<h2>CHAPTER VIII</h2>
<p>Sometimes I think Wolf Larsen mad, or half-mad at least, what
of his strange moods and vagaries. At other times I take
him for a great man, a genius who has never arrived. And,
finally, I am convinced that he is the perfect type of the
primitive man, born a thousand years or generations too late and
an anachronism in this culminating century of civilization.
He is certainly an individualist of the most pronounced
type. Not only that, but he is very lonely. There is
no congeniality between him and the rest of the men aboard
ship. His tremendous virility and mental strength wall him
apart. They are more like children to him, even the
hunters, and as children he treats them, descending perforce to
their level and playing with them as a man plays with
puppies. Or else he probes them with the cruel hand of a
vivisectionist, groping about in their mental processes and
examining their souls as though to see of what soul-stuff is
made.</p>
<p>I have seen him a score of times, at table, insulting this
hunter or that, with cool and level eyes and, withal, a certain
air of interest, pondering their actions or replies or petty
rages with a curiosity almost laughable to me who stood onlooker
and who understood. Concerning his own rages, I am
convinced that they are not real, that they are sometimes
experiments, but that in the main they are the habits of a pose
or attitude he has seen fit to take toward his fellow-men.
I know, with the possible exception of the incident of the dead
mate, that I have not seen him really angry; nor do I wish ever
to see him in a genuine rage, when all the force of him is called
into play.</p>
<p>While on the question of vagaries, I shall tell what befell
Thomas Mugridge in the cabin, and at the same time complete an
incident upon which I have already touched once or twice.
The twelve o’clock dinner was over, one day, and I had just
finished putting the cabin in order, when Wolf Larsen and Thomas
Mugridge descended the companion stairs. Though the cook
had a cubby-hole of a state-room opening off from the cabin, in
the cabin itself he had never dared to linger or to be seen, and
he flitted to and fro, once or twice a day, a timid spectre.</p>
<p>“So you know how to play ‘Nap,’” Wolf
Larsen was saying in a pleased sort of voice. “I
might have guessed an Englishman would know. I learned it
myself in English ships.”</p>
<p>Thomas Mugridge was beside himself, a blithering imbecile, so
pleased was he at chumming thus with the captain. The
little airs he put on and the painful striving to assume the easy
carriage of a man born to a dignified place in life would have
been sickening had they not been ludicrous. He quite
ignored my presence, though I credited him with being simply
unable to see me. His pale, wishy-washy eyes were swimming
like lazy summer seas, though what blissful visions they beheld
were beyond my imagination.</p>
<p>“Get the cards, Hump,” Wolf Larsen ordered, as
they took seats at the table. “And bring out the
cigars and the whisky you’ll find in my berth.”</p>
<p>I returned with the articles in time to hear the Cockney
hinting broadly that there was a mystery about him, that he might
be a gentleman’s son gone wrong or something or other;
also, that he was a remittance man and was paid to keep away from
England—“p’yed ’ansomely, sir,” was
the way he put it; “p’yed ’ansomely to sling my
’ook an’ keep slingin’ it.”</p>
<p>I had brought the customary liquor glasses, but Wolf Larsen
frowned, shook his head, and signalled with his hands for me to
bring the tumblers. These he filled two-thirds full with
undiluted whisky—“a gentleman’s drink?”
quoth Thomas Mugridge,—and they clinked their glasses to
the glorious game of “Nap,” lighted cigars, and fell
to shuffling and dealing the cards.</p>
<p>They played for money. They increased the amounts of the
bets. They drank whisky, they drank it neat, and I fetched
more. I do not know whether Wolf Larsen cheated or
not,—a thing he was thoroughly capable of doing,—but
he won steadily. The cook made repeated journeys to his
bunk for money. Each time he performed the journey with
greater swagger, but he never brought more than a few dollars at
a time. He grew maudlin, familiar, could hardly see the
cards or sit upright. As a preliminary to another journey
to his bunk, he hooked Wolf Larsen’s buttonhole with a
greasy forefinger and vacuously proclaimed and reiterated,
“I got money, I got money, I tell yer, an’ I’m
a gentleman’s son.”</p>
<p>Wolf Larsen was unaffected by the drink, yet he drank glass
for glass, and if anything his glasses were fuller. There
was no change in him. He did not appear even amused at the
other’s antics.</p>
<p>In the end, with loud protestations that he could lose like a
gentleman, the cook’s last money was staked on the
game—and lost. Whereupon he leaned his head on his
hands and wept. Wolf Larsen looked curiously at him, as
though about to probe and vivisect him, then changed his mind, as
from the foregone conclusion that there was nothing there to
probe.</p>
<p>“Hump,” he said to me, elaborately polite,
“kindly take Mr. Mugridge’s arm and help him up on
deck. He is not feeling very well.”</p>
<p>“And tell Johnson to douse him with a few buckets of
salt water,” he added, in a lower tone for my ear
alone.</p>
<p>I left Mr. Mugridge on deck, in the hands of a couple of
grinning sailors who had been told off for the purpose. Mr.
Mugridge was sleepily spluttering that he was a gentleman’s
son. But as I descended the companion stairs to clear the
table I heard him shriek as the first bucket of water struck
him.</p>
<p>Wolf Larsen was counting his winnings.</p>
<p>“One hundred and eighty-five dollars even,” he
said aloud. “Just as I thought. The beggar came
aboard without a cent.”</p>
<p>“And what you have won is mine, sir,” I said
boldly.</p>
<p>He favoured me with a quizzical smile. “Hump, I
have studied some grammar in my time, and I think your tenses are
tangled. ‘Was mine,’ you should have said, not
’is mine.’”</p>
<p>“It is a question, not of grammar, but of ethics,”
I answered.</p>
<p>It was possibly a minute before he spoke.</p>
<p>“D’ye know, Hump,” he said, with a slow
seriousness which had in it an indefinable strain of sadness,
“that this is the first time I have heard the word
‘ethics’ in the mouth of a man. You and I are
the only men on this ship who know its meaning.”</p>
<p>“At one time in my life,” he continued, after
another pause, “I dreamed that I might some day talk with
men who used such language, that I might lift myself out of the
place in life in which I had been born, and hold conversation and
mingle with men who talked about just such things as
ethics. And this is the first time I have ever heard the
word pronounced. Which is all by the way, for you are
wrong. It is a question neither of grammar nor ethics, but
of fact.”</p>
<p>“I understand,” I said. “The fact is
that you have the money.”</p>
<p>His face brightened. He seemed pleased at my
perspicacity. “But it is avoiding the real
question,” I continued, “which is one of
right.”</p>
<p>“Ah,” he remarked, with a wry pucker of his mouth,
“I see you still believe in such things as right and
wrong.”</p>
<p>“But don’t you?—at all?” I
demanded.</p>
<p>“Not the least bit. Might is right, and that is
all there is to it. Weakness is wrong. Which is a
very poor way of saying that it is good for oneself to be strong,
and evil for oneself to be weak—or better yet, it is
pleasurable to be strong, because of the profits; painful to be
weak, because of the penalties. Just now the possession of
this money is a pleasurable thing. It is good for one to
possess it. Being able to possess it, I wrong myself and
the life that is in me if I give it to you and forego the
pleasure of possessing it.”</p>
<p>“But you wrong me by withholding it,” I
objected.</p>
<p>“Not at all. One man cannot wrong another
man. He can only wrong himself. As I see it, I do
wrong always when I consider the interests of others.
Don’t you see? How can two particles of the yeast
wrong each other by striving to devour each other? It is
their inborn heritage to strive to devour, and to strive not to
be devoured. When they depart from this they
sin.”</p>
<p>“Then you don’t believe in altruism?” I
asked.</p>
<p>He received the word as if it had a familiar ring, though he
pondered it thoughtfully. “Let me see, it means
something about coöperation, doesn’t it?”</p>
<p>“Well, in a way there has come to be a sort of
connection,” I answered unsurprised by this time at such
gaps in his vocabulary, which, like his knowledge, was the
acquirement of a self-read, self-educated man, whom no one had
directed in his studies, and who had thought much and talked
little or not at all. “An altruistic act is an act
performed for the welfare of others. It is unselfish, as
opposed to an act performed for self, which is
selfish.”</p>
<p>He nodded his head. “Oh, yes, I remember it
now. I ran across it in Spencer.”</p>
<p>“Spencer!” I cried. “Have you read
him?”</p>
<p>“Not very much,” was his confession.
“I understood quite a good deal of <i>First Principles</i>,
but his <i>Biology</i> took the wind out of my sails, and his
<i>Psychology</i> left me butting around in the doldrums for many
a day. I honestly could not understand what he was driving
at. I put it down to mental deficiency on my part, but
since then I have decided that it was for want of
preparation. I had no proper basis. Only Spencer and
myself know how hard I hammered. But I did get something
out of his <i>Data of Ethics</i>. There’s where I ran
across ‘altruism,’ and I remember now how it was
used.”</p>
<p>I wondered what this man could have got from such a
work. Spencer I remembered enough to know that altruism was
imperative to his ideal of highest conduct. Wolf Larsen,
evidently, had sifted the great philosopher’s teachings,
rejecting and selecting according to his needs and desires.</p>
<p>“What else did you run across?” I asked.</p>
<p>His brows drew in slightly with the mental effort of suitably
phrasing thoughts which he had never before put into
speech. I felt an elation of spirit. I was groping
into his soul-stuff as he made a practice of groping in the
soul-stuff of others. I was exploring virgin
territory. A strange, a terribly strange, region was
unrolling itself before my eyes.</p>
<p>“In as few words as possible,” he began,
“Spencer puts it something like this: First, a man must act
for his own benefit—to do this is to be moral and
good. Next, he must act for the benefit of his
children. And third, he must act for the benefit of his
race.”</p>
<p>“And the highest, finest, right conduct,” I
interjected, “is that act which benefits at the same time
the man, his children, and his race.”</p>
<p>“I wouldn’t stand for that,” he
replied. “Couldn’t see the necessity for it,
nor the common sense. I cut out the race and the
children. I would sacrifice nothing for them.
It’s just so much slush and sentiment, and you must see it
yourself, at least for one who does not believe in eternal
life. With immortality before me, altruism would be a
paying business proposition. I might elevate my soul to all
kinds of altitudes. But with nothing eternal before me but
death, given for a brief spell this yeasty crawling and squirming
which is called life, why, it would be immoral for me to perform
any act that was a sacrifice. Any sacrifice that makes me
lose one crawl or squirm is foolish,—and not only foolish,
for it is a wrong against myself and a wicked thing. I must
not lose one crawl or squirm if I am to get the most out of the
ferment. Nor will the eternal movelessness that is coming
to me be made easier or harder by the sacrifices or selfishnesses
of the time when I was yeasty and acrawl.”</p>
<p>“Then you are an individualist, a materialist, and,
logically, a hedonist.”</p>
<p>“Big words,” he smiled. “But what is a
hedonist?”</p>
<p>He nodded agreement when I had given the definition.
“And you are also,” I continued, “a man one
could not trust in the least thing where it was possible for a
selfish interest to intervene?”</p>
<p>“Now you’re beginning to understand,” he
said, brightening.</p>
<p>“You are a man utterly without what the world calls
morals?”</p>
<p>“That’s it.”</p>
<p>“A man of whom to be always afraid—”</p>
<p>“That’s the way to put it.”</p>
<p>“As one is afraid of a snake, or a tiger, or a
shark?”</p>
<p>“Now you know me,” he said. “And you
know me as I am generally known. Other men call me
‘Wolf.’”</p>
<p>“You are a sort of monster,” I added audaciously,
“a Caliban who has pondered Setebos, and who acts as you
act, in idle moments, by whim and fancy.”</p>
<p>His brow clouded at the allusion. He did not understand,
and I quickly learned that he did not know the poem.</p>
<p>“I’m just reading Browning,” he confessed,
“and it’s pretty tough. I haven’t got
very far along, and as it is I’ve about lost my
bearings.”</p>
<p>Not to be tiresome, I shall say that I fetched the book from
his state-room and read “Caliban” aloud. He was
delighted. It was a primitive mode of reasoning and of
looking at things that he understood thoroughly. He
interrupted again and again with comment and criticism.
When I finished, he had me read it over a second time, and a
third. We fell into discussion—philosophy, science,
evolution, religion. He betrayed the inaccuracies of the
self-read man, and, it must be granted, the sureness and
directness of the primitive mind. The very simplicity of
his reasoning was its strength, and his materialism was far more
compelling than the subtly complex materialism of Charley
Furuseth. Not that I—a confirmed and, as Furuseth
phrased it, a temperamental idealist—was to be compelled;
but that Wolf Larsen stormed the last strongholds of my faith
with a vigour that received respect, while not accorded
conviction.</p>
<p>Time passed. Supper was at hand and the table not
laid. I became restless and anxious, and when Thomas
Mugridge glared down the companion-way, sick and angry of
countenance, I prepared to go about my duties. But Wolf
Larsen cried out to him:</p>
<p>“Cooky, you’ve got to hustle to-night.
I’m busy with Hump, and you’ll do the best you can
without him.”</p>
<p>And again the unprecedented was established. That night
I sat at table with the captain and the hunters, while Thomas
Mugridge waited on us and washed the dishes afterward—a
whim, a Caliban-mood of Wolf Larsen’s, and one I foresaw
would bring me trouble. In the meantime we talked and
talked, much to the disgust of the hunters, who could not
understand a word.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />