<p><SPAN name="link2H_4_0046" id="link2H_4_0046"></SPAN></p>
<br/>
<h2> GOD-MAKING. </h2>
<p>"Man is certainly stark mad; he cannot make a flea, and yet he will be
making gods by dozens." So wrote honest Montaigne, the first great sceptic
in modern history, who was so far in advance of his age that he surprised
the world by venturing to doubt whether it was after all a just and
sensible thing to burn a man alive for differing from his neighbors.</p>
<p>The history of that mental aberration which is called religion, and a
survey of the present state of the world, from the fetish worshipper of
central Africa to the super-subtle Theist of educated Europe, furnish us
with countless illustrations of the truth of Montaigne's exclamation.
God-making has always been a prevalent pastime, although it has less
attraction for the modern than for the ancient mind. It was a recreation
in which everyone could indulge, whether learned or illiterate, young or
old, rich or poor. All the material needed to fashion gods of was
ignorance, and there was always an unlimited stock of that article. The
artificer was imagination, a glorious faculty, which is the highest dower
of the creative artist and the scientific discoverer, and in their service
is fruitful in usefulness and beauty, but which in the service of theology
is a frightful curse, filling the mental world with fantastic monsters who
waylay and devour.</p>
<p>Common people, however, who did the work of the world, were not able to do
much god-making. Their leisure and ability were both limited. But they had
a large capacity for admiring the productions of others, and their
deficiencies were supplied by a special class of men, called priests, who
were set apart for the manufacture of deities, and who devoted their time
and their powers to the holy trade. This pious division of labor, this
specialisation of function, still continues. Carpenters and tailors,
grocers and butchers, who are immersed all the week in labor or business,
have no opportunity for long excursions in the field of divinity; and
therefore they take their religion at second hand from the priest on
Sunday. It was not the multitude, but the sacred specialists, who built up
the gigantic and elaborate edifice of theology, which is a purely
arbitrary construction, deriving all its design and coherence from the
instinctive logic of the human mind, that operates alike in a fairy tale
and in a syllogism.</p>
<p>Primitive man used conveniently-shaped flints before he fashioned flint
instruments; discovery always preceding invention. In like manner he found
gods before he made them. A charm resides in some natural object, such as
a fish's tooth, a queer-shaped pebble, or a jewel, and it is worn as an
amulet to favor and protect. This is fetishism. By-and-bve counterfeits
are made of animals and men, or amalgams of both, and the fetishistic
sentiment is transferred to these. This is the beginning of polytheism.
And how far it extends even into civilised periods, let the superstitions
of Europe attest. The nun who tells her beads, and the lady who wears an
ornamental crucifix, are to some extent fetishists; while the Catholic
worship of saints is only polytheism in disguise.</p>
<p>Reading the Bible with clear eyes, we see that the ancient Jews worshipped
gods of their own making, which were handed down as family relics. When
Jacob made tracks after sucking his uncle dry, Rachel carried off the poor
old fellow's teraphim, and left him without even a god to worship. Jahveh
himself, who has since developed into God the Father, was originally
nothing but an image in an ark. Micah, in the book of Judges, makes
himself a houseful of gods, and hires a Levite as his domestic chaplain.
How long the practice persisted we may judge from the royal scorn which
Isaiah pours on the image-mongers, who hewed down cedars and cypresses,
oaks and ashes, some for fuel and some for idols. Let us hear the great
prophet: "He burneth part thereof in the fire; with part thereof he eateth
flesh; he roasteth roast, and is satisfied: yea, he warmeth himself, and
saith, Aha, I am warm, I have seen the fire: And the residue thereof he
maketh a god, even his graven image: he falleth down unto it, and
worshippeth it, and prayeth unto it, and saith, Deliver me, for thou art
my god."</p>
<p>Twenty-six centuries have elapsed since Isaiah wrote that biting satire,
yet image-worship still prevails over three-fourths of the world; and even
in Christian countries, to use Browning's phrase, we "see God made and
eaten every day." A wave of the hand and a muttered spell, change bread or
wafer and port-wine into the body and blood of Christ, which are joyously
consumed by his cannibal worshippers.</p>
<p>Not even the higher divinities of the greater faiths are exempt from the
universal law. They are not creatures of man's hand, yet they are
creatures of his brain. What are they but his own fancies, brooded on till
they become facts of memory, and seem to possess an objective existence?
The process is natural and easy. A figment of the imagination may become
intensely real. Have we not a clearer idea of Hamlet and Othello than of
half our closest acquaintances? Feuerbach went straight to the mark when
he aimed to prove "that the powers before which man crouches are the
creatures of his own limited, ignorant, uncultured and timorous mind, and
that in especial the being whom man sets over against himself as a
separate supernatural existence in his own being."</p>
<p>Yes, all theology is anthropomorphism—the making of gods in man's
image. What is the God of our own theology, as Matthew Arnold puts it, but
a magnified man? We cannot transcend our own natures, even in imagination;
we can only interpret the universe in the terms of our own consciousness,
nor can we endow our gods with any other attributes than we possess
ourselves. When we seek to penetrate the "mystery of the infinite," we see
nothing but our own shadow and hear nothing but the echo of our own voice.</p>
<p>As we are so are our gods, and what man worships is what he himself would
be. The placid Egyptian nature smiles on the face of the sphinx. The gods
of India reflect the terror of its heat and its beasts and serpents, the
fertility of its soil, and the exuberance of its people's imagination. The
glorious Pantheon of Greece—</p>
<p>Praxitelean shapes, whose marble smiles<br/>
Fill the hashed air with everlasting love—<br/></p>
<p>embodies the wise and graceful fancies of the noblest race that ever
adorned the earth, compared with whose mythology the Christian system is a
hideous nightmare. The Roman gods wear a sterner look, befitting their
practical and imperial worshippers, and Jove himself is the ideal genius
of the eternal city. The deities of the old Scandinavians, whose blood
tinges our English veins, were fierce and warlike as themselves, with
strong hands, supple wrists, mighty thews, lofty stature, grey-blue eyes
and tawny hair. Thus has it ever been. So Man created god in his own
image, in the image of Man created he him; male and female created he
them.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />