<h2><SPAN name="chap05"></SPAN>CHAPTER V</h2>
<p>For more than two weeks, I checked on the Godman Field tragedy. One fact stood
out at the start: The death of Mantell had had a profound effect on many in the
Air Force. A dozen times I was told:</p>
<p>“I thought the saucers were a joke-until Mantell was killed chasing that
thing at Fort Knox.”</p>
<p>Many ranking officers who had laughed at the saucer scare stopped scoffing. One
of these was General Sory Smith, now Deputy Director of Air Force Public
Relations. Later in my investigation, General Smith told me:</p>
<p>“It was the Mantell case that got me. I knew Tommy Mantell. very
well—also Colonel Hix, the C.O. at Godman. I knew they were both
intelligent men—not the kind to be imagining things.”</p>
<p>For fifteen months, the Air Force kept a tight-lipped silence. Meantime, rumors
began to spread. One report said that Mantell had been shot, his body riddled
with bullets; his P-51, also riddled, had simply disintegrated. Another rumor
reported Mantell as having been killed by some mysterious force; this same
force had also destroyed his fighter. The Air Force, the rumors said, had
covered up the truth by telling Mantell’s family he had blacked out from
lack of oxygen.</p>
<p>Checking the last angle, I found that this was the explanation given to
Mantell’s mother, just after his death, she was told by Standiford Field
officers that he had flown too high in chasing the strange object.</p>
<p>Shallet, in the <i>Saturday Evening Post</i> articles, described Project
“Saucer’s” reconstruction of the case. Mantell was said to
have climbed up to 25,000 feet, despite his firm decision to end the chase at
20,000, since he carried no oxygen. Around 25,000 feet, Shallett quoted the Air
Force investigators, Mantell must have lost consciousness. After this, his
pilotless plane climbed on up to some 30,000 feet, then dived. Between 20,000
and 10,000 feet, Shallett suggested, the P-51 began to disintegrate, obviously
from excessive speed. The gleaming object that hypnotized Mantell into this
fatal climb was, Shallett said, either the planet Venus or a Navy cosmic-ray
research balloon.</p>
<p>The Air Force Project “Saucer” report of April 27, 1949, released
just after the first Post article, makes these statements:</p>
<p>“Five minutes after Mantell disappeared from his formation, the two
remaining planes returned to Godman. A few minutes later, one resumed the
search, covering territory 100 miles to the south as high as 33,000 feet, but
found nothing.</p>
<p>“Subsequent investigation revealed that Mantell had probably blacked out
at 20,000 feet from lack of oxygen and had died of suffocation before the
crash.</p>
<p>“The mysterious object which the flyer chased to his death was first
identified as the Planet Venus. However, further probing showed the elevation
and azimuth readings of Venus and the object at specified time intervals did
not coincide.</p>
<p>“It is still considered ‘Unidentified.’</p>
<p>The Venus explanation, even though now denied, puzzled me. It was plain that
the Air Force had seriously considered offering it as the answer then abandoned
it. Apparently someone had got his signals mixed and let Shallett use the
discarded answer. And for some unknown reason, the Air Force had found it
imperative to deny the Venus story at once.</p>
<p>In these first weeks of checking, I had run onto the Venus explanation in other
cases. Several Air Force officers repeated it so quickly that it had the sound
of a stock alibi. But in the daytime cases this was almost ridiculous.</p>
<p>I knew of a few instances in World War II when bomber crews and antiaircraft
gunners had loosed a few bursts at Venus. But this was mostly at night, when
the planet was at peak brilliance. And more than one gunner later admitted
firing to relieve long hours of boredom. Since enemy planes did not carry
lights, there was no authentic case, to my knowledge, where plane or ground
gunners actually believed Venus was an enemy aircraft.</p>
<p>Checking the astronomer’s report, I read over the concluding statement:</p>
<p>“It simply could not have been Venus. They must have been desperate even
to suggest it in the first place.” Months later, in the secret Project
“Saucer” report released December 30, 1949, I found official
confirmation of this astronomer’s opinions. Since it has a peculiar
bearing on the Mantell case, I am quoting it now:</p>
<div style="margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%;">
<p>When Venus is at its greatest brilliance, it is possible to see it during
daytime when one knows exactly where to look. But on January 7, 1948, Venus was
less than half as bright as its peak brilliance. However, under exceptionally
good atmospheric conditions, and with the eye shielded from direct rays of the
sun, Venus might be seen as an exceedingly tiny bright point of light. . . .
However, the chances of looking at just the right spot are very few.</p>
<p>It has been unofficially reported that the object was a Navy cosmic-ray
research balloon. If this can be established, it Is to be preferred as an
explanation. However, if one accepts the assumption that reports from various
other localities refer to the same object, any such device must have been a
good many miles high—25 to 50—in order to have been seen clearly,
almost simultaneously, from places 175 miles apart.</p>
<p>If all reports were of a single object, in the knowledge of this investigator
no man-made object could have been large enough and far enough away for the
approximate simultaneous sightings. It is most unlikely, however, that so many
separated persons should at that time have chanced on Venus in the daylight
sky. It seems therefore much more probable that more than one object was
involved.</p>
<p>The sighting might have included two or more balloons (or aircraft) or they
might have included Venus and balloons. For reasons given above, the latter
explanation seems more likely.</p>
</div>
<p>Two things stand out in his report:</p>
<p>1. The obvious determination to fit some explanation, no matter how farfetched,
to the Mantell sighting.</p>
<p>2. The impossibility that Venus—a tiny point of light, seen only with
difficulty—was the tremendous metallic object described by Mantell and
seen by Godman Field officers.</p>
<p>With Venus eliminated, I went to work on the balloon theory. Since I had been a
balloon pilot before learning to fly planes, this was fairly familiar ground.</p>
<p>Shallett’s alternate theory that Mantell had chased a Navy research
balloon was widely repeated by readers unfamiliar with balloon operation. Few
thought to check the speeds, heights, and distances involved.</p>
<p>Cosmic-ray research balloons are not powered; they are set free to drift with
the wind. This particular Navy type is released at a base near Minneapolis. The
gas bag is filled with only a small per cent of its helium capacity before the
take-off.</p>
<p>In a routine flight, the balloon ascends rapidly to a very high altitude-as
high as 100,000 feet. By this time the gas bag has swelled to full size, about
l00 feet high and 70 feet in diameter. At a set time, a device releases the
case of instruments under the balloon. The instruments descend by parachute,
and the balloon, rising quickly, explodes from the sudden expansion.</p>
<p>Occasionally a balloon starts leaking, and it then remains relatively low. At
first glance, this might seem the answer to the Kentucky sightings. If the
balloon were low enough, it would loom up as a large circular object, as seen
from directly below. Some witnesses might estimate its diameter as 250 feet or
more, instead of its actual 70 feet. But this failure to recognize a balloon
would require incredibly poor vision on the part of trained
observers—state police, Army M.P.’s, the Godman Field officers,
Mantell and his pilots.</p>
<p>Captain Mantell was a wartime pilot, with over three thousand hours in the air.
He was trained to identify a distant enemy plane in a split second. His vision
was perfect, and so was that of his pilots. In broad daylight they could not
fail to recognize a balloon during their thirty-minute chase.</p>
<p>Colonel Hix and the other Godman officers watched the object with high-powered
glasses for long periods. It is incredible that they would not identify it as a
balloon.</p>
<p>Before its appearance over Godman Field, the leaking balloon would have
drifted, at a low altitude, over several hundred miles. (A leak large enough to
bring it down from high altitude would have caused it to land and be found.)
Drifting at a low altitude, it would have been seen by several hundred thousand
people, at the very least. Many would have reported it as a balloon. But even
if this angle is ignored it still could not possibly have been a balloon at low
altitude. The fast flight from Madisonville, the abrupt stop and hour-long
hovering at Godman Field, the quick bursts of speed Mantell reported make it
impossible. To fly the go miles from Madisonville to Fort Knox in 30 minutes, a
balloon would require a wind of 180 m.p.h. After traveling at this hurricane
speed, it would then have had to come to a dead stop above Godman Field. As the
P-51’s approached, it would have had to speed tip again to 180, then to
more than 360 to keep ahead of Mantell.</p>
<p>The three fighter pilots chased the mysterious object for half an hour. (I have
several times chased balloons with a plane, overtaking them in seconds.) In a
straight chase, Mantell would have been closing in at 360; the tail wind acting
on his fighter would nullify the balloon’s forward drift.</p>
<p>But even if you accept these improbable factors, there is one final fact that
nullifies the balloon explanation. The strange object had disappeared when
Mantell’s wingman searched the sky, just after the leader’s death.
If it had been a balloon held stationary for an hour at a high altitude, and
glowing brightly enough to be seen through clouds, it would have remained
visible in the same general position. Seen from 33,000 feet, it would have been
even brighter, because of the clearer air.</p>
<p>But the mysterious object had completely vanished in those few minutes. A
search covering a hundred miles failed to reveal a trace.</p>
<p>Whether at a high or low altitude, a balloon could not have escaped the
pilot’s eyes. It would also have continued to be seen at Godman Field and
other points, through occasional breaks in the clouds.</p>
<p>I pointed out these facts to one Air Force officer at the Pentagon. Next day he
phoned me:</p>
<p>“I figured it out. The timing device went off and the balloon exploded.
That’s why the pilot didn’t see it.”</p>
<p>“It’s an odd coincidence,” I said, “that it exploded in
those five minutes after Mantell’s last report.”</p>
<p>“Even so, it’s obviously the answer,” he said.</p>
<p>Checking on this angle, I found:</p>
<p>1. No one in the Kentucky area had reported a descending parachute.</p>
<p>2. No cosmic-ray research instrument case or parachute was found in the area.</p>
<p>3. No instruments were returned to the Navy from this region. And <i>all</i>
balloons and instruments released at that time were <i>fully accounted for</i>.</p>
<p>Even if it had been a balloon, it would not explain the <i>later</i> January
7th reports—the simultaneous sightings mentioned by Professor Hynek in
the Project “Saucer” report. This includes the thing seen at
Lockbourne Air Force Base two hours after Mantell’s death.</p>
<p>Obviously, the saucer seen flying at 500 m.p.h. over Lockbourne Field could not
have been a balloon. Even if there had been several balloons in this area (and
there were not, by official record), they could not have covered the courses
reported. In some cases, they would have been flying against the wind, at
terrific speed.</p>
<p>Then what was the mysterious object? And what killed Mantell?</p>
<p>Both the Air Force and the <i>Post</i> articles speculate that Mantell
carelessly let himself black out.</p>
<p>Since some explanation had to be given, this might seem a good answer. But
Mantell was known for coolheaded judgment. As a wartime pilot, he was familiar
with signs of anoxia (oxygen starvation). That he knew his tolerance for
altitude is proved by his firmly declared intention to abandon the chase at
20,000 feet, since he had no oxygen equipment.</p>
<p>Mantell had his altimeter to warn him. From experience, he would recognize the
first vague blurring, narrowing of vision, and other signs of anoxia. Despite
this, the “blackout” explanation was accepted as plausible by many
Americans.</p>
<p>While investigating the Mantell case, I talked with several pilots and
aeronautical engineers. Several questioned that a P-51 starting a dive from
20,000 feet would have disintegrated so thoroughly.</p>
<p>“From thirty thousand feet, yes,” said one engineer. “If the
idea was to explain it away, I’d pick a high altitude to start from. But
a pilotless plane doesn’t necessarily dive, as you know.</p>
<p>“It might slip off and spin, or spiral down, and a few have even landed
themselves. Also, if the plane started down from twenty thousand, the pilot
wouldn’t be too far blacked out. The odds are he’d come to when he
got into thicker air—admitting he did blur out, which is only an Air
Force guess. I don’t see why they’re so positive Mantell died
before he hit the ground—unless they know something we
don’t.”</p>
<p>One of the pilot group put it more bluntly.</p>
<p>“It looks like a cover-up to me. I think Mantell did just what he said he
would—close in on the thing. I think he either collided with it, or more
likely they knocked him out of the air. They’d think he was trying to
bring them down, barging in like that.”</p>
<p>Even if you accept the blackout answer, it still does not explain what Mantell
was chasing. it is possible that, excited by the huge, mysterious object, he
recklessly climbed beyond the danger level, though such an act was completely
at odds with his character.</p>
<p>But the <i>identity</i> of the thing remains—officially—a mystery.
If it was some weird experimental craft or a guided missile, then whose was it?
Air Force officers had repeatedly told me they had no such device. General Carl
Touhy Spaatz, former Air Force chief, had publicly insisted that no such weapon
had been developed in his regime. Secretary Symington and General Hoyt
Vandenberg, present Air Force chief, had been equally emphatic. Of course,
official denials could be expected if it were a top-level secret. But if it
were a secret device, would it be tested so publicly that thousands would see
it?</p>
<p>If it were an Air Force device, then I could see only one answer for the Godman
Field incident: The thing was such a closely guarded secret that even Colonel
Hix hadn’t known. That would mean that most or all Air Force Base
C.O.’s were also in ignorance of the secret device.</p>
<p>Could it be a Navy experiment, kept secret from the Air Force?</p>
<p>I did a little checking.</p>
<p>Admiral Calvin Bolster, chief of aeronautics research experimental craft, was
an Annapolis classmate of mine. So was Captain Delmer S. Fahrney, head of the
Navy guided-missile program. Fahrney was at Point Mugu, missile-testing base in
California, and I wasn’t able to see him. But I knew him as a careful,
conscientious officer; I can’t believe he would let such a device,
piloted or not, hover over an Air Force base with no warning to its C.O.</p>
<p>I saw Admiral Bolster. His denial seemed genuine; unless he’d got to be a
dead-pan poker player since our earlier days, I was sure he was telling the
truth.</p>
<p>The only other alternate was Russia. It was incredible that they would develop
such a device and then expose it to the gaze of U.S. Air Force officers. It
could be photographed, its speed and maneuverability checked; it might crash,
or antiaircraft fire might bring it down, The secret might be lost in one such
test flight.</p>
<p>There was one other explanation: The thing was not intended to be seen; it had
got out of control. In this event; the long hovering period at Godman Field was
caused by the need for repairs inside the flying saucer, or repairs to
remote-control apparatus.</p>
<p>If it were Air Force or Navy, that would explain official concern; even if
completely free of negligence, the service responsible would be blamed for
Mantell’s death. If it were Russian, the Air Force would of course try to
conceal the fact for fear of public hysteria.</p>
<p>But if the device was American, it meant that Project “Saucer” was
a cover-up unit. While pretending to investigate, it would actually hush up
reports, make false explanations, and safeguard the secret in every possible
way. Also, the reported order for Air Force pilots to pursue the disks would
have to be a fake. Instead, there would be a secret order telling them to avoid
strange objects in the sky.</p>
<p>By the time I finished my check-up, I was sure of one thing: This particular
saucer had been real.</p>
<p>I was almost positive of one other point-that the thing had been over 30 miles
high during part of its flight. I found that <i>after</i> Mantell’s death
it was reported simultaneously from Madisonville, Elizabethtown, and
Lexington—over a distance of 175 miles. (Professor Hynek’s analysis
later confirmed this.)</p>
<p>How low it had been while hovering over Godman, and during Mantell’s
chase, there was no way to determine. But all the evidence pointed to a swift
ascent after Mantell’s last report.</p>
<p>Had Mantell told Godman Tower more than the Air Force admitted? I went back to
the Pentagon and asked for a full transcript of the flight leader’s radio
messages. I got a quick turn-down. The reports, I was told, were still
classified as secret. Requests for pictures of the P-51 wreckage, and for a
report on the condition of Mantell’s body, also drew a blank. I had heard
that some photographs were taken of the Godman Field saucer from outside the
tower. But the Air Force denied knowledge of any such pictures.</p>
<p>Puzzling over the riddle, I remembered John Steele, the former Intelligence
captain. If by any chance he was a plant, it would be interesting to suggest
the various answers and watch his reaction. When I phoned him to suggest
luncheon, Steele accepted at once. We met at the Occidental, on Pennsylvania
Avenue. Steele was younger than I had expected—not over twenty-five. He
was a tall man, with a crew haircut and the build of a football player. Looking
at him the first time, I expected a certain breeziness. instead, he was almost
solemn.</p>
<p>“I owe you an apology,” he said in a careful voice after we’d
ordered. “You probably know I’m a syndicate writer?”</p>
<p>I wondered if he’d found out Jack Daly was checking on him.</p>
<p>“When you mentioned the Press Club,” I said, “I gathered you
were in the business.”</p>
<p>“I’m afraid you thought I was fishing for a lead.” Steele
looked at me earnestly. “I’m not working on the
story—I’m tied up on other stuff.”</p>
<p>“Forget it,” I told him.</p>
<p>He seemed anxious to reassure me. “I’d been worried for some time
about the saucers. I called you that night on an impulse.”</p>
<p>“Glad you did,” I said. “I need every tip I can get.”</p>
<p>“Did it help you any?”</p>
<p>“Yes, though it still doesn’t fit together. But I can tell you
this: The saucers are real, or at least one of them.”</p>
<p>“Which one?”</p>
<p>“The thing Captain Mantell was chasing near Fort Knox, before he
died.”</p>
<p>“Oh, that one.” Steele looked down at the roll he was buttering.
“I thought that case was fully explained. Wasn’t he chasing a
balloon?”</p>
<p>“The Air Force says it’s still unidentified.” I told him what
I had learned. “Apparently you’re right—it’s either an
American or a Soviet missile.”</p>
<p>“After what you’ve told me,” said Steele, “I
can’t believe it’s ours. It must be Russian.”</p>
<p>“They’d be pretty stupid to test it over here.”</p>
<p>“You said it was probably out of control.”</p>
<p>“That particular one, maybe. But there have been several hundred seen
over here. If they found their controls were haywire, they wouldn’t keep
testing the things until they’d corrected that.”</p>
<p>The waiter came with the soup, and Steele was silent until he left.</p>
<p>“I still can’t believe it’s our weapon,” he said
slowly. “They wouldn’t have Air Force pilots alerted to chase the
things. And I happen to how they do.”</p>
<p>“There’s something queer about this missile angle,” I said.
“That saucer was seen at the same time by people a hundred and
seventy-five miles apart. To be that high in the sky, and still look more than
two hundred and fifty feet in diameter, it must have been enormous.”</p>
<p>Steele didn’t answer for a moment.</p>
<p>“Obviously, that was an illusion,” he finally answered.
“I’d discount those estimates.”</p>
<p>“Even Mantell’s? And the Godman Field officers’?”</p>
<p>“Not knowing the thing’s height, how could they judge
accurately?”</p>
<p>“To be seen at points that far apart, it had to be over thirty miles
high,” I told him. “It would have to be huge to show up at
all.”</p>
<p>He shook his head. “I can’t believe those reports are right. It
must have been sighted at different times.”</p>
<p>I let it drop.</p>
<p>“What are you working on now?” Steele asked, after a minute or two.</p>
<p>I said I hadn’t decided. Actually, I planned a trip to the coast, to
interview pilots who had sighted flying disks.</p>
<p>“What would you do if you found it wasn’t a Soviet missile?”
said Steele. He sounded almost too casual.</p>
<p>“If security was involved, I’d keep still. But the Air Force and
the Navy swear they haven’t any such things.”</p>
<p>Steele looked at me thoughtfully.</p>
<p>“You know, <i>True</i> might force something into the open that would be
better left secret.” He smiled ironically. “I realize that sounds
peculiar, since I suggested the Russian angle. But if it isn’t
Russian—though I still think it is—then we have nothing to worry
about.”</p>
<p>I was almost sure now that he was a plant. During the rest of the luncheon, I
tried to draw him out, but Steele was through talking. When we parted, he gave
me a sober warning.</p>
<p>“You and <i>True</i> should consider your moral responsibility, no matter
what you find. Even if it’s not actual security, there may be reasons to
keep still.”</p>
<p>After he left me, I tried to figure it out. If the Air Force was back of this,
they must not think much of my intelligence. Or else they had been in such a
hurry to get a line on <i>True’s</i> investigation that they had no
choice but to use Steele. Of course, it was still possible he was doing this on
his own.</p>
<p>Either way, his purpose was obvious. He hoped to have us swallow the
Soviet-missile answer. If we did, then we would have to keep still, even though
we found absolute proof. Obviously, it would be dangerous to print <i>that</i>
story.</p>
<p>Thinking back, I recalled Steele’s apparent attempt to dismiss the
Mantell case. I was convinced now. The Godman Field affair must hold an
important clue that I had overlooked. It might even be the key to the whole
flying saucer riddle.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />