<SPAN name="chap13"></SPAN>
<P CLASS="noindent">
{185}</p>
<h3> CHAPTER XIII </h3>
<h3> THE REIGN OF TERROR </h3>
<p>For six weeks after the fall of the Gironde, until the 13th of July,
the course of events in France, both in Paris and in the provinces,
reflected the bitterness of the two factions, conqueror and conquered.
In a minor way, it also revealed the fundamental difference of attitude
between the two wings of the successful party, between Danton, content
to push the Girondins out of the way of the national policy, and
Robespierre, rankling to destroy those who offended his puritanical and
exclusive doctrine.</p>
<p>The Girondins had behind them a strong country backing; they had always
been the advocates of the provinces against Paris; some of them had
declared for federalism, for local republics, semi-independent states
centring about Lyons, Marseilles, Bordeaux. Those who succeeded in
escaping from Paris, made their way to where they might obtain support,
and found, here and there, arms open to {186} receive them. Lyons had
risen against the Government on the 29th of May, and had rid itself of
the Jacobin committee headed by Chalier, that had so far held it under
control. Marseilles followed the example of Lyons. Normandy, where a
considerable group of the fugitive deputies sought refuge, began to
make preparations for marching on the capital.</p>
<p>This was serious enough. But two other dangers, each greater,
threatened Paris. The military situation on the northern frontier was
still no better, while the Vendéens were advancing from success to
success, were increasing the size, the confidence, the efficiency of
their armies. In such a desperate situation Danton seemed the only
possible saviour, and for a few weeks he had his way. New generals
were appointed; Custine to the Netherlands, Beauharnais to the Rhine,
Biron to the Vendée; and at the same time negotiations were opened with
the powers. But fortune refused to smile on Danton. Ill success met
him at every turn, and opened the way to power for Robespierre. On the
10th of June the Vendéens captured the town of Saumur on the Loire,
giving them a good passage for carrying operations to the northern side
of the river. A council of war decided that an {187} advance should be
made into Brittany and Normandy, both strongly disaffected to the
Convention. In the latter province Brissot and Buzot were already
actively forming troops for the projected march against Paris. But
before advancing to the north the Vendéen generals decided that it was
imperative they should capture the city of Nantes, which controls all
the country about the mouth of the Loire. Preparations were made
accordingly, and, as the Vendéens had no siege train, Cathelineau and
Charette headed a desperate assault against the city on the 29th of
June. Cathelineau was killed. Nantes defended itself bravely. The
Vendéens were thrown back, and, as many writers have thought, their
failure at that point and at that moment saved the Republic.</p>
<p>Apart from this one success, everything had been going ill with
Danton's measures, and the Robespierrists were making corresponding
headway. On the 10th of July the Committee of Public Safety was
reconstituted, and Danton was not re-elected. Couthon and St. Just
joined it, and Robespierre himself went on two weeks later; among the
other members Barère for the moment followed Robespierre, while Carnot
accepted every internal {188} measure, concentrating all his energy on
the administration of the war department.</p>
<p>It was just at this instant, with the Vendéens for the moment checked,
that Normandy made its effort. On the 13th of July its army under the
Baron de Wimpffen, a constitutional monarchist, was met by a Parisian
army at Pacy, 30 miles from the capital. The Normans met with defeat,
a defeat they were never able to retrieve.</p>
<p>On the same day a dramatic event was occurring at Paris,—the last
despairing stroke of the Gironde against its detested opponents. From
Caen, where Brissot and Buzot had been helping to organize Wimpffen's
army, there had started for the capital a few days previously a young
woman, Charlotte Corday. Full of enthusiasm, like Madame Roland, for
the humanitarian ideals that blended so largely with the passions of
the Revolution, she represented in its noblest, most fervent form that
French provincial liberalism that looked to the Girondins for
leadership. Like them she detested the three great figures who had led
the Parisian democracy through massacre to its triumph,—Danton,
Robespierre, Marat. And of the three it was Marat who worked deepest
on her imagination, Marat always baying for {189} blood, always
scenting fresh victims, always corrupting opinion with his scum of
printer's ink and poison. To Charlotte Corday it appeared that in this
one individual all that was noble and beautiful in the Revolution was
converted into all that was hideous and ignoble; and she slowly began
to perceive that even a feeble woman like herself could remove that
blot from France, if only she could find the courage…</p>
<p>On the 13th of July, Charlotte Corday, accomplished her twofold
sacrifice. She gained admission to Marat's house and stabbed him in
his bath; she meekly but courageously accepted the consequences. After
being nearly lynched by the mob, she was tried by the Revolutionary
Tribunal, and sent to the guillotine.</p>
<p>The Prussians captured Mainz on the 23rd of July, the Austrians
Valenciennes on the 28th. These disasters enabled Robespierre and the
Commune to impose their views as to the conduct of the military affairs
of the Republic. Decrees were passed for purifying the army. The
aristocrat generals, Beauharnais, Biron, Custine, were removed, and,
eventually, were all sent to the scaffold. <i>Sans-culottes</i>, some
honest, some capable, many dishonest, many {190} incapable, replaced
them. Sans-culottism reigned supreme. Civic purity became the
universal test; and on this shibboleth the Commune inaugurated a system
of politics of which the Tammany organization in New York offers the
most conspicuous example at the beginning of the 20th century. Hébert
was the party boss; his nominees filled the offices; graft was placed
on the order of the day. The ministry of war and its numerous
contracts became the happy hunting ground of the Parisian
politician,—Hébert himself, on one occasion, working off an edition of
600,000 copies of his <i>Père Duchesne</i> through that ministry. And
lastly one must add that the army of the interior, the army facing the
Vendée fell into the hands of the politicians. An incapable drunkard,
Rossignol, was placed in command instead of Biron who, after two
victories over the Vendéens, was dismissed, imprisoned and sent to the
guillotine.</p>
<p>It was perhaps necessary that a brave and dashing soldier of the old
school like Biron should be removed from command, if the decrees of the
Convention for prosecuting the war against the Vendée were to be
carried out. One of those decrees ordered that "the forests shall be
razed, the crops cut down, the cattle {191} seized. The Minister of
War shall send combustible materials of all sorts to burn the woods,
brush, and heath." That was the spirit now entering the Revolution,
the fury of destruction, the dementia of suspicion, the reign of terror.</p>
<p>The terrorists were of two sorts, the men of faction like Hébert;
together with those who accepted terrorism reluctantly but daringly
like Danton; with them terror was a political weapon. With
Robespierre, however, and his Jacobin stalwarts, it was something more,
a strangely compounded thing, a political weapon in a sense, but a
weapon behind which stood a bigot, a fanatic, a temperament governed by
jealous fears and by the morbid revengefulness of the man of feeble
physique. It was Robespierre who always stood for the worst side of
terrorism, for all that was most insidious and deep seated in it; and
after its failure and the reaction in the summer of 1794, it was his
name that was deservedly associated with the reign of terror.</p>
<p>Robespierre in the summer of 1793 was still logically maintaining his
attitude; while Danton fought the enemies of the Republic, he fought
Danton's measures. He told the Jacobin Club that it was always the
same {192} proposal they had to face, new levies, new battalions, to
feed the great butchery. The plan of the enemies of the people,—he
did not yet dare declare that Danton was one of them,—was to destroy
the republic by civil and foreign war. In a manuscript note found
after his death, he says "The interior danger comes from the bourgeois;
to conquer them one must rally the people. The Convention must use the
people and must spread insurrection.…" In August, carrying his
thought a step further, he appeals to the Jacobin Club against the
traitors whom he sees in everyone whose opinion diverges a hair's
breadth from his own. There are traitors, he declares, even on the
Committee of Public Safety, and all traitors must go to the guillotine.</p>
<p>At the moment this speech was delivered Admiral Lord Hood had just
captured Toulon, while Marseilles was being attacked by Carteaux at the
head of an army acting for the Convention. Coburg, commanding the
Austrian forces in the Netherlands, was gaining a series of minor
successes, and his cavalry was not much more than four days' march from
Paris. Provisions were being gathered into the city by requisition,
that is, by armed columns operating in the neighbouring departments.
{193} Confiscatory measures passed the Convention for raising a forced
loan of 1,000,000,000 francs, for converting "superfluous" income to
the use of the State,—a policy of poor man against rich.</p>
<p>Alongside of these measures terrorism was getting into full swing. The
revolutionary tribunal had its staff quadrupled on the 5th of
September; within a few days the sections were given increased police
powers; and Collot d'Herbois and Billaud-Varennes, the two strongest
supporters of Hébert in the Convention were elected to the Committee of
Public Safety. On the 17th was passed the famous <i>Loi des suspects</i>,
the most drastic, if not the first, decree on that burning question.
It provided that all partisans of federalism and tyranny, all enemies
of liberty, all <i>ci-devant</i> nobles not known for their attachment to
the new institutions, must be arrested; and further that the section
committees must draw up lists of suspects residing within their
districts. All this meant a repetition on a larger and better
organized plan of the massacres of a year before. As Danton had said
in the debates on the Revolutionary Tribunal: "This tribunal will take
the place of that supreme tribunal, the vengeance of the people; let us
be terrible so {194} as to dispense the people from being terrible."
Judicial, organized terror was to replace popular, chaotic terror.</p>
<p>With terror now organized, the prisons filled, and the Revolutionary
Tribunal sending victims to the guillotine daily, the internal struggle
became one between two terrorist parties, of Hébert and of Robespierre,
both committed to the policy of the day, but with certain differences.
Hébert viewed the system as one affording personal safety,—the
executioner being safer than the victim,—and the best opportunity for
graft. The man of means was singled out by his satellites for
suspicion and arrest, and was then informed that a judicious payment in
the right quarter would secure release. Beyond that, Hébert probably
cared little enough one way or the other; he was merely concerned in
extracting all the material satisfaction he could out of life. With
Robespierre the case was different; it was a struggle for a cause, for
a creed, a creed of which he was the only infallible prophet. Poor,
neat, respectable, unswerving but jealous, he commanded wide admiration
as the type of the incorruptible democrat; stiffly and self-consciously
he was reproducing the popular pose of Benjamin Franklin. {195}
Between him and Hébert there could be no real union. He was willing,
while Hébert remained strong in his hold on the public, to act
alongside of him, but that was all.</p>
<p>Under the pressure of the Commune and the Mountain, the Convention put
the laws of terror in force against the defeated Gironde on the 3rd of
October. Forty-three deputies, including Philippe <i>Egalité</i>, were sent
to the tribunal, and about one hundred others were outlawed or ordered
under arrest. The Convention, having thus washed its hands before the
public, now felt able to make a stand against the increasing
encroachments of the Commune, and on the 10th St. Just proposed that
the Government should continue revolutionary till the peace, which
meant that the Committee of Public Safety should govern and the
constitution remain suspended.</p>
<p>The Committee showed as much vigour in dealing with the provinces as it
showed feebleness in dealing with Paris. Through August and September,
rebellious Lyons had been besieged; early in October it fell. The
Committee proposed a decree which the Convention accepted,—from June
1793 to July 1794 it accepted everything,—declaring that Lyons should
be razed to the earth. Couthon was {196} sent to carry out this
draconian edict, but proved too mild. At the end of October Collot
d'Herbois, Fouché and 3,000 Parisian <i>sans-culottes</i> were sent down,
and for awhile all went well. Houses were demolished, and executions
were got in hand with so much energy that cannon and grape shot had to
be used to keep pace with the rapidity of the sentences. About three
thousand persons in all probably perished.</p>
<p>It was at this moment that in Paris the guillotine, working more slowly
but more steadily than Fouché's cannon and grape, was claiming some of
its most illustrious victims. From the 12th to the 15th of October,
the Revolutionary Tribunal had to deal with the case of Marie
Antoinette. The Queen, who had been treated with increased severity
since the execution of the King, supported the attacks of the pitiless
public prosecutor, Fouquier-Tinville, with firmness and dignity. The
accusations against her were of the same general character as those
against Louis, and require no special comment. But an incident of the
trial brought out some of the most nauseous aspects of the Hébert
régime. The Commune had introduced men of the lowest type at {197} the
Temple, had placed the Dauphin in the keeping of the infamous cobbler
Simon, had attempted to manufacture filthy evidence against the Queen.
Hébert went into the witness box to sling mud at her in person, and it
was at that moment only, with a look and a word of reply that no
instinct could mistake, that she forced a murmur of indignation or
sympathy from the public. Robespierre was dining when he heard of the
incident, and in his anger with Hébert broke his plate over the table.</p>
<p>The Queen went to the guillotine, driven in an open cart, on the 16th.
A week later the Girondins went to trial, twenty-one deputies, among
them Brissot, Vergniaud, Gensonné and Boyer Fonfrède. Their trial
lasted five days, and among its auditors was Camille
Desmoulins,—Desmoulins, whose pamphlets had helped place his
unfortunate opponents where they stood, Desmoulins, whose heart, whose
generosity was stirred, who already was revolting against terrorism,
who was suddenly overwhelmed with a wave of remorse when sentence of
death was pronounced against the men of the Gironde. It was the first
revolt of opinion against the reign of terror, the first {198}
perceptible movement of the conscience of France, and it was to send
Desmoulins himself to the guillotine.</p>
<p>The Girondins went to the scaffold on the 31st of October. The Duc
d'Orléans on the 6th of November; four days later Madame Roland, who
met death perhaps a little pedantically but quite nobly; then, on the
12th, Bailly. Of the Girondins who had escaped from Paris several
committed suicide, Roland on receiving news of his wife's death; others
within the next few months, Condorcet, Pétion, Buzot.</p>
<p>In this same month of November 1793 was introduced the Revolutionary
Calendar, of which more will be said in the last chapter.[1] The holy
seventh day disappeared in favour of the anti-clerical tenth day,
Décadi; Saints' days and Church festivals were wiped out. This new
departure was a step forward in the religious question which, a few
weeks later, brought about an acute crisis.</p>
<p>Between October and December the climax and the turn were reached in
the Vendean war. After heavy fighting in October Henri de La
Rochejacquelein had invaded Brittany, defeating the Republicans at
Chateau Gontier {199} on the 25th. Rossignol now had under his orders
the garrison of Mainz and two excellent subordinates in Kléber and
Marceau, who succeeded, in spite of their commander, in wresting
success at last. On the 13th of December a tremendous struggle took
place at Le Mans in which the Vendéens were beaten after a loss of
about 15,000 men. Kléber gave them no respite but a few days later cut
up the remnants at Savenay. Although fighting continued long
afterwards this proved the end of the Vendean grand army.</p>
<p>These victories were immediately followed by judicial repression. The
<i>conventionnel</i> Carrier organized a Revolutionary Tribunal at Nantes,
and committed worse horrors than Fouché had at Lyons. Finding a rate
of 200 executions a day insufficient he invented the noyade. River
barges were taken, their bottoms were hinged so as to open
conveniently, and prisoners, tied in pairs, naked and regardless of
sex, were taken out in them, and released into the water. At Nantes,
like at Arras and several other points, the proceedings of the
Revolutionary Tribunals and of the gangs who worked the prisons, were
marked by gross immorality in dealing with the women prisoners. At
Nantes, Carrier, {200} most thorough and most infamous of the
Terrorists, is said to have caused the death of 15,000 persons in four
months.</p>
<p>The fury of the Revolution, which turned to frenzy and dementia at
Nantes, blazed into a marvellous flame of patriotic energy on the
frontiers. Nearly half a million men were enrolled in the course of
1793. A new volunteer battalion was added to each battalion of the old
army, the new unit being named a <i>demi-brigade</i>. Rankers were pushed
up to high command, partly by political influence, partly for merit.
Jourdan, an old soldier, a shop-keeper, became general of the army of
the north, and on the 15th of October defeated Coburg at Wattignies.
The brilliant Hoche, ex-corporal of the French guards, was placed at
the head of the army of the Moselle. Pichegru, the son of a peasant,
took over the army of the Rhine. Under these citizen generals new
tactics replaced the old. Pipe-clay and method gave way to
Sans-culottism and dash. The greatest of the generals of the
Revolution said: "I had sooner see a soldier without his breeches than
without his bayonet." Rapidity, surprise, the charging column, the
helter-skelter pursuit, were the innovations of {201} the new French
generals. They translated into terms of tactics and strategy, Danton's
famous apostrophe, "Audacity, more audacity, yet more audacity!"</p>
<br/><br/>
<P CLASS="noindent">
[1] See Chap. XVII.</p>
<br/><br/><br/>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />