<h2> <SPAN name="article06"></SPAN> The Robinson Tradition </h2>
<p>Having read lately an appreciation of that almost forgotten
author Marryat, and having seen in the shilling box of a
second-hand bookseller a few days afterward a copy of
<i>Masterman Ready</i>, I went in and bought the same. I had
read it as a child, and remembered vaguely that it combined
desert-island adventure with a high moral tone; jam and
powder in the usual proportions. Reading it again, I found
that the powder was even more thickly spread than I had
expected; hardly a page but carried with it a valuable lesson
for the young; yet this particular jam (guava and cocoanut)
has such an irresistible attraction for me that I swallowed
it all without a struggle, and was left with a renewed
craving for more and yet more desert-island stories. Having,
unfortunately, no others at hand, the only satisfaction I can
give myself is to write about them.</p>
<p>I would say first that, even if an author is writing for
children (as was Marryat), and even if morality can best be
implanted in the young mind with a watering of fiction, yet a
desert-island story is the last story which should be used
for this purpose. For a desert-island is a child’s
escape from real life and its many lessons. Ask yourself why
you longed for a desert-island when you were young, and you
will find the answer to be that you did what you liked there,
ate what you liked, and carried through your own adventures.
It is the “Family” which spoils <i>The Swiss
Family Robinson</i>, just as it is the Seagrave family which
nearly wrecks <i>Masterman Ready</i>. What is the good of
imagining yourself (as every boy does) “Alone in the
Pacific” if you are not going to be alone? Well,
perhaps we do not wish to be quite alone; but certainly to
have more than two on an island is to overcrowd it, and our
companion must be of a like age and disposition.</p>
<p>For this reason parents spoil any island for a healthy-minded
boy. He may love his father and mother as fondly as even they
could wish, but he does not want to take them bathing in the
lagoon with him--still less to have them on the shore,
telling him that there are too many sharks this morning and
that it is quite time he came out. Nor for that matter do
parents want to be bothered with children on a South Sea
holiday. In <i>Masterman Ready</i> there is a horrid little
boy called Tommy, aged six, who is always letting the musket
off accidentally, or getting bitten by a turtle, or taking
more than his share of the cocoanut milk. As a grown-up I
wondered why his father did not give him to the first savage
who came by, and so allow himself a chance of enjoying his
island in peace; but at Tommy’s age I should have
resented just as strongly a father who, even on a
desert-island, could not bear to see his boy making a fool of
himself with turtle and gunpowder.</p>
<p>I am not saying that a boy would really be happy for long,
whether on a desert-island or elsewhere, without his father
and mother. Indeed it is doubtful if he could survive,
happily or unhappily. Possibly William Seagrave could have
managed it. William was only twelve, but he talked like this:
“I agree with you, Ready. Indeed I have been thinking
the same thing for many days past.... I wish the savages
would come on again, for the sooner they come the sooner the
affair will be decided.” A boy who can talk like this
at twelve is capable of finding the bread-fruit tree for
himself. But William is an exception. I claim no such
independence for the ordinary boy; I only say that the
ordinary boy, however dependent on his parents, does like to
pretend that he is capable of doing without them, wherefore
he gives them no leading part in the imaginary adventures
which he pursues so ardently. If they are there at all, it is
only that he may come back to them in the last chapter and
tell them all about it... and be suitably admired.</p>
<p><i>Masterman Ready</i> seems to me, then, to be the work of a
father, not of an understanding writer for boys. Marryat
wrote it for his own children, towards whom he had
responsibilities; not for other people’s children, for
whom he would only be concerned to provide entertainment. But
even if the book was meant for no wider circle than the home,
one would still feel that the moral teaching was overdone. It
should be possible to be edifying without losing one’s
sense of humour. When Juno, the black servant, was struck by
lightning and not quite killed, she “appeared to be
very sensible of the wonderful preservation which she had
had. She had always been attentive whenever the Bible was
read, but now she did not appear to think that the morning
and evening services were sufficient to express her
gratitude.” Even a child would feel that Juno really
need not have been struck by lightning at all; even a child
might wonder how many services, on this scale of gratitude,
were adequate for the rest of the party whom the lightning
had completely missed. And it was perhaps a little
self-centred of Ready to thank God for her recovery on the
grounds that she could “ill be spared” by a
family rather short-handed in the rainy season.</p>
<p>However, the story is the thing. As long as a desert-island
book contains certain ingredients, I do not mind if other
superfluous matter creeps in. Our demands--we of the elect
who adore desert-islands--are simple. The castaways must
build themselves a hut with the aid of a bag of nails saved
from the wreck; they must catch turtles by turning them over
on their backs; they must find the bread-fruit tree and have
adventures with sharks. Twice they must be visited by
savages. On the first occasion they are taken by surprise,
but--the savages being equally surprised--no great harm is
done. Then the Hero says, “They will return when the
wind is favourable,” and he arranges his defences, not
forgetting to lay in a large stock of water. The savages
return in force, and then--this is most important--at the
most thirsty moment of the siege it is discovered that the
water is all gone! Generally a stray arrow has pierced the
water-butt, but in <i>Masterman Ready</i> the insufferable
Tommy has played the fool with it. (He would.) This is the
Hero’s great opportunity. He ventures to the spring to
get more water, and returns with it--wounded. Barely have the
castaways wetted their lips with the precious fluid when the
attack breaks out with redoubled fury. It seems now that all
is lost... when, lo! a shell bursts into the middle of the
attacking hordes. (Never into the middle of the defenders.
That would be silly.) “Look,” the Hero cries,
“a vessel off-shore with its main braces set and a
jib-sail flying”--or whatever it may be. And they
return to London.</p>
<p>This is the story which we want, and we cannot have too many
of them. Should you ever see any of us with our noses over
the shilling box and an eager light in our eyes, you may be
sure that we are on the track of another one.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />