<p><br/><br/><br/><br/> <br/><br/> <SPAN name="linkc41" id="linkc41"></SPAN></p>
<h2> Chapter 41 </h2>
<p><br/></p>
<h3> The Metropolis of the South </h3>
<p><br/> <SPAN name="link422"></SPAN></p>
<div class="fig"> <ANTIMG alt="422.jpg (81K)" src="images/422.jpg" width-obs="100%" /><br/></div>
<p><br/><br/></p>
<p>THE approaches to New Orleans were familiar; general aspects were
unchanged. When one goes flying through London along a railway propped in
the air on tall arches, he may inspect miles of upper bedrooms through the
open windows, but the lower half of the houses is under his level and out
of sight. Similarly, in high-river stage, in the New Orleans region, the
water is up to the top of the enclosing levee-rim, the flat country behind
it lies low—representing the bottom of a dish—and as the boat
swims along, high on the flood, one looks down upon the houses and into
the upper windows. There is nothing but that frail breastwork of earth
between the people and destruction.</p>
<p><SPAN name="link423"></SPAN></p>
<div class="fig"> <ANTIMG alt="423.jpg (69K)" src="images/423.jpg" width-obs="100%" /><br/></div>
<p><br/><br/></p>
<p>The old brick salt-warehouses clustered at the upper end of the city
looked as they had always looked; warehouses which had had a kind of
Aladdin's lamp experience, however, since I had seen them; for when the
war broke out the proprietor went to bed one night leaving them packed
with thousands of sacks of vulgar salt, worth a couple of dollars a sack,
and got up in the morning and found his mountain of salt turned into a
mountain of gold, so to speak, so suddenly and to so dizzy a height had
the war news sent up the price of the article.</p>
<p>The vast reach of plank wharves remained unchanged, and there were as many
ships as ever: but the long array of steamboats had vanished; not
altogether, of course, but not much of it was left.</p>
<p>The city itself had not changed—to the eye. It had greatly increased
in spread and population, but the look of the town was not altered. The
dust, waste-paper-littered, was still deep in the streets; the deep,
trough-like gutters alongside the curbstones were still half full of
reposeful water with a dusty surface; the sidewalks were still—in
the sugar and bacon region—encumbered by casks and barrels and
hogsheads; the great blocks of austerely plain commercial houses were as
dusty-looking as ever.</p>
<p>Canal Street was finer, and more attractive and stirring than formerly,
with its drifting crowds of people, its several processions of hurrying
street-cars, and—toward evening—its broad second-story
verandas crowded with gentlemen and ladies clothed according to the latest
mode.</p>
<p><SPAN name="link425"></SPAN></p>
<div class="fig"> <ANTIMG alt="425.jpg (159K)" src="images/425.jpg" width-obs="100%" /><br/></div>
<p><br/><br/></p>
<p>Not that there is any 'architecture' in Canal Street: to speak in broad,
general terms, there is no architecture in New Orleans, except in the
cemeteries. It seems a strange thing to say of a wealthy, far-seeing, and
energetic city of a quarter of a million inhabitants, but it is true.
There is a huge granite U.S. Custom-house—costly enough, genuine
enough, but as a decoration it is inferior to a gasometer. It looks like a
state prison. But it was built before the war. Architecture in America may
be said to have been born since the war. New Orleans, I believe, has had
the good luck—and in a sense the bad luck—to have had no great
fire in late years. It must be so. If the opposite had been the case, I
think one would be able to tell the 'burnt district' by the radical
improvement in its architecture over the old forms. One can do this in
Boston and Chicago. The 'burnt district' of Boston was commonplace before
the fire; but now there is no commercial district in any city in the world
that can surpass it—or perhaps even rival it—in beauty,
elegance, and tastefulness.</p>
<p>However, New Orleans has begun—just this moment, as one may say.
When completed, the new Cotton Exchange will be a stately and beautiful
building; massive, substantial, full of architectural graces; no shams or
false pretenses or uglinesses about it anywhere. To the city, it will be
worth many times its cost, for it will breed its species. What has been
lacking hitherto, was a model to build toward; something to educate eye
and taste; a <i>suggester</i>, so to speak.</p>
<p><SPAN name="link428"></SPAN></p>
<div class="fig"> <ANTIMG alt="428.jpg (54K)" src="images/428.jpg" width-obs="100%" /><br/></div>
<p><br/><br/></p>
<p>The city is well outfitted with progressive men—thinking, sagacious,
long-headed men. The contrast between the spirit of the city and the
city's architecture is like the contrast between waking and sleep.
Apparently there is a 'boom' in everything but that one dead feature. The
water in the gutters used to be stagnant and slimy, and a potent
disease-breeder; but the gutters are flushed now, two or three times a
day, by powerful machinery; in many of the gutters the water never stands
still, but has a steady current. Other sanitary improvements have been
made; and with such effect that New Orleans claims to be (during the long
intervals between the occasional yellow-fever assaults) one of the
healthiest cities in the Union. There's plenty of ice now for everybody,
manufactured in the town. It is a driving place commercially, and has a
great river, ocean, and railway business. At the date of our visit, it was
the best lighted city in the Union, electrically speaking. The New Orleans
electric lights were more numerous than those of New York, and very much
better. One had this modified noonday not only in Canal and some
neighboring chief streets, but all along a stretch of five miles of river
frontage. There are good clubs in the city now—several of them but
recently organized—and inviting modern-style pleasure resorts at
West End and Spanish Fort. The telephone is everywhere. One of the most
notable advances is in journalism. The newspapers, as I remember them,
were not a striking feature. Now they are. Money is spent upon them with a
free hand. They get the news, let it cost what it may. The editorial work
is not hack-grinding, but literature. As an example of New Orleans
journalistic achievement, it may be mentioned that the 'Times-Democrat' of
August 26, 1882, contained a report of the year's business of the towns of
the Mississippi Valley, from New Orleans all the way to St. Paul—two
thousand miles. That issue of the paper consisted of forty pages; seven
columns to the page; two hundred and eighty columns in all; fifteen
hundred words to the column; an aggregate of four hundred and twenty
thousand words. That is to say, not much short of three times as many
words as there are in this book. One may with sorrow contrast this with
the architecture of New Orleans.</p>
<p>I have been speaking of public architecture only. The domestic article in
New Orleans is reproachless, notwithstanding it remains as it always was.
All the dwellings are of wood—in the American part of the town, I
mean—and all have a comfortable look. Those in the wealthy quarter
are spacious; painted snow-white usually, and generally have wide
verandas, or double-verandas, supported by ornamental columns. These
mansions stand in the center of large grounds, and rise, garlanded with
roses, out of the midst of swelling masses of shining green foliage and
many-colored blossoms. No houses could well be in better harmony with
their surroundings, or more pleasing to the eye, or more home-like and
comfortable-looking.</p>
<p>One even becomes reconciled to the cistern presently; this is a mighty
cask, painted green, and sometimes a couple of stories high, which is
propped against the house-corner on stilts. There is a mansion-and-brewery
suggestion about the combination which seems very incongruous at first.
But the people cannot have wells, and so they take rain-water. Neither can
they conveniently have cellars, or graves,{footnote [The Israelites are
buried in graves—by permission, I take it, not requirement; but none
else, except the destitute, who are buried at public expense. The graves
are but three or four feet deep.]} the town being built upon 'made'
ground; so they do without both, and few of the living complain, and none
of the others.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />