<h2><SPAN name="XXXI" id="XXXI"></SPAN>XXXI</h2>
<br/>
<p><i>Shaping of the Presidential Campaign—Criticisms
of Mr. Lincoln—Chase's Presidential
Ambitions—The Pomeroy Circular—Cleveland
Convention—Attempt to Nominate
Grant—Meeting of Baltimore
Convention—Lincoln's Letter to
Schurz—Platform of Republican
Convention—Lincoln Renominated—Refuses to
Indicate Preference for Vice-President—Johnson
Nominated for Vice-President—Lincoln's Speech to
Committee of Notification—Reference to Mexico in his
Letter of Acceptance—The French in Mexico</i></p>
<br/>
<br/>
<p>The final shaping of the campaign, the definition of the issues,
the wording of the platforms, and selection of the candidates, had
grown much more out of national politics than out of mere party
combination or personal intrigues. The success of the war, and fate
of the Union, of course dominated every other consideration; and
next to this the treatment of the slavery question became in a
hundred forms almost a direct personal interest. Mere party
feeling, which had utterly vanished for a few months in the first
grand uprising of the North, had been once more awakened by the
first Bull Run defeat, and from that time onward was heard in loud
and constant criticism of Mr. Lincoln and the acts of his
supporters wherever they touched the institution of slavery. The
Democratic party, which had been allied with the Southern
politicians in the interests of that institution through so many
decades, quite naturally took up its habitual <SPAN name="page438" id="page438"></SPAN>
rôle of protest that slavery should receive no hurt or damage
from the incidents of war, where, in the border States, it still
had constitutional existence among loyal Union men.</p>
<p>On the other hand, among Republicans who had elected Mr.
Lincoln, and who, as a partizan duty, indorsed and sustained his
measures, Frémont's proclamation of military emancipation in
the first year of the war excited the over-hasty zeal of
antislavery extremists, and developed a small but very active
faction which harshly denounced the President when Mr. Lincoln
revoked that premature and ill-considered measure. No matter what
the President subsequently did about slavery, the Democratic press
and partizans always assailed him for doing too much, while the
Frémont press and partizans accused him of doing too
little.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, personal considerations were playing their minor, but
not unimportant parts. When McClellan was called to Washington, and
during all the hopeful promise of the great victories he was
expected to win, a few shrewd New York Democratic politicians
grouped themselves about him, and put him in training as the future
Democratic candidate for President; and the general fell easily
into their plans and ambitions. Even after he had demonstrated his
military incapacity, when he had reaped defeat instead of victory,
and earned humiliation instead of triumph, his partizan adherents
clung to the desperate hope that though they could not win applause
for him as a conqueror, they might yet create public sympathy in
his behalf as a neglected and persecuted genius.</p>
<p>The cabinets of Presidents frequently develop rival presidential
aspirants, and that of Mr. Lincoln was no exception. Considering
the strong men who <SPAN name="page439" id="page439"></SPAN>composed it, the only wonder is that there
was so little friction among them. They disagreed constantly and
heartily on minor questions, both with Mr. Lincoln and with each
other, but their great devotion to the Union, coupled with his
kindly forbearance, and the clear vision which assured him mastery
over himself and others, kept peace and even personal affection in
his strangely assorted official family.</p>
<p>The man who developed the most serious presidential aspirations
was Salmon P. Chase, his Secretary of the Treasury, who listened to
and actively encouraged the overtures of a small faction of the
Republican party which rallied about him at the end of the year
1863. Pure and disinterested, and devoted with all his energies and
powers to the cause of the Union, he was yet singularly ignorant of
current public thought, and absolutely incapable of judging men in
their true relations He regarded himself as the friend of Mr.
Lincoln and made strong protestations to him and to others of this
friendship, but he held so poor an opinion of the President's
intellect and character, compared with his own, that he could not
believe the people blind enough to prefer the President to himself.
He imagined that he did not covet advancement, and was anxious only
for the public good; yet, in the midst of his enormous labors found
time to write letters to every part of the country, protesting his
indifference to the presidency, but indicating his willingness to
accept it, and painting pictures so dark of the chaotic state of
affairs in the government, that the irresistible inference was that
only he could save the country. From the beginning Mr. Lincoln had
been aware of this quasi-candidacy, which continued all through the
winter Indeed, it was impossible to remain unconscious of it,
although he discouraged all conversation on the <SPAN name="page440" id="page440"></SPAN>subject,
and refused to read letters relating to it. He had his own opinion
of the taste and judgment displayed by Mr. Chase in his criticisms
of the President and his colleagues in the cabinet, but he took no
note of them.</p>
<p>"I have determined," he said, "to shut my eyes, so far as
possible, to everything of the sort. Mr. Chase makes a good
secretary, and I shall keep him where he is. If he becomes
President, all right. I hope we may never have a worse man."</p>
<p>And he went on appointing Mr. Chase's partizans and adherents to
places in the government. Although his own renomination was a
matter in regard to which he refused to talk much, even with
intimate friends, he was perfectly aware of the true drift of
things. In capacity of appreciating popular currents Chase was as a
child beside him; and he allowed the opposition to himself in his
own cabinet to continue, without question or remark, all the more
patiently, because he knew how feeble it really was.</p>
<p>The movement in favor of Mr. Chase culminated in the month of
February, 1864, in a secret circular signed by Senator Pomeroy of
Kansas, and widely circulated through the Union; which criticised
Mr. Lincoln's "tendency toward compromises and temporary
expedients"; explained that even if his reëlection were
desirable, it was practically impossible in the face of the
opposition that had developed; and lauded Chase as the statesman
best fitted to rescue the country from present perils and guard it
against future ills. Of course copies of this circular soon reached
the White House, but Mr. Lincoln refused to look at them, and they
accumulated unread in the desk of his secretary. Finally, it got
into print, whereupon Mr. Chase wrote to the President to assure
him he had no knowledge of <SPAN name="page441" id="page441"></SPAN>the letter before seeing it in the
papers. To this Mr. Lincoln replied:</p>
<p>"I was not shocked or surprised by the appearance of the letter,
because I had had knowledge of Mr. Pomeroy's committee, and of
secret issues which I supposed came from it, ... for several weeks.
I have known just as little of these things as my friends have
allowed me to know.... I fully concur with you that neither of us
can be justly held responsible for what our respective friends may
do without our instigation or countenance.... Whether you shall
remain at the head of the Treasury Department is a question which I
will not allow myself to consider from any standpoint other than my
judgment of the public service, and, in that view, I do not
perceive occasion for a change."</p>
<p>Even before the President wrote this letter, Mr. Chase's
candidacy had passed out of sight. In fact, it never really existed
save in the imagination of the Secretary of the Treasury and a
narrow circle of his adherents. He was by no means the choice of
the body of radicals who were discontented with Mr. Lincoln because
of his deliberation in dealing with the slavery question, or of
those others who thought he was going entirely too fast and too
far.</p>
<p>Both these factions, alarmed at the multiplying signs which
foretold his triumphant renomination, issued calls for a mass
convention of the people, to meet at Cleveland, Ohio, on May 31, a
week before the assembling of the Republican national convention at
Baltimore, to unite in a last attempt to stem the tide in his
favor. Democratic newspapers naturally made much of this, heralding
it as a hopeless split in the Republican ranks, and printing
fictitious despatches from Cleveland reporting that city thronged
with <SPAN name="page442" id="page442"></SPAN>influential and earnest delegates. Far
from this being the case, there was no crowd and still less
enthusiasm. Up to the very day of its meeting no place was provided
for the sessions of the convention, which finally came together in
a small hall whose limited capacity proved more than ample for both
delegates and spectators. Though organization was delayed nearly
two hours in the vain hope that more delegates would arrive, the
men who had been counted upon to give character to the gathering
remained notably absent. The delegates prudently refrained from
counting their meager number, and after preliminaries of a more or
less farcical nature, voted for a platform differing little from
that afterward adopted at Baltimore, listened to the reading of a
vehement letter from Wendell Phillips denouncing Mr. Lincoln's
administration and counseling the choice of Frémont for
President, nominated that general by acclamation, with General John
Cochrane of New York for his running-mate, christened themselves
the "Radical Democracy," and adjourned.</p>
<p>The press generally greeted the convention and its work with a
chorus of ridicule, though certain Democratic newspapers, from
motives harmlessly transparent, gave it solemn and unmeasured
praise. General Frémont, taking his candidacy seriously,
accepted the nomination, but three months later, finding no
response from the public, withdrew from the contest.</p>
<p>At this fore-doomed Cleveland meeting a feeble attempt had been
made by the men who considered Mr. Lincoln too radical, to nominate
General Grant for President, instead of Frémont; but he had
been denounced as a Lincoln hireling, and his name unceremoniously
swept aside. During the same week another effort in the same
direction was made in New York, though the committee having the
matter in charge <SPAN name="page443" id="page443"></SPAN> made no public avowal of its intention
beforehand, merely calling a meeting to express the gratitude of
the country to the general for his signal services; and even
inviting Mr. Lincoln to take part in the proceedings. This he
declined to do, but wrote:</p>
<p>"I approve, nevertheless, whatever may tend to strengthen and
sustain General Grant and the noble armies now under his direction.
My previous high estimate of General Grant has been maintained and
heightened by what has occurred in the remarkable campaign he is
now conducting, while the magnitude and difficulty of the task
before him do not prove less than I expected. He and his brave
soldiers are now in the midst of their great trial, and I trust
that at your meeting you will so shape your good words that they
may turn to men and guns, moving to his and their support."</p>
<p>With such gracious approval of the movement the meeting
naturally fell into the hands of the Lincoln men. General Grant
neither at this time nor at any other, gave the least countenance
to the efforts which were made to array him in political opposition
to the President.</p>
<p>These various attempts to discredit the name of Mr. Lincoln and
nominate some one else in his place caused hardly a ripple on the
great current of public opinion. Death alone could have prevented
his choice by the Union convention. So absolute and universal was
the tendency that most of the politicians made no effort to direct
or guide it; they simply exerted themselves to keep in the van and
not be overwhelmed. The convention met on June 7, but irregular
nominations of Mr. Lincoln for President had begun as early as
January 6, when the first State convention of the year was held in
New Hampshire.</p>
<p><SPAN name="page444" id="page444"></SPAN> From one end of the country to the other
such spontaneous nominations had joyously echoed his name. Only in
Missouri did it fail of overwhelming adhesion, and even in the
Missouri Assembly the resolution in favor of his renomination was
laid upon the table by a majority of only eight. The current swept
on irresistibly throughout the spring. A few opponents of Mr.
Lincoln endeavored to postpone the meeting of the national
convention until September, knowing that their only hope lay in
some possible accident of the summer. But though supported by so
powerful an influence as the New York "Tribune," the National
Committee paid no attention to this appeal. Indeed, they might as
well have considered the request of a committee of prominent
citizens to check an impending thunderstorm.</p>
<p>Mr. Lincoln took no measures whatever to promote his own
candidacy. While not assuming airs of reluctance or bashfulness, he
discouraged on the part of strangers any suggestion as to his
reëlection. Among his friends he made no secret of his
readiness to continue the work he was engaged in, if such should be
the general wish. "A second term would be a great honor and a great
labor, which together, perhaps, I would not decline if tendered,"
he wrote Elihu B. Washburne. He not only opposed no obstacle to the
ambitions of Chase, but received warnings to beware of Grant in the
same serene manner, answering tranquilly, "If he takes Richmond,
let him have it." And he discouraged office-holders, civil or
military, who showed any special zeal in his behalf. To General
Schurz, who wrote asking permission to take an active part in the
presidential campaign, he replied:</p>
<p>"Allow me to suggest that if you wish to remain in the military
service, it is very dangerous for you to get <SPAN name="page445" id="page445"></SPAN>
temporarily out of it; because, with a major-general once out, it
is next to impossible for even the President to get him in
again.... Of course I would be very glad to have your service for
the country in the approaching political canvass; but I fear we
cannot properly have it without separating you from the military."
And in a later letter he added: "I perceive no objection to your
making a political speech when you are where one is to be made; but
quite surely, speaking in the North and fighting in the South at
the same time are not possible; nor could I be justified to detail
any officer to the political campaign during its continuance and
then return him to the army."</p>
<p>Not only did he firmly take this stand as to his own nomination,
but enforced it even more rigidly in cases where he learned that
Federal office-holders were working to defeat the return of certain
Republican congressmen. In several such instances he wrote
instructions of which the following is a type:</p>
<p>"Complaint is made to me that you are using your official power
to defeat Judge Kelley's renomination to Congress.... The correct
principle, I think, is that all our friends should have absolute
freedom of choice among our friends. My wish, therefore, is that
you will do just as you think fit with your own suffrage in the
case, and not constrain any of your subordinates to do other than
as he thinks fit with his."</p>
<p>He made, of course, no long speeches during the campaign, and in
his short addresses, at Sanitary Fairs, in response to visiting
delegations, or on similar occasions where custom and courtesy
decreed that he must say something, preserved his mental balance
undisturbed, speaking heartily and to the point, but skilfully
avoiding the perils that beset the candidate who talks.<SPAN name="page446" id="page446"></SPAN></p>
<p>When at last the Republican convention came together on June 7,
1864, it had less to do than any other convention in our political
history; for its delegates were bound by a peremptory mandate. It
was opened by brief remarks from Senator Morgan of New York, whose
significant statement that the convention would fall far short of
accomplishing its great mission unless it declared for a
Constitutional amendment prohibiting African slavery, was loudly
cheered. In their speeches on taking the chair, both the temporary
chairman, Rev. Robert J. Breckinridge of Kentucky, and the
permanent chairman, William Dennison of Ohio, treated Mr. Lincoln's
nomination as a foregone conclusion, and the applause which greeted
his name showed that the delegates did not resent this disregard of
customary etiquette. There were, in fact, but three tasks before
the convention—to settle the status of contesting
delegations, to agree upon a platform, and to nominate a candidate
for Vice-President.</p>
<p>The platform declared in favor of crushing rebellion and
maintaining the integrity of the Union, commending the government's
determination to enter into no compromise with the rebels. It
applauded President Lincoln's patriotism and fidelity in the
discharge of his duties, and stated that only those in harmony with
"these resolutions" ought to have a voice in the administration of
the government. This, while intended to win support of radicals
throughout the Union, was aimed particularly at Postmaster General
Blair, who had made many enemies. It approved all acts directed
against slavery; declared in favor of a constitutional amendment
forever abolishing it; claimed full protection of the laws of war
for colored troops; expressed gratitude to the soldiers and sailors
of the Union; pronounced in favor of encouraging foreign
immigration; <SPAN name="page447" id="page447"></SPAN> of building a Pacific railway; of
keeping inviolate the faith of the nation, pledged to redeem the
national debt; and vigorously reaffirmed the Monroe Doctrine.</p>
<p>Then came the nominations. The only delay in registering the
will of the convention occurred as a consequence of the attempt of
members to do it by irregular and summary methods. When Mr. Delano
of Ohio made the customary motion to proceed to the nomination,
Simon Cameron moved as a substitute the renomination of Lincoln and
Hamlin by acclamation. A long wrangle ensued on the motion to lay
this substitute on the table, which was finally brought to an end
by the cooler heads, who desired that whatever opposition to Mr.
Lincoln there might be in the convention should have fullest
opportunity of expression. The nominations, therefore, proceeded by
call of States in the usual way. The interminable nominating
speeches of recent years had not yet come into fashion. B.C. Cook,
the chairman of the Illinois delegation, merely said:</p>
<p>"The State of Illinois again presents to the loyal people of
this nation for President of the United States, Abraham
Lincoln—God bless him!"</p>
<p>Others, who seconded the nomination, were equally brief. Every
State gave its undivided vote for Lincoln, with the exception of
Missouri, which cast its vote, under positive instructions, as the
chairman stated, for Grant. But before the result was announced,
John F. Hume of Missouri moved that Mr. Lincoln's nomination be
declared unanimous. This could not be done until the result of the
balloting was made known—four hundred and eighty-four for
Lincoln, twenty-two for Grant. Missouri then changed its vote, and
the secretary read the grand total of five hundred and six for
Lincoln; the announcement being <SPAN name="page448" id="page448"></SPAN> greeted with a storm of
cheering which lasted many minutes.</p>
<p>The principal names mentioned for the vice-presidency were
Hannibal Hamlin, the actual incumbent; Andrew Johnson of Tennessee;
and Daniel S. Dickinson of New York. Besides these, General L.H.
Rousseau had the vote of his own State—Kentucky. The radicals
of Missouri favored General B.F. Butler, who had a few scattered
votes also from New England. Among the principal candidates,
however, the voters were equally enough divided to make the contest
exceedingly spirited and interesting.</p>
<p>For several days before the convention met Mr. Lincoln had been
besieged by inquiries as to his personal wishes in regard to his
associate on the ticket. He had persistently refused to give the
slightest intimation of such wish. His private secretary, Mr.
Nicolay, who was at Baltimore in attendance at the convention, was
well acquainted with this attitude; but at last, over-borne by the
solicitations of the chairman of the Illinois delegation, who had
been perplexed at the advocacy of Joseph Holt by Leonard Swett, one
of the President's most intimate friends, Mr. Nicolay wrote to Mr.
Hay, who had been left in charge of the executive office in his
absence:</p>
<p>"Cook wants to know, confidentially, whether Swett is all right;
whether in urging Holt for Vice-President he reflects the
President's wishes; whether the President has any preference,
either personal or on the score of policy; or whether he wishes not
even to interfere by a confidential intimation.... Please get this
information for me, if possible."</p>
<p>The letter was shown to the President, who indorsed upon it:</p>
<p>"Swett is unquestionably all right. Mr. Holt is a <SPAN name="page449" id="page449"></SPAN>good man,
but I had not heard or thought of him for V.P. Wish not to
interfere about V.P. Cannot interfere about platform. Convention
must judge for itself."</p>
<p>This positive and final instruction was sent at once to Mr.
Nicolay, and by him communicated to the President's most intimate
friends in the convention. It was therefore with minds absolutely
untrammeled by even any knowledge of the President's wishes that
the convention went about its work of selecting his associate on
the ticket. It is altogether probable that the ticket of 1860 would
have been nominated without a contest had it not been for the
general impression, in and out of the convention, that it would be
advisable to select as a candidate for the vice-presidency a war
Democrat. Mr. Dickinson, while not putting himself forward as a
candidate, had sanctioned the use of his name on the special ground
that his candidacy might attract to the support of the Union party
many Democrats who would have been unwilling to support a ticket
avowedly Republican; but these considerations weighed with still
greater force in favor of Mr. Johnson, who was not only a Democrat,
but also a citizen of a slave State. The first ballot showed that
Mr. Johnson had received two hundred votes, Mr. Hamlin one hundred
and fifty, and Mr. Dickinson one hundred and eight; and before the
result was announced almost the whole convention turned their votes
to Johnson; whereupon his nomination was declared unanimous. The
work was so quickly done that Mr. Lincoln received notice of the
action of the convention only a few minutes after the telegram
announcing his own renomination had reached him.</p>
<p>Replying next day to a committee of notification, he said in
part:<SPAN name="page450" id="page450"></SPAN></p>
<p>"I will neither conceal my gratification nor restrain the
expression of my gratitude that the Union people, through their
convention, in the continued effort to save and advance the nation,
have deemed me not unworthy to remain in my present position. I
know no reason to doubt that I shall accept the nomination tendered
and yet, perhaps I should not declare definitely before reading and
considering what is called the platform. I will say now, however, I
approve the declaration in favor of so amending the Constitution as
to prohibit slavery throughout the nation. When the people in
revolt, with a hundred days of explicit notice that they could
within those days resume their allegiance without the overthrow of
their institutions, and that they could not resume it afterward,
elected to stand out, such amendment to the Constitution as is now
proposed became a fitting and necessary conclusion to the final
success of the Union cause.... In the joint names of Liberty and
Union, let us labor to give it legal form and practical
effect."</p>
<p>In his letter of June 29, formally accepting the nomination, the
President observed the same wise rule of brevity which he had
followed four years before. He made but one specific reference to
any subject of discussion. While he accepted the convention's
resolution reaffirming the Monroe Doctrine, he gave the convention
and the country distinctly to understand that he stood by the
action already adopted by himself and the Secretary of State. He
said:</p>
<p>"There might be misunderstanding were I not to say that the
position of the government in relation to the action of France in
Mexico, as assumed through the State Department and approved and
indorsed by the convention among the measures and acts of the
Executive will be faithfully maintained so long as the state
<SPAN name="page451" id="page451"></SPAN> of facts shall leave that position
pertinent and applicable."</p>
<p>This resolution, which was, in truth, a more vigorous assertion
of the Monroe Doctrine than the author of that famous tenet ever
dreamed of making, had been introduced in the convention by the
radicals as a covert censure of Mr. Lincoln's attitude toward the
French invasion of our sister republic; but through skilful wording
of the platform had been turned by his friends into an indorsement
of the administration.</p>
<p>And, indeed, this was most just, since from the beginning
President Lincoln and Mr. Seward had done all in their power to
discourage the presence of foreign troops on Mexican territory.
When a joint expedition by England, France, and Spain had been
agreed upon to seize certain Mexican ports in default of a money
indemnity demanded by those countries for outrages against their
subjects, England had invited the United States to be a party to
the convention. Instead, Mr. Lincoln and Mr. Seward attempted to
aid Mexico with a sufficient sum to meet these demands, and
notified Great Britain of their intention to do so, and the motives
which prompted them. The friendly assistance came to naught; but as
the three powers vigorously disclaimed any designs against Mexico's
territory or her form of government, the United States saw no
necessity for further action, beyond a clear definition of its own
attitude for the benefit of all the parties.</p>
<p>This it continued to repeat after England withdrew from the
expedition, and Spain, soon recalling her troops, left Napoleon III
to set the Archduke Maximilian on his shadowy throne, and to
develop in the heart of America his scheme of an empire friendly to
the South. At the moment the government was unable to do more,
though recognizing the veiled <SPAN name="page452" id="page452"></SPAN>hostility of Europe which thus
manifested itself in a movement on what may be called the right
flank of the republic. While giving utterance to no expressions of
indignation at the aggressions, or of gratification at disaster
which met the aggressor, the President and Mr. Seward continued to
assert, at every proper opportunity the adherence of the American
government to its traditional policy of discouraging European
intervention in the affairs of the New World.</p>
<hr style="width: 65%;" />
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<br/>
<SPAN name="page453" id="page453"></SPAN>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />