<p><SPAN name="link82HCH0014" id="link82HCH0014">
<!-- h3 anchor --> </SPAN></p>
<h3> CHAPTER 14. How Hadad King Of Damascus And Of Syria, Made Two Expeditions Against Ahab And Was Beaten. </h3>
<p>1. When the affairs of Ahab were thus, at that very time the son of Hadad,
[Benhadad,] who was king of the Syrians and of Damascus, got together an
army out of all his country, and procured thirty-two kings beyond
Euphrates to be his auxiliaries: so he made an expedition against Ahab;
but because Ahab's army was not like that of Benhadad, he did not set it
in array to fight him, but having shut up every thing that was in the
country in the strongest cities he had, he abode in Samaria himself, for
the walls about it were very strong, and it appeared to be not easily to
be taken in other respects also. So the king of Syria took his army with
him, and came to Samaria, and placed his army round about the city, and
besieged it. He also sent a herald to Ahab, and desired he would admit the
ambassadors he would send him, by whom he would let him know his pleasure.
So, upon the king of Israel's permission for him to send, those
ambassador's came, and by their king's command spake thus: That Ahab's
riches, and his children, and his wives were Benhadad's, and if he would
make an agreement, and give him leave to take as much of what he had as he
pleased, he would withdraw his army, and leave off the siege. Upon this
Ahab bade the ambassadors to go back, and tell their king, that both he
himself and all that he hath are his possessions. And when these
ambassadors had told this to Berthadad, he sent to him again, and desired,
since he confessed that all he had was his, that he would admit those
servants of his which he should send the next day; and he commanded him to
deliver to those whom he should send whatsoever, upon their searching his
palace, and the houses of his friends and kindred, they should find to be
excellent in its kind, but that what did not please them they should leave
to him. At this second embassage of the king of Syria, Ahab was surprised,
and gathered together the multitude to a congregation, and told them that,
for himself, he was ready, for their safety and peace, to give up his own
wives and children to the enemy, and to yield to him all his own
possessions, for that was what the Syrian king required at his first
embassage; but that now he desires to send his servants to search all
their houses, and in them to leave nothing that is excellent in its kind,
seeking an occasion of fighting against him, "as knowing that I would not
spare what is mine own for your sakes, but taking a handle from the
disagreeable terms he offers concerning you to bring a war upon us;
however, I will do what you shall resolve is fit to be done." But the
multitude advised him to hearken to none of his proposals, but to despise
him, and be in readiness to fight him. Accordingly, when he had given the
ambassadors this answer to be reported, that he still continued in the
mind to comply with what terms he at first desired, for the safety of the
citizens; but as for his second desires, he cannot submit to them,—he
dismissed them.</p>
<p>2. Now when Benhadad heard this, he had indignation, and sent ambassadors
to Ahab the third time, and threatened that his army would raise a bank
higher than those walls, in confidence of whose strength he despised him,
and that by only each man of his army taking a handful of earth; hereby
making a show of the great number of his army, and aiming to affright him.
Ahab answered, that he ought not to vaunt himself when he had only put on
his armor, but when he should have conquered his enemies in the battle. So
the ambassadors came back, and found the king at supper with his
thirty-two kings, and informed him of Ahab's answer; who then immediately
gave order for proceeding thus: To make lines round the city, and raise a
bulwark, and to prosecute the siege all manner of ways. Now, as this was
doing, Ahab was in a great agony, and all his people with him; but he took
courage, and was freed from his fears, upon a certain prophet coming to
him, and saying to him, that God had promised to subdue so many ten
thousands of his enemies under him. And when he inquired by whose means
the victory was to be obtained, he said, "By the sons of the princes; but
under thy conduct as their leader, by reason of their unskilfulness [in
war]." Upon which he called for the sons of the princes, and found them to
be two hundred and thirty-two persons. So when he was informed that the
king of Syria had betaken himself to feasting and repose, he opened the
gates, and sent out the princes' sons. Now when the sentinels told
Benhadad of it, he sent some to meet them, and commanded them, that if
these men were come out for fighting, they should bind them, and bring
them to him; and that if they came out peaceably, they should do the same.
Now Ahab had another army ready within the walls, but the sons of the
princes fell upon the out-guard, and slew many of them, and pursued the
rest of them to the camp; and when the king of Israel saw that these had
the upper hand, he sent out all the rest of his army, which, falling
suddenly upon the Syrians, beat them, for they did not think they would
have come out; on which account it was that they assaulted them when they
were naked <SPAN href="#link8note-37" name="link8noteref-37" id="link8noteref-37"><small>37</small></SPAN> and drunk, insomuch that they
left all their armor behind them when they fled out of the camp, and the
king himself escaped with difficulty, by fleeing away on horseback. But
Ahab went a great way in pursuit of the Syrians; and when he had spoiled
their camp, which contained a great deal of wealth, and moreover a large
quantity of gold and silver, he took Benhadad's chariots and horses, and
returned to the city; but as the prophet told him he ought to have his
army ready, because the Syrian king would make another expedition against
him the next year, Ahab was busy in making provision for it accordingly.</p>
<p>3. Now Benhadad, when he had saved himself, and as much of his army as he
could, out of the battle, he consulted with his friends how he might make
another expedition against the Israelites. Now those friends advised him
not to fight with them on the hills, because their God was potent in such
places, and thence it had come to pass that they had very lately been
beaten; but they said, that if they joined battle with them in the plain,
they should beat them. They also gave him this further advice, to send
home those kings whom he had brought as his auxiliaries, but to retain
their army, and to set captains over it instead of the kings, and to raise
an army out of their country, and let them be in the place of the former
who perished in the battle, together with horses and chariots. So he
judged their counsel to be good, and acted according to it in the
management of the army.</p>
<p>4. At the beginning of the spring, Benhadad took his army with him, and
led it against the Hebrews; and when he was come to a certain city which
was called Aphek, he pitched his camp in the great plain. Ahab also went
to meet him with his army, and pitched his camp over against him, although
his army was a very small one, if it were compared with the enemy's; but
the prophet came again to him, and told him, that God would give him the
victory, that he might demonstrate his own power to be, not only on the
mountains, but on the plains also; which it seems was contrary to the
opinion of the Syrians. So they lay quiet in their camp seven days; but on
the last of those days, when the enemies came out of their camp, and put
themselves in array in order to fight, Ahab also brought out his own army;
and when the battle was joined, and they fought valiantly, he put the
enemy to flight, and pursued them, and pressed upon them, and slew them;
nay, they were destroyed by their own chariots, and by one another; nor
could any more than a few of them escape to their own city Aphek, who were
also killed by the walls falling upon them, being in number twenty-seven
thousand. <SPAN href="#link8note-38" name="link8noteref-38" id="link8noteref-38"><small>38</small></SPAN> Now there were slain in this
battle a hundred thousand more; but Benhadad, the king of the Syrians,
fled away, with certain others of his most faithful servants, and hid
himself in a cellar under ground; and when these told him that the kings
of Israel were humane and merciful men, and that they might make use of
the usual manner of supplication, and obtain deliverance from Ahab, in
case he would give them leave to go to him, he gave them leave
accordingly. So they came to Ahab, clothed in sackcloth, with ropes about
their heads, (for this was the ancient manner of supplication among the
Syrians,) <SPAN href="#link8note-39" name="link8noteref-39" id="link8noteref-39"><small>39</small></SPAN> and said, that Benhadad desired
he would save him, and that he would ever be a servant to him for that
favor. Ahab replied he was glad that he was alive, and not hurt in the
battle; and he further promised him the same honor and kindness that a man
would show to his brother. So they received assurances upon oath from him,
that when he came to him he should receive no harm from him, and then went
and brought him out of the cellar wherein he was hid, and brought him to
Ahab as he sat in his chariot. So Benhadad worshipped him; and Ahab gave
him his hand, and made him come up to him into his chariot, and kissed
him, and bid him be of good cheer, and not to expect that any mischief
should be done to him. So Berthadad returned him thanks, and professed
that he would remember his kindness to him all the days of his life; and
promised he would restore those cities of the Israelites which the former
kings had taken from them, and grant that he should have leave to come to
Damascus, as his forefathers had to come to Samaria. So they confirmed
their covenant by oaths, and Ahab made him many presents, and sent him
back to his own kingdom. And this was the conclusion of the war that
Benhadad made against Ahab and the Israelites.</p>
<p>5. But a certain prophet, whose name was Micaiah, <SPAN href="#link8note-40"
name="link8noteref-40" id="link8noteref-40"><small>40</small></SPAN> came to
one of the Israelites, and bid him smite him on the head, for by so doing
he would please God; but when he would not do so, he foretold to him, that
since he disobeyed the commands of God, he should meet with a lion, and be
destroyed by him. When that sad accident had befallen the man, the prophet
came again to another, and gave him the same injunction; so he smote him,
and wounded his skull; upon which he bound up his head, and came to the
king, and told him that he had been a soldier of his, and had the custody
of one of the prisoners committed to him by an officer, and that the
prisoner being run away, he was in danger of losing his own life by the
means of that officer, who had threatened him, that if the prisoner
escaped he would kill him. And when Ahab had said that he would justly
die, he took off the binding about his head, and was known by the king to
be Micaiah the prophet, who made use of this artifice as a prelude to his
following words; for he said that God would punish him who had suffered
Benhadad, a blasphemer against him, to escape punishment; and that he
would so bring it about, that he should die by the other's means <SPAN href="#link8note-41" name="link8noteref-41" id="link8noteref-41"><small>41</small></SPAN>
and his people by the other's army. Upon which Ahab was very angry at the
prophet, and gave commandment that he should be put in prison, and there
kept; but for himself, he was in confusion at the words of Micaiah, and
returned to his own house.</p>
<p><SPAN name="link82HCH0015" id="link82HCH0015">
<!-- h3 anchor --> </SPAN></p>
<h3> CHAPTER 15. Concerning Jehoshaphat The King Of Jerusalem And How Ahab Made An Expedition Against The Syrians And Was Assisted Therein By Jehoshaphat, But Was Himself Overcome In Battle And Perished Therein. </h3>
<p>1. And these were the circumstances in which Ahab was. But I now return to
Jehoshaphat, the king of Jerusalem, who, when he had augmented his
kingdom, had set garrisons in the cities of the countries belonging to his
subjects, and had put such garrisons no less into those cities which were
taken out of the tribe of Ephraim by his grandfather Abijah, when Jeroboam
reigned over the ten tribes [than he did into the other]. But then he had
God favorable and assisting to him, as being both righteous and religious,
and seeking to do somewhat every day that should be agreeable and
acceptable to God. The kings also that were round about him honored him
with the presents they made him, till the riches that he had acquired were
immensely great, and the glory he had gained was of a most exalted nature.</p>
<p>2. Now, in the third year of this reign, he called together the rulers of
the country, and the priests, and commanded them to go round the land, and
teach all the people that were under him, city by city, the laws of Moses,
and to keep them, and to be diligent in the worship of God. With this the
whole multitude was so pleased, that they were not so eagerly set upon or
affected with any thing so much as the observation of the laws. The
neighboring nations also continued to love Jehoshaphat, and to be at peace
with him. The Philistines paid their appointed tribute, and the Arabians
supplied him every year with three hundred and sixty lambs, and as many
kids of the goats. He also fortified the great cities, which were many in
number, and of great consequence. He prepared also a mighty army of
soldiers and weapons against their enemies. Now the army of men that wore
their armor, was three hundred thousand of the tribe of Judah, of whom
Adnah was the chief; but John was chief of two hundred thousand. The same
man was chief of the tribe of Benjamin, and had two hundred thousand
archers under him. There was another chief, whose name was Jehozabad, who
had a hundred and fourscore thousand armed men. This multitude was
distributed to be ready for the king's service, besides those whom he sent
to the best fortified cities.</p>
<p>3. Jehoshaphat took for his son Jehoram to wife the daughter of Ahab, the
king of the ten tribes, whose name was Athaliah. And when, after some
time, he went to Samaria, Ahab received him courteously, and treated the
army that followed him in a splendid manner, with great plenty of corn and
wine, and of slain beasts; and desired that he would join with him in his
war against the king of Syria, that he might recover from him the city
Ramoth, in Gilead; for though it had belonged to his father, yet had the
king of Syria's father taken it away from him; and upon Jehoshaphat's
promise to afford him his assistance, [for indeed his army was not
inferior to the other,] and his sending for his army from Jerusalem to
Samaria, the two kings went out of the city, and each of them sat on his
own throne, and each gave their orders to their several armies. Now
Jehoshaphat bid them call some of the prophets, if there were any there,
and inquire of them concerning this expedition against the king of Syria,
whether they would give them counsel to make that expedition at this time,
for there was peace at that time between Ahab and the king of Syria, which
had lasted three years, from the time he had taken him captive till that
day.</p>
<p>4. So Ahab called his own prophets, being in number about four hundred,
and bid them inquire of God whether he would grant him the victory, if he
made an expedition against Benhadad, and enable him to overthrow that
city, for whose sake it was that he was going to war. Now these prophets
gave their counsel for making this expedition, and said that he would beat
the king of Syria, and, as formerly, would reduce him under his power. But
Jehoshaphat, understanding by their words that they were false prophets,
asked Ahab whether there were not some other prophet, and he belonging to
the true God, that we may have surer information concerning futurities.
Hereupon Ahab said there was indeed such a one, but that he hated him, as
having prophesied evil to him, and having foretold that he should be
overcome and slain by the king of Syria, and that for this cause he had
him now in prison, and that his name was Micaiah, the son of Imlah. But
upon Jehoshaphat's desire that he might be produced, Ahab sent a eunuch,
who brought Micaiah to him. Now the eunuch had informed him by the way,
that all the other prophets had foretold that the king should gain the
victory; but he said, that it was not lawful for him to lie against God,
but that he must speak what he should say to him about the king,
whatsoever it were. When he came to Ahab, and he had adjured him upon oath
to speak the truth to him, he said that God had shown to him the
Israelites running away, and pursued by the Syrians, and dispersed upon
the mountains by them, as flocks of sheep are dispersed when their
shepherd is slain. He said further, that God signified to him, that those
Israelites should return in peace to their own home, and that he only
should fall in the battle. When Micalab had thus spoken, Ahab said to
Jehoshaphat, "I told thee a little while ago the disposition of the man
with regard to me, and that he uses to prophesy evil to me." Upon which
Micaiah replied, that he ought to hear all, whatsoever it be, that God
foretells; and that in particular, they were false prophets that
encouraged him to make this war in hope of victory, whereas he must fight
and be killed. Whereupon the king was in suspense with himself: but
Zedekiah, one of those false prophets, came near, and exhorted him not to
hearken to Micaiah, for he did not at all speak truth; as a demonstration
of which he instanced in what Elijah had said, who was a better prophet in
foretelling futurities than Micaiah <SPAN href="#link8note-42"
name="link8noteref-42" id="link8noteref-42"><small>42</small></SPAN> for he
foretold that the dogs should lick his blood in the city of Jezreel, in
the field of Naboth, as they licked the blood of Naboth, who by his means
was there stoned to death by the multitude; that therefore it was plain
that this Micalab was a liar, as contradicting a greater prophet than
himself, and saying that he should be slain at three days' journey
distance: "and [said he] you shall soon know whether he be a true prophet,
and hath the power of the Divine Spirit; for I will smite him, and let him
then hurt my hand, as Jadon caused the hand of Jeroboam the king to wither
when he would have caught him; for I suppose thou hast certainly heard of
that accident." So when, upon his smiting Micaiah, no harm happened to
him, Ahab took courage, and readily led his army against the king of
Syria; for, as I suppose, fate was too hard for him, and made him believe
that the false prophets spake truer than the true one, that it might take
an occasion of bringing him to his end. However, Zedekiah made horns of
iron, and said to Ahab, that God made those horns signals, that by them he
should overthrow all Syria. But Micaiah replied, that Zedekiah, in a few
days, should go from one secret chamber to another to hide himself, that
he might escape the punishment of his lying. Then did the king give orders
that they should take Micaiah away, and guard him to Amon, the governor of
the city, and to give him nothing but bread and water.</p>
<p>5. Then did Ahab, and Jehoshaphat the king of Jerusalem, take their
forces, and marched to Ramoth a city of Gilead; and when the king of Syria
heard of this expedition, he brought out his army to oppose them, and
pitched his camp not far from Ramoth. Now Ahalx and Jehoshaphat had agreed
that Ahab should lay aside his royal robes, but that the king of Jerusalem
should put on his [Ahab's] proper habit, and stand before the army, in
order to disprove, by this artifice, what Micaiah had foretold. <SPAN href="#link8note-43" name="link8noteref-43" id="link8noteref-43"><small>43</small></SPAN>
But Ahab's fate found him out without his robes; for Benhadad, the king of
Assyria, had charged his army, by the means of their commanders, to kill
nobody else but only the king of Israel. So when the Syrians, upon their
joining battle with the Israelites, saw Jehoshaphat stand before the army,
and conjectured that he was Ahab, they fell violently upon him, and
encompassed him round; but when they were near, and knew that it was not
he, they all returned back; and while the fight lasted from the morning
till late in the evening, and the Syrians were conquerors, they killed
nobody, as their king had commanded them. And when they sought to kill
Ahab alone, but could not find him, there was a young nobleman belonging
to king Benhadad, whose name was Naaman; he drew his bow against the
enemy, and wounded the king through his breastplate, in his lungs. Upon
this Ahab resolved not to make his mischance known to his army, lest they
should run away; but he bid the driver of his chariot to turn it back, and
carry him out of the battle, because he was sorely and mortally wounded.
However, he sat in his chariot and endured the pain till sunset, and then
he fainted away and died.</p>
<p>6. And now the Syrian army, upon the coming on of the night, retired to
their camp; and when the herald belonging to the camp gave notice that
Ahab was dead, they returned home; and they took the dead body of Ahab to
Samaria, and buried it there; but when they had washed his chariot in the
fountain of Jezreel, which was bloody with the dead body of the king, they
acknowledged that the prophecy of Elijah was true, for the dogs licked his
blood, and the harlots continued afterwards to wash themselves in that
fountain; but still he died at Ramoth, as Micaiah had foretold. And as
what things were foretold should happen to Ahab by the two prophets came
to pass, we ought thence to have high notions of God, and every where to
honor and worship him, and never to suppose that what is pleasant and
agreeable is worthy of belief before what is true, and to esteem nothing
more advantageous than the gift of prophecy <SPAN href="#link8note-44"
name="link8noteref-44" id="link8noteref-44"><small>44</small></SPAN> and that
foreknowledge of future events which is derived from it, since God shows
men thereby what we ought to avoid. We may also guess, from what happened
to this king, and have reason to consider the power of fate; that there is
no way of avoiding it, even when we know it. It creeps upon human souls,
and flatters them with pleasing hopes, till it leads them about to the
place where it will be too hard for them. Accordingly Ahab appears to have
been deceived thereby, till he disbelieved those that foretold his defeat;
but, by giving credit to such as foretold what was grateful to him, was
slain; and his son Ahaziah succeeded him.</p>
<p><SPAN name="link82H_FOOT" id="link82H_FOOT">
<!-- h3 anchor --> </SPAN></p>
<h3> FOOTNOTES: </h3>
<p><SPAN name="link8note-1" id="link8note-1">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
1 (<SPAN href="#link8noteref-1">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ This execution upon Joab,
as a murderer, by slaying him, even when he had taken sanctuary at God's
altar, is perfectly agreeable to the law of Moses, which enjoins, that "if
a man come presumptuously upon his neighbor to slay him with guile, thou
shalt take him from mine altar that he die," Exodus 21:14.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link8note-2" id="link8note-2">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
2 (<SPAN href="#link8noteref-2">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ This building of the walls
of Jerusalem, soon after David's death, illustrates the conclusion of the
51st Psalm, where David prays, "Build thou the walls of Jerusalem;" they
being, it seems, unfinished or imperfect at that time. See ch. 6. sect. 1;
and ch. 1. sect. 7; also 1 Kings 9:15.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link8note-3" id="link8note-3">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
3 (<SPAN href="#link8noteref-3">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ It may not be amiss to
compare the daily furniture of king Solomon's table, here set down, and 1
Kings 4;22, 23, with the like daily furniture of Nehemiah the governor's
table, after the Jews were come back from Babylon; and to remember withal,
that Nehemiah was now building the walls of Jerusalem, and maintained,
more than usual, above a hundred and fifty considerable men every day, and
that, because the nation was then very poor, at his own charges also,
without laying any burden upon the people at all. "Now that which was
prepared for me daily was one ox and six choice sheep; also fowls were
prepared for me, and once in ten days store of all sorts of wine; and yet
for all this required not the bread of the governor, because the bondage
was heavy upon this people," Nehemiah 5:18: see the whole context, ver.
14-19. Nor did the governor's usual allowance of forty shekels of silver
a-day, ver. 15, amount to 45 a day, nor to 1800 a-year. Nor does it indeed
appear that, under the judges, or under Samuel the prophet, there was any
such public allowance to those governors at all. Those great charges upon
the public for maintaining courts came in with kings, as God foretold they
would, 1 Samuel 8:11-18.</p>
<p><SPAN name="link8note-4" id="link8note-4">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
4 (<SPAN href="#link8noteref-4">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Some pretended fragments
of these books of conjuration of Solomon are still extant in Fabricius's
Cod. Pseudepigr. Vet. Test. page 1054, though I entirely differ from
Josephus in this his supposal, that such books and arts of Solomon were
parts of that wisdom which was imparted to him by God in his younger days;
they must rather have belonged to such profane but curious arts as we find
mentioned Acts 19:13-20, and had been derived from the idolatry and
superstition of his heathen wives and concubines in his old age, when he
had forsaken God, and God had forsaken him, and given him up to demoniacal
delusions. Nor does Josephus's strange account of the root Baara [Of the
War, B. VIII. ch. 6. sect. 3: seem to be other than that of its magical
use in such conjurations. As for the following history, it confirms what
Christ says, Matthew 12;27 "If I by Beelzebub cast out demons, by whom do
your Sons cast them out?"]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link8note-5" id="link8note-5">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
5 (<SPAN href="#link8noteref-5">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ These epistles of Solomon
and Hiram are those in 1 Kings 5:3-9, and, as enlarged, in 2 Chronicles
2:3-16, but here given us by Josephus in his own words.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link8note-6" id="link8note-6">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
6 (<SPAN href="#link8noteref-6">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ What Josephus here puts
into his copy of Hiram's epistle to Solomon, and repeats afterwards, ch.
5. sect. 3, that Tyre was now an island, is not in any of the three other
copies, viz. that of the Kings, Chronicles, or Eusebius; nor is it any
other, I suppose, than his own conjectural paraphrase; for when I, many
years ago, inquired into this matter, I found the state of this famous
city, and of the island whereupon it stood, to have been very different at
different times. The result of my inquiries in this matter, with the
addition of some later improvements, stands thus: That the best
testimonies hereto relating, imply, that Paketyrus, or Oldest Tyre, was no
other than that most ancient smaller fort or city Tyre, situated on the
continent, and mentioned in Joshua 19:29, out of which the Canaanite or
Phoenician inhabitants were driven into a large island, that lay not far
off in the sea, by Joshua: that this island was then joined to the
continent at the present remains of Paketyrus, by a neck of land over
against Solomon's cisterns, still so called; and the city's fresh water,
probably, was carried along in pipes by that neck of land; and that this
island was therefore, in strictness, no other than a peninsula, having
villages in its fields, Ezekiel 26:6, and a wall about it, Amos 1:10, and
the city was not of so great reputation as Sitlon for some ages: that it
was attacked both by sea and land by Salmanasser, as Josephus informs us,
Antiq. B. IX. ch. 14. sect. 2, and afterwards came to be the metropolis of
Phoenicia; and was afterwards taken and destroyed by Nebuchadnezzar,
according to the numerous Scripture prophecies thereto relating, Isaiah
23.; Jeremiah 25:22; 27:3; 47:4; Ezekiel 26., 27., 28.: that seventy years
after that destruction by Nebuchadnezzar, this city was in some measure
revived and rebuilt, Isaiah 23:17, 18, but that, as the prophet Ezekiel
had foretold, chap. 26:3-5, 14; 27: 34, the sea arose higher than before,
till at last it over flowed, not only the neck of land, but the main
island or peninsula itself, and destroyed that old and famous city for
ever: that, however, there still remained an adjoining smaller island,
once connected to Old Tyre itself by Hiram, which was afterwards
inhabited; to which Alexander the Great, with incredible pains, raised a
new bank or causeway: and that it plainly appears from Ifaundreh, a most
authentic eye-witness, that the old large and famous city, on the original
large island, is now laid so generally under water, that scarce more than
forty acres of it, or rather of that adjoining small island remain at this
day; so that, perhaps, not above a hundredth part of the first island and
city is now above water. This was foretold in the same prophecies of
Ezekiel; and according to them, as Mr. Maundrell distinctly observes,
these poor remains of Old Tyre are now "become like the top of a rock, a
place for the spreading of nets in the midst of the sea."]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link8note-7" id="link8note-7">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
7 (<SPAN href="#link8noteref-7">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Of the temple of Solomon
here described by Josephus, in this and the following sections of this
chapter, see my description of the temples belonging to this work, ch. 13,
These small rooms, or side chambers, seem to have been, by Josephus's
description, no less than twenty cubits high a piece, otherwise there must
have been a large interval between one and the other that was over it; and
this with double floors, the one of six cubits distance from the floor
beneath it, as 1 Kings 6:5]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link8note-8" id="link8note-8">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
8 (<SPAN href="#link8noteref-8">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Josephus says here that
the cherubims were of solid gold, and only five cubits high, while our
Hebrew copies [1 Kings 6;23, 28: say they were of the olive tree, and the
LXXX. of the cypress tree, and only overlaid with gold; and both agree
they were ten cubits high. I suppose the number here is falsely
transcribed, and that Josephus wrote ten cubits also.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link8note-9" id="link8note-9">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
9 (<SPAN href="#link8noteref-9">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ As for these two famous
pillars, Jachin and Booz, their height could be no more than eighteen
cubits, as here, and 1 Kings 7:15; 2 Kings 25:17; Jeremiah 3:21; those
thirty-five cubits in 2 Chronicles 3:15, being contrary to all the rules
of architecture in the world.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link8note-10" id="link8note-10">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
10 (<SPAN href="#link8noteref-10">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The round or cylindrical
lavers of four cubits in diameter, and four in height, both in our copies,
1 Kings 7:38, 39, and here in Josephus, must have contained a great deal
more than these forty baths, which are always assigned them. Where the
error lies is hard to say: perhaps Josephus honestly followed his copies
here, though they had been corrupted, and he was not able to restore the
true reading. In the mean time, the forty baths are probably the true
quantity contained in each laver, since they went upon wheels, and were to
be drawn by the Levites about the courts of the priests for the washings
they were designed for; and had they held much more, they would have been
too heavy to have been so drawn.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link8note-11" id="link8note-11">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
11 (<SPAN href="#link8noteref-11">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Here Josephus gives us a
key to his own language, of right and left hand in the tabernacle and
temple; that by the right hand he means what is against our left, when we
suppose ourselves going up from the east gate of the courts towards the
tabernacle or temple themselves, and so vice versa; whence it follows,
that the pillar Jachin, on the right hand of the temple was on the south,
against our left hand; and Booz on the north, against our right hand. Of
the golden plate on the high priest's forehead that was in being in the
days of Josephus, and a century or two at least later, seethe note on
Antiq. B. III. ch. 7. sect. 6.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link8note-12" id="link8note-12">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
12 (<SPAN href="#link8noteref-12">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ When Josephus here says
that the floor of the outmost temple or court of the Gentiles was with
vast labor raised to be even, or of equal height, with the floor of the
inner, or court of the priests, he must mean this in a gross estimation
only; for he and all others agree, that the inner temple, or court of the
priests, was a few cubits more elevated than the middle court, the court
of Israel, and that much more was the court of the priests elevated
several cubits above that outmost court, since the court of Israel was
lower than the one and higher than the other. The Septuagint say that
"they prepared timber and stones to build the temple for three years," 1
Kings 5:18; and although neither our present Hebrew copy, nor Josephus,
directly name that number of years, yet do they both say the building
itself did not begin till Solomon's fourth year; and both speak of the
preparation of materials beforehand, 1 Kings v. 18; Antiq. B. VIII. ch. 5.
sect. 1. There is no reason, therefore, to alter the Septuagint's number;
but we are to suppose three years to have been the just time of the
preparation, as I have done in my computation of the expense in building
that temple.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link8note-13" id="link8note-13">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
13 (<SPAN href="#link8noteref-13">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ This solemn removal of
the ark from Mount Sion to Mount Moriah, at the distance of almost three
quarters of a mile, confutes that notion of the modern Jews, and followed
by many Christians also, as if those two were after a sort one and the
same mountain, for which there is, I think, very little foundation.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link8note-14" id="link8note-14">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
14 (<SPAN href="#link8noteref-14">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ This mention of the
Corinthian ornaments of architecture in Solomon's palace by Josephus seems
to be here set down by way of prophecy although it appears to me that the
Grecian and Roman most ancient orders of architecture were taken from
Solomon's temple, as from their original patterns, yet it is not so clear
that the last and most ornamental order of the Corinthian was so ancient,
although what the same Josephus says, [Of the War, B. V. ch. 5. sect. 3,]
that one of the gates of Herod's temple was built according to the rules
of this Corinthian order, is no way improbable, that order being, without
dispute, much older than the reign of Herod. However, upon some trial, I
confess I have not hitherto been able fully to understand the structure of
this palace of Solomon, either as described in our Bibles, or even with
the additional help of this description here by Josephus; only the reader
may easily observe with me, that the measures of this first building in
Josephus, a hundred cubits long, and fifty cubits broad, are the very same
with the area of the cart of the tabernacle of Moses, and just hall' an
Egyptian orout, or acre.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link8note-15" id="link8note-15">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
15 (<SPAN href="#link8noteref-15">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ This signification of
the name Pharaoh appears to be true. But what Josephus adds presently,
that no king of Egypt was called Pharaoh after Solomon's father-in-law,
does hardly agree to our copies, which have long afterwards the names of
Pharaoh Neehob, and Pharaoh Hophrah, 2 Kings 23:29; Jeremiah 44:30,
besides the frequent mention of that name Pharaoh in the prophets.
However, Josephus himself, in his own speech to the Jews, Of the War, B.
V. ch. 9. sect. 4, speaks of Neehao, who was also called Pharaoh, as the
name of that king of Egypt with whom Abraham was concerned; of which name
Neehao yet we have elsewhere no mention till the days of Josiah, but only
of Pharaoh. And, indeed, it must be conceded, that here, and sect. 5, we
have more mistakes made by Josephus, and those relating to the kings of
Egypt, and to that queen of Egypt and Ethiopia, whom he supposes to have
come to see Solomon, than almost any where else in all his Antiquities.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link8note-16" id="link8note-16">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
16 (<SPAN href="#link8noteref-16">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ That this queen of Sheba
was a queen of Sabea in South Arabia, and not of Egypt and Ethiopia, as
Josephus here asserts, is, I suppose, now generally agreed. And since
Sabea is well known to be a country near the sea in the south of Arabia
Felix, which lay south from Judea also; and since our Savior calls this
queen, "the queen of the south," and says, "she came from the utmost parts
of the earth," Matthew 12:42; Luke 11:31, which descriptions agree better
to this Arabia than to Egypt and Ethiopia; there is little occasion for
doubting in this matter.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link8note-17" id="link8note-17">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
17 (<SPAN href="#link8noteref-17">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Some blame Josephus for
supposing that the balsam tree might be first brought out of Arabia, or
Egypt, or Ethiopia, into Judea, by this queen of Sheba, since several have
said that of old no country bore this precious balsam but Judea; yet it is
not only false that this balsam was peculiar to Judea but both Egypt and
Arabia, and particularly Sabea; had it; which last was that very country
whence Josephus, if understood not of Ethiopia, but of Arabia, intimates
this queen might bring it first into Judea. Nor are we to suppose that the
queen of Sabaea could well omit such a present as this balsam tree would
be esteemed by Solomon, in case it were then almost peculiar to her own
country. Nor is the mention of balm or balsam, as carried by merchants,
and sent as a present out of Judea by Jacob, to the governor of Egypt,
Genesis 37:25; 43:11, to be alleged to the contrary, since what we there
render balm or balsam, denotes rather that turpentine which we now call
turpentine of Chio, or Cyprus, the juice of the turpentine tree, than this
precious balm. This last is also the same word that we elsewhere render by
the same mistake balm of Gilead; it should be rendered, the turpentine of
Gilead, Jeremiah 8:22.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link8note-18" id="link8note-18">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
18 (<SPAN href="#link8noteref-18">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Whether these fine
gardens and rivulets of Etham, about six miles from Jerusalem, whither
Solomon rode so often in state, be not those alluded to, Ecclesiastes 2:5,
6, where he says, "He made him gardens and orchards, and planted trees in
them of all kinds of fruits: he made him pools of water, to water the wood
that bringeth forth trees;" and to the finest part whereof he seems to
allude, when, in the Canticles, he compares his spouse to a garden
"enclosed," to a "spring shut up," to a "fountain sealed," ch. 4. 12 [part
of which from rains are still extant, as Mr. Matmdrell informs us, page
87, 88]; cannot now be certainly determined, but may very probably be
conjectured. But whether this Etham has any relation to those rivers of
Etham, which Providence once dried up in a miraculous manner, Psalm 74:15,
in the Septuagint, I cannot say.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link8note-19" id="link8note-19">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
19 (<SPAN href="#link8noteref-19">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ These seven hundred
wives, or the daughters of great men, and the three hundred concubines,
the daughters of the ignoble, make one thousand in all; and are, I
suppose, those very one thousand women intimated elsewhere by Solomon
himself, when he speaks of his not having found one [good] woman among
that very number, Ecclesiastes 7:28.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link8note-20" id="link8note-20">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
20 (<SPAN href="#link8noteref-20">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Josephus is here
certainly too severe upon Solomon, who, in making the cherubims, and these
twelve brazen oxen, seems to have done no more than imitate the patterns
left him by David, which were all given David by Divine inspiration. See
my description of the temples, ch. 10. And although God gave no direction
for the lions that adorned his throne, yet does not Solomon seem therein
to have broken any law of Moses; for although the Pharisees and latter
Rabbins have extended the second commandment, to forbid the very making of
any image, though without any intention to have it worshipped, yet do not
I suppose that Solomon so understood it, nor that it ought to be so
understood. The making any other altar for worship but that at the
tabernacle was equally forbidden by Moses, Antiq. B. IV. ch. 8. sect. 5;
yet did not the two tribes and a half offend when they made an altar for a
memorial only, Joshua 22; Antiq. B. V. ch. 1. sect. 26, 27.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link8note-21" id="link8note-21">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
21 (<SPAN href="#link8noteref-21">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Since the beginning of
Solomon's evil life and adversity was the time when Hadad or Ader, who was
born at least twenty or thirty years before Solomon came to the crown, in
the days of David, began to give him disturbance, this implies that
Solomon's evil life began early, and continued very long, which the
multitude of his wives and concubines does imply also; I suppose when he
was not fifty years of age.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link8note-22" id="link8note-22">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
22 (<SPAN href="#link8noteref-22">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ This youth of Jeroboam,
when Solomon built the walls of righteous and keep the laws, because he
hath proposed to thee the greatest of all rewards for thy piety, and the
honor thou shalt pay to God, namely, to be as greatly exalted as thou
knowest David to have been." Jerusalem, not very long after he had
finished his twenty years building of the temple and his own palace, or
not very long after the twenty-fourth of his reign, 1 Kings 9:24; 2
Chronicles 8:11, and his youth here still mentioned, when Solomon's
wickedness was become intolerable, fully confirm my former observation,
that such his wickedness began early, and continued very long. See Ecclus.
47:14.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link8note-23" id="link8note-23">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
23 (<SPAN href="#link8noteref-23">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ That by scorpions is not
here meant that small animal so called, which was never used in
corrections, but either a shrub, furze bush, or else some terrible sort of
whip of the like nature see Hudson's and Spanheim's notes here.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link8note-24" id="link8note-24">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
24 (<SPAN href="#link8noteref-24">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Whether these "fountains
of the Lesser Jordan" were near a place called Dan, and the fountains of
the Greater near a place called Jor, before their conjunction; or whether
there was only one fountain, arising at the lake Phiala, at first sinking
under ground, and then arising near the mountain Paneum, and thence
running through the lake Scmochonitis to the Sea of Galilee, and so far
called the Lesser Jordan; is hardly certain, even in Josephus himself,
though the latter account be the most probable. However, the northern
idolatrous calf, set up by Jeroboam, was where Little Jordan fell into
Great Jordan, near a place called Daphnae, as Josephus elsewhere informs
us, Of the War, B. IV. ch. 1. sect. 1: see the note there.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link8note-25" id="link8note-25">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
25 (<SPAN href="#link8noteref-25">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ How much a larger and
better copy Josephus had in this remarkable history of the true prophet of
Judea, and his concern with Jeroboam, and with the false prophet of
Bethel, than our other copies have, is evident at first sight. The
prophet's very name, Jadon, or, as the Constitutions call him, Adonias, is
wanting in our other copies; and it is there, with no little absurdity,
said that God revealed Jadon the true prophet's death, not to himself as
here, but to the false prophet. Whether the particular account of the
arguments made use of, after all, by the false prophet against his own
belief and his own conscience, in order to persuade Jeroboam to persevere
in his idolatry and wickedness, than which more plausible could not be
invented, was intimated in Josephus's copy, or in some other ancient book,
cannot now be determined; our other copies say not one word of it.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link8note-26" id="link8note-26">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
26 (<SPAN href="#link8noteref-26">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ That this Shishak was
not the same person with the famous Sesostris, as some have very lately,
in contradiction to all antiquity, supposed, and that our Josephus did not
take him to be the same, as they pretend, but that Sesostris was many
centuries earlier than Shishak, see Authent. Records, part II. page 1024.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link8note-27" id="link8note-27">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
27 (<SPAN href="#link8noteref-27">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Herodotus, as here
quoted by Josephus, and as this passage still stands in his present
copies, B. II. ch. 14., affirms, that "the Phoenicians and Syrians in
Palestine [which last are generally supposed to denote the Jews] owned
their receiving circumcision from the Egyptians;" whereas it is abundantly
evident that the Jews received their circumcision from the patriarch
Abraham, Genesis 17:9-14; John 7:22, 23, as I conclude the Egyptian
priests themselves did also. It is not therefore very unlikely that
Herodotus, because the Jews had lived long in Egypt, and came out of it
circumcised, did thereupon think they had learned that circumcision in
Egypt, and had it not broke. Manetho, the famous Egyptian chronologer and
historian, who knew the history of his own country much better than
Herodotus, complains frequently of his mistakes about their affairs, as
does Josephus more than once in this chapter. Nor indeed does Herodotus
seem at all acquainted with the affairs of the Jews; for as he never names
them, so little or nothing of what he says about them, their country, or
maritime cities, two of which he alone mentions, Cadytus and Jenysus,
proves true; nor indeed do there appear to have ever been any such cities
on their coast.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link8note-28" id="link8note-28">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
28 (<SPAN href="#link8noteref-28">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ This is a strange
expression in Josephus, that God is his own workmanship, or that he made
himself, contrary to common sense and to catholic Christianity; perhaps he
only means that he was not made by one, but was unoriginated.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link8note-29" id="link8note-29">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
29 (<SPAN href="#link8noteref-29">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ By this terrible and
perfectly unparalleled slaughter of five hundred thousand men of the newly
idolatrous and rebellious ten tribes, God's high displeasure and
indignation against that idolatry and rebellion fully appeared; the
remainder were thereby seriously cautioned not to persist in them, and a
kind of balance or equilibrium was made between the ten and the two tribes
for the time to come; while otherwise the perpetually idolatrous and
rebellious ten tribes would naturally have been too powerful for the two
tribes, which were pretty frequently free both from such idolatry and
rebellion; nor is there any reason to doubt of the truth of the prodigious
number upmost: signal an occasion.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link8note-30" id="link8note-30">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
30 (<SPAN href="#link8noteref-30">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The reader is to
remember that Cush is not Ethiopia, but Arabia. See Bochart, B. IV. ch.
2.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link8note-31" id="link8note-31">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
31 (<SPAN href="#link8noteref-31">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Here is a very great
error in our Hebrew copy in this place, 2 Chronicles 15:3-6, as applying
what follows to times past, and not to times future; whence that text is
quite misapplied by Sir Isaac Newton.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link8note-32" id="link8note-32">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
32 (<SPAN href="#link8noteref-32">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ This Abelmain, or, in
Josephus's copy, Abellane, that belonged to the land of Israel, and
bordered on the country of Damascus, is supposed, both by Hudson and
Spanheim, to be the same with Abel, or Ahila, whence came Abilene. This
may be that city so denominated from Abel the righteous, there buried,
concerning the shedding of whose blood within the compass of the land of
Israel, I understand our Savior's words about the fatal war and overthrow
of Judea by Titus and his Roman army; "That upon you may come all the
righteous blood shed upon the land, from the blood of righteous Abel to
the blood of Zacharias son of Barnchins, whom ye slew between the temple
and the altar. Verily, I say unto you, all these things shall come upon
this generation," Matthew 23;35, 36; Luke 11:51.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link8note-33" id="link8note-33">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
33 (<SPAN href="#link8noteref-33">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Josephus, in his present
copies, says, that a little while rain upon the earth; whereas, in our
other copies, it is after many days, 1 Kings 18:1. Several years are also
intimated there, and in Josephus, sect. 2, as belonging to this drought
and famine; nay, we have the express mention of the third year, which I
suppose was reckoned from the recovery of the widow's son, and the ceasing
of this drought in Phmuiela [Footnote which, as Menander informs us here,
lasted one whole year]; and both our Savior and St. James affirm, that
this drought lasted in all three years and six months, as their copies of
the Old Testament then informed them, Luke 4:25; James 5:17. Josephus here
seems to mean, that this drought affected all the habitable earth, and
presently all the earth, as our Savior says it was upon all the earth,
Luke 4:25. They who restrain these expressions to the land of Judea alone,
go without sufficient authority or examples.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link8note-34" id="link8note-34">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
34 (<SPAN href="#link8noteref-34">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Mr. Spanheim takes
notice here, that in the worship of Mithra [the god of the Persians] the
priests cut themselves in the same manner as did these priests in their
invocation of Baal [the god of the Phoenicians].]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link8note-35" id="link8note-35">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
35 (<SPAN href="#link8noteref-35">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ For Izar we may here
read [with Hudson and Cocceius] Isachar, i.e of the tribe of Isachar, for
to that tribe did Jezreel belong; and presently at the beginning of sect.
8, as also ch. 15. sect. 4, we may read for Iar, with one MS. nearly, and
the Scripture, Jezreel, for that was the city meant in the history of
Naboth.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link8note-36" id="link8note-36">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
36 (<SPAN href="#link8noteref-36">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ "The Jews weep to this
day," [says Jerome, here cited by Reland,] "and roll themselves upon
sackcloth, in ashes, barefoot, upon such occasions." To which Spanheim
adds, "that after the same manner Bernice, when his life was in danger,
stood at the tribunal of Florus barefoot." Of the War, B. II. ch. 15.
sect. 1. See the like of David, 2 Samuel 15:30; Antiq. B. VII. ch. 9.
sect. 2.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link8note-37" id="link8note-37">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
37 (<SPAN href="#link8noteref-37">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Mr. Reland notes here
very truly, that the word naked does not always signify entirely naked,
but sometimes without men's usual armor, without heir usual robes or upper
garments; as when Virgil bids the husbandman plough naked, and sow naked;
when Josephus says [Antiq. B. IV. ch. 3. sect. 2: that God had given the
Jews the security of armor when they were naked; and when he here says
that Ahab fell on the Syrians when they were naked and drunk; when [Antiq.
B. XI. ch. 5. sect. 8: he says that Nehemiah commanded those Jews that
were building the walls of Jerusalem to take care to have their armor on
upon occasion, that the enemy might not fall upon them naked. I may add,
that the case seems to be the same in the Scripture, when it says that
Saul lay down naked among the prophets, 1 Samuel 19:24; when it says that
Isaiah walked naked and barefoot, Isaiah 20:2, 3; and when it says that
Peter, before he girt his fisher's coat to him, was naked, John 21:7. What
is said of David also gives light to this, who was reproached by Michal
for "dancing before the ark, and uncovering himself in the eyes of his
handmaids, as one of the vain fellows shamelessly uncovereth himself," 2
Samuel 6:14, 20; yet it is there expressly said [ver. 14: that "David was
girded with a linen ephod," i.e. he had laid aside his robes of state, and
put on the sacerdotal, Levitical, or sacred garments, proper for such a
solemnity.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link8note-38" id="link8note-38">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
38 (<SPAN href="#link8noteref-38">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Josephus's number, two
myriads and seven thousand, agrees here with that in our other copies, as
those that were slain by the falling down of the walls of Aphek; but I
suspected at first that this number in Josephus's present copies could not
be his original number, because he calls them "oligoi," a few, which could
hardly be said of so many as twenty-seven thousand, and because of the
improbability of the fall of a particular wall killing so many; yet when I
consider Josephus's next words, how the rest which were slain in the
battle were "ten other myriads," that twenty-seven thousand are but a few
in comparison of a hundred thousand, and that it was not "a wall," as in
our English version, but "the walls" or "the entire walls" of the city
that fell down, as in all the originals, I lay aside that suspicion, and
firmly believe that Josephus himself hath, with the rest, given us the
just number, twenty-seven thousand.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link8note-39" id="link8note-39">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
39 (<SPAN href="#link8noteref-39">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ This manner of
supplication for men's lives among the Syrians, with ropes or halters
about their heads or necks, is, I suppose, no strange thing in later ages,
even in our own country.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link8note-40" id="link8note-40">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
40 (<SPAN href="#link8noteref-40">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ It is here remarkable,
that in Josephus's copy this prophet, whose severe denunciation of a
disobedient person's slaughter by a lion had lately come to pass, was no
other than Micaiah, the son of Imlah, who, as he now denounced God's
judgment on disobedient Ahab, seems directly to have been that very
prophet whom the same Ahab, in 1 Kings 22:8, 18, complains of, "as one
whom he hated, because he did not prophesy good concerning him, but evil,"
and who in that chapter openly repeats his denunciations against him; all
which came to pass accordingly; nor is there any reason to doubt but this
and the former were the very same prophet.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link8note-41" id="link8note-41">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
41 (<SPAN href="#link8noteref-41">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ What is most remarkable
in this history, and in many histories on other occasions in the Old
Testament, is this, that during the Jewish theocracy God acted entirely as
the supreme King of Israel, and the supreme General of their armies, and
always expected that the Israelites should be in such absolute subjection
to him, their supreme and heavenly King, and General of their armies, as
subjects and soldiers are to their earthly kings and generals, and that
usually without knowing the particular reasons of their injunctions.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link8note-42" id="link8note-42">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
42 (<SPAN href="#link8noteref-42">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ These reasonings of
Zedekiah the false prophet, in order to persuade Ahab not to believe
Micaiah the true prophet, are plausible; but being omitted in our other
copies, we cannot now tell whence Josephus had them, whether from his own
temple copy, from some other original author, or from certain ancient
notes. That some such plausible objection was now raised against Micaiah
is very likely, otherwise Jehoshaphat, who used to disbelieve all such
false prophets, could never have been induced to accompany Ahab in these
desperate circumstances.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link8note-43" id="link8note-43">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
43 (<SPAN href="#link8noteref-43">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ This reading of
Josephus, that Jehoshaphat put on not his own, but Ahab's robes, in order
to appear to be Ahab, while Ahab was without any robes at all, and hoped
thereby to escape his own evil fate, and disprove Micaiah's prophecy
against him, is exceeding probable. It gives great light also to this
whole history; and shows, that although Ahab hoped Jehoshaphat would be
mistaken for him, and run the only risk of being slain in the battle, yet
he was entirely disappointed, while still the escape of the good man
Jehoshaphat, and the slaughter of the bad man Ahab, demonstrated the great
distinction that Divine providence made betwixt them.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link8note-44" id="link8note-44">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
44 (<SPAN href="#link8noteref-44">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ We have here a very wise
reflection of Josephus about Divine Providence, and what is derived from
it, prophecy, and the inevitable certainty of its accomplishment; and that
when wicked men think they take proper methods to elude what is denounced
against them, and to escape the Divine judgments thereby threatened them,
without repentance, they are ever by Providence infatuated to bring about
their own destruction, and thereby withal to demonstrate the perfect
veracity of that God whose predictions they in vain endeavored to elude.]</p>
<p><br/></p>
<hr />
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />