<h2> <SPAN name="ch57" id="ch57"></SPAN><br/> <br/> CHAPTER LVII. </h2>
<p><small><i>India the Most Extraordinary Country on Earth—Nothing Forgotten—The
Land of Wonders—Annual Statistics Everywhere about Violence—Tiger
vs. Man—A Handsome Fight—Annual Man Killing and Tiger Killing—Other
Animals—Snakes—Insurance and Snake Tables—The Cobra Bite—Muzaffurpore—Dinapore—A
Train that Stopped for Gossip—Six Hours for Thirty-five Miles—A
Rupee to the Engineer—Ninety Miles an Hour—Again to Benares,
the Piety Hive—To Lucknow<br/> <br/> <br/></i></small></p>
<p><i>She was not quite what you would call refined. She was not quite what
you would call unrefined. She was the kind of person that keeps a parrot.</i></p>
<p>—Pudd'nhead Wilson's New Calendar.</p>
<p>So far as I am able to judge, nothing has been left undone, either by man
or Nature, to make India the most extraordinary country that the sun
visits on his round. Nothing seems to have been forgotten, nothing over
looked. Always, when you think you have come to the end of her tremendous
specialties and have finished hanging tags upon her as the Land of the
Thug, the Land of the Plague, the Land of Famine, the Land of Giant
Illusions, the Land of Stupendous Mountains, and so forth, another
specialty crops up and another tag is required. I have been overlooking
the fact that India is by an unapproachable supremacy—the Land of
Murderous Wild Creatures. Perhaps it will be simplest to throw away the
tags and generalize her with one all-comprehensive name, as the Land of
Wonders.</p>
<p>For many years the British Indian Government has been trying to destroy
the murderous wild creatures, and has spent a great deal of money in the
effort. The annual official returns show that the undertaking is a
difficult one.</p>
<p>These returns exhibit a curious annual uniformity in results; the sort of
uniformity which you find in the annual output of suicides in the world's
capitals, and the proportions of deaths by this, that, and the other
disease. You can always come close to foretelling how many suicides will
occur in Paris, London, and New York, next year, and also how many deaths
will result from cancer, consumption, dog-bite, falling out of the window,
getting run over by cabs, etc., if you know the statistics of those
matters for the present year. In the same way, with one year's Indian
statistics before you, you can guess closely at how many people were
killed in that Empire by tigers during the previous year, and the year
before that, and the year before that, and at how many were killed in each
of those years by bears, how many by wolves, and how many by snakes; and
you can also guess closely at how many people are going to be killed each
year for the coming five years by each of those agencies. You can also
guess closely at how many of each agency the government is going to kill
each year for the next five years.</p>
<p>I have before me statistics covering a period of six consecutive years. By
these, I know that in India the tiger kills something over 800 persons
every year, and that the government responds by killing about double as
many tigers every year. In four of the six years referred to, the tiger
got 800 odd; in one of the remaining two years he got only 700, but in the
other remaining year he made his average good by scoring 917. He is always
sure of his average. Anyone who bets that the tiger will kill 2,400 people
in India in any three consecutive years has invested his money in a
certainty; anyone who bets that he will kill 2,600 in any three
consecutive years, is absolutely sure to lose.</p>
<p>As strikingly uniform as are the statistics of suicide, they are not any
more so than are those of the tiger's annual output of slaughtered human
beings in India. The government's work is quite uniform, too; it about
doubles the tiger's average. In six years the tiger killed 5,000 persons,
minus 50; in the same six years 10,000 tigers were killed, minus 400.</p>
<p>The wolf kills nearly as many people as the tiger—700 a year to the
tiger's 800 odd—but while he is doing it, more than 5,000 of his
tribe fall.</p>
<p>The leopard kills an average of 230 people per year, but loses 3,300 of
his own mess while he is doing it.</p>
<p>The bear kills 100 people per year at a cost of 1,250 of his own tribe.</p>
<p>The tiger, as the figures show, makes a very handsome fight against man.
But it is nothing to the elephant's fight. The king of beasts, the lord of
the jungle, loses four of his mess per year, but he kills forty—five
persons to make up for it.</p>
<p>But when it comes to killing cattle, the lord of the jungle is not
interested. He kills but 100 in six years—horses of hunters, no
doubt—but in the same six the tiger kills more than 84,000, the
leopard 100,000, the bear 4,000, the wolf 70,000, the hyena more than
13,000, other wild beasts 27,000, and the snakes 19,000, a grand total of
more than 300,000; an average of 50,000 head per year.</p>
<p>In response, the government kills, in the six years, a total of 3,201,232
wild beasts and snakes. Ten for one.</p>
<p>It will be perceived that the snakes are not much interested in cattle;
they kill only 3,000 odd per year. The snakes are much more interested in
man. India swarms with deadly snakes. At the head of the list is the
cobra, the deadliest known to the world, a snake whose bite kills where
the rattlesnake's bite merely entertains.</p>
<p>In India, the annual man-killings by snakes are as uniform, as regular,
and as forecastable as are the tiger-average and the suicide-average.
Anyone who bets that in India, in any three consecutive years the snakes
will kill 49,500 persons, will win his bet; and anyone who bets that in
India in any three consecutive years, the snakes will kill 53,500 persons,
will lose his bet. In India the snakes kill 17,000 people a year; they
hardly ever fall short of it; they as seldom exceed it. An insurance
actuary could take the Indian census tables and the government's snake
tables and tell you within sixpence how much it would be worth to insure a
man against death by snake-bite there. If I had a dollar for every person
killed per year in India, I would rather have it than any other property,
as it is the only property in the world not subject to shrinkage.</p>
<p>I should like to have a royalty on the government-end of the snake
business, too, and am in London now trying to get it; but when I get it it
is not going to be as regular an income as the other will be if I get
that; I have applied for it. The snakes transact their end of the business
in a more orderly and systematic way than the government transacts its end
of it, because the snakes have had a long experience and know all about
the traffic. You can make sure that the government will never kill fewer
than 110,000 snakes in a year, and that it will newer quite reach 300,000—too
much room for oscillation; good speculative stock, to bear or bull, and
buy and sell long and short, and all that kind of thing, but not eligible
for investment like the other. The man that speculates in the government's
snake crop wants to go carefully. I would not advise a man to buy a single
crop at all—I mean a crop of futures for the possible wobble is
something quite extraordinary. If he can buy six future crops in a bunch,
seller to deliver 1,500,000 altogether, that is another matter. I do not
know what snakes are worth now, but I know what they would be worth then,
for the statistics show that the seller could not come within 427,000 of
carrying out his contract. However, I think that a person who speculates
in snakes is a fool, anyway. He always regrets it afterwards.</p>
<p>To finish the statistics. In six years the wild beasts kill 20,000
persons, and the snakes kill 103,000. In the same six the government kills
1,073,546 snakes. Plenty left.</p>
<p>There are narrow escapes in India. In the very jungle where I killed
sixteen tigers and all those elephants, a cobra bit me but it got well;
everyone was surprised. This could not happen twice in ten years, perhaps.
Usually death would result in fifteen minutes.</p>
<p>We struck out westward or northwestward from Calcutta on an itinerary of a
zig-zag sort, which would in the course of time carry us across India to
its northwestern corner and the border of Afghanistan. The first part of
the trip carried us through a great region which was an endless garden—miles
and miles of the beautiful flower from whose juices comes the opium, and
at Muzaffurpore we were in the midst of the indigo culture; thence by a
branch road to the Ganges at a point near Dinapore, and by a train which
would have missed the connection by a week but for the thoughtfulness of
some British officers who were along, and who knew the ways of trains that
are run by natives without white supervision. This train stopped at every
village; for no purpose connected with business, apparently. We put out
nothing, we took nothing aboard. The train bands stepped ashore and
gossiped with friends a quarter of an hour, then pulled out and repeated
this at the succeeding villages. We had thirty-five miles to go and six
hours to do it in, but it was plain that we were not going to make it. It
was then that the English officers said it was now necessary to turn this
gravel train into an express. So they gave the engine-driver a rupee and
told him to fly. It was a simple remedy. After that we made ninety miles
an hour. We crossed the Ganges just at dawn, made our connection, and went
to Benares, where we stayed twenty-four hours and inspected that strange
and fascinating piety-hive again; then left for Lucknow, a city which is
perhaps the most conspicuous of the many monuments of British fortitude
and valor that are scattered about the earth.</p>
<p>The heat was pitiless, the flat plains were destitute of grass, and baked
dry by the sun they were the color of pale dust, which was flying in
clouds. But it was much hotter than this when the relieving forces marched
to Lucknow in the time of the Mutiny. Those were the days of 138 deg. in
the shade.<br/> <br/> <br/> <br/></p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />