moment could not
be delayed much longer. In the night preparations had been made. Men
to do the business of popular execution had been approached; some had
been offered pay. The leaders were determined to carry through their
enterprise. In the assembly Danton thundered from the tribune: {151}
"Verdun has not yet surrendered. One part of the people will march to
the frontier, another will throw up intrenchments, and the rest will
defend our cities with pikes. Paris will second these great efforts.
The assembly will become a war committee. We demand that whoever
refuses to serve shall be punished by death. The tocsin you will hear
presently is not a signal of alarm; it is ringing the charge against
the enemies of our country. To conquer them we must be audacious, yet
more audacious, and still more audacious, and France is saved."</p>
<p>The tocsin rang, as Danton had ordered; alarm guns were fired; drummers
woke the echoes of the streets and of the squares, and presently the
deed of supreme audacity and of supreme horror began to come into
being. Crowds collected about the prisons. Groups forced a way in.
More or less improvised committees took possession, and massacre began.</p>
<p>The massacre of September is one of the most lurid events of the
Revolution, easier therefore for the romancist to deal with than for
the historian. Its horrors are quite beyond question. At one point,
Bicêtre, the killing continued until late on the 6th, nearly four days.
The {152} total number of victims was very large, possibly between
2,000 and 3,000. At many places the slaughter was indiscriminate,
accompanied by nameless barbarities, carried out by gangs of brutal
ruffians who were soon intoxicated with gore and with wine. But
alongside of these aspects were others more difficult to do justice to,
but the careful weighing of which is necessary if any just estimate of
the event is to be reached.</p>
<p>The massacring was carried out by a small number of individuals,
perhaps two or three hundred in all, and of these a considerable
proportion undoubtedly acted in a spirit of blind political and social
rage, and in the belief that they were carrying out an act of justice.
A large mass of citizens gave the massacres their approval by forming
crowds about the prison doors. As to these crowds there are two
salient facts. The first is that on the first day they were large and
excited, and afforded that moral support without which the massacres
could hardly have been carried out. After the first day they
diminished rapidly; and by the end of the third day all popular support
was gone, and a feeling of horror had seized on the city and supplanted
everything else. Then again the mob, as it crowded about the {153}
prison doors, showed a marked attitude. Many of the prisoners, those
who were so lucky as to pass for good citizens and friends of the
people, were released. As these came out the crowd received them with
every sign of joy and of fraternization. When on the contrary it was a
victim coming out to be slaughtered, there was silence, no shouting, no
exultation.</p>
<p>In other words, the event was, with most, an act of popular justice,
and this was the appearance it had even when seen from the interior of
the prisons. At l'Abbaye Maillard presided over the self-appointed
tribunal, and it is impossible to doubt that, whenever he was satisfied
that the prisoner deserved his freedom, he attempted to secure his
life. The case of St. Méard, an aristocrat, a colonel, who had enough
good sense and courage to speak plainly to the judges, avowing himself
a royalist but persuading them that he took no part in
anti-revolutionary schemes, is most illuminating. Maillard declared he
saw no harm in him; he was acquitted; and was fraternally embraced by
the crowd when he safely passed the fatal door.</p>
<p>All did not have the good fortune of St. Méard. The case of the
Princesse de {154} Lamballe, at La Force, must serve to give the worst
side of, and to close, this chapter of blood. Long the friend,
confidante and agent of the Queen, she had followed her to the Temple,
and had been removed from there but a few days previously. She was too
well known and too near Marie Antoinette to have any chance of escape.
In a fainting condition she was dragged before the tribunal, and was
soon passed out to the executioners. It is not probable that she had
much consciousness of what followed. The gang of murderers at this
point were butchers of the Halles, and they apparently treated their
victim as they might have a beast brought to the slaughter. She was
carried under the arms to where a pile of bodies had accumulated, and,
in a moment made ready, was butchered in the technical sense of the
term. Her head was hoisted on a pike, as also other parts of her
dismembered anatomy, and carried in triumph to be displayed under the
windows of the prisoners at the Temple.</p>
<br/>
<p>Verdun fell on the 2d of September, at the very moment when Danton was
announcing its continued resistance. On the 5th the Duke of Brunswick
resumed his march on Paris, and {155} on the same day, the electors of
that city met and chose twenty deputies to the convention; their choice
was coloured by the fact that the massacres were still continuing. At
the head of the poll stood Robespierre; Danton was next; among the
others may be noted Camille Desmoulins, Marat, and, last of all, the
duc d'Orléans, who a few days later metamorphosed his Bourbon name into
Philippe <i>Egalité</i>.</p>
<p>Throughout France the electoral process was everywhere giving much the
same result. Less than one-tenth of the electors used their franchise;
and the extreme party won great successes. By the middle of September
the new deputies were reaching Paris. The <i>Législative</i> in its last
moments was feeble and undignified. Marat threatened it with massacre,
and declared that its members were as much the enemies of the country
as were the imprisoned aristocrats. Under this menace the Législative
watched the massacres of September without raising a hand to protect
its unfortunate victims. Danton did the same. As minister of Justice
the prisoners and the tribunals were under his special charge. But
although he may have facilitated the escape of some individuals, and
although he took no direct {156} part, yet he believed that no
government could be established strong enough to save the Revolution,
at such a crisis as it had reached, save by paying this toll of blood
to the suspicion, the vengeance, the cruelty, the justice of the
people. He dared to pay the price, and later he, and he alone, dared
to shoulder the responsibility.</p>
<br/><br/><br/>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />