<p><SPAN name="link2H_4_0133" id="link2H_4_0133"></SPAN></p>
<h2> LETTER CXXXI </h2>
<h3> LONDON, February 11, O. S. 1751 </h3>
<p>MY DEAR FRIEND: When you go to the play, which I hope you do often, for it
is a very instructive amusement, you must certainly have observed the very
different effects which the several parts have upon you, according as they
are well or ill acted. The very best tragedy of, Corneille's, if well
spoken and acted, interests, engages, agitates, and affects your passions.
Love, terror, and pity alternately possess you. But, if ill spoken and
acted, it would only excite your indignation or your laughter. Why? It is
still Corneille's; it is the same sense, the same matter, whether well or
ill acted. It is, then, merely the manner of speaking and acting that
makes this great difference in the effects. Apply this to yourself, and
conclude from it, that if you would either please in a private company, or
persuade in a public assembly, air, looks, gestures, graces, enunciation,
proper accents, just emphasis, and tuneful cadences, are full as necessary
as the matter itself. Let awkward, ungraceful, inelegant, and dull fellows
say what they will in behalf of their solid matter and strong reasonings;
and let them despise all those graces and ornaments which engage the
senses and captivate the heart; they will find (though they will possibly
wonder why) that their rough, unpolished matter, and their unadorned,
coarse, but strong arguments, will neither please nor persuade; but, on
the contrary, will tire out attention, and excite disgust. We are so made,
we love to be pleased better than to be informed; information is, in a
certain degree, mortifying, as it implies our previous ignorance; it must
be sweetened to be palatable.</p>
<p>To bring this directly to you: know that no man can make a figure in this
country, but by parliament. Your fate depends upon your success there as a
speaker; and, take my word for it, that success turns much more upon
manner than matter. Mr. Pitt and Mr. Murray the solicitor-general, uncle
to Lord Stormount, are, beyond comparison, the best speakers; why? only
because they are the best orators. They alone can inflame or quiet the
House; they alone are so attended to, in that numerous and noisy assembly,
that you might hear a pin fall while either of them is speaking. Is it
that their matter is better, or their arguments stronger, than other
people's? Does the House expect extraordinary informations from them? Not,
in the least: but the House expects pleasure from them, and therefore
attends; finds it, and therefore approves. Mr. Pitt, particularly, has
very little parliamentary knowledge; his matter is generally flimsy, and
his arguments often weak; but his eloquence is superior, his action
graceful, his enunciation just and harmonious; his periods are well
turned, and every word he makes use of is the very best, and the most
expressive, that can be used in that place. This, and not his matter, made
him Paymaster, in spite of both king and ministers. From this draw the
obvious conclusion. The same thing holds full as true in conversation;
where even trifles, elegantly expressed, well looked, and accompanied with
graceful action, will ever please, beyond all the homespun, unadorned
sense in the world. Reflect, on one side, how you feel within yourself,
while you are forced to suffer the tedious, muddy, and ill-turned
narration of some awkward fellow, even though the fact may be interesting;
and, on the other hand, with what pleasure you attend to the relation of a
much less interesting matter, when elegantly expressed, genteelly turned,
and gracefully delivered. By attending carefully to all these agremens in
your daily conversation, they will become habitual to you, before you come
into parliament; and you will have nothing then, to do, but to raise them
a little when you come there. I would wish you to be so attentive to this
object, that I, would not have you speak to your footman, but in the very
best words that the subject admits of, be the language what it will. Think
of your words, and of their arrangement, before you speak; choose the most
elegant, and place them in the best order. Consult your own ear, to avoid
cacophony, and, what is very near as bad, monotony. Think also of your
gesture and looks, when you are speaking even upon the most trifling
subjects. The same things, differently expressed, looked, and delivered,
cease to be the same things. The most passionate lover in the world cannot
make a stronger declaration of love than the 'Bourgeois gentilhomme' does
in this happy form of words, 'Mourir d'amour me font belle Marquise vos
beaux yeux'. I defy anybody to say more; and yet I would advise nobody to
say that, and I would recommend to you rather to smother and conceal your
passion entirely than to reveal it in these words. Seriously, this holds
in everything, as well as in that ludicrous instance. The French, to do
them justice, attend very minutely to the purity, the correctness, and the
elegance of their style in conversation and in their letters. 'Bien
narrer' is an object of their study; and though they sometimes carry it to
affectation, they never sink into inelegance, which is much the worst
extreme of the two. Observe them, and form your French style upon theirs:
for elegance in one language will reproduce itself in all. I knew a young
man, who, being just elected a member of parliament, was laughed at for
being discovered, through the keyhole of his chamber-door, speaking to
himself in the glass, and forming his looks and gestures. I could not join
in that laugh; but, on the contrary, thought him much wiser than those who
laughed at him; for he knew the importance of those little graces in a
public assembly, and they did not. Your little person (which I am told, by
the way, is not ill turned), whether in a laced coat or a blanket, is
specifically the same; but yet, I believe, you choose to wear the former,
and you are in the right, for the sake of pleasing more. The worst-bred
man in Europe, if a lady let fall her fan, would certainly take it up and
give it her; the best-bred man in Europe could do no more. The difference,
however, would be considerable; the latter would please by doing it
gracefully; the former would be laughed at for doing it awkwardly. I
repeat it, and repeat it again, and shall never cease repeating it to you:
air, manners, graces, style, elegance, and all those ornaments, must now
be the only objects of your attention; it is now, or never, that you must
acquire them. Postpone, therefore, all other considerations; make them now
your serious study; you have not one moment to lose. The solid and the
ornamental united, are undoubtedly best; but were I reduced to make an
option, I should without hesitation choose the latter.</p>
<p>I hope you assiduously frequent Marcell—[At that time the most
celebrated dancing-master at Paris.]—and carry graces from him;
nobody had more to spare than he had formerly. Have you learned to carve?
for it is ridiculous not to carve well. A man who tells you gravely that
he cannot carve, may as well tell you that he cannot blow his nose: it is
both as necessary, and as easy.</p>
<p>Make my compliments to Lord Huntingdon, whom I love and honor extremely,
as I dare say you do; I will write to him soon, though I believe he has
hardly time to read a letter; and my letters to those I love are, as you
know by experience, not very short ones: this is one proof of it, and this
would have been longer, if the paper had been so. Good night then, my dear
child.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />
1 of 2
2 of 2
Previous
Next
Update Required
To play the media you will need to either update your browser to a recent version or update your Flash plugin.