<h2><SPAN name="XIX" id="XIX"></SPAN>XIX</h2>
<br/>
<p><i>Lincoln Directs Coöperation—Halleck and
Buell—Ulysses S. Grant—Grant's
Demonstration—Victory at Mill River—Fort
Henry—Fort Donelson—Buell's Tardiness—Halleck's
Activity—Victory of Pea Ridge—Halleck Receives General
Command—Pittsburg Landing—Island No. 10—Halleck's
Corinth Campaign—Halleck's Mistakes</i></p>
<br/>
<br/>
<p>Toward the end of December, 1861, the prospects of the
administration became very gloomy. McClellan had indeed organized a
formidable army at Washington, but it had done nothing to efface
the memory of the Bull Run defeat. On the contrary, a practical
blockade of the Potomac by rebel batteries on the Virginia shore,
and another small but irritating defeat at Ball's Bluff, greatly
heightened public impatience. The necessary surrender of Mason and
Slidell to England was exceedingly unpalatable. Government
expenditures had risen to $2,000,000 a day, and a financial crisis
was imminent. Buell would not move into East Tennessee, and Halleck
seemed powerless in Missouri. Added to this, McClellan's illness
completed a stagnation of military affairs both east and west.
Congress was clamoring for results, and its joint Committee on the
Conduct of the War was pushing a searching inquiry into the causes
of previous defeats.</p>
<p>To remove this inertia, President Lincoln directed specific
questions to the Western commanders. "Are<SPAN name="page263" id="page263"></SPAN> General
Buell and yourself in concert?" he telegraphed Halleck on December
31. And next day he wrote:</p>
<p>"I am very anxious that, in case of General Buell's moving
toward Nashville, the enemy shall not be greatly reinforced, and I
think there is danger he will be from Columbus. It seems to me that
a real or feigned attack on Columbus from up-river at the same time
would either prevent this, or compensate for it by throwing
Columbus into our hands."</p>
<p>Similar questions also went to Buell, and their replies showed
that no concert, arrangement, or plans existed, and that Halleck
was not ready to coöperate. The correspondence started by the
President's inquiry for the first time clearly brought out an
estimate of the Confederate strength opposed to a southward
movement in the West. Since the Confederate invasion of Kentucky on
September 4, the rebels had so strongly fortified Columbus on the
Mississippi River that it came to be called the "Gibraltar of the
West," and now had a garrison of twenty thousand to hold it; while
General Buckner was supposed to have a force of forty thousand at
Bowling Green on the railroad between Louisville and Nashville. For
more than a month Buell and Halleck had been aware that a joint
river and land expedition southward up the Tennessee or the
Cumberland River, which would outflank both positions and cause
their evacuation, was practicable with but little opposition. Yet
neither Buell nor Halleck had exchanged a word about it, or made
the slightest preparation to begin it; each being busy in his own
field, and with his own plans. Even now, when the President had
started the subject, Halleck replied that it would be bad strategy
for himself to move against Columbus, or Buell against Bowling
Green; but he had nothing to say about a Tennessee River
expedition, or <SPAN name="page264" id="page264"></SPAN>coöperation with Buell to effect
it, except by indirectly complaining that to withdraw troops from
Missouri would risk the loss of that State.</p>
<p>The President, however, was no longer satisfied with indecision
and excuses, and telegraphed to Buell on January 7:</p>
<p>"Please name as early a day as you safely can on or before which
you can be ready to move southward in concert with Major-General
Halleck. Delay is ruining us, and it is indispensable for me to
have something definite. I send a like despatch to Major-General
Halleck."</p>
<p>To this Buell made no direct reply, while Halleck answered that
he had asked Buell to designate a date for a demonstration, and
explained two days later: "I can make, with the gunboats and
available troops, a pretty formidable demonstration, but no real
attack." In point of fact, Halleck had on the previous day, January
6, written to Brigadier-General U.S. Grant: "I wish you to make a
demonstration in force": and he added full details, to which Grant
responded on January 8: "Your instructions of the sixth were
received this morning, and immediate preparations made for carrying
them out"; also adding details on his part.</p>
<p>Ulysses S. Grant was born on April 27, 1822, was graduated from
West Point in 1843, and brevetted captain for gallant conduct in
the Mexican War; but resigned from the army and was engaged with
his father in a leather store at Galena, Illinois, when the Civil
War broke out. Employed by the governor of Illinois a few weeks at
Springfield to assist in organizing militia regiments under the
President's first call, Grant wrote a letter to the War Department
at Washington tendering his services, and saying: "I feel myself
competent to command a regiment, if the President in his judgment <SPAN name="page265" id="page265"></SPAN>
should see fit to intrust one to me."
For some reason, never explained, this letter remained unanswered,
though the department was then and afterward in constant need of
educated and experienced officers. A few weeks later, however,
Governor Yates commissioned him colonel of one of the Illinois
three years' regiments. From that time until the end of 1861,
Grant, by constant and specially meritorious service, rose in rank
to brigadier-general and to the command of the important post of
Cairo, Illinois, having meanwhile, on November 7, won the battle of
Belmont on the Missouri shore opposite Columbus.</p>
<p>The "demonstration'" ordered by Halleck was probably intended
only as a passing show of activity; but it was executed by Grant,
though under strict orders to "avoid a battle," with a degree of
promptness and earnestness that drew after it momentous
consequences. He pushed a strong reconnaissance by eight thousand
men within a mile or two of Columbus, and sent three gunboats up
the Tennessee River, which drew the fire of Fort Henry. The results
of the combined expedition convinced Grant that a real movement in
that direction was practicable, and he hastened to St. Louis to lay
his plan personally before Halleck. At first that general would
scarcely listen to it; but, returning to Cairo, Grant urged it
again and again, and the rapidly changing military conditions soon
caused Halleck to realize its importance.</p>
<p>Within a few days, several items of interesting information
reached Halleck: that General Thomas, in eastern Kentucky, had won
a victory over the rebel General Zollicoffer, capturing his
fortified camp on Cumberland River, annihilating his army of over
ten regiments, and fully exposing Cumberland Gap; that the
Confederates were about to throw strong <SPAN name="page266" id="page266"></SPAN>reinforcements
into Columbus; that seven formidable Union ironclad river gunboats
were ready for service; and that a rise of fourteen feet had taken
place in the Tennessee River, greatly weakening the rebel batteries
on that stream and the Cumberland. The advantages on the one hand,
and the dangers on the other, which these reports indicated, moved
Halleck to a sudden decision. When Grant, on January 28,
telegraphed him: "With permission, I will take Fort Henry on the
Tennessee, and establish and hold a large camp there," Halleck
responded on the thirtieth: "Make your preparations to take and
hold Fort Henry."</p>
<p>It would appear that Grant's preparations were already quite
complete when he received written instructions by mail on February
1, for on the next day he started fifteen thousand men on
transports, and on February 4 himself followed with seven gunboats
under command of Commodore Foote. Two days later, Grant had the
satisfaction of sending a double message in return: "Fort Henry is
ours.... I shall take and destroy Fort Donelson on the eighth."</p>
<p>Fort Henry had been an easy victory. The rebel commander,
convinced that he could not defend the place, had early that
morning sent away his garrison of three thousand on a retreat to
Fort Donelson, and simply held out during a two hours' bombardment
until they could escape capture. To take Fort Donelson was a more
serious enterprise. That stronghold, lying twelve miles away on the
Cumberland River, was a much larger work, with a garrison of six
thousand, and armed with seventeen heavy and forty-eight field
guns. If Grant could have marched immediately to an attack of the
combined garrisons, there would have been a chance of quick
success. But the high water presented unlooked-for obstacles, and
nearly a week <SPAN name="page267" id="page267"></SPAN>elapsed before his army began stretching
itself cautiously around the three miles of Donelson's
intrenchments. During this delay, the conditions became greatly
changed. When the Confederate General Albert Sidney Johnston
received news that Fort Henry had fallen, he held a council at
Bowling Green with his subordinate generals Hardee and Beauregard,
and seeing that the Union success would, if not immediately
counteracted, render both Nashville and Columbus untenable,
resolved, to use his own language, "To defend Nashville at
Donelson."</p>
<p>An immediate retreat was begun from Bowling Green to Nashville,
and heavy reinforcements were ordered to the garrison of Fort
Donelson. It happened, therefore, that when Grant was ready to
begin his assault the Confederate garrison with its reinforcements
outnumbered his entire army. To increase the discouragement, the
attack by gunboats on the Cumberland River on the afternoon of
February 14 was repulsed, seriously damaging two of them, and a
heavy sortie from the fort threw the right of Grant's investing
line into disorder. Fortunately, General Halleck at St. Louis
strained all his energies to send reinforcements, and these arrived
in time to restore Grant's advantage in numbers.</p>
<p>Serious disagreement among the Confederate commanders also
hastened the fall of the place. On February 16, General Buckner, to
whom the senior officers had turned over the command, proposed an
armistice, and the appointment of commissioners to agree on terms
of capitulation. To this Grant responded with a characteristic
spirit of determination: "No terms except unconditional and
immediate surrender can be accepted. I propose to move immediately
upon your works." Buckner complained that the terms were
<SPAN name="page268" id="page268"></SPAN>ungenerous and unchivalric, but that
necessity compelled him to accept them; and Grant telegraphed
Halleck on February 16: "We have taken Fort Donelson, and from
twelve to fifteen thousand prisoners." The senior Confederate
generals, Pillow and Floyd, and a portion of the garrison had
escaped by the Cumberland River during the preceding night.</p>
<p>Since the fall of Fort Henry on February 6, a lively
correspondence had been going on, in which General Halleck besought
Buell to come with his available forces, assist in capturing
Donelson, and command the column up the Cumberland to cut off both
Columbus and Nashville. President Lincoln, scanning the news with
intense solicitude, and losing no opportunity to urge effective
coöperation, telegraphed Halleck:</p>
<p>"You have Fort Donelson safe, unless Grant shall be overwhelmed
from outside: to prevent which latter will, I think, require all
the vigilance, energy, and skill of yourself and Buell, acting in
full coöperation. Columbus will not get at Grant, but the
force from Bowling Green will. They hold the railroad from Bowling
Green to within a few miles of Fort Donelson, with the bridge at
Clarksville undisturbed. It is unsafe to rely that they will not
dare to expose Nashville to Buell. A small part of their force can
retire slowly toward Nashville, breaking up the railroad as they
go, and keep Buell out of that city twenty days. Meantime,
Nashville will be abundantly defended by forces from all south and
perhaps from here at Manassas. Could not a cavalry force from
General Thomas on the upper Cumberland dash across, almost
unresisted, and cut the railroad at or near Knoxville, Tennessee?
In the midst of a bombardment at Fort Donelson, why could not a
gunboat run up and destroy the bridge at Clarksville? Our success
or failure at Fort Donelson <SPAN name="page269" id="page269"></SPAN>is vastly important, and I beg you to
put your soul in the effort. I send a copy of this to Buell."</p>
<p>This telegram abundantly shows with what minute understanding
and accurate judgment the President comprehended military
conditions and results in the West. Buell, however, was too intent
upon his own separate movement to seize the brilliant opportunity
offered him. As he only in a feeble advance followed up the
retreating Confederate column from Bowling Green to Nashville,
Halleck naturally appropriated to himself the merit of the
campaign, and telegraphed to Washington on the day after the
surrender:</p>
<p>"Make Buell, Grant, and Pope major-generals of volunteers, and
give me command in the West. I ask this in return for Forts Henry
and Donelson."</p>
<p>The eagerness of General Halleck for superior command in the
West was, to say the least, very pardonable. A vast horizon of
possibilities was opening up to his view. Two other campaigns under
his direction were exciting his liveliest hopes. Late in December
he had collected an army of ten thousand at the railroad terminus
at Rolla, Missouri, under command of Brigadier-General Curtis, for
the purpose of scattering the rebel forces under General Price at
Springfield or driving them out of the State. Despite the hard
winter weather, Halleck urged on the movement with almost
peremptory orders, and Curtis executed the intentions of his chief
with such alacrity that Price was forced into a rapid and damaging
retreat from Springfield toward Arkansas. While forcing this
enterprise in the southwest, Halleck had also determined on an
important campaign in southeast Missouri.</p>
<p>Next to Columbus, which the enemy evacuated on March 2, the
strongest Confederate fortifications on <SPAN name="page270" id="page270"></SPAN>the
Mississippi River were at Island No. 10, about forty miles farther
to the south. To operate against these, he planned an expedition
under Brigadier-General Pope to capture the town of New Madrid as a
preliminary step. Columbus and Nashville were almost sure to fall
as the result of Donelson. If now he could bring his two Missouri
campaigns into a combination with two swift and strong Tennessee
expeditions, while the enemy was in scattered retreat, he could
look forward to the speedy capture of Memphis. But to the
realization of such a project, the hesitation and slowness of Buell
were a serious hindrance. That general had indeed started a
division under Nelson to Grant's assistance, but it was not yet in
the Cumberland when Donelson surrendered. Halleck's demand for
enlarged power, therefore, became almost imperative. He pleaded
earnestly with Buell:</p>
<p>"I have asked the President to make you a major-general. Come
down to the Cumberland and take command. The battle of the West is
to be fought in that vicinity.... There will be no battle at
Nashville." His telegrams to McClellan were more urgent. "Give it
[the Western Division] to me, and I will split secession in twain
in one month." And again: "I must have command of the armies in the
West. Hesitation and delay are losing us the golden opportunity.
Lay this before the President and Secretary of War. May I assume
the command? Answer quickly."</p>
<p>But McClellan was in no mood to sacrifice the ambition of his
intimate friend and favorite, General Buell, and induced the
President to withhold his consent; and while the generals were
debating by telegraph, Nelson's division of the army of Buell moved
up the Cumberland and occupied Nashville under the orders of Grant.
Halleck, however, held tenaciously to his views and <SPAN name="page271" id="page271"></SPAN>requests,
explaining to McClellan that he himself proposed going to
Tennessee:</p>
<p>"That is now the great strategic line of the western campaign,
and I am surprised that General Buell should hesitate to reinforce
me. He was too late at Fort Donelson.... Believe me, General, you
make a serious mistake in having three independent commands in the
West. There never will and never can be any coöperation at the
critical moment; all military history proves it."</p>
<p>This insistence had greater point because of the news received
that Curtis, energetically following Price into Arkansas, had won a
great Union victory at Pea Ridge, between March 5 and 8, over the
united forces of Price and McCulloch, commanded by Van Dorn. At
this juncture, events at Washington, hereafter to be mentioned,
caused a reorganization of military commands and President
Lincoln's Special War Order No. 3 consolidated the western
departments of Hunter, Halleck, and Buell, as far east as
Knoxville, Tennessee, under the title of the Department of the
Mississippi, and placed General Halleck in command of the whole.
Meanwhile, Halleck had ordered the victorious Union army at Fort
Donelson to move forward to Savannah on the Tennessee River under
the command of Grant; and, now that he had superior command,
directed Buell to march all of his forces not required to defend
Nashville "as rapidly as possible" to the same point. Halleck was
still at St. Louis; and through the indecision of his further
orders, through the slowness of Buell's march, and through the
unexplained inattention of Grant, the Union armies narrowly escaped
a serious disaster, which, however, the determined courage of the
troops and subordinate officers turned into a most important
victory.<SPAN name="page272" id="page272"></SPAN></p>
<p>The "golden opportunity" so earnestly pointed out by Halleck,
while not entirely lost, was nevertheless seriously diminished by
the hesitation and delay of the Union commanders to agree upon some
plan of effective coöperation. When, at the fall of Fort
Donelson the Confederates retreated from Nashville toward
Chattanooga, and from Columbus toward Jackson, a swift advance by
the Tennessee River could have kept them separated; but as that
open highway was not promptly followed in force, the flying
Confederate detachments found abundant leisure to form a
junction.</p>
<p>Grant reached Savannah, on the east bank of the Tennessee River,
about the middle of March, and in a few days began massing troops
at Pittsburg Landing, six miles farther south, on the west bank of
the Tennessee; still keeping his headquarters at Savannah, to await
the arrival of Buell and his army. During the next two weeks he
reported several times that the enemy was concentrating at Corinth,
Mississippi, an important railroad crossing twenty miles from
Pittsburg Landing, the estimate of their number varying from forty
to eighty thousand. All this time his mind was so filled with an
eager intention to begin a march upon Corinth, and a confidence
that he could win a victory by a prompt attack, that he neglected
the essential precaution of providing against an attack by the
enemy, which at the same time was occupying the thoughts of the
Confederate commander General Johnston.</p>
<p>General Grant was therefore greatly surprised on the morning of
April 6, when he proceeded from Savannah to Pittsburg Landing, to
learn the cause of a fierce cannonade. He found that the
Confederate army, forty thousand strong, was making an unexpected
and determined attack in force on the Union camp, whose five
divisions numbered a total of about <SPAN name="page273" id="page273"></SPAN>thirty-three thousand. The
Union generals had made no provision against such an attack. No
intrenchments had been thrown up, no plan or understanding
arranged. A few preliminary picket skirmishes had, indeed, put the
Union front on the alert, but the commanders of brigades and
regiments were not prepared for the impetuous rush with which the
three successive Confederate lines began the main battle. On their
part, the enemy did not realize their hope of effecting a complete
surprise, and the nature of the ground was so characterized by a
network of local roads, alternating patches of woods and open
fields, miry hollows and abrupt ravines, that the lines of conflict
were quickly broken into short, disjointed movements that admitted
of little or no combined or systematic direction. The effort of the
Union officers was necessarily limited to a continuous resistance
to the advance of the enemy, from whatever direction it came; that
of the Confederate leaders to the general purpose of forcing the
Union lines away from Pittsburg Landing so that they might destroy
the Federal transports and thus cut off all means of retreat. In
this effort, although during the whole of Sunday, April 6, the
Union front had been forced back a mile and a half, the enemy had
not entirely succeeded. About sunset, General Beauregard, who, by
the death of General Johnston during the afternoon, succeeded to
the Confederate command, gave orders to suspend the attack, in the
firm expectation however, that he would be able to complete his
victory the next morning.</p>
<p>But in this hope he was disappointed. During the day the
vanguard of Buell's army had arrived on the opposite bank of the
river. Before nightfall one of his brigades was ferried across and
deployed in front of the exultant enemy. During the night and
early<SPAN name="page274" id="page274"></SPAN> Monday morning three superb divisions of
Buell's army, about twenty thousand fresh, well-drilled troops,
were advanced to the front under Buell's own direction; and by
three o'clock of that day the two wings of the Union army were once
more in possession of all the ground that had been lost on the
previous day, while the foiled and disorganized Confederates were
in full retreat upon Corinth. The severity of the battle may be
judged by the losses. In the Union army: killed, 1754; wounded,
8408; missing, 2885. In the Confederate army: killed, 1728;
wounded, 8012; missing. 954.</p>
<p>Having comprehended the uncertainty of Buell's successful
junction with Grant, Halleck must have received tidings of the
final victory at Pittsburg Landing with emotions of deep
satisfaction. To this was now joined the further gratifying news
that the enemy on that same momentous April 7 had surrendered
Island No. 10, together with six or seven thousand Confederate
troops, including three general officers, to the combined
operations of General Pope and Flag-Officer Foote. Full particulars
of these two important victories did not reach Halleck for several
days. Following previous suggestions, Pope and Foote promptly moved
their gunboats and troops down the river to the next Confederate
stronghold, Fort Pillow, where extensive fortifications, aided by
an overflow of the adjacent river banks, indicated strong
resistance and considerable delay. When all the conditions became
more fully known, Halleck at length adopted the resolution, to
which he had been strongly leaning for some time, to take the field
himself. About April 10 he proceeded from St. Louis to Pittsburg
Landing, and on the fifteenth ordered Pope with his army to join
him there, which the latter, having his troops already on
transports succeeded in accomplishing by April 22. <SPAN name="page275" id="page275"></SPAN>Halleck
immediately effected a new organization, combining the armies of
the Tennessee, of the Ohio, and of the Mississippi into
respectively his right wing, center, and left wing. He assumed
command of the whole himself, and nominally made Grant second in
command. Practically, however, he left Grant so little authority or
work that the latter felt himself slighted, and asked leave to
proceed to another field of duty.</p>
<p>It required but a few weeks to demonstrate that however high
were Halleck's professional acquirements in other respects, he was
totally unfit for a commander in the field. Grant had undoubtedly
been careless in not providing against the enemy's attack at
Pittsburg Landing. Halleck, on the other extreme, was now doubly
over-cautious in his march upon Corinth. From first to last, his
campaign resembled a siege. With over one hundred thousand men
under his hand, he moved at a snail's pace, building roads and
breastworks, and consuming more than a month in advancing a
distance of twenty miles; during which period Beauregard managed to
collect about fifty thousand effective Confederates and construct
defensive fortifications with equal industry around Corinth. When,
on May 29, Halleck was within assaulting distance of the rebel
intrenchments Beauregard had leisurely removed his sick and
wounded, destroyed or carried away his stores, and that night
finally evacuated the place, leaving Halleck to reap, practically,
a barren victory.</p>
<p>Nor were the general's plans and actions any more fruitful
during the following six weeks. He wasted the time and energy of
his soldiers multiplying useless fortifications about Corinth. He
despatched Buell's wing of the army on a march toward eastern
Tennessee but under such instructions and limitations that long
before reaching its objective it was met by a <SPAN name="page276" id="page276"></SPAN>Confederate
army under General Bragg, and forced into a retrograde movement
which carried it back to Louisville. More deplorable, however, than
either of these errors of judgment was Halleck's neglect to seize
the opportune moment when, by a vigorous movement in
coöperation with the brilliant naval victories under
Flag-Officer Farragut, commanding a formidable fleet of Union
war-ships, he might have completed the over-shadowing military task
of opening the Mississippi River.</p>
<hr style="width: 65%;" />
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<SPAN name="page277" id="page277"></SPAN>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />