<p><SPAN name="link2HCH0014" id="link2HCH0014"></SPAN></p>
<h2> CHAPTER XIV </h2>
<h3> INVENTING A COMPLETE SYSTEM OF LIGHTING </h3>
<p>IN Berlin, on December 11, 1908, with notable eclat, the seventieth
birthday was celebrated of Emil Rathenau, the founder of the great
Allgemein Elektricitaets Gesellschaft. This distinguished German, creator
of a splendid industry, then received the congratulations of his
fellow-countrymen, headed by Emperor William, who spoke enthusiastically
of his services to electro-technics and to Germany. In his interesting
acknowledgment, Mr. Rathenau told how he went to Paris in 1881, and at the
electrical exhibition there saw the display of Edison's inventions in
electric lighting "which have met with as little proper appreciation as
his countless innovations in connection with telegraphy, telephony, and
the entire electrical industry." He saw the Edison dynamo, and he saw the
incandescent lamp, "of which millions have been manufactured since that
day without the great master being paid the tribute to his invention." But
what impressed the observant, thoroughgoing German was the breadth with
which the whole lighting art had been elaborated and perfected, even at
that early day. "The Edison system of lighting was as beautifully
conceived down to the very details, and as thoroughly worked out as if it
had been tested for decades in various towns. Neither sockets, switches,
fuses, lamp-holders, nor any of the other accessories necessary to
complete the installation were wanting; and the generating of the current,
the regulation, the wiring with distributing boxes, house connections,
meters, etc., all showed signs of astonishing skill and incomparable
genius."</p>
<p>Such praise on such an occasion from the man who introduced incandescent
electric lighting into Germany is significant as to the continued
appreciation abroad of Mr. Edison's work. If there is one thing modern
Germany is proud and jealous of, it is her leadership in electrical
engineering and investigation. But with characteristic insight, Mr.
Rathenau here placed his finger on the great merit that has often been
forgotten. Edison was not simply the inventor of a new lamp and a new
dynamo. They were invaluable elements, but far from all that was
necessary. His was the mighty achievement of conceiving and executing in
all its details an art and an industry absolutely new to the world. Within
two years this man completed and made that art available in its essential,
fundamental facts, which remain unchanged after thirty years of rapid
improvement and widening application.</p>
<p>Such a stupendous feat, whose equal is far to seek anywhere in the history
of invention, is worth studying, especially as the task will take us over
much new ground and over very little of the territory already covered.
Notwithstanding the enormous amount of thought and labor expended on the
incandescent lamp problem from the autumn of 1878 to the winter of 1879,
it must not be supposed for one moment that Edison's whole endeavor and
entire inventive skill had been given to the lamp alone, or the dynamo
alone. We have sat through the long watches of the night while Edison
brooded on the real solution of the swarming problems. We have gazed
anxiously at the steady fingers of the deft and cautious Batchelor, as one
fragile filament after another refused to stay intact until it could be
sealed into its crystal prison and there glow with light that never was
before on land or sea. We have calculated armatures and field coils for
the new dynamo with Upton, and held the stakes for Jehl and his fellows at
their winding bees. We have seen the mineral and vegetable kingdoms rifled
and ransacked for substances that would yield the best "filament." We have
had the vague consciousness of assisting at a great development whose
evidences to-day on every hand attest its magnitude. We have felt the
fierce play of volcanic effort, lifting new continents of opportunity from
the infertile sea, without any devastation of pre-existing fields of human
toil and harvest. But it still remains to elucidate the actual thing done;
to reduce it to concrete data, and in reducing, to unfold its colossal
dimensions.</p>
<p>The lighting system that Edison contemplated in this entirely new
departure from antecedent methods included the generation of electrical
energy, or current, on a very large scale; its distribution throughout
extended areas, and its division and subdivision into small units
converted into light at innumerable points in every direction from the
source of supply, each unit to be independent of every other and
susceptible to immediate control by the user.</p>
<p>This was truly an altogether prodigious undertaking. We need not wonder
that Professor Tyndall, in words implying grave doubt as to the
possibility of any solution of the various problems, said publicly that he
would much rather have the matter in Edison's hands than in his own. There
were no precedents, nothing upon which to build or improve. The problems
could only be answered by the creation of new devices and methods
expressly worked out for their solution. An electric lamp answering
certain specific requirements would, indeed, be the key to the situation,
but its commercial adaptation required a multifarious variety of apparatus
and devices. The word "system" is much abused in invention, and during the
early days of electric lighting its use applied to a mere freakish lamp or
dynamo was often ludicrous. But, after all, nothing short of a complete
system could give real value to the lamp as an invention; nothing short of
a system could body forth the new art to the public. Let us therefore set
down briefly a few of the leading items needed for perfect illumination by
electricity, all of which were part of the Edison programme:</p>
<p>First—To conceive a broad and fundamentally correct method of
distributing the current, satisfactory in a scientific sense and practical
commercially in its efficiency and economy. This meant, ready made, a
comprehensive plan analogous to illumination by gas, with a network of
conductors all connected together, so that in any given city area the
lights could be fed with electricity from several directions, thus
eliminating any interruption due to the disturbance on any particular
section.</p>
<p>Second—To devise an electric lamp that would give about the same
amount of light as a gas jet, which custom had proven to be a suitable and
useful unit. This lamp must possess the quality of requiring only a small
investment in the copper conductors reaching it. Each lamp must be
independent of every other lamp. Each and all the lights must be produced
and operated with sufficient economy to compete on a commercial basis with
gas. The lamp must be durable, capable of being easily and safely handled
by the public, and one that would remain capable of burning at full
incandescence and candle-power a great length of time.</p>
<p>Third—To devise means whereby the amount of electrical energy
furnished to each and every customer could be determined, as in the case
of gas, and so that this could be done cheaply and reliably by a meter at
the customer's premises.</p>
<p>Fourth—To elaborate a system or network of conductors capable of
being placed underground or overhead, which would allow of being tapped at
any intervals, so that service wires could be run from the main conductors
in the street into each building. Where these mains went below the surface
of the thoroughfare, as in large cities, there must be protective conduit
or pipe for the copper conductors, and these pipes must allow of being
tapped wherever necessary. With these conductors and pipes must also be
furnished manholes, junction-boxes, connections, and a host of varied
paraphernalia insuring perfect general distribution.</p>
<p>Fifth—To devise means for maintaining at all points in an extended
area of distribution a practically even pressure of current, so that all
the lamps, wherever located, near or far away from the central station,
should give an equal light at all times, independent of the number that
might be turned on; and safeguarding the lamps against rupture by sudden
and violent fluctuations of current. There must also be means for thus
regulating at the point where the current was generated the quality or
pressure of the current throughout the whole lighting area, with devices
for indicating what such pressure might actually be at various points in
the area.</p>
<p>Sixth—To design efficient dynamos, such not being in existence at
the time, that would convert economically the steam-power of high-speed
engines into electrical energy, together with means for connecting and
disconnecting them with the exterior consumption circuits; means for
regulating, equalizing their loads, and adjusting the number of dynamos to
be used according to the fluctuating demands on the central station. Also
the arrangement of complete stations with steam and electric apparatus and
auxiliary devices for insuring their efficient and continuous operation.</p>
<p>Seventh—To invent devices that would prevent the current from
becoming excessive upon any conductors, causing fire or other injury; also
switches for turning the current on and off; lamp-holders, fixtures, and
the like; also means and methods for establishing the interior circuits
that were to carry current to chandeliers and fixtures in buildings.</p>
<p>Here was the outline of the programme laid down in the autumn of 1878, and
pursued through all its difficulties to definite accomplishment in about
eighteen months, some of the steps being made immediately, others being
taken as the art evolved. It is not to be imagined for one moment that
Edison performed all the experiments with his own hands. The method of
working at Menlo Park has already been described in these pages by those
who participated. It would not only have been physically impossible for
one man to have done all this work himself, in view of the time and labor
required, and the endless detail; but most of the apparatus and devices
invented or suggested by him as the art took shape required the handiwork
of skilled mechanics and artisans of a high order of ability. Toward the
end of 1879 the laboratory force thus numbered at least one hundred
earnest men. In this respect of collaboration, Edison has always adopted a
policy that must in part be taken to explain his many successes. Some
inventors of the greatest ability, dealing with ideas and conceptions of
importance, have found it impossible to organize or even to tolerate a
staff of co-workers, preferring solitary and secret toil, incapable of
team work, or jealous of any intrusion that could possibly bar them from a
full and complete claim to the result when obtained. Edison always stood
shoulder to shoulder with his associates, but no one ever questioned the
leadership, nor was it ever in doubt where the inspiration originated. The
real truth is that Edison has always been so ceaselessly fertile of ideas
himself, he has had more than his whole staff could ever do to try them
all out; he has sought co-operation, but no exterior suggestion. As a
matter of fact a great many of the "Edison men" have made notable
inventions of their own, with which their names are imperishably
associated; but while they were with Edison it was with his work that they
were and must be busied.</p>
<p>It was during this period of "inventing a system" that so much systematic
and continuous work with good results was done by Edison in the design and
perfection of dynamos. The value of his contributions to the art of
lighting comprised in this work has never been fully understood or
appreciated, having been so greatly overshadowed by his invention of the
incandescent lamp, and of a complete system of distribution. It is a fact,
however, that the principal improvements he made in dynamo-electric
generators were of a radical nature and remain in the art. Thirty years
bring about great changes, especially in a field so notably progressive as
that of the generation of electricity; but different as are the dynamos of
to-day from those of the earlier period, they embody essential principles
and elements that Edison then marked out and elaborated as the conditions
of success. There was indeed prompt appreciation in some well-informed
quarters of what Edison was doing, evidenced by the sensation caused in
the summer of 1881, when he designed, built, and shipped to Paris for the
first Electrical Exposition ever held, the largest dynamo that had been
built up to that time. It was capable of lighting twelve hundred
incandescent lamps, and weighed with its engine twenty-seven tons, the
armature alone weighing six tons. It was then, and for a long time after,
the eighth wonder of the scientific world, and its arrival and
installation in Paris were eagerly watched by the most famous physicists
and electricians of Europe.</p>
<p>Edison's amusing description of his experience in shipping the dynamo to
Paris when built may appropriately be given here: "I built a very large
dynamo with the engine directly connected, which I intended for the Paris
Exposition of 1881. It was one or two sizes larger than those I had
previously built. I had only a very short period in which to get it ready
and put it on a steamer to reach the Exposition in time. After the machine
was completed we found the voltage was too low. I had to devise a way of
raising the voltage without changing the machine, which I did by adding
extra magnets. After this was done, we tested the machine, and the
crank-shaft of the engine broke and flew clear across the shop. By working
night and day a new crank-shaft was put in, and we only had three days
left from that time to get it on board the steamer; and had also to run a
test. So we made arrangements with the Tammany leader, and through him
with the police, to clear the street—one of the New York crosstown
streets—and line it with policemen, as we proposed to make a quick
passage, and didn't know how much time it would take. About four hours
before the steamer had to get it, the machine was shut down after the
test, and a schedule was made out in advance of what each man had to do.
Sixty men were put on top of the dynamo to get it ready, and each man had
written orders as to what he was to perform. We got it all taken apart and
put on trucks and started off. They drove the horses with a fire-bell in
front of them to the French pier, the policemen lining the streets. Fifty
men were ready to help the stevedores get it on the steamer—and we
were one hour ahead of time."</p>
<p>This Exposition brings us, indeed, to a dramatic and rather pathetic
parting of the ways. The hour had come for the old laboratory force that
had done such brilliant and memorable work to disband, never again to
assemble under like conditions for like effort, although its members all
remained active in the field, and many have ever since been associated
prominently with some department of electrical enterprise. The fact was
they had done their work so well they must now disperse to show the world
what it was, and assist in its industrial exploitation. In reality, they
were too few for the demands that reached Edison from all parts of the
world for the introduction of his system; and in the emergency the men
nearest to him and most trusted were those upon whom he could best depend
for such missionary work as was now required. The disciples full of fire
and enthusiasm, as well as of knowledge and experience, were soon
scattered to the four winds, and the rapidity with which the Edison system
was everywhere successfully introduced is testimony to the good judgment
with which their leader had originally selected them as his colleagues. No
one can say exactly just how this process of disintegration began, but Mr.
E. H. Johnson had already been sent to England in the Edison interests,
and now the question arose as to what should be done with the French
demands and the Paris Electrical Exposition, whose importance as a point
of new departure in electrical industry was speedily recognized on both
sides of the Atlantic. It is very interesting to note that as the earlier
staff broke up, Edison became the centre of another large body, equally
devoted, but more particularly concerned with the commercial development
of his ideas. Mr. E. G. Acheson mentions in his personal notes on work at
the laboratory, that in December of 1880, while on some experimental work,
he was called to the new lamp factory started recently at Menlo Park, and
there found Edison, Johnson, Batchelor, and Upton in conference, and
"Edison informed me that Mr. Batchelor, who was in charge of the
construction, development, and operation of the lamp factory, was soon to
sail for Europe to prepare for the exhibit to be made at the Electrical
Exposition to be held in Paris during the coming summer." These
preparations overlap the reinforcement of the staff with some notable
additions, chief among them being Mr. Samuel Insull, whose interesting
narrative of events fits admirably into the story at this stage, and gives
a vivid idea of the intense activity and excitement with which the whole
atmosphere around Edison was then surcharged: "I first met Edison on March
1, 1881. I arrived in New York on the City of Chester about five or six in
the evening, and went direct to 65 Fifth Avenue. I had come over to act as
Edison's private secretary, the position having been obtained for me
through the good offices of Mr. E. H. Johnson, whom I had known in London,
and who wrote to Mr. U. H. Painter, of Washington, about me in the fall of
1880. Mr. Painter sent the letter on to Mr. Batchelor, who turned it over
to Edison. Johnson returned to America late in the fall of 1880, and in
January, 1881, cabled to me to come to this country. At the time he cabled
for me Edison was still at Menlo Park, but when I arrived in New York the
famous offices of the Edison Electric Light Company had been opened at
'65' Fifth Avenue, and Edison had moved into New York with the idea of
assisting in the exploitation of the Light Company's business.</p>
<p>"I was taken by Johnson direct from the Inman Steamship pier to 65 Fifth
Avenue, and met Edison for the first time. There were three rooms on the
ground floor at that time. The front one was used as a kind of
reception-room; the room immediately behind it was used as the office of
the president of the Edison Electric Light Company, Major S. B. Eaton. The
rear room, which was directly back of the front entrance hall, was
Edison's office, and there I first saw him. There was very little in the
room except a couple of walnut roller-top desks—which were very
generally used in American offices at that time. Edison received me with
great cordiality. I think he was possibly disappointed at my being so
young a man; I had only just turned twenty-one, and had a very boyish
appearance. The picture of Edison is as vivid to me now as if the incident
occurred yesterday, although it is now more than twenty-nine years since
that first meeting. I had been connected with Edison's affairs in England
as private secretary to his London agent for about two years; and had been
taught by Johnson to look on Edison as the greatest electrical inventor of
the day—a view of him, by-the-way, which has been greatly
strengthened as the years have rolled by. Owing to this, and to the fact
that I felt highly flattered at the appointment as his private secretary,
I was naturally prepared to accept him as a hero. With my strict English
ideas as to the class of clothes to be worn by a prominent man, there was
nothing in Edison's dress to impress me. He wore a rather seedy black
diagonal Prince Albert coat and waistcoat, with trousers of a dark
material, and a white silk handkerchief around his neck, tied in a
careless knot falling over the stiff bosom of a white shirt somewhat the
worse for wear. He had a large wide-awake hat of the sombrero pattern then
generally used in this country, and a rough, brown overcoat, cut somewhat
similarly to his Prince Albert coat. His hair was worn quite long, and
hanging carelessly over his fine forehead. His face was at that time, as
it is now, clean shaven. He was full in face and figure, although by no
means as stout as he has grown in recent years. What struck me above
everything else was the wonderful intelligence and magnetism of his
expression, and the extreme brightness of his eyes. He was far more modest
than in my youthful picture of him. I had expected to find a man of
distinction. His appearance, as a whole, was not what you would call
'slovenly,' it is best expressed by the word 'careless.'"</p>
<p>Mr. Insull supplements this pen-picture by another, bearing upon the
hustle and bustle of the moment: "After a short conversation Johnson
hurried me off to meet his family, and later in the evening, about eight
o'clock, he and I returned to Edison's office; and I found myself launched
without further ceremony into Edison's business affairs. Johnson had
already explained to me that he was sailing the next morning, March 2d, on
the S.S. Arizona, and that Mr. Edison wanted to spend the evening
discussing matters in connection with his European affairs. It was
assumed, inasmuch as I had just arrived from London, that I would be able
to give more or less information on this subject. As Johnson was to sail
the next morning at five o'clock, Edison explained that it would be
necessary for him to have an understanding of European matters. Edison
started out by drawing from his desk a check-book and stating how much
money he had in the bank; and he wanted to know what European telephone
securities were most salable, as he wished to raise the necessary funds to
put on their feet the incandescent lamp factory, the Electric Tube works,
and the necessary shops to build dynamos. All through the interview I was
tremendously impressed with Edison's wonderful resourcefulness and grasp,
and his immediate appreciation of any suggestion of consequence bearing on
the subject under discussion.</p>
<p>"He spoke with very great enthusiasm of the work before him—namely,
the development of his electric-lighting system; and his one idea seemed
to be to raise all the money he could with the object of pouring it into
the manufacturing side of the lighting business. I remember how
extraordinarily I was impressed with him on this account, as I had just
come from a circle of people in London who not only questioned the
possibility of the success of Edison's invention, but often expressed
doubt as to whether the work he had done could be called an invention at
all. After discussing affairs with Johnson—who was receiving his
final instructions from Edison—far into the night, and going down to
the steamer to see Johnson aboard, I finished my first night's business
with Edison somewhere between four and five in the morning, feeling
thoroughly imbued with the idea that I had met one of the great master
minds of the world. You must allow for my youthful enthusiasm, but you
must also bear in mind Edison's peculiar gift of magnetism, which has
enabled him during his career to attach so many men to him. I fell a
victim to the spell at the first interview."</p>
<p>Events moved rapidly in those days. The next morning, Tuesday, Edison took
his new fidus Achates with him to a conference with John Roach, the famous
old ship-builder, and at it agreed to take the AEtna Iron works, where
Roach had laid the foundations of his fame and fortune. These works were
not in use at the time. They were situated on Goerck Street, New York,
north of Grand Street, on the east side of the city, and there, very soon
after, was established the first Edison dynamo-manufacturing
establishment, known for many years as the Edison Machine Works. The same
night Insull made his first visit to Menlo Park. Up to that time he had
seen very little incandescent lighting, for the simple reason that there
was very little to see. Johnson had had a few Edison lamps in London, lit
up from primary batteries, as a demonstration; and in the summer of 1880
Swan had had a few series lamps burning in London. In New York a small
gas-engine plant was being started at the Edison offices on Fifth Avenue.
But out at Menlo Park there was the first actual electric-lighting central
station, supplying distributed incandescent lamps and some electric motors
by means of underground conductors imbedded in asphaltum and surrounded by
a wooden box. Mr. Insull says: "The system employed was naturally the
two-wire, as at that time the three-wire had not been thought of. The
lamps were partly of the horseshoe filament paper-carbon type, and partly
bamboo-filament lamps, and were of an efficiency of 95 to 100 watts per 16
c.p. I can never forget the impression that this first view of the
electric-lighting industry produced on me. Menlo Park must always be
looked upon as the birthplace of the electric light and power industry. At
that time it was the only place where could be seen an electric light and
power multiple arc distribution system, the operation of which seemed as
successful to my youthful mind as the operation of one of the large
metropolitan systems to-day. I well remember about ten o'clock that night
going down to the Menlo Park depot and getting the station agent, who was
also the telegraph operator, to send some cable messages for me to my
London friends, announcing that I had seen Edison's incandescent lighting
system in actual operation, and that so far as I could tell it was an
accomplished fact. A few weeks afterward I received a letter from one of
my London friends, who was a doubting Thomas, upbraiding me for coming so
soon under the spell of the 'Yankee inventor.'"</p>
<p>It was to confront and deal with just this element of doubt in London and
in Europe generally, that the dispatch of Johnson to England and of
Batchelor to France was intended. Throughout the Edison staff there was a
mingled feeling of pride in the work, resentment at the doubts expressed
about it, and keen desire to show how excellent it was. Batchelor left for
Paris in July, 1881—on his second trip to Europe that year—and
the exhibit was made which brought such an instantaneous recognition of
the incalculable value of Edison's lighting inventions, as evidenced by
the awards and rewards immediately bestowed upon him. He was made an
officer of the Legion of Honor, and Prof. George F. Barker cabled as
follows from Paris, announcing the decision of the expert jury which
passed upon the exhibits: "Accept my congratulations. You have distanced
all competitors and obtained a diploma of honor, the highest award given
in the Exposition. No person in any class in which you were an exhibitor
received a like reward."</p>
<p>Nor was this all. Eminent men in science who had previously expressed
their disbelief in the statements made as to the Edison system were now
foremost in generous praise of his notable achievements, and accorded him
full credit for its completion. A typical instance was M. Du Moncel, a
distinguished electrician, who had written cynically about Edison's work
and denied its practicability. He now recanted publicly in this language,
which in itself shows the state of the art when Edison came to the front:
"All these experiments achieved but moderate success, and when, in 1879,
the new Edison incandescent carbon lamp was announced, many of the
scientists, and I, particularly, doubted the accuracy of the reports which
came from America. This horseshoe of carbonized paper seemed incapable to
resist mechanical shocks and to maintain incandescence for any
considerable length of time. Nevertheless, Mr. Edison was not discouraged,
and despite the active opposition made to his lamp, despite the polemic
acerbity of which he was the object, he did not cease to perfect it; and
he succeeded in producing the lamps which we now behold exhibited at the
Exposition, and are admired by all for their perfect steadiness."</p>
<p>The competitive lamps exhibited and tested at this time comprised those of
Edison, Maxim, Swan, and Lane-Fox. The demonstration of Edison's success
stimulated the faith of his French supporters, and rendered easier the
completion of plans for the Societe Edison Continental, of Paris, formed
to operate the Edison patents on the Continent of Europe. Mr. Batchelor,
with Messrs. Acheson and Hipple, and one or two other assistants, at the
close of the Exposition transferred their energies to the construction and
equipment of machine-shops and lamp factories at Ivry-sur-Seine for the
company, and in a very short time the installation of plants began in
various countries—France, Italy, Holland, Belgium, etc.</p>
<p>All through 1881 Johnson was very busy, for his part, in England. The
first "Jumbo" Edison dynamo had gone to Paris; the second and third went
to London, where they were installed in 1881 by Mr. Johnson and his
assistant, Mr. W. J. Hammer, in the three-thousand-light central station
on Holborn Viaduct, the plant going into operation on January 12, 1882.
Outside of Menlo Park this was the first regular station for incandescent
lighting in the world, as the Pearl Street station in New York did not go
into operation until September of the same year. This historic plant was
hurriedly thrown together on Crown land, and would doubtless have been the
nucleus of a great system but for the passage of the English electric
lighting act of 1882, which at once throttled the industry by its absurd
restrictive provisions, and which, though greatly modified, has left
England ever since in a condition of serious inferiority as to development
in electric light and power. The streets and bridges of Holborn Viaduct
were lighted by lamps turned on and off from the station, as well as the
famous City Temple of Dr. Joseph Parker, the first church in the world to
be lighted by incandescent lamps—indeed, so far as can be
ascertained, the first church to be illuminated by electricity in any
form. Mr. W. J. Hammer, who supplies some very interesting notes on the
installation, says: "I well remember the astonishment of Doctor Parker and
his associates when they noted the difference of temperature as compared
with gas. I was informed that the people would not go in the gallery in
warm weather, owing to the great heat caused by the many gas jets, whereas
on the introduction of the incandescent lamp there was no complaint." The
telegraph operating-room of the General Post-Office, at St. Martin's-Le
Grand and Newgate Street nearby, was supplied with four hundred lamps
through the instrumentality of Mr. (Sir) W. H. Preece, who, having been
seriously sceptical as to Mr. Edison's results, became one of his most
ardent advocates, and did much to facilitate the introduction of the
light. This station supplied its customers by a network of feeders and
mains of the standard underground two-wire Edison tubing-conductors in
sections of iron pipe—such as was used subsequently in New York,
Milan, and other cities. It also had a measuring system for the current,
employing the Edison electrolytic meter. Arc lamps were operated from its
circuits, and one of the first sets of practicable storage batteries was
used experimentally at the station. In connection with these batteries Mr.
Hammer tells a characteristic anecdote of Edison: "A careless boy passing
through the station whistling a tune and swinging carelessly a hammer in
his hand, rapped a carboy of sulphuric acid which happened to be on the
floor above a 'Jumbo' dynamo. The blow broke the glass carboy, and the
acid ran down upon the field magnets of the dynamo, destroying the
windings of one of the twelve magnets. This accident happened while I was
taking a vacation in Germany, and a prominent scientific man connected
with the company cabled Mr. Edison to know whether the machine would work
if the coil was cut out. Mr. Edison sent the laconic reply: 'Why doesn't
he try it and see?' Mr. E. H. Johnson was kept busy not only with the
cares and responsibilities of this pioneer English plant, but by
negotiations as to company formations, hearings before Parliamentary
committees, and particularly by distinguished visitors, including all the
foremost scientific men in England, and a great many well-known members of
the peerage. Edison was fortunate in being represented by a man with so
much address, intimate knowledge of the subject, and powers of
explanation. As one of the leading English papers said at the time, with
equal humor and truth: 'There is but one Edison, and Johnson is his
prophet.'"</p>
<p>As the plant continued in operation, various details and ideas of
improvement emerged, and Mr. Hammer says: "Up to the time of the
construction of this plant it had been customary to place a single-pole
switch on one wire and a safety fuse on the other; and the practice of
putting fuses on both sides of a lighting circuit was first used here.
Some of the first, if not the very first, of the insulated fixtures were
used in this plant, and many of the fixtures were equipped with ball
insulating joints, enabling the chandeliers—or 'electroliers'—to
be turned around, as was common with the gas chandeliers. This particular
device was invented by Mr. John B. Verity, whose firm built many of the
fixtures for the Edison Company, and constructed the notable electroliers
shown at the Crystal Palace Exposition of 1882."</p>
<p>We have made a swift survey of developments from the time when the system
of lighting was ready for use, and when the staff scattered to introduce
it. It will be readily understood that Edison did not sit with folded
hands or drop into complacent satisfaction the moment he had reached the
practical stage of commercial exploitation. He was not willing to say "Let
us rest and be thankful," as was one of England's great Liberal leaders
after a long period of reform. On the contrary, he was never more active
than immediately after the work we have summed up at the beginning of this
chapter. While he had been pursuing his investigations of the generator in
conjunction with the experiments on the incandescent lamp, he gave much
thought to the question of distribution of the current over large areas,
revolving in his mind various plans for the accomplishment of this
purpose, and keeping his mathematicians very busy working on the various
schemes that suggested themselves from time to time. The idea of a
complete system had been in his mind in broad outline for a long time, but
did not crystallize into commercial form until the incandescent lamp was
an accomplished fact. Thus in January, 1880, his first patent application
for a "System of Electrical Distribution" was signed. It was filed in the
Patent Office a few days later, but was not issued as a patent until
August 30, 1887. It covered, fundamentally, multiple arc distribution, how
broadly will be understood from the following extracts from the New York
Electrical Review of September 10, 1887: "It would appear as if the entire
field of multiple distribution were now in the hands of the owners of this
patent.... The patent is about as broad as a patent can be, being
regardless of specific devices, and laying a powerful grasp on the
fundamental idea of multiple distribution from a number of generators
throughout a metallic circuit."</p>
<p>Mr. Edison made a number of other applications for patents on electrical
distribution during the year 1880. Among these was the one covering the
celebrated "Feeder" invention, which has been of very great commercial
importance in the art, its object being to obviate the "drop" in pressure,
rendering lights dim in those portions of an electric-light system that
were remote from the central station. [10]</p>
<p>[Footnote 10: For further explanation of "Feeder" patent,<br/>
see Appendix.]<br/></p>
<p>From these two patents alone, which were absolutely basic and fundamental
in effect, and both of which were, and still are, put into actual use
wherever central-station lighting is practiced, the reader will see that
Mr. Edison's patient and thorough study, aided by his keen foresight and
unerring judgment, had enabled him to grasp in advance with a master hand
the chief and underlying principles of a true system—that system
which has since been put into practical use all over the world, and whose
elements do not need the touch or change of more modern scientific
knowledge.</p>
<p>These patents were not by any means all that he applied for in the year
1880, which it will be remembered was the year in which he was perfecting
the incandescent electric lamp and methods, to put into the market for
competition with gas. It was an extraordinarily busy year for Mr. Edison
and his whole force, which from time to time was increased in number.
Improvement upon improvement was the order of the day. That which was
considered good to-day was superseded by something better and more
serviceable to-morrow. Device after device, relating to some part of the
entire system, was designed, built, and tried, only to be rejected
ruthlessly as being unsuitable; but the pursuit was not abandoned. It was
renewed over and over again in innumerable ways until success had been
attained.</p>
<p>During the year 1880 Edison had made application for sixty patents, of
which thirty-two were in relation to incandescent lamps; seven covered
inventions relating to distributing systems (including the two above
particularized); five had reference to inventions of parts, such as
motors, sockets, etc.; six covered inventions relating to dynamo-electric
machines; three related to electric railways, and seven to miscellaneous
apparatus, such as telegraph relays, magnetic ore separators, magneto
signalling apparatus, etc.</p>
<p>The list of Mr. Edison's patents (see Appendices) is not only a monument
to his life's work, but serves to show what subjects he has worked on from
year to year since 1868. The reader will see from an examination of this
list that the years 1880, 1881, 1882, and 1883 were the most prolific
periods of invention. It is worth while to scrutinize this list closely to
appreciate the wide range of his activities. Not that his patents cover
his entire range of work by any means, for his note-books reveal a great
number of major and minor inventions for which he has not seen fit to take
out patents. Moreover, at the period now described Edison was the victim
of a dishonest patent solicitor, who deprived him of a number of patents
in the following manner:</p>
<p>"Around 1881-82 I had several solicitors attending to different classes of
work. One of these did me a most serious injury. It was during the time
that I was developing my electric-lighting system, and I was working and
thinking very hard in order to cover all the numerous parts, in order that
it would be complete in every detail. I filed a great many applications
for patents at that time, but there were seventy-eight of the inventions I
made in that period that were entirely lost to me and my company by reason
of the dishonesty of this patent solicitor. Specifications had been drawn,
and I had signed and sworn to the application for patents for these
seventy-eight inventions, and naturally I supposed they had been filed in
the regular way.</p>
<p>"As time passed I was looking for some action of the Patent Office, as
usual, but none came. I thought it very strange, but had no suspicions
until I began to see my inventions recorded in the Patent Office Gazette
as being patented by others. Of course I ordered an investigation, and
found that the patent solicitor had drawn from the company the fees for
filing all these applications, but had never filed them. All the papers
had disappeared, however, and what he had evidently done was to sell them
to others, who had signed new applications and proceeded to take out
patents themselves on my inventions. I afterward found that he had been
previously mixed up with a somewhat similar crooked job in connection with
telephone patents.</p>
<p>"I am free to confess that the loss of these seventy-eight inventions has
left a sore spot in me that has never healed. They were important, useful,
and valuable, and represented a whole lot of tremendous work and mental
effort, and I had had a feeling of pride in having overcome through them a
great many serious obstacles, One of these inventions covered the
multipolar dynamo. It was an elaborated form of the type covered by my
patent No. 219,393 which had a ring armature. I modified and improved on
this form and had a number of pole pieces placed all around the ring, with
a modified form of armature winding. I built one of these machines and ran
it successfully in our early days at the Goerck Street shop.</p>
<p>"It is of no practical use to mention the man's name. I believe he is
dead, but he may have left a family. The occurrence is a matter of the old
Edison Company's records."</p>
<p>It will be seen from an examination of the list of patents in the Appendix
that Mr. Edison has continued year after year adding to his contributions
to the art of electric lighting, and in the last twenty-eight years—1880-1908—has
taken out no fewer than three hundred and seventy-five patents in this
branch of industry alone. These patents may be roughly tabulated as
follows:</p>
<p>Incandescent lamps and their manufacture....................149<br/>
Distributing systems and their control and regulation....... 77<br/>
Dynamo-electric machines and accessories....................106<br/>
Minor parts, such as sockets, switches, safety catches,<br/>
meters, underground conductors and parts, etc............... 43<br/></p>
<p>Quite naturally most of these patents cover inventions that are in the
nature of improvements or based upon devices which he had already created;
but there are a number that relate to inventions absolutely fundamental
and original in their nature. Some of these have already been alluded to;
but among the others there is one which is worthy of special mention in
connection with the present consideration of a complete system. This is
patent No. 274,290, applied for November 27, 1882, and is known as the
"Three-wire" patent. It is described more fully in the Appendix.</p>
<p>The great importance of the "Feeder" and "Three-wire" inventions will be
apparent when it is realized that without them it is a question whether
electric light could be sold to compete with low-priced gas, on account of
the large investment in conductors that would be necessary. If a large
city area were to be lighted from a central station by means of copper
conductors running directly therefrom to all parts of the district, it
would be necessary to install large conductors, or suffer such a drop of
pressure at the ends most remote from the station as to cause the lights
there to burn with a noticeable diminution of candle-power. The Feeder
invention overcame this trouble, and made it possible to use conductors
ONLY ONE-EIGHTH THE SIZE that would otherwise have been necessary to
produce the same results.</p>
<p>A still further economy in cost of conductors was effected by the
"Three-wire" invention, by the use of which the already diminished
conductors could be still further reduced TO ONE-THIRD of this smaller
size, and at the same time allow of the successful operation of the
station with far better results than if it were operated exactly as at
first conceived. The Feeder and Three-wire systems are at this day used in
all parts of the world, not only in central-station work, but in the
installation and operation of isolated electric-light plants in large
buildings. No sensible or efficient station manager or electric contractor
would ever think of an installation made upon any other plan. Thus Mr.
Edison's early conceptions of the necessities of a complete system, one of
them made even in advance of practice, have stood firm, unimproved, and
unchanged during the past twenty-eight years, a period of time which has
witnessed more wonderful and rapid progress in electrical science and art
than has been known during any similar art or period of time since the
world began.</p>
<p>It must be remembered that the complete system in all its parts is not
comprised in the few of Mr. Edison's patents, of which specific mention is
here made. In order to comprehend the magnitude and extent of his work and
the quality of his genius, it is necessary to examine minutely the list of
patents issued for the various elements which go to make up such a system.
To attempt any relation in detail of the conception and working-out of
each part or element; to enter into any description of the almost
innumerable experiments and investigations that were made would entail the
writing of several volumes, for Mr. Edison's close-written note-books
covering these subjects number nearly two hundred.</p>
<p>It is believed that enough evidence has been given in this chapter to lead
to an appreciation of the assiduous work and practical skill involved in
"inventing a system" of lighting that would surpass, and to a great
extent, in one single quarter of a century, supersede all the other
methods of illumination developed during long centuries. But it will be
appropriate before passing on to note that on January 17, 1908, while this
biography was being written, Mr. Edison became the fourth recipient of the
John Fritz gold medal for achievement in industrial progress. This medal
was founded in 1902 by the professional friends and associates of the
veteran American ironmaster and metallurgical inventor, in honor of his
eightieth birthday. Awards are made by a board of sixteen engineers
appointed in equal numbers from the four great national engineering
societies—the American Society of Civil Engineers, the American
Institute of Mining Engineers, the American Society of Mechanical
Engineers, and the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, whose
membership embraces the very pick and flower of professional engineering
talent in America. Up to the time of the Edison award, three others had
been made. The first was to Lord Kelvin, the Nestor of physics in Europe,
for his work in submarine-cable telegraphy and other scientific
achievement. The second was to George Westinghouse for the air-brake. The
third was to Alexander Graham Bell for the invention and introduction of
the telephone. The award to Edison was not only for his inventions in
duplex and quadruplex telegraphy, and for the phonograph, but for the
development of a commercially practical incandescent lamp, and the
development of a complete system of electric lighting, including dynamos,
regulating devices, underground system, protective devices, and meters.
Great as has been the genius brought to bear on electrical development,
there is no other man to whom such a comprehensive tribute could be paid.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />