<h3><SPAN name="chap_24"></SPAN>CHAPTER XXIV.</h3>
<h5>THE ROLL AND RECESS.</h5>
<p><span class="scs">I</span>. <span class="sc">I have</span> classed these two means of architectural effect
together, because the one is in most cases the negative of the
other, and is used to relieve it exactly as shadow relieves light;
recess alternating with roll, not only in lateral, but in successive
order; not merely side by side with each other, but interrupted
the one by the other in their own lines. A recess itself
has properly no decoration; but its depth gives value to the
decoration which flanks, encloses, or interrupts it, and the
form which interrupts it best is the roll.</p>
<p><span class="scs">II</span>. I use the word roll generally for any mouldings
which present to the eye somewhat the appearance of being
cylindrical, and look like round rods. When upright, they are
in appearance, if not in fact, small shafts; and are a kind of
bent shaft, even when used in archivolts and traceries;—when
horizontal, they confuse themselves with cornices, and are, in
fact, generally to be considered as the best means of drawing
an architectural line in any direction, the soft curve of their
side obtaining some shadow at nearly all times of the day, and
that more tender and grateful to the eye than can be obtained
either by an incision or by any other form of projection.</p>
<p><span class="scs">III</span>. Their decorative power is, however, too slight for
rich work, and they frequently require, like the angle and the
fillet, to be rendered interesting by subdivision or minor ornament
of their own. When the roll is small, this is effected,
exactly as in the case of the fillet, by cutting pieces out of it;
giving in the simplest results what is called the Norman billet
moulding: and when the cuts are given in couples, and the
pieces rounded into spheres and almonds, we have the ordinary
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="page277"></SPAN>277</span>
Greek bead, both of them too well known to require illustration.
The Norman billet we shall not meet with in Venice;
the bead constantly occurs in Byzantine, and of course in
Renaissance work. In <SPAN href="#plate_9">Plate IX.</SPAN>, Fig. 17, there is a remarkable
example of its early treatment, where the cuts in it are left
sharp.</p>
<p><span class="scs">IV</span>. But the roll, if it be of any size, deserves better treatment.
Its rounded surface is too beautiful to be cut away in
notches; and it is rather to be covered with flat chasing or inlaid
patterns. Thus ornamented, it gradually blends itself with
the true shaft, both in the Romanesque work of the North, and
in the Italian connected schools; and the patterns used for it
are those used for shaft decoration in general.</p>
<p><span class="scs">V</span>. But, as alternating with the recess, it has a decoration
peculiar to itself. We have often, in the preceding chapters,
noted the fondness of the Northern builders for deep shade
and hollowness in their mouldings; and in the second chapter
of the “Seven Lamps,” the changes are described which reduced
the massive roll mouldings of the early Gothic to a
series of recesses, separated by bars of light. The shape of
these recesses is at present a matter of no importance to us: it
was, indeed, endlessly varied; but needlessly, for the value of
a recess is in its darkness, and its darkness disguises its form.
But it was not in mere wanton indulgence of their love of
shade that the Flamboyant builders deepened the furrows of
their mouldings: they had found a means of decorating those
furrows as rich as it was expressive, and the entire frame-work
of their architecture was designed with a view to the effect of
this decoration; where the ornament ceases, the frame-work is
meagre and mean: but the ornament is, in the best examples of
the style, unceasing.</p>
<p><span class="scs">VI</span>. It is, in fact, an ornament formed by the ghosts or
anatomies of the old shafts, left in the furrows which had
taken their place. Every here and there, a fragment of a roll
or shaft is left in the recess or furrow: a billet-moulding on a
huge scale, but a billet-moulding reduced to a skeleton; for
the fragments of roll are cut hollow, and worked into mere
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="page278"></SPAN>278</span>
entanglement of stony fibres, with the gloom of the recess
shown through them. These ghost rolls, forming sometimes
pedestals, sometimes canopies, sometimes covering the whole
recess with an arch of tracery, beneath which it runs like a
tunnel, are the peculiar decorations of the Flamboyant Gothic.</p>
<p><span class="scs">VII</span>. Now observe, in all kinds of decoration, we must
keep carefully under separate heads, the consideration of the
changes wrought in the mere physical form, and in the intellectual
purpose of ornament. The relations of the canopy to
the statue it shelters, are to be considered altogether distinctly
from those of the canopy to the building which it decorates.
In its earliest conditions the canopy is partly confused with
representations of miniature architecture: it is sometimes a
small temple or gateway, sometimes a honorary addition to
the pomp of a saint, a covering to his throne, or to his shrine;
and this canopy is often expressed in bas-relief (as in painting),
without much reference to the great requirements of the building.
At other times it is a real protection to the statue, and is
enlarged into a complete pinnacle, carried on proper shafts, and
boldly roofed. But in the late northern system the canopies
are neither expressive nor protective. They are a kind of
stone lace-work, required for the ornamentation of the building,
for which the statues are often little more than an excuse,
and of which the physical character is, as above described, that
of ghosts of departed shafts.</p>
<p><span class="scs">VIII</span>. There is, of course, much rich tabernacle work
which will not come literally under this head, much which is
straggling or flat in its plan, connecting itself gradually with
the ordinary forms of independent shrines and tombs; but the
general idea of all tabernacle work is marked in the common
phrase of a “niche,” that is to say a hollow intended for a
statue, and crowned by a canopy; and this niche decoration
only reaches its full development when the Flamboyant hollows
are cut deepest, and when the manner and spirit of sculpture
had so much lost their purity and intensity that it became
desirable to draw the eye away from the statue to its covering,
so that at last the canopy became the more important of
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="page279"></SPAN>279</span>
the two, and is itself so beautiful that we are often contented
with architecture from which profanity has struck the statues,
if only the canopies are left; and consequently, in our modern
ingenuity, even set up canopies where we have no intention of
setting statues.</p>
<p><span class="scs">IX</span>. It is a pity that thus we have no really noble example
of the effect of the statue in the recesses of architecture: for
the Flamboyant recess was not so much a preparation for it
as a gulf which swallowed it up. When statues were most
earnestly designed, they were thrust forward in all kinds of
places, often in front of the pillars, as at Amiens, awkwardly
enough, but with manly respect to the purpose of the figures.
The Flamboyant hollows yawned at their sides, the statues
fell back into them, and nearly disappeared, and a flash of
flame in the shape of a canopy rose as they expired.</p>
<p><span class="scs">X</span>. I do not feel myself capable at present of speaking
with perfect justice of this niche ornament of the north, my
late studies in Italy having somewhat destroyed my sympathies
with it. But I once loved it intensely, and will not say anything
to depreciate it now, save only this, that while I have
studied long at Abbeville, without in the least finding that it
made me care less for Verona, I never remained long in
Verona without feeling some doubt of the nobility of Abbeville.</p>
<p><span class="scs">XI</span>. Recess decoration by leaf mouldings is constantly and
beautifully associated in the north with niche decoration, but
requires no special notice, the recess in such cases being used
merely to give value to the leafage by its gloom, and the difference
between such conditions and those of the south being
merely that in the one the leaves are laid across a hollow, and
in the other over a solid surface; but in neither of the schools
exclusively so, each in some degree intermingling the method
of the other.</p>
<p><span class="scs">XII</span>. Finally the recess decoration by the ball flower is
very definite and characteristic, found, I believe, chiefly in
English work. It consists merely in leaving a small boss or
sphere, fixed, as it were, at intervals in the hollows; such
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="page280"></SPAN>280</span>
bosses being afterwards carved into roses, or other ornamental
forms, and sometimes lifted quite up out of the hollow, on
projecting processes, like vertebr�, so as to make them more
conspicuous, as throughout the decoration of the cathedral of
Bourges.</p>
<p>The value of this ornament is chiefly in the <i>spotted</i> character
which it gives to the lines of mouldings seen from a distance.
It is very rich and delightful when not used in excess;
but it would satiate and weary the eye if it were ever used in
general architecture. The spire of Salisbury, and of St.
Mary’s at Oxford, are agreeable as isolated masses; but if an
entire street were built with this spotty decoration at every
casement, we could not traverse it to the end without disgust.
It is only another example of the constant aim at piquancy of
effect which characterised the northern builders; an ingenious
but somewhat vulgar effort to give interest to their grey masses
of coarse stone, without overtaking their powers either of invention
or execution. We will thank them for it without
blame or praise, and pass on.</p>
<hr class="art" />
<p><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="page281"></SPAN>281</span></p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />