<SPAN name="VIII"></SPAN>
<h2>VIII</h2>
<h2>THE DAILY FRICTION</h2>
<br/>
<p>It is with common daily affairs that I am
now dealing, not with heroic enterprises,
ambitions, martyrdoms. Take the day,
the ordinary day in the ordinary house or
office. Though it comes seven times a
week, and is the most banal thing imaginable,
it is quite worth attention. How
does the machine get through it? Ah!
the best that can be said of the machine
is that it does get through it, somehow.
The friction, though seldom such as to
bring matters to a standstill, is frequent—the
sort of friction that, when it occurs in
a bicycle, is just sufficient to annoy the
rider, but not sufficient to make him get
off the machine and examine the bearings.
Occasionally the friction is very loud;
indeed, disturbing, and at rarer intervals
it shrieks, like an omnibus brake out
of order. You know those days when
you have the sensation that life is not
large enough to contain the household
or the office-staff, when the business of
intercourse may be compared to the
manoeuvres of two people who, having
awakened with a bad headache, are
obliged to dress simultaneously in a very
small bedroom. 'After you with that
towel!' in accents of bitter, grinding
politeness. 'If you could kindly move
your things off this chair!' in a voice
that would blow brains out if it were a
bullet. I venture to say that you know
those days. 'But,' you reply, 'such days
are few. Usually...!' Well, usually,
the friction, though less intense, is still
proceeding. We grow accustomed to it.
We scarcely notice it, as a person in a
stuffy chamber will scarcely notice the
stuffiness. But the deteriorating influence
due to friction goes on, even if unperceived.
And one morning we perceive
its ravages—and write a letter to the
<i>Telegraph</i> to inquire whether life is
worth living, or whether marriage is a
failure, or whether men are more polite
than women. The proof that friction,
in various and varying degrees, is practically
conscious in most households lies
in the fact that when we chance on a
household where there is no friction we
are startled. We can't recover from the
phenomenon. And in describing this
household to our friends, we say: 'They
get on so well together,' as if we were
saying: 'They have wings and can fly!
Just fancy! Did you ever hear of such
a thing?'</p>
<p>Ninety per cent. of all daily friction is
caused by tone—mere tone of voice.
Try this experiment. Say: 'Oh, you
little darling, you sweet pet, you entirely
charming creature!' to a baby or a dog;
but roar these delightful epithets in the
tone of saying: 'You infernal little
nuisance! If I hear another sound I'll
break every bone in your body!' The
baby will infallibly whimper, and the
dog will infallibly mouch off. True, a
dog is not a human being, neither is a
baby. They cannot understand. It is
precisely because they cannot understand
and articulate words that the experiment
is valuable; for it separates the effect
of the tone from the effect of the word
spoken. He who speaks, speaks twice.
His words convey his thought, and his
tone conveys his mental attitude towards
the person spoken to. And certainly the
attitude, so far as friction goes, is more
important than the thought. Your wife
may say to you: 'I shall buy that hat
I spoke to you about.' And you may
reply, quite sincerely, 'As you please.'
But it will depend on your tone whether
you convey: 'As you please. I am
sympathetically anxious that your innocent
caprices should be indulged.' Or
whether you convey: 'As you please.
Only don't bother me with hats. I am
above hats. A great deal too much
money is spent in this house on hats.
However, I'm helpless!' Or whether
you convey: 'As you please, heart of
my heart, but if you would like to be a
nice girl, go gently. We're rather tight.'
I need not elaborate. I am sure of being
comprehended.</p>
<p>As tone is the expression of attitude,
it is, of course, caused by attitude. The
frictional tone is chiefly due to that general
attitude of blame which I have already
condemned as being absurd and unjustifiable.
As, by constant watchful discipline,
we gradually lose this silly attitude of
blame, so the tone will of itself gradually
change. But the two ameliorations can
proceed together, and it is a curious thing
that an agreeable tone, artificially and
deliberately adopted, will influence the
mental attitude almost as much as the
mental attitude will influence the tone.
If you honestly feel resentful against
some one, but, having understood the
foolishness of fury, intentionally mask
your fury under a persuasive tone, your
fury will at once begin to abate. You
will be led into a rational train of thought;
you will see that after all the object
of your resentment has a right to exist,
and that he is neither a doormat nor a
scoundrel, and that anyhow nothing is
to be gained, and much is to be lost, by
fury. You will see that fury is unworthy
of you.</p>
<p>Do you remember the gentleness of the
tone which you employed after the healing
of your first quarrel with a beloved
companion? Do you remember the persuasive
tone which you used when you
wanted to obtain something from a
difficult person on whom your happiness
depended? Why should not your tone
always combine these qualities? Why
should you not carefully school your tone?
Is it beneath you to ensure the largest
possible amount of your own 'way' by
the simplest means? Or is there at the
back of your mind that peculiarly English
and German idea that politeness, sympathy,
and respect for another immortal
soul would imply deplorable weakness on
your part? You say that your happiness
does not depend on every person
whom you happen to speak to. Yes,
it does. Your happiness is always dependent
on just that person. Produce
friction, and you suffer. Idle to argue
that the person has no business to be upset
by your tone! You have caused avoidable
friction, simply because your machine
for dealing with your environment was
suffering from pride, ignorance, or thoughtlessness.
You say I am making a mountain
out of a mole-hill. No! I am
making a mountain out of ten million
mole-hills. And that is what life does.
It is the little but continuous causes that
have great effects. I repeat: Why not
deliberately adopt a gentle, persuasive
tone—just to see what the results are?
Surely you are not ashamed to be wise.
You may smile superiorly as you read
this. Yet you know very well that more
than once you <i>have</i> resolved to use a
gentle and persuasive tone on all occasions,
and that the sole reason why you
had that fearful shindy yesterday with
your cousin's sister-in-law was that you
had long since failed to keep your resolve.
But you were of my mind once, and more
than once.</p>
<p>What you have to do is to teach the
new habit to your brain by daily concentration
on it; by forcing your brain
to think of nothing else for half an hour
of a morning. After a time the brain will
begin to remember automatically. For,
of course, the explanation of your previous
failures is that your brain, undisciplined,
merely forgot at the critical moment.
The tone was out of your mouth before
your brain had waked up. It is necessary
to watch, as though you were a sentinel,
not only against the wrong tone, but
against the other symptoms of the attitude
of blame. Such as the frown. It is
necessary to regard yourself constantly,
and in minute detail. You lie in bed for
half an hour and enthusiastically concentrate
on this beautiful new scheme of
the right tone. You rise, and because
you don't achieve a proper elegance of
necktie at the first knotting, you frown
and swear and clench your teeth! There
is a symptom of the wrong attitude
towards your environment. You are
awake, but your brain isn't. It is in
such a symptom that you may judge
yourself. And not a trifling symptom
either! If you will frown at a necktie,
if you will use language to a necktie
which no gentleman should use to a
necktie, what will you be capable of to
a responsible being?... Yes, it is very
difficult. But it can be done.</p>
<hr style="height: 2px; width: 45%;" />
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />