<h2><SPAN name="CHAPTER_XXXIII" id="CHAPTER_XXXIII"></SPAN>CHAPTER XXXIII.</h2>
<h3>THE STORY OF THE PIANOFORTE.</h3>
<hr style="width: 15%;" />
<p><ANTIMG src="images/capt.png" width-obs="102" height-obs="100" alt="T" title="T" class="floatl" />HE popular instrument of the nineteenth century has been the
pianoforte, the result of an evolution having its beginning more than
six centuries back. It is impossible in the present state of knowledge
to trace all the steps through which this remarkable instrument has
reached its present form. In the Assyrian sculptures discovered by
Layard, there are instruments apparently composed of metal rods or
plates, touched by hammers, upon the same general principle as the toy
instrument with glass plates, or the xylophone composed of wooden rods
resting upon bands of straw. In these the use of the hammer for
producing the tone is obvious. In the Middle Ages there was an
instrument called the psaltery, apparently some sort of a four-sided
harp strung with metal strings. The evidence upon this point is rather
indistinct. Still later there is the Arab santir (<SPAN href="#Page_114"></SPAN>). This was a
trapeze-shaped instrument, composed of a solid frame, sounding board
and metal wires struck with hammers. This instrument still exists in
Germany under the name of <i>Hackbrett</i>, or the dulcimer. As now made,
each string consists of three wires tuned in unison. It is played by
means of leather hammers held in the hand. The difficulty of adapting
this instrument to the keyboard consisted in the fact that if the<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_393" id="Page_393">[Pg 393]</SPAN></span>
hammers were connected with the keys, they would be under the strings
instead of above them, and this difficulty for a long time proved
insurmountable.</p>
<p> </p>
<p style="text-align: center"><SPAN name="FIG_68">
<ANTIMG src="images/fig68.png" width-obs="400" height-obs="174" alt="Fig. 68" title="Fig. 68" /></SPAN></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><b>Fig. 68.</b></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><b>SPINET.</b></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><b>[Showing the disposition of the strings,
bridges, etc. Dresden, 1590.]</b></p>
<p> </p>
<p>Two forms of instruments were at length developed, composed of a
wire-strung psaltery, played from a chromatic keyboard like that of
the organ. The first of these was the one called in England Spinet, or
in Italy <i>Espinnetto</i>, and in Germany the <i>Clavier</i>. The essential
characteristic of this instrument was the manner of producing tones.
Upon the ends of the keys were brass pieces called "tangents," of a
triangular shape, of such form that when the key was pressed, the
tangent pushed the wire and so produced the tone. As it remained in
contact with the wire as long as the key was held down, there was
nothing like what we now call a singing tone. The instruments were
very small, in shape like a square piano, but of three or four octaves
compass; the wires were of brass, and quite small. In several
representations which have come down to us from the seventeenth
century, the number of strings shown is smaller than the number of<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_394" id="Page_394">[Pg 394]</SPAN></span>
keys, from which some writers have inferred that it might have been
possible to obtain more than one tone from the same string, through a
process of stopping it with one tangent and striking it with another.
This, however, is highly improbable; the discrepancies referred to are
undoubtedly due to carelessness of the engraver. The clavier, or
spinet, was a better instrument than the lute, which at length it
superseded, having more tones and a greater harmonic capacity. Besides
which it was a step toward something much better still. In England
they made them with pieces of cloth drawn through between the wires,
to deaden the already small tone still further. These were sometimes
called virginals, and seem to have been used as practice pianos, where
the noise of the full tone might have been objectionable. The oldest
form of the clavier known to the writer was that shown in <SPAN href="#FIG_69">Fig. 69</SPAN>,
which was so small that it might be carried under the arm, and when
used was placed upon the table. They were sometimes ornamented in a
very elaborate manner.</p>
<p> </p>
<p style="text-align: center"><SPAN name="FIG_69">
<ANTIMG src="images/fig69.png" width-obs="400" height-obs="88" alt="Fig. 69" title="Fig. 69" /></SPAN></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><b>Fig. 69.</b></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><b>KEYBOARD AND FRET WORK OF SPINET SHOWN IN
<SPAN href="#FIG_68">FIG.
68</SPAN>.</b></p>
<p> </p>
<p style="text-align: center"><SPAN name="FIG_70">
<ANTIMG src="images/fig70.png" width-obs="400" height-obs="360" alt="Fig. 70" title="Fig. 70" /></SPAN></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><b>Fig. 70.</b></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><b>RICHLY ORNAMENTED SPINET.</b></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><b>[Made for the Princess Anna, of Saxony, about
1550.]</b></p>
<p> </p>
<p>Contemporaneously with the spinet, and of almost equal antiquity, was
an instrument in the form of a grand piano, called in Italy the
clavicembalo, and in England the harpsichord. In Germany it was called
the <i>flugel</i> or wing, from its being shaped like the wings of a bird.<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_395" id="Page_395">[Pg 395]</SPAN></span>
These also, in the earlier times, were made very small, and were
rested upon the table. The essential distinction between the cembalo
and the spinet was in the manner of tone production. In the cembalo
there was a wooden jack resting upon the end of the keys, and upon
this jack a little plectrum made of raven's quill, which had to be
frequently renewed. When the key was pressed, the jack rose and the
plectrum snapped the wire. The tone was thin and delicate, but as the
plectrum did not remain in contact with the string, the vibration
continued longer than in the clavier. The cembalo was the favorite
instrument in Italy during the seventeenth century, and in England it
had a great currency under the<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_396" id="Page_396">[Pg 396]</SPAN></span> name of harpsichord. Many attempts
were made at increasing the resources of this instrument, one of the
most curious being that of combining two harpsichords in one, having
two actions, two sounding boards and sets of strings, and two
keyboards related like those of the organ. This form seems to have
been exclusively English. The form of the harpsichord is shown in Fig.
71.</p>
<p> </p>
<p style="text-align: center"><SPAN name="FIG_71">
<ANTIMG src="images/fig71.png" width-obs="300" height-obs="240" alt="Fig. 71" title="Fig. 71" /></SPAN></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><b>Fig. 71.</b></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><b>MOZART'S CONCERT GRAND PIANO.</b></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><b>[Now in the Mozart Museum at Salzburg. Its
compass is five octaves.]</b></p>
<p> </p>
<p>Far back in the sixteenth century an attempt was made at a hammer
mechanism to strike down upon the strings. For this purpose the
strings were placed in a vertical position, the same as in our upright
pianos of the present day. Mr. B.J. Lang, of Boston, has an upright
spinet of this kind, which he bought in Nuremburg. It is a small and
rude affair, having about four octaves compass and a very small scale.</p>
<p> </p>
<p style="text-align: center"><SPAN name="FIG_72">
<ANTIMG src="images/fig72.png" width-obs="500" height-obs="263" alt="Fig. 72" title="Fig. 72" /></SPAN></p>
<div class="blockquot">
<p style="text-align: center"><b>Fig. 72.</b></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><b>CRISTOFORI'S ACTION.</b></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><b>[According to his original diagram.]</b></p>
<p><b><i>A</i> is the string; <i>b</i> the bottom; <i>c</i> the first lever, or key; there
is a pad, <i>d</i>, upon the key to raise a second lever, <i>e</i>, which is
pivoted upon <i>f</i>; <i>g</i> is the hopper—Cristofori's <i>linguetta
mobile</i>—which, controlled by the springs <i>i</i> and <i>l</i>, effects the
escape, or immediate drop, of the hammer from the strings after the
blow has been struck, although the key is still kept down by the
finger. The hopper is centered at <i>h</i>. <i>M</i> is a rack or comb on the
beam, <i>s</i>, where, <i>h</i>, the butt, <i>n</i>, of the hammer, <i>o</i>, is centered.
In a state of rest the hammer is supported by a cross or fork of silk
thread, <i>p</i>. On the depression of the key, <i>c</i>, the tail, <i>q</i>, of the
second lever, <i>e</i>, draws away the damper, <i>r</i>, from the strings,
leaving them free to vibrate. (Hipkins.)</b></p>
</div>
<p> </p>
<p>The pianoforte proper was not invented until 1711, when a Florentine
mechanic, named Cristofori, invented what he called a Fortepiano, from
its capacity of being<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_397" id="Page_397">[Pg 397]</SPAN></span> played loud or soft. The essential feature of
the pianoforte mechanism is in the use of the hammer to produce the
tone, and the necessary provision for doing this successfully is to
secure an instantaneous escapement of the hammer from contact with the
wire, as soon as the blow has been delivered, while at the same time
the key remains pressed in order to hold the damper away from the
strings and allow the tone to go on. These features were all contained
in Cristofori's invention. The above diagram, <SPAN href="#FIG_72">Fig. 72</SPAN>, illustrates the
mechanism employed. It is from Cristofori's published account of his
invention, dated 1711; but there is in Florence a pianoforte of his
manufacture still existing, dated 1726, in which the action is more
perfect, as shown in <SPAN href="#FIG_73">Fig. 73</SPAN>.<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_398" id="Page_398">[Pg 398]</SPAN></span></p>
<p> </p>
<p style="text-align: center">
<SPAN name="FIG_73">
<ANTIMG src="images/fig73.png" width-obs="500" height-obs="270" alt="Fig. 73" title="Fig. 73" /></SPAN></p>
<div class="blockquot">
<p style="text-align: center"><b>Fig. 73.</b></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><b>ACTION OF CRISTOFORI'S FORTEPIANO. DATE 1726.</b></p>
<p><b>[Besides several minor improvements over his first idea, the later
instrument has a hammer check, <i>p</i>, and the hammer is more developed.]</b></p>
</div>
<p> </p>
<p>The invention of Cristofori was taken up in Germany almost
immediately, and a Dresden piano maker, Silbermann, became very
celebrated. It was the pianofortes of his manufacture in the palace at
Potsdam, which Frederick the Great made Bach try, one after another.
The form of these instruments was the same as that of Mozart's piano,
shown in <SPAN href="#FIG_71">Fig. 71</SPAN>. The square-formed piano began to be made about 1750,
but the instrument involved no application of new principles, being
merely a clavier with pianoforte mechanism. The new form, so much more
compact and inexpensive, began to be popular, and was soon the
standard form for private families, as that of the clavier had been
before, and as the square piano, remained until as late as about 1870,
when the inherent mechanical difficulties of the upright were for the
first time satisfactorily overcome. Pepys, in his diary, tells of
having purchased a virginal which pleased him very much. It cost five
guineas—about $26.<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_399" id="Page_399">[Pg 399]</SPAN></span></p>
<p> </p>
<p style="text-align: center"><SPAN name="FIG_74">
<ANTIMG src="images/fig74.png" width-obs="500" height-obs="278" alt="Fig. 74" title="Fig. 74" /></SPAN></p>
<div class="blockquot">
<p style="text-align: center"><b>Fig. 74.</b></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><b>IMPROVED ACTION OF THE ÉRARD CONCERT GRAND. (1821.)</b></p>
<p><b><i>C</i> is the key; <i>d</i> is a pilot, centered at <i>dd</i> to give the blow, by
means of a carrier, <i>e</i>, holding the hopper, <i>g</i>, which delivers the
blow to the hammer, <i>o</i>, by the thrust of the hopper, which escapes by
forward movement after contact with a projection from the hammer
covered with leather, answering to the notch of the English action.
This escapement is controlled at <i>x</i>; a double spring <i>il</i>, pushes up
a hinged lever, <i>ee</i>, the rise of which is checked at <i>pp</i>, and causes
the second or double escapement; a little stirrup at the shoulder of
the hammer, known as the "repetition" pressing down <i>ee</i> at the point,
and by this depression permitting <i>g</i> to go back to its place, and be
ready for a second blow before the key has been materially raised. The
check <i>p</i> in this action is not behind the hammer, but before it,
fixed into the carrier, <i>e</i>, which also, as the key is put down,
brings down the under damper. (Hipkins.)]</b></p>
</div>
<p> </p>
<p>The instruments were still small, and strung with small wires;
nevertheless, there was a tendency toward increased compass, which, by
the beginning of the nineteenth century, led the Broadwoods, of
London, to attempt a grand piano with six octaves' compass. But they
found that the wrest plank (in which the tuning strings are placed),
was so weakened by the extension that the treble would not stand in
tune. In order to strengthen the instrument, he introduced the iron
tension bar. This, like nearly all of the English improvements of the
piano during the first quarter of the nineteenth century, was in<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_400" id="Page_400">[Pg 400]</SPAN></span> the
direction of greater solidity, and better resisting power to the pull
of the strings.</p>
<p>Upon the artistic side, Sebastian Érard in 1808 patented his grand
action, which, with very slight improvements, still remains the model
of what a piano action should be. <SPAN href="#FIG_74">Fig. 74</SPAN> shows this action and its
parts.</p>
<p> </p>
<p style="text-align: center"><SPAN name="FIG_75">
<ANTIMG src="images/fig75.png" width-obs="176" height-obs="300" alt="Fig. 75" title="Fig. 75" /></SPAN></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><b>Fig. 75.</b></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><b>THE STEINWAY IRON FRAME.</b></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><b>[Showing the disposition of the sounding board,
bridges, etc.]</b></p>
<p> </p>
<p>Between 1808, when the Érard action was perfected, and 1832 or 1834,
when Thalberg and Liszt began to revolutionize the art of piano
playing, the instrument was the subject of a great number of
improvements in every direction. The damper mechanism was perfected
between 1821 and 1827; the stringing had been made heavier, the
hammers proportionately stronger, and the power of tone had become
greater. Thus the instrument had become ready for the great
pianists—Liszt having made his first appearance in Vienna in 1823,
and<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_401" id="Page_401">[Pg 401]</SPAN></span> within seven years after having become generally recognized as a
phenomenal appearance in art. Meanwhile, great improvements were
continually carried on for the purpose of rendering the instrument
impervious to the forcible attacks made upon its stability by these
new virtuosi. In the early appearances of Liszt it was necessary to
have several pianos in reserve upon the stage, so that when a hammer
or string broke, which very often happened, another instrument could
be moved forward for the next piece.</p>
<p>The most important improvement in the solidity of the piano came from
the iron frame, which was introduced tentatively, somewhere about
1821, in the form of what is now called a "hitch-pin plate," or half
iron frame. About 1825 an American, Alpheus Babcock, of Philadelphia,
patented a full iron frame, but it was imperfect, and nothing came of
it. Conrad Meyer, of Philadelphia, in 1833, patented an iron frame and
manufactured pianos with it, which are still in existence. In 1837,
Jonas Chickering, of Boston, perfected the iron frame by including in
the single casting the pin bridge and damper socket rail. This
improvement still remains at the foundation of the piano making of the
world. Previous to this invention some of the American piano makers
had constructed their cases upon a solid wooden bottom plank <i>five
inches thick</i>. In 1855 the firm of Steinway & Sons exhibited their
first overstrung scale, in which the bass strings were spread out and
carried over a part of the treble strings, thus affording them more
latitude for vibration, without interfering, and bringing the bridges
nearer to the center of the sounding board. The idea of overstringing
was not new at this time, Lichtenberg, of St. Petersburg, having
exhibited a grand<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_402" id="Page_402">[Pg 402]</SPAN></span> piano with overstringing at the London exposition
in 1851, and Theodore Boehm, the celebrated improver of the flute,
having invented an overstrung system for square pianos as early as
1835. In 1853, also, Jonas Chickering combined an iron frame with an
overstrung system in square pianos, the instrument having been
completed and exhibited after his death. The Steinway system of
overstringing, however, was more extended, and solved the acoustical
difficulties of cross-vibrations more successfully by spreading the
long strings, and this, therefore, is the system now generally
followed. The superiority of this principle was immediately
acknowledged, and it has since been applied to grands and uprights,
and few makers in the world but follow it in their work. Many minor
improvements have been introduced in America by Steinway & Sons and
others, whereby the artistic qualities and the durability of the best
American pianos are now generally acknowledged throughout the world.
The solidity of construction is such that with a compass of seven and
one-third octaves the tension of the strings amounts to about 50,000
pounds avoirdupois. The hammers are larger and heavier, the action
more responsive, and the singing quality and sustaining power has
reached remarkable perfection. Perhaps the most curious and important
of all American improvements in this direction is the so-called
"duplex scale" of Steinway & Sons, patented in 1872, in which a
fraction of the string is made to vibrate sympathetically, thereby
strengthening the super-octave harmonic, and imparting to the tone a
brightness and sweetness not so well secured in any other way at
present known.</p>
<p>If space permitted it would be interesting to follow the course by
which the difficulties of the upright piano<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_403" id="Page_403">[Pg 403]</SPAN></span> have at length been
surmounted, and the tone of this form of instrument rendered nearly
equal to that of the grand. This was first accomplished by Steinway &
Sons between 1862 and 1878, by a succession of improvements having for
their object, first, the solidity of the instrument, then its prompt
action, together with as much of the tone quality of the grand as
possible. Many other American builders have taken part in this
development, whereby the American pianoforte to-day is the strongest,
the fullest-toned and the most expensively constructed of any in the
world. Still later, quite a number of more or less successful attempts
have been made to increase the stability of the tuning of the
pianoforte by a different system of stringing, the tension of the
strings being regulated by means of a tuning pin of "set-screw"
pattern, working through a collar of steel, instead of being thrust
into a wooden wrest-plank, where it holds fast by friction alone, as
has been the universal way previous to these inventions.</p>
<p> </p>
<p style="text-align: center">
<ANTIMG src="images/deco2.png" width-obs="200" height-obs="50" alt="decoration" title="decoration" /></p>
<p> </p>
<p><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_404" id="Page_404">[Pg 404]</SPAN></span></p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />