<SPAN name="ch5" id="ch5"></SPAN>
<h2>CHAPTER V.</h2>
<p><small><i>A lesson in Pronunciation—Reverence for Robert Burns—The
Southern Cross—Troublesome Constellations—Victoria for a Name—Islands
on the Map—Alofa and Fortuna—Recruiting for the Queensland
Plantations—Captain Warren's NoteBook—Recruiting not
thoroughly Popular<br/> <br/> <br/></i></small></p>
<p><i>Noise proves nothing. Often a hen who has merely laid an egg cackles as
if she had laid an asteroid.</i></p>
<p>—Pudd'nhead Wilson's New Calendar.</p>
<p>WEDNESDAY, Sept. 11. In this world we often make mistakes of judgment. We
do not as a rule get out of them sound and whole, but sometimes we do. At
dinner yesterday evening-present, a mixture of Scotch, English, American,
Canadian, and Australasian folk—a discussion broke out about the
pronunciation of certain Scottish words. This was private ground, and the
non-Scotch nationalities, with one exception, discreetly kept still. But I
am not discreet, and I took a hand. I didn't know anything about the
subject, but I took a hand just to have something to do. At that moment
the word in dispute was the word three. One Scotchman was claiming that
the peasantry of Scotland pronounced it three, his adversaries claimed
that they didn't—that they pronounced it 'thraw'. The solitary Scot
was having a sultry time of it, so I thought I would enrich him with my
help. In my position I was necessarily quite impartial, and was equally as
well and as ill equipped to fight on the one side as on the other. So I
spoke up and said the peasantry pronounced the word three, not thraw. It
was an error of judgment. There was a moment of astonished and ominous
silence, then weather ensued. The storm rose and spread in a surprising
way, and I was snowed under in a very few minutes. It was a bad defeat for
me—a kind of Waterloo. It promised to remain so, and I wished I had
had better sense than to enter upon such a forlorn enterprise. But just
then I had a saving thought—at least a thought that offered a
chance. While the storm was still raging, I made up a Scotch couplet, and
then spoke up and said:</p>
<p>"Very well, don't say any more. I confess defeat. I thought I knew, but I
see my mistake. I was deceived by one of your Scotch poets."</p>
<p>"A Scotch poet! O come! Name him."</p>
<p>"Robert Burns."</p>
<p>It is wonderful the power of that name. These men looked doubtful—but
paralyzed, all the same. They were quite silent for a moment; then one of
them said—with the reverence in his voice which is always present in
a Scotchman's tone when he utters the name.</p>
<p>"Does Robbie Burns say—what does he say?"</p>
<p>"This is what he says:</p>
<table summary="">
<tr>
<td>
'There were nae bairns but only three—<br/> Ane at the breast,
twa at the knee.'"<br/>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>It ended the discussion. There was no man there profane enough, disloyal
enough, to say any word against a thing which Robert Burns had settled. I
shall always honor that great name for the salvation it brought me in this
time of my sore need.</p>
<p>It is my belief that nearly any invented quotation, played with
confidence, stands a good chance to deceive. There are people who think
that honesty is always the best policy. This is a superstition; there are
times when the appearance of it is worth six of it.</p>
<p>We are moving steadily southward-getting further and further down under
the projecting paunch of the globe. Yesterday evening we saw the Big
Dipper and the north star sink below the horizon and disappear from our
world. No, not "we," but they. They saw it—somebody saw it—and
told me about it. But it is no matter, I was not caring for those things,
I am tired of them, any way. I think they are well enough, but one doesn't
want them always hanging around. My interest was all in the Southern
Cross. I had never seen that. I had heard about it all my life, and it was
but natural that I should be burning to see it. No other constellation
makes so much talk. I had nothing against the Big Dipper—and
naturally couldn't have anything against it, since it is a citizen of our
own sky, and the property of the United States—but I did want it to
move out of the way and give this foreigner a chance. Judging by the size
of the talk which the Southern Cross had made, I supposed it would need a
sky all to itself.</p>
<p>But that was a mistake. We saw the Cross to-night, and it is not large.
Not large, and not strikingly bright. But it was low down toward the
horizon, and it may improve when it gets up higher in the sky. It is
ingeniously named, for it looks just as a cross would look if it looked
like something else. But that description does not describe; it is too
vague, too general, too indefinite. It does after a fashion suggest a
cross—a cross that is out of repair—or out of drawing; not
correctly shaped. It is long, with a short cross-bar, and the cross-bar is
canted out of the straight line.<br/> <br/> <br/> <br/></p>
<div class="fig"> <ANTIMG alt="p079.jpg (15K)" src="images/p079.jpg" width-obs="100%" /><br/></div>
<p><br/> <br/> <br/> <br/></p>
<p>It consists of four large stars and one little one. The little one is out
of line and further damages the shape. It should have been placed at the
intersection of the stem and the cross-bar. If you do not draw an
imaginary line from star to star it does not suggest a cross—nor
anything in particular.</p>
<p>One must ignore the little star, and leave it out of the combination—it
confuses everything. If you leave it out, then you can make out of the
four stars a sort of cross—out of true; or a sort of kite—out
of true; or a sort of coffin-out of true.</p>
<p>Constellations have always been troublesome things to name. If you give
one of them a fanciful name, it will always refuse to live up to it; it
will always persist in not resembling the thing it has been named for.
Ultimately, to satisfy the public, the fanciful name has to be discarded
for a common-sense one, a manifestly descriptive one. The Great Bear
remained the Great Bear—and unrecognizable as such—for
thousands of years; and people complained about it all the time, and quite
properly; but as soon as it became the property of the United States,
Congress changed it to the Big Dipper, and now every body is satisfied,
and there is no more talk about riots. I would not change the Southern
Cross to the Southern Coffin, I would change it to the Southern Kite; for
up there in the general emptiness is the proper home of a kite, but not
for coffins and crosses and dippers. In a little while, now—I cannot
tell exactly how long it will be—the globe will belong to the
English-speaking race; and of course the skies also. Then the
constellations will be re-organized, and polished up, and re-named—the
most of them "Victoria," I reckon, but this one will sail thereafter as
the Southern Kite, or go out of business. Several towns and things, here
and there, have been named for Her Majesty already.<br/> <br/> <br/> <br/></p>
<div class="fig"> <ANTIMG alt="p080.jpg (11K)" src="images/p080.jpg" width-obs="100%" /><br/></div>
<p><br/> <br/> <br/> <br/></p>
<p>In these past few days we are plowing through a mighty Milky Way of
islands. They are so thick on the map that one would hardly expect to find
room between them for a canoe; yet we seldom glimpse one. Once we saw the
dim bulk of a couple of them, far away, spectral and dreamy things;
members of the Horne-Alofa and Fortuna. On the larger one are two rival
native kings—and they have a time together. They are Catholics; so
are their people. The missionaries there are French priests.</p>
<p>From the multitudinous islands in these regions the "recruits" for the
Queensland plantations were formerly drawn; are still drawn from them, I
believe. Vessels fitted up like old-time slavers came here and carried off
the natives to serve as laborers in the great Australian province. In the
beginning it was plain, simple man-stealing, as per testimony of the
missionaries. This has been denied, but not disproven. Afterward it was
forbidden by law to "recruit" a native without his consent, and
governmental agents were sent in all recruiting vessels to see that the
law was obeyed—which they did, according to the recruiting people;
and which they sometimes didn't, according to the missionaries. A man
could be lawfully recruited for a three-years term of service; he could
volunteer for another term if he so chose; when his time was up he could
return to his island. And would also have the means to do it; for the
government required the employer to put money in its hands for this
purpose before the recruit was delivered to him.</p>
<p>Captain Wawn was a recruiting ship-master during many years. From his
pleasant book one gets the idea that the recruiting business was quite
popular with the islanders, as a rule. And yet that did not make the
business wholly dull and uninteresting; for one finds rather frequent
little breaks in the monotony of it—like this, for instance:</p>
<p>"The afternoon of our arrival at Leper Island the schooner was lying
almost becalmed under the lee of the lofty central portion of the island,
about three-quarters of a mile from the shore. The boats were in sight at
some distance. The recruiter-boat had run into a small nook on the rocky
coast, under a high bank, above which stood a solitary hut backed by dense
forest. The government agent and mate in the second boat lay about 400
yards to the westward.</p>
<p>"Suddenly we heard the sound of firing, followed by yells from the natives
on shore, and then we saw the recruiter-boat push out with a seemingly
diminished crew. The mate's boat pulled quickly up, took her in tow, and
presently brought her alongside, all her own crew being more or less hurt.
It seems the natives had called them into the place on pretence of
friendship. A crowd gathered about the stern of the boat, and several
fellows even got into her. All of a sudden our men were attacked with
clubs and tomahawks. The recruiter escaped the first blows aimed at him,
making play with his fists until he had an opportunity to draw his
revolver. 'Tom Sayers,' a Mare man, received a tomahawk blow on the head
which laid the scalp open but did not penetrate his skull, fortunately.
'Bobby Towns,' another Mare boatman, had both his thumbs cut in warding
off blows, one of them being so nearly severed from the hand that the
doctors had to finish the operation. Lihu, a Lifu boy, the recruiter's
special attendant, was cut and pricked in various places, but nowhere
seriously. Jack, an unlucky Tanna recruit, who had been engaged to act as
boatman, received an arrow through his forearm, the head of which—apiece
of bone seven or eight inches long—was still in the limb, protruding
from both sides, when the boats returned. The recruiter himself would have
got off scot-free had not an arrow pinned one of his fingers to the loom
of the steering-oar just as they were getting off. The fight had been
short but sharp. The enemy lost two men, both shot dead."</p>
<p>The truth is, Captain Wawn furnishes such a crowd of instances of fatal
encounters between natives and French and English recruiting-crews (for
the French are in the business for the plantations of New Caledonia), that
one is almost persuaded that recruiting is not thoroughly popular among
the islanders; else why this bristling string of attacks and bloodcurdling
slaughter? The captain lays it all to "Exeter Hall influence." But for the
meddling philanthropists, the native fathers and mothers would be fond of
seeing their children carted into exile and now and then the grave,
instead of weeping about it and trying to kill the kind recruiters.<br/>
<br/> <br/> <br/></p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />