<SPAN name="startofbook"></SPAN>
<h1>The Flying Saucers are Real</h1>
<h2 class="no-break">by Donald E. Keyhoe</h2>
<h2>Author’s Note</h2>
<p>ON APRIL 27, 1949, the U.S. Air Force stated:</p>
<p><i>“The mere existence of some yet unidentified flying objects
necessitates a constant vigilance on the part of Project ‘Saucer’
personnel, and on the part of the civilian population.</i></p>
<p><i>“Answers have been—and will be—drawn from such factors as
guided missile research activity, balloons, astronomical phenomena. . . . But
there are still question marks.</i></p>
<p><i>“Possibilities that the saucers are foreign aircraft have also been
considered. . . . But observations based on nuclear power plant research in
this country label as ‘highly improbable’ the existence on Earth of
engines small enough to have Powered the saucers.</i></p>
<p><i>“Intelligent life on Mars . . . is not impossible but is completely
unproven. The possibility of intelligent life on the Planet Venus is not
considered completely unreasonable by astronomers.</i></p>
<p><i>“The saucers are not jokes. Neither are they cause for
alarm.”</i></p>
<p>On December 27, 1949, the Air Force denied the existence of flying
saucers.</p>
<p>On December 30, 1949, the Air Force revealed part of a secret Project
“Saucer” report to members of the press at Washington. The official
report stated:</p>
<p>“It will never be possible to say with certainty that any individual did
not see a space ship, an enemy missile, or some other object.”</p>
<p>Discussing the motives of possible visitors from space, the report also stated:</p>
<p>“Such a civilization might observe that on Earth we now have atomic bombs
and are fast developing rockets. In view of the past history of mankind, they
should be alarmed. We should therefore expect at this time above all to behold
such visitations.”</p>
<p>(In its April 22 report, Project “Saucer” stated that space travel
outside the solar system is almost a certainty.)</p>
<p>On February 22, 1950, the Air Force again denied the existence of flying
saucers. On this same date, two saucers reported above Key West Naval Air
Station were tracked by radar; they were described as maneuvering at high speed
fifty miles above the earth. The Air Force refused to comment.</p>
<p>On March 9, 1950, a large metallic disk was pursued by F-51 and jet fighters
and observed by scores of Air Force officers at Wright Field, Ohio. On March
18, an Air Force spokesman again denied that saucers exist and specifically
stated that they were not American guided missiles or space-exploration
devices.</p>
<p>I have carefully examined all Air Force saucer reports made in the last three
years. For the past year, I have taken part in a special investigation of the
flying-saucer riddle.</p>
<p>I believe that the Air Force statements, contradictory as they appear, are part
of an intricate program to prepare America—and the world—for the
secret of the disks.</p>
<h2><SPAN name="chap01"></SPAN>CHAPTER I</h2>
<p>It was a strange assignment.</p>
<p>I picked up the telegram from my desk and read it a third time.</p>
<p>NEW YORK, N. Y., MAY 9, 1949</p>
<p>HAVE BEEN INVESTIGATING FLYING SAUCER MYSTERY. FIRST TIP HINTED GIGANTIC HOAX
TO COVER UP OFFICIAL SECRET. BELIEVE IT MAY HAVE BEEN PLANTED TO HIDE REAL
ANSWER. LOOKS LIKE TERRIFIC STORY. CAN YOU TAKE OVER WASHINGTON END?</p>
<p>KEN W. PURDY, EDITOR, TRUE MAGAZINE</p>
<p>I glanced out at the Potomac, recalling the first saucer story. As a pilot,
I’d been skeptical of flying disks. Then reports had begun to pour in
from Air Force and airline pilots. Apparently alarmed, the Air Force had
ordered fighters to pursue the fast-flying saucers. In one mysterious chase, a
pilot had been killed, and his death was unexplained. That had been seventeen
months ago. Since then, the whole flying-saucer riddle had been hidden behind a
curtain of Air Force secrecy.</p>
<p>And now, an assignment from True magazine on flying saucers.</p>
<p>Twenty-four hours later, I was in Ken Purdy’s office.</p>
<p>“I’ve had men on this for two months,” he told me. “I
might as well warn you, it’s a tough story to crack.”</p>
<p>“You think it’s a Russian missile?” I asked him. “Or an
Air Force secret?”</p>
<p>“We’ve had several answers. None of them stacks up. But I’m
positive one was deliberately planted when they found we were checking.”</p>
<p>He told me the whole story of the work that had been done by the staff of True
and of the reports sent in by competent writers. The deeper he delved into the
mystery, the tougher the assignment got. The more I learned about flying
saucers, the less I knew.</p>
<p>“There’s one angle I want rechecked,” Purdy said.</p>
<p>“You’ve heard of the Mantell case?”</p>
<p>I nodded.</p>
<p>“O.K. Try to get the details of Mantell’s radio report to Godman
Tower. Before he was killed, he described the thing he was chasing—we
know that much. Project ‘Saucer’ gave out a hint, but they’ve
never released the transcript. Here’s another lead. See if you can find
anything about a secret picture, taken at Harmon Field, Newfoundland—it
was around July 1947. I’ll send you other ideas as I get them.”</p>
<p>Before I left, Purdy wished me hick and told me that he would work in closest
harmony with me.</p>
<p>“But watch out for fake tips,” he said. “You’ll
probably run into some people at the Pentagon who’ll talk to you
‘off the record.’ That handcuffs a writer. Look out they
don’t lead you into a blind alley. Even the Air Force statements and the
Project ‘Saucer’ report contradict each other.”</p>
<p>For six months, I worked with other investigators to solve the mystery of the
disks. We checked a hundred sighting reports, frequently crossing the trail of
Project “Saucer” teams and F.B.I. agents. Old records gave
fantastic leads. So did Air Force plans for exploring space. Rocket experts,
astronomers, Air Force officials and pilot gave us clues pointing to a
startling solution. Many intelligent persons—including
scientists—believe that the saucers contain spies from another planet.</p>
<p>When this first phase was ended, we were faced with a hard decision. We had
uncovered important facts, We knew the saucers were real. If it was handled
carefully, we believed the story would be in line with a secret Air Force
policy.</p>
<p>It was finally decided to publish certain alternate conclusions. The Air Force
was informed of <i>True’s</i> intentions; no attempt was made to block
publication.</p>
<p>In the January 1950 issue of <i>True</i>, I reported that we had reached the
following conclusions:</p>
<p>1 The earth has been observed periodically by visitors from another planet.</p>
<p>2. This observation has increased markedly in the past two years.</p>
<p>“The only other possible explanation,” I wrote, “is that, the
saucers are extremely high-speed, long-range devices developed here on earth.
Such an advance (which the Air Force has denied) would require an almost
incredible leap in technical progress even for American scientists and
designers.”</p>
<p>Nation-wide press and radio comment followed the appearance of the article.
This publicity was obviously greater than the Air Force had expected. Within
twenty-four hours the Pentagon was deluged with telegrams, letters, and
long-distance calls. Apparently fearing a panic, the Air Force hastily stated
that flying-saucer reports—even those made by its own pilots and
high-ranking officers—were mistakes or were caused by
hysteria.<SPAN href="#fn3" name="fnref3"><sup>[3]</sup></SPAN></p>
<p class="footnote">
<SPAN name="fn3"></SPAN> <SPAN href="#fnref3">[3]</SPAN>
Air Force press release 629-49, December 27, 1949.</p>
<p>But three days later, when it was plain that many Americans calmly accepted
<i>True’s</i> disclosures, the Air Force released a secret project
“Saucer” file containing this significant statement:</p>
<p>“It will never be possible to say with certainty that any individual did
not see a space ship, an enemy missile or other object.”</p>
<p>In this same document there appears a confidential analysis of Air intelligence
reports.<SPAN href="#fn4" name="fnref4"><sup>[4]</sup></SPAN> It is this summary that
contains the official suggestion Of. space visitors’ motives. After
stating that such a civilization would obviously be far ahead of our own, the
report adds:</p>
<p class="footnote">
<SPAN name="fn4"></SPAN> <SPAN href="#fnref4">[4]</SPAN>
Air Force Project “Saucer” December 30, 1949.</p>
<p>“Since the acts of mankind most easily observed from a distance are
A-bomb explosions, we should expect some relation to obtain between the time of
the A-bomb explosions, the time at which the space ships are seen, and the time
required for such ships to arrive from and return to home base.”</p>
<p>(In a previous report, which alternately warned and reassured the public, the
Air Force stated that space travel outside the solar system is almost a
certainty.<SPAN href="#fn5" name="fnref5"><sup>[5]</sup></SPAN>)</p>
<p class="footnote">
<SPAN name="fn5"></SPAN> <SPAN href="#fnref5">[5]</SPAN>
Air Force report M-26-49, Preliminary Studies on Flying saucers, April 27,
1949.</p>
<p>Since 1949 there has been a steady increase in saucer sightings. Most of them
have been authentic reports, which Air Force denials cannot disprove. In
January, mystery disks were reported over Kentucky, Indiana, Texas,
Pennsylvania, and several other states. On the Seattle Anchorage route, an air
freighter was paced for five minutes by a night-flying saucer. When the pilots
tried to close in, the strange craft zoomed at terrific speed. Later, the
airline head reported that Intelligence officers had quizzed the pilots for
hours.</p>
<p>“From their questions,” he said, “I could tell they had a
good idea of what the saucers are. One officer admitted they did, but he
wouldn’t say any more.”</p>
<p>Another peculiar incident occurred at Tucson, Arizona, on February 1. Just at
dusk, a weird, fiery object raced westward over the city, astonishing hundreds
in the streets below. The Tucson Daily Citizen ran the story next day with a
double-banner headline:</p>
<p>FLYING SAUCER OVER TUCSON?</p>
<p>B-29 FAILS TO CATCH OBJECT</p>
<div style="margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%;">
<p>Flying saucer? Secret experimental plane? Or perhaps a scout craft from Mars?
Certainly the strange aircraft that blazed a smoke trail over Tucson at dusk
last night defies logical explanation. It was as mystifying to experienced
pilots as to groundlings who have trouble in identifying conventional planes.</p>
<p>Cannonballing through the sky, some 30,000 feet aloft, was a fiery object
shooting westward so fast it was impossible to gain any clear impression of its
shape or size. . . .</p>
<p>At what must have been top speed the object spewed out light colored smoke, but
almost directly over Tucson it appeared to hover for a few seconds. The smoke
puffed out an angry black and then be came lighter as the strange missile
appeared to gain speed”</p>
<p>The radio operator in the Davis-Monthan air force base control tower contacted
First Lt. Roy L. Jones, taking off for a cross-country flight in a B-29, and
asked him to investigate. Jones revved up his swift aerial tanker and still the
unknown aircraft steadily pulled away toward California.</p>
<p>Dr. Edwin F. Carpenter, head of the University of Arizona department of
astronomy, said he was certain that the object was not a meteor or other
natural phenomenon. . . .</p>
<p><i>Switchboards Swamped</i></p>
<p>Switchboards at the Pima county sheriff’s office and Tucson police
station were jammed with inquiries. Hundreds saw the object. Tom Bailey, 1411
E. 10th Street, thought it was a large airplane on fire. [A later check showed
no planes missing.] He said it wavered from left to right as it passed over the
mountains. Bailey also noticed that the craft appeared to slow perceptibly over
Tucson. He said the smoke apparently came out in a thin, almost invisible
stream, gaining substance within a few seconds.</p>
</div>
<p>This incident had an odd sequel the following day. Its significance was not
lost on the Daily Citizen. It ran another front-page story, headlined:</p>
<p>WHAT DO YOU MEAN ONLY VAPOR TRAIL?</p>
<div style="margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%;">
<p>As though to prove itself blameless for tilting hundreds of Tucson heads
skyward, the U.S. Air Force yesterday afternoon spent hours etching vapor
trails through the skies over the city.</p>
<p>The demonstration proved conclusively to the satisfaction of most that the
strange path of dark smoke blazed across the evening sky at dusk Wednesday was
no vapor trail and did not emanate from any conventional airplane.</p>
<p>The Wednesday night spectacle was entirely dissimilar. Then, heavy smoke boiled
and swirled in a broad, dark ribbon fanning out at least a mile in width and
stretching across the sky in a straight line. Since there was no proof as to
what caused the strange predark manifestation, and because even expert
witnesses were unable to explain the appearance, the matter remains a subject
for interesting speculation.</p>
</div>
<p>There is strong evidence that this story was deliberately kept off the press
wires. The Associated Press and other wire services in Washington had no
report. Requests for details by Frank Edwards, Mutual newscaster, and other
radio commentators ran into a blank wall. At the Pentagon I was told that the
Air Force had no knowledge of the sighting or the vapor-trail maneuvers.</p>
<p>On February 22 two similar glowing objects were seen above Boca Chica Naval Air
Station at Key West. A plane sent tip to investigate was hopelessly
outdistanced; it was obvious the things were at a great height. Back at the
station, radarmen tracked the objects as they hovered for a moment above Key
West. They were found to be at least fifty miles above the earth. After a few
seconds, they accelerated at high speed and streaked out of sight.</p>
<p>On the following day Commander Augusto Orrego, a Chilean naval officer,
reported that saucers had flown above his antarctic base.</p>
<p>“During the bright antarctic night,” be said, “we saw flying
saucers, one above the other, turning at tremendous speeds. We have photographs
to prove what we saw.”</p>
<p>Early in March, Ken Purdy phoned the latest development in the investigation.
He had just received a tip predicting a flurry of saucer publicity during
March. It had come from an important source in Washington.</p>
<p>“You know what it probably means,” he said. “The same thing
we talked about last month. But why were we tipped off in advance?”</p>
<p>“It’s one more piece in the pattern,” I said. “If the
tip’s on the level, then they’re stepping up the program.”</p>
<p>Within three days, reports began to pour in—from Peru, Cuba, Mexico,
Turkey, and other parts of the world. Then on March 9 a gleaming metallic disk
was sighted over Dayton, Ohio. Observers at Vandalia Airport phoned
Wright-Patterson Field. Scores of Air Force pilots and groundmen watched the
disk, as fighters raced up in pursuit. The mysterious object streaked
vertically skyward, hovered for a while miles above the earth, and then
disappeared. A secret report was rushed to the Civil Aeronautics Authority in
Washington, then turned over to Air Force Intelligence.</p>
<p>Soon after this Dr. Craig Hunter, director of a medical supply firm, reported a
huge elliptical saucer flying at a low altitude in Pennsylvania. He described
it as metallic, with a slotted outer rim and a rotating ring just inside. On
top of this sighting, thousands of people at Farmington, New Mexico, watched a
large formation of disks pass high above the city.</p>
<p>Throughout all these reports, the Air Force refused to admit the existence of
flying saucers. On March 18 it flatly denied they were Air Force secret
missiles or space-exploration devices.</p>
<p>Three days later, a Chicago and Southern airliner crew saw a fast-flying disk
near Stuttgart, Arkansas. The circular craft, blinking a strange blue-white
light, pulled up in an arc at terrific speed. The two pilots said they glimpsed
lighted ports on the lower side as the saucer zoomed above them. The lights had
a soft fluorescence, unlike anything they had seen.</p>
<p>There was one peculiar angle in the Arkansas incident. There was no apparent
attempt to muzzle the two pilots, as in earlier airline cases. Instead, a
United Press interview was quickly arranged, for nation-wide publication. In
this wire story Captain Jack Adams and First Officer G. W. Anderson made two
statements:</p>
<p>“We firmly believe that the flying saucer we saw over Arkansas was a
secret experimental type aircraft—not a visitor from outer space. . . .</p>
<p>“We know the Air Force has denied there is anything to this flying-saucer
business, but we’re both experienced pilots and we’re not easily
fooled.”</p>
<p>The day after this story appeared, I was discussing it with an airline official
in Washington.</p>
<p>“That’s an odd thing,” he said. “The Air Force could
have persuaded those pilots—or the line president—to hush the thing
up. It looks as if they wanted that story broadcast.”</p>
<p>“You mean the whole thing was planted?”</p>
<p>“I won’t say that, though it could have been. Probably they did see
something. But they might have been told what to say about it.”</p>
<p>“Any idea why?”</p>
<p>He looked at me sharply. “You and Purdy probably know the answer. At a
guess, I’d say it might have been planned to offset that Navy
commander’s report—the one on the White Sands sightings.”</p>
<p>The White Sands case had puzzled many skeptics, because the Pentagon had
cleared the published report. The author, Commander R. B. McLaughlin, was a
regular Navy officer. As a Navy rocket expert, he had been stationed at the
White Sands Rocket Proving Ground in New Mexico. In his published article he
described three disk sightings at White Sands.</p>
<p>One of the disks, a huge elliptical craft, was tracked by scientists with
precision instruments at five miles per second. That’s 18,000 miles per
hour. It was found to be flying fifty-six miles above the earth. Two other
disks, smaller types, were watched from five observation posts on hills at the
proving ground. Circling at incredible speed, the two disks paced an Army
high-altitude rocket that had just been launched, then speeded up and swiftly
outclimbed the projectile.</p>
<p>Commander McLaughlin’s report, giving dates and factual details, was
cleared by the Department of Defense. So was a later nation-wide broadcast.</p>
<p>Then the Air Force made its routine denial.</p>
<p>Why was McLaughlin, a regular Navy officer subject to security screening,
permitted to give out this story? Was it an incredible slip-up? Or was it part
of some carefully thought-out plan? I believe it was part of an elaborate
program to prepare the American people for a dramatic disclosure.</p>
<p>For almost a year I have watched the behind-the-scenes maneuvers of those who
guide this program. In the following chapters I have tried to show the strange
developments in our search for the answer; the carefully misleading tips, the
blind alleys we entered, the unexpected assistance, the confidential leads, and
the stunning contradictions.</p>
<p>It has been a complicated jigsaw puzzle. Only by seeing all parts of this
intricate picture can you begin to glimpse the reasons for this stubbornly
hidden secret.</p>
<p>The official explanation may be imminent. When it is finally revealed, I
believe the elaborate preparation—even the wide deceit
involved—will be fully justified in the minds of the American people.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />