<h2>CHAPTER VIII.</h2>
<p><span class="smcap">Nothing</span> more vexatious had ever
happened to me than to become aware before Corvick’s
arrival in England that I shouldn’t be there to put him
through. I found myself abruptly called to Germany by the
alarming illness of my younger brother, who, against my advice,
had gone to Munich to study, at the feet indeed of a great
master, the art of portraiture in oils. The near relative
who made him an allowance had threatened to withdraw it if he
should, under specious pretexts, turn for superior truth to
Paris—Paris being somehow, for a Cheltenham aunt, the
school of evil, the abyss. I deplored this prejudice at the
time, and the deep injury of it was now visible—first in
the fact that it hadn’t saved the poor boy, who was clever,
frail and foolish, from congestion of the lungs, and second in
the greater break with London to which the event condemned
me. I’m afraid that what was uppermost in my mind
during several anxious weeks was the sense that if we had only
been in Paris I might have run over to see Corvick. This
was actually out of the question from every point of view: my
brother, whose recovery gave us both plenty to do, was ill for
three months, during which I never left him and at the end of
which we had to face the absolute prohibition of a return to
England. The consideration of climate imposed itself, and
he was in no state to meet it alone. I took him to Meran
and there spent the summer with him, trying to show him by
example how to get back to work and nursing a rage of another
sort that I tried <i>not</i> to show him.</p>
<p>The whole business proved the first of a series of phenomena
so strangely interlaced that, taken together—which was how
I had to take them—they form as good an illustration as I
can recall of the manner in which, for the good of his soul
doubtless, fate sometimes deals with a man’s avidity.
These incidents certainly had larger bearings than the
comparatively meagre consequence we are here concerned
with—though I feel that consequence also a thing to speak
of with some respect. It’s mainly in such a light, I
confess, at any rate, that the ugly fruit of my exile is at this
hour present to me. Even at first indeed the spirit in
which my avidity, as I have called it, made me regard that term
owed no element of ease to the fact that before coming back from
Rapallo George Corvick addressed me in a way I objected to.
His letter had none of the sedative action I must to-day profess
myself sure he had wished to give it, and the march of
occurrences was not so ordered as to make up for what it
lacked. He had begun on the spot, for one of the
quarterlies, a great last word on Vereker’s writings, and
this exhaustive study, the only one that would have counted, have
existed, was to turn on the new light, to utter—oh, so
quietly!—the unimagined truth. It was in other words
to trace the figure in the carpet through every convolution, to
reproduce it in every tint. The result, according to my
friend, would be the greatest literary portrait ever painted, and
what he asked of me was just to be so good as not to trouble him
with questions till he should hang up his masterpiece before
me. He did me the honour to declare that, putting aside the
great sitter himself, all aloft in his indifference, I was
individually the connoisseur he was most working for. I was
therefore to be a good boy and not try to peep under the curtain
before the show was ready: I should enjoy it all the more if I
sat very still.</p>
<p>I did my best to sit very still, but I couldn’t help
giving a jump on seeing in <i>The Times</i>, after I had been a
week or two in Munich and before, as I knew, Corvick had reached
London, the announcement of the sudden death of poor Mrs.
Erme. I instantly, by letter, appealed to Gwendolen for
particulars, and she wrote me that her mother had yielded to
long-threatened failure of the heart. She didn’t say,
but I took the liberty of reading into her words, that from the
point of view of her marriage and also of her eagerness, which
was quite a match for mine, this was a solution more prompt than
could have been expected and more radical than waiting for the
old lady to swallow the dose. I candidly admit indeed that
at the time—for I heard from her repeatedly—I read
some singular things into Gwendolen’s words and some still
more extraordinary ones into her silences. Pen in hand,
this way, I live the time over, and it brings back the oddest
sense of my having been, both for months and in spite of myself,
a kind of coerced spectator. All my life had taken refuge
in my eyes, which the procession of events appeared to have
committed itself to keep astare. There were days when I
thought of writing to Hugh Vereker and simply throwing myself on
his charity. But I felt more deeply that I hadn’t
fallen quite so low—besides which, quite properly, he would
send me about my business. Mrs. Erme’s death brought
Corvick straight home, and within the month he was united
“very quietly”—as quietly, I seemed to make
out, as he meant in his article to bring out his
trouvaille—to the young lady he had loved and
quitted. I use this last term, I may parenthetically say,
because I subsequently grew sure that at the time he went to
India, at the time of his great news from Bombay, there had been
no positive pledge between them whatever. There had been
none at the moment she was affirming to me the very
opposite. On the other hand he had certainly become engaged
the day he returned. The happy pair went down to Torquay
for their honeymoon, and there, in a reckless hour, it occurred
to poor Corvick to take his young bride a drive. He had no
command of that business: this had been brought home to me of old
in a little tour we had once made together in a dogcart. In
a dogcart he perched his companion for a rattle over Devonshire
hills, on one of the likeliest of which he brought his horse,
who, it was true, had bolted, down with such violence that the
occupants of the cart were hurled forward and that he fell
horribly on his head. He was killed on the spot; Gwendolen
escaped unhurt.</p>
<p>I pass rapidly over the question of this unmitigated tragedy,
of what the loss of my best friend meant for me, and I complete
my little history of my patience and my pain by the frank
statement of my having, in a postscript to my very first letter
to her after the receipt of the hideous news, asked Mrs. Corvick
whether her husband mightn’t at least have finished the
great article on Vereker. Her answer was as prompt as my
question: the article, which had been barely begun, was a mere
heartbreaking scrap. She explained that our friend, abroad,
had just settled down to it when interrupted by her
mother’s death, and that then, on his return, he had been
kept from work by the engrossments into which that calamity was
to plunge them. The opening pages were all that existed;
they were striking, they were promising, but they didn’t
unveil the idol. That great intellectual feat was obviously
to have formed his climax. She said nothing more, nothing
to enlighten me as to the state of her own knowledge—the
knowledge for the acquisition of which I had fancied her
prodigiously acting. This was above all what I wanted to
know: had <i>she</i> seen the idol unveiled? Had there been
a private ceremony for a palpitating audience of one? For
what else but that ceremony had the nuptials taken place? I
didn’t like as yet to press her, though when I thought of
what had passed between us on the subject in Corvick’s
absence her reticence surprised me. It was therefore not
till much later, from Meran, that I risked another appeal, risked
it in some trepidation, for she continued to tell me
nothing. “Did you hear in those few days of your
blighted bliss,” I wrote, “what we desired so to
hear?” I said, “we,” as a little hint and
she showed me she could take a little hint; “I heard
everything,” she replied, “and I mean to keep it to
myself!”</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />