<h2><SPAN name="XXIV" id="XXIV"></SPAN>XXIV</h2>
<br/>
<p><i>Criticism of the President for his Action on
Slavery—Lincoln's Letters to Louisiana
Friends—Greeley's Open Letter—Mr. Lincoln's
Reply—Chicago Clergymen Urge Emancipation—Lincoln's
Answer—Lincoln Issues Preliminary
Proclamation—President Proposes Constitutional
Amendment—Cabinet Considers Final Proclamation—Cabinet
Discusses Admission of West Virginia—Lincoln Signs Edict of
Freedom—Lincoln's Letter to Hodges</i></p>
<br/>
<br/>
<p>The secrets of the government were so well kept that no hint
whatever came to the public that the President had submitted to the
cabinet the draft of an emancipation proclamation. Between that
date and the battle of the second Bull Run intervened the period of
a full month, during which, in the absence of military movements or
congressional proceedings to furnish exciting news, both private
individuals and public journals turned a new and somewhat
vindictive fire of criticism upon the administration. For this they
seized upon the ever-ready text of the ubiquitous slavery question.
Upon this issue the conservatives protested indignantly that the
President had been too fast, while, contrarywise, the radicals
clamored loudly that he had been altogether too slow. We have seen
how his decision was unalterably taken and his course distinctly
marked out, but that he was not yet ready publicly to announce it.
Therefore, during this period <SPAN name="page334" id="page334"></SPAN>of waiting for victory, he
underwent the difficult task of restraining the impatience of both
sides, which he did in very positive language. Thus, under date of
July 26, 1862, he wrote to a friend in Louisiana:</p>
<p>"Yours of the sixteenth, by the hand of Governor Shepley, is
received. It seems the Union feeling in Louisiana is being crushed
out by the course of General Phelps. Please pardon me for believing
that is a false pretense. The people of Louisiana—all
intelligent people everywhere—know full well that I never had
a wish to touch the foundations of their society, or any right of
theirs. With perfect knowledge of this, they forced a necessity
upon me to send armies among them, and it is their own fault, not
mine, that they are annoyed by the presence of General Phelps. They
also know the remedy—know how to be cured of General Phelps.
Remove the necessity of his presence.... I am a patient
man—always willing to forgive on the Christian terms of
repentance, and also to give ample time for repentance. Still, I
must save this government if possible. What I cannot do, of course
I will not do; but it may as well be understood, once for all, that
I shall not surrender this game leaving any available card
unplayed."</p>
<p>Two days later he answered another Louisiana critic:</p>
<p>"Mr. Durant complains that, in various ways, the relation of
master and slave is disturbed by the presence of our army, and he
considers it particularly vexatious that this, in part, is done
under cover of an act of Congress, while constitutional guarantees
are suspended on the plea of military necessity. The truth is that
what is done and omitted about slaves is done <SPAN name="page335" id="page335"></SPAN>and
omitted on the same military necessity. It is a military necessity
to have men and money; and we can get neither in sufficient numbers
or amounts if we keep from or drive from our lines slaves coming to
them. Mr. Durant cannot be ignorant of the pressure in this
direction, nor of my efforts to hold it within bounds till he and
such as he shall have time to help themselves.... What would you do
in my position? Would you drop the war where it is? Or would you
prosecute it in future with elder-stalk squirts charged with
rose-water? Would you deal lighter blows rather than heavier ones?
Would you give up the contest, leaving any available means
unapplied? I am in no boastful mood. I shall not do more than I
can, and I shall do all I can, to save the government, which is my
sworn duty as well as my personal inclination. I shall do nothing
in malice. What I deal with is too vast for malicious dealing."</p>
<p>The President could afford to overlook the misrepresentations
and invective of the professedly opposition newspapers, but he had
also to meet the over-zeal of influential Republican editors of
strong antislavery bias. Horace Greeley printed, in the New York
"Tribune" of August 20, a long "open letter" ostentatiously
addressed to Mr. Lincoln, full of unjust censure all based on the
general accusation that the President and many army officers as
well, were neglecting their duty under pro-slavery influences and
sentiments. The open letter which Mr. Lincoln wrote in reply is
remarkable not alone for the skill with which it separated the true
from the false issue of the moment, but also for the equipoise and
dignity with which it maintained his authority as moral arbiter
between the contending factions.<SPAN name="page336" id="page336"></SPAN></p>
<p><span style="margin-left: 2.5em;">"EXECUTIVE MANSION,
WASHINGTON,</span><br/>
<span style="margin-left: 2.5em;">August 22, 1862.</span><br/>
<br/>
<span style="margin-left: 2.5em;">"HON. HORACE
GREELEY.</span><br/></p>
<p>"DEAR SIR: I have just read yours of the nineteenth, addressed
to myself through the New York 'Tribune.' If there be in it any
statements or assumptions of fact which I may know to be erroneous,
I do not, now and here, controvert them. If there be in it any
inferences which I may believe to be falsely drawn, I do not, now
and here, argue against them. If there be perceptible in it an
impatient and dictatorial tone, I waive it in deference to an old
friend whose heart I have always supposed to be right.</p>
<p>"As to the policy I 'seem to be pursuing,' as you say, I have
not meant to leave any one in doubt.</p>
<p>"I would save the Union. I would save it the shortest way under
the Constitution. The sooner the national authority can be
restored, the nearer the Union will be 'the Union as it was.' If
there be those who would not save the Union unless they could at
the same time save slavery, I do not agree with them. If there be
those who would not save the Union unless they could, at the same
time, destroy slavery, I do not agree with them. My paramount
object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to
save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without
freeing any slave, I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing
all the slaves, I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing
some and leaving others alone, I would also do that. What I do
about slavery and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps
to save the Union; and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not
believe it would help to save the Union. I shall do less whenever I
shall believe what I am doing hurts the cause, and I shall do more
whenever I shall <SPAN name="page337" id="page337"></SPAN>believe doing more will help the cause.
I shall try to correct errors when shown to be errors, and I shall
adopt new views so fast as they shall appear to be true views.</p>
<p>"I have here stated my purpose according to my view of official
duty; and I intend no modification of my oft-expressed personal
wish that all men everywhere could be free.</p>
<p><span style="margin-left: 2.5em;">"Yours,</span><br/>
<br/>
<span style="margin-left: 2.5em;">"A. LINCOLN."</span><br/></p>
<p>It can hardly be doubted that President Lincoln, when he wrote
this letter, intended that it should have a twofold effect upon
public opinion: first, that it should curb extreme antislavery
sentiment to greater patience; secondly, that it should rouse
dogged pro-slavery conservatism, and prepare it for the
announcement which he had resolved to make at the first fitting
opportunity. At the date of the letter, he very well knew that a
serious conflict of arms was soon likely to occur in Virginia; and
he had strong reason to hope that the junction of the armies of
McClellan and Pope which had been ordered, and was then in
progress, could be successfully effected, and would result in a
decisive Union victory. This hope, however, was sadly disappointed.
The second battle of Bull Run, which occurred one week after the
Greeley letter, proved a serious defeat, and necessitated a further
postponement of his contemplated action.</p>
<p>As a secondary effect of the new disaster, there came upon him
once more an increased pressure to make reprisal upon what was
assumed to be the really vulnerable side of the rebellion. On
September 13, he was visited by an influential deputation from the
religious denominations of Chicago, urging him to issue at once <SPAN name="page338" id="page338"></SPAN>
a proclamation of universal
emancipation. His reply to them, made in the language of the most
perfect courtesy nevertheless has in it a tone of rebuke that
indicates the state of irritation and high sensitiveness under
which he was living from day to day. In the actual condition of
things, he could neither safely satisfy them nor deny them. As any
answer he could make would be liable to misconstruction, he devoted
the larger part of it to pointing out the unreasonableness of their
dogmatic insistence:</p>
<p>"I am approached with the most opposite opinions and advice, and
that by religious men, who are equally certain that they represent
the divine will. I am sure that either the one or the other class
is mistaken in that belief, and perhaps, in some respects, both. I
hope it will not be irreverent for me to say that if it is probable
that God would reveal his will to others, on a point so connected
with my duty, it might be supposed he would reveal it directly to
me.... What good would a proclamation of emancipation from me do,
especially as we are now situated? I do not want to issue a
document that the whole world will see must necessarily be
inoperative, like the Pope's bull against the comet.... Understand,
I raise no objections against it on legal or constitutional
grounds, for, as commander-in-chief of the army and navy in time of
war, I suppose I have a right to take any measure which may best
subdue the enemy; nor do I urge objections of a moral nature, in
view of possible consequences of insurrection and massacre at the
South. I view this matter as a practical war measure, to be decided
on according to the advantages or disadvantages it may offer to the
suppression of the rebellion.... Do not misunderstand me because I
have mentioned these objections. They indicate the difficulties
that have thus far prevented my action in some such way
<SPAN name="page339" id="page339"></SPAN> as you desire. I have not decided
against a proclamation of liberty to the slaves, but hold the
matter under advisement. And I can assure you that the subject is
on my mind, by day and night, more than any other. Whatever shall
appear to be God's will, I will do."</p>
<p>Four days after this interview the battle of Antietam was
fought, and when, after a few days of uncertainty it was
ascertained that it could be reasonably claimed as a Union victory,
the President resolved to carry out his long-matured purpose. The
diary of Secretary Chase has recorded a very full report of the
interesting transaction. On this ever memorable September 22, 1862,
after some playful preliminary talk, Mr. Lincoln said to his
cabinet:</p>
<p>"GENTLEMEN: I have, as you are aware, thought a great deal about
the relation of this war to slavery; and you all remember that,
several weeks ago, I read to you an order I had prepared on this
subject, which, on account of objections made by some of you, was
not issued. Ever since then my mind has been much occupied with
this subject, and I have thought, all along, that the time for
acting on it might probably come. I think the time has come now. I
wish it was a better time. I wish that we were in a better
condition. The action of the army against the rebels has not been
quite what I should have best liked. But they have been driven out
of Maryland, and Pennsylvania is no longer in danger of invasion.
When the rebel army was at Frederick, I determined, as soon as it
should be driven out of Maryland, to issue a proclamation of
emancipation, such as I thought most likely to be useful. I said
nothing to any one, but I made the promise to myself and
[hesitating a little] to my Maker. The rebel army is now driven
out, and I am going to fulfil that promise. I have got you together
to hear what I have written down. I do not wish your advice about
<SPAN name="page340" id="page340"></SPAN> the main matter, for that I have
determined for myself. This I say without intending anything but
respect for any one of you. But I already know the views of each on
this question. They have been heretofore expressed, and I have
considered them as thoroughly and carefully as I can. What I have
written is that which my reflections have determined me to say. If
there is anything in the expressions I use, or in any minor matter
which any one of you thinks had best be changed, I shall be glad to
receive the suggestions. One other observation I will make. I know
very well that many others might, in this matter as in others, do
better than I can; and if I was satisfied that the public
confidence was more fully possessed by any one of them than by me,
and knew of any constitutional way in which he could be put in my
place, he should have it. I would gladly yield it to him. But,
though I believe that I have not so much of the confidence of the
people as I had some time since, I do not know that, all things
considered any other person has more; and, however this may be,
there is no way in which I can have any other man put where I am. I
am here; I must do the best I can, and bear the responsibility of
taking the course which I feel I ought to take."</p>
<p>The members of the cabinet all approved the policy of the
measure; Mr. Blair only objecting that he thought the time
inopportune, while others suggested some slight amendments. In the
new form in which it was printed on the following morning, the
document announced a renewal of the plan of compensated
abolishment, a continuance of the effort at voluntary colonization,
a promise to recommend ultimate compensation to loyal owners,
and—</p>
<p>"That on the first day of January, in the year of our Lord one
thousand eight hundred and sixty-three, all <SPAN name="page341" id="page341"></SPAN>persons
held as slaves within any State, or designated part of a State, the
people whereof shall then be in rebellion against the United
States, shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free; and the
executive government of the United States, including the military
and naval authorities thereof, will recognize and maintain the
freedom of such persons, and will do no act or acts to repress such
persons, or any of them, in any efforts they may make for their
actual freedom."</p>
<p>Pursuant to these announcements, the President's annual message
of December 1, 1862, recommended to Congress the passage of a joint
resolution proposing to the legislatures of the several States a
constitutional amendment consisting of three articles, namely: One
providing compensation in bonds for every State which should
abolish slavery before the year 1900; another securing freedom to
all slaves who, during the rebellion, had enjoyed actual freedom by
the chances of war—also providing compensation to legal
owners; the third authorizing Congress to provide for colonization.
The long and practical argument in which he renewed this plan, "not
in exclusion of, but additional to, all others for restoring and
preserving the national authority throughout the Union," concluded
with the following eloquent sentences:</p>
<p>"We can succeed only by concert. It is not, 'Can any of us
imagine better?' but, 'Can we all do better?' Object whatsoever is
possible, still the question recurs, 'Can we do better?' The dogmas
of the quiet past are inadequate to the stormy present. The
occasion is piled high with difficulty, and we must rise with the
occasion. As our case is new, so we must think anew and act anew.
We must disenthrall ourselves, and then we shall save our
country.</p>
<p>"Fellow-citizens, we cannot escape history. We, of <SPAN name="page342" id="page342"></SPAN>this
Congress and this administration, will be remembered in spite of
ourselves. No personal significance, or insignificance, can spare
one or another of us. The fiery trial through which we pass will
light us down, in honor or dishonor, to the latest generation. We
say we are for the Union. The world will not forget that we say
this. We know how to save the Union. The world knows we do know how
to save it. We—even we here—hold the power and bear the
responsibility. In giving freedom to the slave, we assure freedom
to the free—honorable alike in what we give and what we
preserve. We shall nobly save, or meanly lose, the last, best hope
of earth. Other means may succeed, this could not fail. The way is
plain, peaceful generous, just—a way which, if followed, the
world will forever applaud, and God must forever bless."</p>
<p>But Mr. Lincoln was not encouraged by any response to this
earnest appeal, either from Congress or by manifestations of public
opinion. Indeed, it may be fairly presumed that he expected none.
Perhaps he considered it already a sufficient gain that it was
silently accepted as another admonition of the consequences which
not he nor his administration, but the Civil War, with its
relentless agencies, was rapidly bringing about. He was becoming
more and more conscious of the silent influence of his official
utterances on public sentiment, if not to convert obstinate
opposition, at least to reconcile it to patient submission.</p>
<p>In that faith he steadfastly went on carrying out his
well-matured plan, the next important step of which was the
fulfilment of the announcements made in the preliminary
emancipation proclamation of September 22. On December 30, he
presented to each member of his cabinet a copy of the draft he had
carefully made <SPAN name="page343" id="page343"></SPAN>of the new and final proclamation to be
issued on New Year's day. It will be remembered that as early as
July 22, he informed the cabinet that the main question involved he
had decided for himself. Now, as twice before it was only upon
minor points that he asked their advice and suggestion, for which
object he placed these drafts in their hands for verbal and
collateral criticism.</p>
<p>In addition to the central point of military emancipation in all
the States yet in rebellion, the President's draft for the first
time announced his intention to incorporate a portion of the newly
liberated slaves into the armies of the Union. This policy had also
been under discussion at the first consideration of the subject in
July. Mr. Lincoln had then already seriously considered it, but
thought it inexpedient and productive of more evil than good at
that date. In his judgment, the time had now arrived for
energetically adopting it.</p>
<p>On the following day, December 31, the members brought back to
the cabinet meeting their several criticisms and suggestions on the
draft he had given them. Perhaps the most important one was that
earnestly pressed by Secretary Chase, that the new proclamation
should make no exceptions of fractional parts of States controlled
by the Union armies, as in Louisiana and Virginia, save the
forty-eight counties of the latter designated as West Virginia,
then in process of formation and admission as a new State; the
constitutionality of which, on this same December 31, was
elaborately discussed in writing by the members of the cabinet, and
affirmatively decided by the President.</p>
<p>On the afternoon of December 31, the cabinet meeting being over,
Mr. Lincoln once more carefully rewrote the proclamation, embodying
in it the suggestions which had been made as to mere verbal
<SPAN name="page344" id="page344"></SPAN> improvements; but he rigidly adhered to
his own draft in retaining the exceptions as to fractional parts of
States and the forty-eight counties of West Virginia; and also his
announcement of intention to enlist the freedmen in military
service. Secretary Chase had submitted the form of a closing
paragraph. This the President also adopted, but added to it, after
the words "warranted by the Constitution," his own important
qualifying correction, "upon military necessity."</p>
<p>The full text of the weighty document will be found in a
foot-note.<SPAN name="FNanchor_5_5" id="FNanchor_5_5"></SPAN><SPAN href="#Footnote_5_5" class="fnanchor">[5]</SPAN></p>
<p>It recited the announcement of the <SPAN name="page345" id="page345"></SPAN>September
proclamation; defined its character and authority as a military
decree; designated the States and parts of States that day in
rebellion against the government; ordered and declared that all
persons held as slaves therein "are and henceforward shall be
free"; and that such persons of suitable condition would be
received into the military service. "And upon this act, sincerely
believed to be an act of justice, warranted by the Constitution
upon military necessity, I invoke the considerate judgment of
mankind, and the gracious favor of Almighty God."</p>
<p>The conclusion of the momentous transaction was <SPAN name="page346" id="page346"></SPAN>as
deliberate and simple as had been its various stages of
preparation. The morning and midday of January 1, 1863, were
occupied by the half-social, half-official ceremonial of the usual
New Year's day reception at the Executive Mansion, established by
long custom. At about three o'clock in the afternoon, after full
three hours of greetings and handshakings, Mr. Lincoln and perhaps
a dozen persons assembled in the executive office, and, without any
prearranged ceremony the President affixed his signature to the
great Edict of Freedom. No better commentary will ever be written
upon this far-reaching act than that which he himself embodied in a
letter written to a friend a little more than a year later:</p>
<p>"I am naturally antislavery. If slavery is not wrong, nothing is
wrong. I cannot remember when I did not so think and feel, and yet
I have never understood that the Presidency conferred upon me an
unrestricted right to act officially upon this judgment and
feeling. It was in the oath I took that I would, to the best of my
ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the
United States. I could not take the office without taking the oath.
Nor was it my view that I might take an oath to get power, and
break the oath in using the power. I understood, too, that in
ordinary civil administration this oath even forbade me to
practically indulge my primary abstract judgment on the moral
question of slavery. I had publicly declared this many times, and
in many ways. And I aver that, to this day, I have done no official
act in mere deference to my abstract judgment and feeling on
slavery. I did understand, however, that my oath to preserve the
Constitution to the best of my ability imposed upon me the duty of
preserving, by every indispensable means, that government, that
nation, of which that<SPAN name="page347" id="page347"></SPAN> Constitution was the organic law. Was it
possible to lose the nation and yet preserve the Constitution? By
general law, life and limb must be protected, yet often a limb must
be amputated to save a life; but a life is never wisely given to
save a limb. I felt that measures otherwise unconstitutional might
become lawful by becoming indispensable to the preservation of the
Constitution, through the preservation of the nation. Right or
wrong, I assumed this ground, and now avow it. I could not feel
that, to the best of my ability, I had even tried to preserve the
Constitution if, to save slavery or any minor matter, I should
permit the wreck of government, country, and Constitution all
together. When, early in the war, General Frémont attempted
military emancipation, I forbade it, because I did not then think
it an indispensable necessity. When, a little later, General
Cameron, then Secretary of War, suggested the arming of the blacks,
I objected because I did not yet think it an indispensable
necessity. When, still later, General Hunter attempted military
emancipation, I again forbade it, because I did not yet think the
indispensable necessity had come. When in March and May and July,
1862, I made earnest and successive appeals to the border States to
favor compensated emancipation, I believed the indispensable
necessity for military emancipation and arming the blacks would
come unless averted by that measure. They declined the proposition,
and I was, in my best judgment, driven to the alternative of either
surrendering the Union, and with it the Constitution, or of laying
strong hand upon the colored element. I chose the latter."</p>
<hr style="width: 65%;" />
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<SPAN name="page348" id="page348"></SPAN>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />