<p><SPAN name="link2HCH0018" id="link2HCH0018"></SPAN></p>
<h2> CHAPTER XVIII </h2>
<h3> THE ELECTRIC RAILWAY </h3>
<p>EDISON had no sooner designed his dynamo in 1879 than he adopted the same
form of machine for use as a motor. The two are shown in the Scientific
American of October 18, 1879, and are alike, except that the dynamo is
vertical and the motor lies in a horizontal position, the article
remarking: "Its construction differs but slightly from the electric
generator." This was but an evidence of his early appreciation of the
importance of electricity as a motive power; but it will probably surprise
many people to know that he was the inventor of an electric motor before
he perfected his incandescent lamp. His interest in the subject went back
to his connection with General Lefferts in the days of the evolution of
the stock ticker. While Edison was carrying on his shop at Newark, New
Jersey, there was considerable excitement in electrical circles over the
Payne motor, in regard to the alleged performance of which Governor
Cornell of New York and other wealthy capitalists were quite enthusiastic.
Payne had a shop in Newark, and in one small room was the motor, weighing
perhaps six hundred pounds. It was of circular form, incased in iron, with
the ends of several small magnets sticking through the floor. A pulley and
belt, connected to a circular saw larger than the motor, permitted large
logs of oak timber to be sawed with ease with the use of two small cells
of battery. Edison's friend, General Lefferts, had become excited and was
determined to invest a large sum of money in the motor company, but
knowing Edison's intimate familiarity with all electrical subjects he was
wise enough to ask his young expert to go and see the motor with him. At
an appointed hour Edison went to the office of the motor company and found
there the venerable Professor Morse, Governor Cornell, General Lefferts,
and many others who had been invited to witness a performance of the
motor. They all proceeded to the room where the motor was at work. Payne
put a wire in the binding-post of the battery, the motor started, and an
assistant began sawing a heavy oak log. It worked beautifully, and so
great was the power developed, apparently, from the small battery, that
Morse exclaimed: "I am thankful that I have lived to see this day." But
Edison kept a close watch on the motor. The results were so foreign to his
experience that he knew there was a trick in it. He soon discovered it.
While holding his hand on the frame of the motor he noticed a tremble
coincident with the exhaust of an engine across the alleyway, and he then
knew that the power came from the engine by a belt under the floor,
shifted on and off by a magnet, the other magnets being a blind. He
whispered to the General to put his hand on the frame of the motor, watch
the exhaust, and note the coincident tremor. The General did so, and in
about fifteen seconds he said: "Well, Edison, I must go now. This thing is
a fraud." And thus he saved his money, although others not so shrewdly
advised were easily persuaded to invest by such a demonstration.</p>
<p>A few years later, in 1878, Edison went to Wyoming with a group of
astronomers, to test his tasimeter during an eclipse of the sun, and saw
the land white to harvest. He noticed the long hauls to market or elevator
that the farmers had to make with their loads of grain at great expense,
and conceived the idea that as ordinary steam-railroad service was too
costly, light electric railways might be constructed that could be
operated automatically over simple tracks, the propelling motors being
controlled at various points. Cheap to build and cheap to maintain, such
roads would be a great boon to the newer farming regions of the West,
where the highways were still of the crudest character, and where
transportation was the gravest difficulty with which the settlers had to
contend. The plan seems to have haunted him, and he had no sooner worked
out a generator and motor that owing to their low internal resistance
could be operated efficiently, than he turned his hand to the practical
trial of such a railroad, applicable to both the haulage of freight and
the transportation of passengers. Early in 1880, when the tremendous rush
of work involved in the invention of the incandescent lamp intermitted a
little, he began the construction of a stretch of track close to the Menlo
Park laboratory, and at the same time built an electric locomotive to
operate over it.</p>
<p>This is a fitting stage at which to review briefly what had been done in
electric traction up to that date. There was absolutely no art, but there
had been a number of sporadic and very interesting experiments made. The
honor of the first attempt of any kind appears to rest with this country
and with Thomas Davenport, a self-trained blacksmith, of Brandon, Vermont,
who made a small model of a circular electric railway and cars in 1834,
and exhibited it the following year in Springfield, Boston, and other
cities. Of course he depended upon batteries for current, but the
fundamental idea was embodied of using the track for the circuit, one rail
being positive and the other negative, and the motor being placed across
or between them in multiple arc to receive the current. Such are also
practically the methods of to-day. The little model was in good
preservation up to the year 1900, when, being shipped to the Paris
Exposition, it was lost, the steamer that carried it foundering in
mid-ocean. The very broad patent taken out by this simple mechanic, so far
ahead of his times, was the first one issued in America for an electric
motor. Davenport was also the first man to apply electric power to the
printing-press, in 1840. In his traction work he had a close second in
Robert Davidson, of Aberdeen, Scotland, who in 1839 operated both a lathe
and a small locomotive with the motor he had invented. His was the credit
of first actually carrying passengers—two at a time, over a rough
plank road—while it is said that his was the first motor to be tried
on real tracks, those of the Edinburgh-Glasgow road, making a speed of
four miles an hour.</p>
<p>The curse of this work and of all that succeeded it for a score of years
was the necessity of depending upon chemical batteries for current, the
machine usually being self-contained and hauling the batteries along with
itself, as in the case of the famous Page experiments in April, 1851, when
a speed of nineteen miles an hour was attained on the line of the
Washington & Baltimore road. To this unfruitful period belonged,
however, the crude idea of taking the current from a stationary source of
power by means of an overhead contact, which has found its practical
evolution in the modern ubiquitous trolley; although the patent for this,
based on his caveat of 1879, was granted several years later than that to
Stephen D. Field, for the combination of an electric motor operated by
means of a current from a stationary dynamo or source of electricity
conducted through the rails. As a matter of fact, in 1856 and again in
1875, George F. Green, a jobbing machinist, of Kalamazoo, Michigan, built
small cars and tracks to which current was fed from a distant battery,
enough energy being utilized to haul one hundred pounds of freight or one
passenger up and down a "road" two hundred feet long. All the work prior
to the development of the dynamo as a source of current was sporadic and
spasmodic, and cannot be said to have left any trace on the art, though it
offered many suggestions as to operative methods.</p>
<p>The close of the same decade of the nineteenth century that saw the
electric light brought to perfection, saw also the realization in practice
of all the hopes of fifty years as to electric traction. Both utilizations
depended upon the supply of current now cheaply obtainable from the
dynamo. These arts were indeed twins, feeding at inexhaustible breasts. In
1879, at the Berlin Exhibition, the distinguished firm of Siemens, to
whose ingenuity and enterprise electrical development owes so much,
installed a road about one-third of a mile in length, over which the
locomotive hauled a train of three small cars at a speed of about eight
miles an hour, carrying some twenty persons every trip. Current was fed
from a dynamo to the motor through a central third rail, the two outer
rails being joined together as the negative or return circuit. Primitive
but essentially successful, this little road made a profound impression on
the minds of many inventors and engineers, and marked the real beginning
of the great new era, which has already seen electricity applied to the
operation of main lines of trunk railways. But it is not to be supposed
that on the part of the public there was any great amount of faith then
discernible; and for some years the pioneers had great difficulty,
especially in this country, in raising money for their early modest
experiments. Of the general conditions at this moment Frank J. Sprague
says in an article in the Century Magazine of July, 1905, on the creation
of the new art: "Edison was perhaps nearer the verge of great
electric-railway possibilities than any other American. In the face of
much adverse criticism he had developed the essentials of the
low-internal-resistance dynamo with high-resistance field, and many of the
essential features of multiple-arc distribution, and in 1880 he built a
small road at his laboratory at Menlo Park."</p>
<p>On May 13th of the year named this interesting road went into operation as
the result of hard and hurried work of preparation during the spring
months. The first track was about a third of a mile in length, starting
from the shops, following a country road, passing around a hill at the
rear and curving home, in the general form of the letter "U." The rails
were very light. Charles T. Hughes, who went with Edison in 1879, and was
in charge of much of the work, states that they were "second" street-car
rails, insulated with tar canvas paper and things of that sort—"asphalt."
They were spiked down on ordinary sleepers laid upon the natural grade,
and the gauge was about three feet six inches. At one point the grade
dropped some sixty feet in a distance of three hundred, and the curves
were of recklessly short radius. The dynamos supplying current to the road
were originally two of the standard size "Z" machines then being made at
the laboratory, popularly known throughout the Edison ranks as
"Longwaisted Mary Anns," and the circuits from these were carried out to
the rails by underground conductors. They were not large—about
twelve horse-power each—generating seventy-five amperes of current
at one hundred and ten volts, so that not quite twenty-five horse-power of
electrical energy was available for propulsion.</p>
<p>The locomotive built while the roadbed was getting ready was a
four-wheeled iron truck, an ordinary flat dump-car about six feet long and
four feet wide, upon which was mounted a "Z" dynamo used as a motor, so
that it had a capacity of about twelve horsepower. This machine was laid
on its side, with the armature end coming out at the front of the
locomotive, and the motive power was applied to the driving-axle by a
cumbersome series of friction pulleys. Each wheel of the locomotive had a
metal rim and a centre web of wood or papier-mache, and the current picked
up by one set of wheels was carried through contact brushes and a brass
hub to the motor; the circuit back to the track, or other rail, being
closed through the other wheels in a similar manner. The motor had its
field-magnet circuit in permanent connection as a shunt across the rails,
protected by a crude bare copper-wire safety-catch. A switch in the
armature circuit enabled the motorman to reverse the direction of travel
by reversing the current flow through the armature coils.</p>
<p>Things went fairly well for a time on that memorable Thursday afternoon,
when all the laboratory force made high holiday and scrambled for foothold
on the locomotive for a trip; but the friction gearing was not equal to
the sudden strain put upon it during one run and went to pieces. Some
years later, also, Daft again tried friction gear in his historical
experiments on the Manhattan Elevated road, but the results were attended
with no greater success. The next resort of Edison was to belts, the
armature shafting belted to a countershaft on the locomotive frame, and
the countershaft belted to a pulley on the car-axle. The lever which threw
the former friction gear into adjustment was made to operate an idler
pulley for tightening the axle-belt. When the motor was started, the
armature was brought up to full revolution and then the belt was tightened
on the car-axle, compelling motion of the locomotive. But the belts were
liable to slip a great deal in the process, and the chafing of the belts
charred them badly. If that did not happen, and if the belt was made taut
suddenly, the armature burned out—which it did with disconcerting
frequency. The next step was to use a number of resistance-boxes in series
with the armature, so that the locomotive could start with those in
circuit, and then the motorman could bring it up to speed gradually by
cutting one box out after the other. To stop the locomotive, the armature
circuit was opened by the main switch, stopping the flow of current, and
then brakes were applied by long levers. Matters generally and the motors
in particular went much better, even if the locomotive was so freely
festooned with resistance-boxes all of perceptible weight and occupying
much of the limited space. These details show forcibly and typically the
painful steps of advance that every inventor in this new field had to make
in the effort to reach not alone commercial practicability, but mechanical
feasibility. It was all empirical enough; but that was the only way open
even to the highest talent.</p>
<p>Smugglers landing laces and silks have been known to wind them around
their bodies, as being less ostentatious than carrying them in a trunk.
Edison thought his resistance-boxes an equally superfluous display, and
therefore ingeniously wound some copper resistance wire around one of the
legs of the motor field magnet, where it was out of the way, served as a
useful extra field coil in starting up the motor, and dismissed most of
the boxes back to the laboratory—a few being retained under the seat
for chance emergencies. Like the boxes, this coil was in series with the
armature, and subject to plugging in and out at will by the motorman. Thus
equipped, the locomotive was found quite satisfactory, and long did yeoman
service. It was given three cars to pull, one an open awning-car with two
park benches placed back to back; one a flat freight-car, and one box-car
dubbed the "Pullman," with which Edison illustrated a system of electric
braking. Although work had been begun so early in the year, and the road
had been operating since May, it was not until July that Edison executed
any application for patents on his "electromagnetic railway engine," or
his ingenious braking system. Every inventor knows how largely his fate
lies in the hands of a competent and alert patent attorney, in both the
preparation and the prosecution of his case; and Mr. Sprague is justified
in observing in his Century article: "The paucity of controlling claims
obtained in these early patents is remarkable." It is notorious that
Edison did not then enjoy the skilful aid in safeguarding his ideas that
he commanded later.</p>
<p>The daily newspapers and technical journals lost no time in bringing the
road to public attention, and the New York Herald of June 25th was swift
to suggest that here was the locomotive that would be "most pleasing to
the average New Yorker, whose head has ached with noise, whose eyes have
been filled with dust, or whose clothes have been ruined with oil." A
couple of days later, the Daily Graphic illustrated and described the road
and published a sketch of a one-hundred-horse-power electric locomotive
for the use of the Pennsylvania Railroad between Perth Amboy and Rahway.
Visitors, of course, were numerous, including many curious, sceptical
railroad managers, few if any of whom except Villard could see the
slightest use for the new motive power. There is, perhaps, some excuse for
such indifference. No men in the world have more new inventions brought to
them than railroad managers, and this was the rankest kind of novelty. It
was not, indeed, until a year later, in May, 1881, that the first regular
road collecting fares was put in operation—a little stretch of one
and a half miles from Berlin to Lichterfelde, with one miniature motorcar.
Edison was in reality doing some heavy electric-railway engineering, his
apparatus full of ideas, suggestions, prophecies; but to the operators of
long trunk lines it must have seemed utterly insignificant and "excellent
fooling."</p>
<p>Speaking of this situation, Mr. Edison says: "One day Frank Thomson, the
President of the Pennsylvania Railroad, came out to see the electric light
and the electric railway in operation. The latter was then about a mile
long. He rode on it. At that time I was getting out plans to make an
electric locomotive of three hundred horse-power with six-foot drivers,
with the idea of showing people that they could dispense with their steam
locomotives. Mr. Thomson made the objection that it was impracticable, and
that it would be impossible to supplant steam. His great experience and
standing threw a wet blanket on my hopes. But I thought he might perhaps
be mistaken, as there had been many such instances on record. I continued
to work on the plans, and about three years later I started to build the
locomotive at the works at Goerck Street, and had it about finished when I
was switched off on some other work. One of the reasons why I felt the
electric railway to be eminently practical was that Henry Villard, the
President of the Northern Pacific, said that one of the greatest things
that could be done would be to build right-angle feeders into the
wheat-fields of Dakota and bring in the wheat to the main lines, as the
farmers then had to draw it from forty to eighty miles. There was a point
where it would not pay to raise it at all; and large areas of the country
were thus of no value. I conceived the idea of building a very light
railroad of narrow gauge, and had got all the data as to the winds on the
plains, and found that it would be possible with very large windmills to
supply enough power to drive those wheat trains."</p>
<p>Among others who visited the little road at this juncture were persons
interested in the Manhattan Elevated system of New York, on which
experiments were repeatedly tried later, but which was not destined to
adopt a method so obviously well suited to all the conditions until after
many successful demonstrations had been made on elevated roads elsewhere.
It must be admitted that Mr. Edison was not very profoundly impressed with
the desire entertained in that quarter to utilize any improvement, for he
remarks: "When the Elevated Railroad in New York, up Sixth Avenue, was
started there was a great clamor about the noise, and injunctions were
threatened. The management engaged me to make a report on the cause of the
noise. I constructed an instrument that would record the sound, and set
out to make a preliminary report, but I found that they never intended to
do anything but let the people complain."</p>
<p>It was upon the co-operation of Villard that Edison fell back, and an
agreement was entered into between them on September 14, 1881, which
provided that the latter would "build two and a half miles of electric
railway at Menlo Park, equipped with three cars, two locomotives, one for
freight, and one for passengers, capacity of latter sixty miles an hour.
Capacity freight engine, ten tons net freight; cost of handling a ton of
freight per mile per horse-power to be less than ordinary locomotive....
If experiments are successful, Villard to pay actual outlay in
experiments, and to treat with the Light Company for the installation of
at least fifty miles of electric railroad in the wheat regions." Mr.
Edison is authority for the statement that Mr. Villard advanced between
$35,000 and $40,000, and that the work done was very satisfactory; but it
did not end at that time in any practical results, as the Northern Pacific
went into the hands of a receiver, and Mr. Villard's ability to help was
hopelessly crippled. The directors of the Edison Electric Light Company
could not be induced to have anything to do with the electric railway, and
Mr. Insull states that the money advanced was treated by Mr. Edison as a
personal loan and repaid to Mr. Villard, for whom he had a high admiration
and a strong feeling of attachment. Mr. Insull says: "Among the financial
men whose close personal friendship Edison enjoyed, I would mention Henry
Villard, who, I think, had a higher appreciation of the possibilities of
the Edison system than probably any other man of his time in Wall Street.
He dropped out of the business at the time of the consolidation of the
Thomson-Houston Company with the Edison General Electric Company; but from
the earliest days of the business, when it was in its experimental period,
when the Edison light and power system was but an idea, down to the day of
his death, Henry Villard continued a strong supporter not only with his
influence, but with his money. He was the first capitalist to back
individually Edison's experiments in electric railways."</p>
<p>In speaking of his relationships with Mr. Villard at this time, Edison
says: "When Villard was all broken down, and in a stupor caused by his
disasters in connection with the Northern Pacific, Mrs. Villard sent for
me to come and cheer him up. It was very difficult to rouse him from his
despair and apathy, but I talked about the electric light to him, and its
development, and told him that it would help him win it all back and put
him in his former position. Villard made his great rally; he made money
out of the electric light; and he got back control of the Northern
Pacific. Under no circumstances can a hustler be kept down. If he is only
square, he is bound to get back on his feet. Villard has often been blamed
and severely criticised, but he was not the only one to blame. His
engineers had spent $20,000,000 too much in building the road, and it was
not his fault if he found himself short of money, and at that time unable
to raise any more."</p>
<p>Villard maintained his intelligent interest in electric-railway
development, with regard to which Edison remarks: "At one time Mr. Villard
got the idea that he would run the mountain division of the Northern
Pacific Railroad by electricity. He asked me if it could be done. I said:
'Certainly, it is too easy for me to undertake; let some one else do it.'
He said: 'I want you to tackle the problem,' and he insisted on it. So I
got up a scheme of a third rail and shoe and erected it in my yard here in
Orange. When I got it all ready, he had all his division engineers come on
to New York, and they came over here. I showed them my plans, and the
unanimous decision of the engineers was that it was absolutely and utterly
impracticable. That system is on the New York Central now, and was also
used on the New Haven road in its first work with electricity."</p>
<p>At this point it may be well to cite some other statements of Edison as to
kindred work, with which he has not usually been associated in the public
mind. "In the same manner I had worked out for the Manhattan Elevated
Railroad a system of electric trains, and had the control of each car
centred at one place—multiple control. This was afterward worked out
and made practical by Frank Sprague. I got up a slot contact for street
railways, and have a patent on it—a sliding contact in a slot.
Edward Lauterbach was connected with the Third Avenue Railroad in New York—as
counsel—and I told him he was making a horrible mistake putting in
the cable. I told him to let the cable stand still and send electricity
through it, and he would not have to move hundreds of tons of metal all
the time. He would rue the day when he put the cable in." It cannot be
denied that the prophecy was fulfilled, for the cable was the beginning of
the frightful financial collapse of the system, and was torn out in a few
years to make way for the triumphant "trolley in the slot."</p>
<p>Incidental glimpses of this work are both amusing and interesting. Hughes,
who was working on the experimental road with Mr. Edison, tells the
following story: "Villard sent J. C. Henderson, one of his mechanical
engineers, to see the road when it was in operation, and we went down one
day—Edison, Henderson, and I—and went on the locomotive.
Edison ran it, and just after we started there was a trestle sixty feet
long and seven feet deep, and Edison put on all the power. When we went
over it we must have been going forty miles an hour, and I could see the
perspiration come out on Henderson. After we got over the trestle and
started on down the track, Henderson said: 'When we go back I will walk.
If there is any more of that kind of running I won't be in it myself.'" To
the correspondence of Grosvenor P. Lowrey we are indebted for a similar
reminiscence, under date of June 5, 1880: "Goddard and I have spent a part
of the day at Menlo, and all is glorious. I have ridden at forty miles an
hour on Mr. Edison's electric railway—and we ran off the track. I
protested at the rate of speed over the sharp curves, designed to show the
power of the engine, but Edison said they had done it often. Finally, when
the last trip was to be taken, I said I did not like it, but would go
along. The train jumped the track on a short curve, throwing Kruesi, who
was driving the engine, with his face down in the dirt, and another man in
a comical somersault through some underbrush. Edison was off in a minute,
jumping and laughing, and declaring it a most beautiful accident. Kruesi
got up, his face bleeding and a good deal shaken; and I shall never forget
the expression of voice and face in which he said, with some foreign
accent: 'Oh! yes, pairfeckly safe.' Fortunately no other hurts were
suffered, and in a few minutes we had the train on the track and running
again."</p>
<p>All this rough-and-ready dealing with grades and curves was not mere
horse-play, but had a serious purpose underlying it, every trip having its
record as to some feature of defect or improvement. One particular set of
experiments relating to such work was made on behalf of visitors from
South America, and were doubtless the first tests of the kind made for
that continent, where now many fine electric street and interurban railway
systems are in operation. Mr. Edison himself supplies the following data:
"During the electric-railway experiments at Menlo Park, we had a short
spur of track up one of the steep gullies. The experiment came about in
this way. Bogota, the capital of Columbia, is reached on muleback—or
was—from Honda on the headwaters of the Magdalena River. There were
parties who wanted to know if transportation over the mule route could not
be done by electricity. They said the grades were excessive, and it would
cost too much to do it with steam locomotives, even if they could climb
the grades. I said: 'Well, it can't be much more than 45 per cent.; we
will try that first. If it will do that it will do anything else.' I
started at 45 per cent. I got up an electric locomotive with a grip on the
rail by which it went up the 45 per cent. grade. Then they said the curves
were very short. I put the curves in. We started the locomotive with
nobody on it, and got up to twenty miles an hour, taking those curves of
very short radius; but it was weeks before we could prevent it from
running off. We had to bank the tracks up to an angle of thirty degrees
before we could turn the curve and stay on. These Spanish parties were
perfectly satisfied we could put in an electric railway from Honda to
Bogota successfully, and then they disappeared. I have never seen them
since. As usual, I paid for the experiment."</p>
<p>In the spring of 1883 the Electric Railway Company of America was
incorporated in the State of New York with a capital of $2,000,000 to
develop the patents and inventions of Edison and Stephen D. Field, to the
latter of whom the practical work of active development was confided, and
in June of the same year an exhibit was made at the Chicago Railway
Exposition, which attracted attention throughout the country, and did much
to stimulate the growing interest in electric-railway work. With the aid
of Messrs. F. B. Rae, C. L. Healy, and C. O. Mailloux a track and
locomotive were constructed for the company by Mr. Field and put in
service in the gallery of the main exhibition building. The track curved
sharply at either end on a radius of fifty-six feet, and the length was
about one-third of a mile. The locomotive named "The Judge," after Justice
Field, an uncle of Stephen D. Field, took current from a central rail
between the two outer rails, that were the return circuit, the contact
being a rubbing wire brush on each side of the "third rail," answering the
same purpose as the contact shoe of later date. The locomotive weighed
three tons, was twelve feet long, five feet wide, and made a speed of nine
miles an hour with a trailer car for passengers. Starting on June 5th,
when the exhibition closed on June 23d this tiny but typical road had
operated for over 118 hours, had made over 446 miles, and had carried
26,805 passengers. After the exposition closed the outfit was taken during
the same year to the exposition at Louisville, Kentucky, where it was also
successful, carrying a large number of passengers. It deserves note that
at Chicago regular railway tickets were issued to paying passengers, the
first ever employed on American electric railways.</p>
<p>With this modest but brilliant demonstration, to which the illustrious
names of Edison and Field were attached, began the outburst of excitement
over electric railways, very much like the eras of speculation and
exploitation that attended only a few years earlier the introduction of
the telephone and the electric light, but with such significant results
that the capitalization of electric roads in America is now over
$4,000,000,000, or twice as much as that of the other two arts combined.
There was a tremendous rush into the electric-railway field after 1883,
and an outburst of inventive activity that has rarely, if ever, been
equalled. It is remarkable that, except Siemens, no European achieved fame
in this early work, while from America the ideas and appliances of Edison,
Van Depoele, Sprague, Field, Daft, and Short have been carried and adopted
all over the world.</p>
<p>Mr. Edison was consulting electrician for the Electric Railway Company,
but neither a director nor an executive officer. Just what the trouble was
as to the internal management of the corporation it is hard to determine a
quarter of a century later; but it was equipped with all essential
elements to dominate an art in which after its first efforts it remained
practically supine and useless, while other interests forged ahead and
reaped both the profit and the glory. Dissensions arose between the
representatives of the Field and Edison interests, and in April, 1890, the
Railway Company assigned its rights to the Edison patents to the Edison
General Electric Company, recently formed by the consolidation of all the
branches of the Edison light, power, and manufacturing industry under one
management. The only patent rights remaining to the Railway Company were
those under three Field patents, one of which, with controlling claims,
was put in suit June, 1890, against the Jamaica & Brooklyn Road
Company, a customer of the Edison General Electric Company. This was, to
say the least, a curious and anomalous situation. Voluminous records were
made by both parties to the suit, and in the spring of 1894 the case was
argued before the late Judge Townsend, who wrote a long opinion dismissing
the bill of complaint. [15] The student will find therein a very complete
and careful study of the early electric-railway art. After this decision
was rendered, the Electric Railway Company remained for several years in a
moribund condition, and on the last day of 1896 its property was placed in
the hands of a receiver. In February of 1897 the receiver sold the three
Field patents to their original owner, and he in turn sold them to the
Westinghouse Electric and Manufacturing Company. The Railway Company then
went into voluntary dissolution, a sad example of failure to seize the
opportunity at the psychological moment, and on the part of the inventor
to secure any adequate return for years of effort and struggle in founding
one of the great arts. Neither of these men was squelched by such a
calamitous result, but if there were not something of bitterness in their
feelings as they survey what has come of their work, they would not be
human.</p>
<p>As a matter of fact, Edison retained a very lively interest in
electric-railway progress long after the pregnant days at Menlo Park, one
of the best evidences of which is an article in the New York Electrical
Engineer of November 18, 1891, which describes some important and original
experiments in the direction of adapting electrical conditions to the
larger cities. The overhead trolley had by that time begun its victorious
career, but there was intense hostility displayed toward it in many places
because of the inevitable increase in the number of overhead wires, which,
carrying, as they did, a current of high voltage and large quantity, were
regarded as a menace to life and property. Edison has always manifested a
strong objection to overhead wires in cities, and urged placing them
underground; and the outcry against the overhead "deadly" trolley met with
his instant sympathy. His study of the problem brought him to the
development of the modern "substation," although the twists that later
evolutions have given the idea have left it scarcely recognizable.</p>
<p>[Footnote 15: See 61 Fed. Rep. 655.]<br/></p>
<p>Mr. Villard, as President of the Edison General Electric Company,
requested Mr. Edison, as electrician of the company, to devise a
street-railway system which should be applicable to the largest cities
where the use of the trolley would not be permitted, where the slot
conduit system would not be used, and where, in general, the details of
construction should be reduced to the simplest form. The limits imposed
practically were such as to require that the system should not cost more
than a cable road to install. Edison reverted to his ingenious lighting
plan of years earlier, and thus settled on a method by which current
should be conveyed from the power plant at high potential to
motor-generators placed below the ground in close proximity to the rails.
These substations would convert the current received at a pressure of,
say, one thousand volts to one of twenty volts available between rail and
rail, with a corresponding increase in the volume of the current. With the
utilization of heavy currents at low voltage it became necessary, of
course, to devise apparatus which should be able to pick up with absolute
certainty one thousand amperes of current at this pressure through two
inches of mud, if necessary. With his wonted activity and fertility Edison
set about devising such a contact, and experimented with metal wheels
under all conditions of speed and track conditions. It was several months
before he could convey one hundred amperes by means of such contacts, but
he worked out at last a satisfactory device which was equal to the task.
The next point was to secure a joint between contiguous rails such as
would permit of the passage of several thousand amperes without
introducing undue resistance. This was also accomplished.</p>
<p>Objections were naturally made to rails out in the open on the street
surface carrying large currents at a potential of twenty volts. It was
said that vehicles with iron wheels passing over the tracks and spanning
the two rails would short-circuit the current, "chew" themselves up, and
destroy the dynamos generating the current by choking all that tremendous
amount of energy back into them. Edison tackled the objection squarely and
short-circuited his track with such a vehicle, but succeeded in getting
only about two hundred amperes through the wheels, the low voltage and the
insulating properties of the axle-grease being sufficient to account for
such a result. An iron bar was also used, polished, and with a man
standing on it to insure solid contact; but only one thousand amperes
passed through it—i.e., the amount required by a single car, and, of
course, much less than the capacity of the generators able to operate a
system of several hundred cars.</p>
<p>Further interesting experiments showed that the expected large leakage of
current from the rails in wet weather did not materialize. Edison found
that under the worst conditions with a wet and salted track, at a
potential difference of twenty volts between the two rails, the extreme
loss was only two and one-half horse-power. In this respect the phenomenon
followed the same rule as that to which telegraph wires are subject—namely,
that the loss of insulation is greater in damp, murky weather when the
insulators are covered with wet dust than during heavy rains when the
insulators are thoroughly washed by the action of the water. In like
manner a heavy rain-storm cleaned the tracks from the accumulations due
chiefly to the droppings of the horses, which otherwise served largely to
increase the conductivity. Of course, in dry weather the loss of current
was practically nothing, and, under ordinary conditions, Edison held, his
system was in respect to leakage and the problems of electrolytic attack
of the current on adjacent pipes, etc., as fully insulated as the standard
trolley network of the day. The cost of his system Mr. Edison placed at
from $30,000 to $100,000 per mile of double track, in accordance with
local conditions, and in this respect comparing very favorably with the
cable systems then so much in favor for heavy traffic. All the arguments
that could be urged in support of this ingenious system are tenable and
logical at the present moment; but the trolley had its way except on a few
lines where the conduit-and-shoe method was adopted; and in the
intervening years the volume of traffic created and handled by electricity
in centres of dense population has brought into existence the modern
subway.</p>
<p>But down to the moment of the preparation of this biography, Edison has
retained an active interest in transportation problems, and his latest
work has been that of reviving the use of the storage battery for
street-car purposes. At one time there were a number of storage-battery
lines and cars in operation in such cities as Washington, New York,
Chicago, and Boston; but the costs of operation and maintenance were found
to be inordinately high as compared with those of the direct-supply
methods, and the battery cars all disappeared. The need for them under
many conditions remained, as, for example, in places in Greater New York
where the overhead trolley wires are forbidden as objectionable, and where
the ground is too wet or too often submerged to permit of the conduit with
the slot. Some of the roads in Greater New York have been anxious to
secure such cars, and, as usual, the most resourceful electrical engineer
and inventor of his times has made the effort. A special experimental
track has been laid at the Orange laboratory, and a car equipped with the
Edison storage battery and other devices has been put under severe and
extended trial there and in New York.</p>
<p>Menlo Park, in ruin and decay, affords no traces of the early Edison
electric-railway work, but the crude little locomotive built by Charles T.
Hughes was rescued from destruction, and has become the property of the
Pratt Institute, of Brooklyn, to whose thousands of technical students it
is a constant example and incentive. It was loaned in 1904 to the
Association of Edison Illuminating Companies, and by it exhibited as part
of the historical Edison collection at the St. Louis Exposition.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />