<p><SPAN name="link2H_4_0050" id="link2H_4_0050"></SPAN></p>
<h2> XVII. THE LONG CEMENT KILN </h2>
<p>IN this remarkable invention, which has brought about a striking
innovation in a long-established business, we see another characteristic
instance of Edison's incisive reasoning and boldness of conception carried
into practical effect in face of universal opinions to the contrary.</p>
<p>For the information of those unacquainted with the process of
manufacturing Portland cement, it may be stated that the material consists
preliminarily of an intimate mixture of cement rock and limestone, ground
to a very fine powder. This powder is technically known in the trade as
"chalk," and is fed into rotary kilns and "burned"; that is to say, it is
subjected to a high degree of heat obtained by the combustion of
pulverized coal, which is injected into the interior of the kiln. This
combustion effects a chemical decomposition of the chalk, and causes it to
assume a plastic consistency and to collect together in the form of small
spherical balls, which are known as "clinker." Kilns are usually arranged
with a slight incline, at the upper end of which the chalk is fed in and
gradually works its way down to the interior flame of burning fuel at the
other end. When it arrives at the lower end, the material has been
"burned," and the clinker drops out into a receiving chamber below. The
operation is continuous, a constant supply of chalk passing in at one end
of the kiln and a continuous dribble of clinker-balls dropping out at the
other. After cooling, the clinker is ground into very fine powder, which
is the Portland cement of commerce.</p>
<p>It is self-evident that an ideal kiln would be one that produced the
maximum quantity of thoroughly clinkered material with a minimum amount of
fuel, labor, and investment. When Edison was preparing to go into the
cement business, he looked the ground over thoroughly, and, after
considerable investigation and experiment, came to the conclusion that
prevailing conditions as to kilns were far from ideal.</p>
<p>The standard kilns then in use were about sixty feet in length, with an
internal diameter of about five feet. In all rotary kilns for burning
cement, the true clinkering operation takes place only within a limited
portion of their total length, where the heat is greatest; hence the
interior of the kiln may be considered as being divided longitudinally
into two parts or zones—namely, the combustion, or clinkering, zone,
and the zone of oncoming raw material. In the sixty-foot kiln the length
of the combustion zone was about ten feet, extending from a point six or
eight feet from the lower, or discharge, end to a point about eighteen
feet from that end. Consequently, beyond that point there was a zone of
only about forty feet, through which the heated gases passed and came in
contact with the oncoming material, which was in movement down toward the
clinkering zone. Since the bulk of oncoming material was small, the gases
were not called upon to part with much of their heat, and therefore passed
on up the stack at very high temperatures, ranging from 1500 degrees to
1800 degrees Fahr. Obviously, this heat was entirely lost.</p>
<p>An additional loss of efficiency arose from the fact that the material
moved so rapidly toward the combustion zone that it had not given up all
its carbon dioxide on reaching there; and by the giving off of large
quantities of that gas within the combustion zone, perfect and economical
combustion of coal could not be effected.</p>
<p>The comparatively short length of the sixty-foot kiln not only limited the
amount of material that could be fed into it, but the limitation in length
of the combustion zone militated against a thorough clinkering of the
material, this operation being one in which the elements of time and
proper heat are prime considerations. Thus the quantity of good clinker
obtainable was unfavorably affected. By reason of these and other
limitations and losses, it had been possible, in practice, to obtain only
about two hundred and fifty barrels of clinker per day of twenty-four
hours; and that with an expenditure for coal proportionately equal to
about 29 to 33 per cent. of the quantity of clinker produced, even
assuming that all the clinker was of good quality.</p>
<p>Edison realized that the secret of greater commercial efficiency and
improvement of quality lay in the ability to handle larger quantities of
material within a given time, and to produce a more perfect product
without increasing cost or investment in proportion. His reasoning led him
to the conclusion that this result could only be obtained through the use
of a kiln of comparatively great length, and his investigations and
experiments enabled him to decide upon a length of one hundred and fifty
feet, but with an increase in diameter of only six inches to a foot over
that of the sixty-foot kiln.</p>
<p>The principal considerations that influenced Edison in making this radical
innovation may be briefly stated as follows:</p>
<p>First. The ability to maintain in the kiln a load from five to seven times
greater than ordinarily employed, thereby tending to a more economical
output.</p>
<p>Second. The combustion of a vastly increased bulk of pulverized coal and a
greatly enlarged combustion zone, extending about forty feet
longitudinally into the kiln—thus providing an area within which the
material might be maintained in a clinkering temperature for a
sufficiently long period to insure its being thoroughly clinkered from
periphery to centre.</p>
<p>Third. By reason of such a greatly extended length of the zone of oncoming
material (and consequently much greater bulk), the gases and other
products of combustion would be cooled sufficiently between the combustion
zone and the stack so as to leave the kiln at a comparatively low
temperature. Besides, the oncoming material would thus be gradually raised
in temperature instead of being heated abruptly, as in the shorter kilns.</p>
<p>Fourth. The material having thus been greatly raised in temperature before
reaching the combustion zone would have parted with substantially all its
carbon dioxide, and therefore would not introduce into the combustion zone
sufficient of that gas to disturb the perfect character of the combustion.</p>
<p>Fifth. On account of the great weight of the heavy load in a long kiln,
there would result the formation of a continuous plastic coating on that
portion of the inner surface of the kiln where temperatures are highest.
This would effectively protect the fire-brick lining from the destructive
effects of the heat.</p>
<p>Such, in brief, were the essential principles upon which Edison based his
conception and invention of the long kiln, which has since become so well
known in the cement business.</p>
<p>Many other considerations of a minor and mechanical nature, but which were
important factors in his solution of this difficult problem, are worthy of
study by those intimately associated with or interested in the art. Not
the least of the mechanical questions was settled by Edison's decision to
make this tremendously long kiln in sections of cast-iron, with flanges,
bolted together, and supported on rollers rotated by electric motors.
Longitudinal expansion and thrust were also important factors to be
provided for, as well as special devices to prevent the packing of the
mass of material as it passed in and out of the kiln. Special provision
was also made for injecting streams of pulverized coal in such manner as
to create the largely extended zone of combustion. As to the details of
these and many other ingenious devices, we must refer the curious reader
to the patents, as it is merely intended in these pages to indicate in a
brief manner the main principles of Edison's notable inventions. The
principal United States patent on the long kiln was issued October 24,
1905, No. 802,631.</p>
<p>That his reasonings and deductions were correct in this case have been
indubitably proven by some years of experience with the long kiln in its
ability to produce from eight hundred to one thousand barrels of good
clinker every twenty-four hours, with an expenditure for coal
proportionately equal to about only 20 per cent. of the quantity of
clinker produced.</p>
<p>To illustrate the long cement kiln by diagram would convey but little to
the lay mind, and we therefore present an illustration (Fig. 1) of actual
kilns in perspective, from which sense of their proportions may be
gathered.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />