<h3>CHAPTER XII</h3>
<p>Only the two Frenchmen remained for examination. They had been
left to the last by pure accident. The exigencies of the inquiry
had led to the preference of others, but these two well-broken and
submissive gentlemen made no visible protest. However much they
may have chafed inwardly at the delay, they knew better than to
object; any outburst of discontent would, they knew, recoil on
themselves. Not only were they perfectly patient now when summoned
before the officers of justice, they were most eager to give every
assistance to the law, to go beyond the mere letter, and, if needs
be, volunteer information.</p>
<p>The first called in was the elder, M. Anatole Lafolay, a true
Parisian _bourgeois_, fat and comfortable, unctuous in speech,
and exceedingly deferential.</p>
<p>The story he told was in its main outlines that which we already
know, but he was further questioned, by the light of the latest
facts and ideas as now elicited.</p>
<p>The line adroitly taken by the Judge was to get some evidence of
collusion and combination among the passengers, especially with
reference to two of them, the two women of the party. On this
important point M. Lafolay had something to say.</p>
<p>Asked if he had seen or noticed the lady's maid on the journey, he
answered "yes" very decisively and with a smack of the lips, as
though the sight of this pretty and attractive person had given
him considerable satisfaction.</p>
<p>"Did you speak to her?"</p>
<p>"Oh, no. I had no opportunity. Besides, she had her own friends--
great friends, I fancy. I caught her more than once whispering in
the corner of the car with one of them."</p>
<p>"And that was--?"</p>
<p>"I think the Italian gentleman; I am almost sure I recognized his
clothes. I did not see his face, it was turned from me--towards
hers, and very close, I may be permitted to say."</p>
<p>"And they were friendly?"</p>
<p>"More than friendly, I should say. Very intimate indeed. I should
not have been surprised if--when I turned away as a matter of
fact--if he did not touch, just touch, her red lips. It would have
been excusable--forgive me, messieurs."</p>
<p>"Aha! They were so intimate as that? Indeed! And did she reserve
her favours exclusively for him? Did no one else address her, pay
her court on the quiet--you understand?"</p>
<p>"I saw her with the porter, I believe, at Laroche, but only then.
No, the Italian was her chief companion."</p>
<p>"Did any one else notice the flirtation, do you think?"</p>
<p>"Possibly. There was no secrecy. It was very marked. We could all
see."</p>
<p>"And her mistress too?"</p>
<p>"That I will not say. The lady I saw but little during the
journey."</p>
<p>A few more questions, mainly personal, as to his address,
business, probable presence in Paris for the next few weeks, and
M. Lafolay was permitted to depart.</p>
<p>The examination of the younger Frenchman, a smart, alert young
man, of pleasant, insinuating address, with a quick, inquisitive
eye, followed the same lines, and was distinctly corroborative on
all the points to which M. Lafolay spoke. But M. Jules Devaux had
something startling to impart concerning the Countess.</p>
<p>When asked if he had seen her or spoken to her, he shook his head.</p>
<p>"No; she kept very much to herself," he said. "I saw her but
little, hardly at all, except at Modane. She kept her own berth."</p>
<p>"Where she received her own friends?"</p>
<p>"Oh, beyond doubt. The Englishmen both visited her there, but not
the Italian."</p>
<p>"The Italian? Are we to infer that she knew the Italian?"</p>
<p>"That is what I wish to convey. Not on the journey, though.
Between Rome and Paris she did not seem to know him. It was
afterwards; this morning, in fact, that I came to the conclusion
that there was some secret understanding between them."</p>
<p>"Why do you say that, M. Devaux?" cried the detective, excitedly.
"Let me urge you and implore you to speak out, and fully. This is
of the utmost, of the very first, importance."</p>
<p>"Well, gentlemen, I will tell you. As you are well aware, on
arrival at this station we were all ordered to leave the car, and
marched to the waiting-room, out there. As a matter of course, the
lady entered first, and she was seated when I went in. There was a
strong light on her face."</p>
<p>"Was her veil down?"</p>
<p>"Not then. I saw her lower it later, and, as I think, for reasons
I will presently put before you. Madame has a beautiful face, and
I gazed at it with sympathy, grieving for her, in fact, in such a
trying situation; when suddenly I saw a great and remarkable
change come over it."</p>
<p>"Of what character?"</p>
<p>"It was a look of horror, disgust, surprise,--a little perhaps of
all three; I could not quite say which, it faded so quickly and
was followed by a cold, deathlike pallor. Then almost immediately
she lowered her veil."</p>
<p>"Could you form any explanation for what you saw in her face? What
caused it?"</p>
<p>"Something unexpected, I believe, some shock, or the sight of
something shocking. That was how it struck me, and so forcibly
that I turned to look over my shoulder, expecting to find the
reason there. And it was."</p>
<p>"That reason--?"</p>
<p>"Was the entrance of the Italian, who came just behind me. I am
certain of this; he almost told me so himself, not in words, but
the mistakable leer he gave her in reply. It was wicked, sardonic,
devilish, and proved beyond doubt that there was some secret, some
guilty secret perhaps, between them."</p>
<p>"And was that all?" cried both the Judge and M. Flo�on in a
breath, leaning forward in their eagerness to hear more.</p>
<p>"For the moment, yes. But I was made so interested, so suspicious
by this, that I watched the Italian closely, awaiting, expecting
further developments. They were long in coming; indeed, I am only
at the end now."</p>
<p>"Explain, pray, as quickly as possible, and in your own words."</p>
<p>"It was like this, monsieur. When we were all seated, I looked
round, and did not at first see our Italian. At last I discovered
he had taken a back seat, through modesty perhaps, or to be out of
observation--how was I to know? He sat in the shadow by a door,
that, in fact, which leads into this room. He was thus in the
background, rather out of the way, but I could see his eyes
glittering in that far-off corner, and they were turned in our
direction, always fixed upon the lady, you understand. She was
next me, the whole time.</p>
<p>"Then, as you will remember, monsieur, you called us in one by
one, and I, with M. Lafolay, was the first to appear before you.
When I returned to the outer room, the Italian was still staring,
but not so fixedly or continuously, at the lady. From time to time
his eyes wandered towards a table near which he sat, and which was
just in the gangway or passage by which people must pass into your
presence.</p>
<p>"There was some reason for this, I felt sure, although I did not
understand it immediately.
"Presently I got at the hidden meaning There was a small piece of
paper, rolled up or crumpled up into a ball, lying upon this
table, and the Italian wished, nay, was desperately anxious, to
call the lady's attention to it. If I had had any doubt of this,
it was quite removed after the man had gone into the inner room.
As he left us, he turned his head over his shoulder significantly
and nodded very slightly, but still perceptibly, at the ball of
paper.</p>
<p>"Well, gentlemen, I was now satisfied in my own mind that this was
some artful attempt of his to communicate with the lady, and had
she fallen in with it, I should have immediately informed you,
the proper authorities. But whether from stupidity, dread,
disinclination, a direct, definite refusal to have any dealings
with this man, the lady would not--at any rate did not--pick up
the ball, as she might have done easily when she in her turn
passed the table on her way to your presence.</p>
<p>"I have no doubt it was thrown there for her, and probably you
will agree with me. But it takes two to make a game of this sort,
and the lady would not join. Neither on leaving the room nor on
returning would she take up the missive."</p>
<p>"And what became of it, then?" asked the detective in breathless
excitement. "I have it here." M. Devaux opened the palm of his
hand and displayed the scrap of paper in the hollow rolled up into
a small tight ball.</p>
<p>"When and how did you become possessed of it?"</p>
<p>"I got it only just now, when I was called in here. Before that I
could not move. I was tied to my chair, practically, and ordered
strictly not to move."</p>
<p>"Perfectly. Monsieur's conduct has been admirable. And now tell
us--what does it contain? Have you looked at it?"</p>
<p>"By no means. It is just as I picked it up. Will you gentlemen
take it, and if you think fit, tell me what is there? Some
writing--a message of some sort, or I am greatly mistaken."</p>
<p>"Yes, here are words written in pencil," said the detective,
unrolling the paper, which he handed on to the Judge, who read the
contents aloud--</p>
<p>"Be careful. Say nothing. If you betray me, you will be lost too."</p>
<p>A long silence followed, broken first by the Judge, who said at
last solemnly to Devaux:</p>
<p>"Monsieur, in the name of justice I beg to thank you most warmly.
You have acted with admirable tact and judgment, and have rendered
us invaluable assistance. Have you anything further to tell us?"</p>
<p>"No, gentlemen. That is all. And you--you have no more questions
to ask? Then I presume I may withdraw?"</p>
<p>Beyond doubt it had been reserved for the last witness to produce
facts that constituted the very essence of the inquiry.</p>
<br/><br/>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />