<h2><SPAN name="CHAPTER_XI" id="CHAPTER_XI">CHAPTER XI.</SPAN></h2>
<h3>THE WAR DEPARTMENT IN WAR TIMES.</h3>
<div class='intro'>
<p>Grant's plans blocked by Halleck—Mr. Dana on duty at Washington—Edwin
McMasters Stanton—His deep religious feeling—His swift
intelligence and almost superhuman energy—The Assistant Secretary's
functions—Contract supplies and contract frauds—Lincoln's
intercession for dishonest contractors with political influence—A
characteristic letter from Sherman.</p>
</div>
<p>I reached Washington about the middle of December,
and immediately gave to Mr. Stanton an outline
of Grant's plan and reasons for a winter campaign.
The President, Mr. Stanton, and General Halleck all
agreed that the proposed operations were the most
promising in sight; indeed, Mr. Stanton was enthusiastic
in favor of the scheme as I presented it to him.
He said that the success of Grant's campaign would
end the war in the Mississippi Valley, and practically
make prisoners of all the rebel forces in the interior of
Mississippi and Alabama, without our being at the direct
necessity of guarding and feeding them. But
Halleck, as a <i lang="la" xml:lang="la">sine qua non</i>, insisted that East Tennessee
should first be cleared out and Longstreet driven off
permanently and things up to date secured, before new
campaigns were entered upon.</p>
<p>The result was that no winter campaign was made in<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_157" id="Page_157">[Pg 157]</SPAN></span>
1863-'64 toward the Alabama River towns and Mobile.
Its success, in my opinion, was certain, and I so represented
to Mr. Stanton. Without jeoparding our interests
in any other quarter, Grant would have opened
the Alabama River and captured Mobile a full year before
it finally fell. Its success meant permanent security
for everything we had already laid hold of, at once
freeing many thousands of garrison troops for service
elsewhere. As long as the rebels held Alabama,
they had a base from which to strike Tennessee. I had
unbounded confidence in Grant's skill and energy to
conduct such a campaign into the interior, cutting loose
entirely from his base and subsisting off the enemy's
country. At the time he had the troops, and could
have finished the job in three months.</p>
<p>After I had explained fully my mission from Grant,
I asked the Secretary what he wanted me to do. Mr.
Stanton told me he would like to have me remain in
the department until I was needed again at the front.
Accordingly, an office in the War Department was provided
for me, and I began to do the regular work of
an assistant to the Secretary of War. This was the
first time since my relations with the War Department
began that I had been thrown much with the Secretary,
and I was very glad to have an opportunity to observe
him.</p>
<p>Mr. Stanton was a short, thick, dark man, with a
very large head and a mass of black hair. His nature
was intense, and he was one of the most eloquent men
that I ever met. Stanton was entirely absorbed in his
duties, and his energy in prosecuting them was some<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_158" id="Page_158">[Pg 158]</SPAN></span>thing
almost superhuman. When he took hold of the
War Department the armies seemed to grow, and they
certainly gained in force and vim and thoroughness.</p>
<p>One of the first things which struck me in Mr. Stanton
was his deep religious feeling and his familiarity
with the Bible. He must have studied the Bible a great
deal when he was a boy. He had the firmest conviction
that the Lord directed our armies. Over and over
again have I heard him express the same opinion which
he wrote to the Tribune after Donelson: "Much has
recently been said of military combinations and organizing
victory. I hear such phrases with apprehension.
They commenced in infidel France with the Italian
campaign, and resulted in Waterloo. Who can organize
victory? Who can combine the elements of success
on the battlefield? We owe our recent victories
to the Spirit of the Lord, that moved our soldiers to
rush into battle, and filled the hearts of our enemies
with dismay. The inspiration that conquered in battle
was in the hearts of the soldiers and from on high; and
wherever there is the same inspiration there will be the
same results." There was never any cant in Stanton's
religious feeling. It was the straightforward expression
of what he believed and lived, and was as simple and
genuine and real to him as the principles of his business.</p>
<p>Stanton was a serious student of history. He had
read many books on the subject—more than on any
other, I should say—and he was fond of discussing historical
characters with his associates; not that he made
a show of his learning. He was fond, too, of discussing<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_159" id="Page_159">[Pg 159]</SPAN></span>
legal questions, and would listen with eagerness to the
statement of cases in which friends had been interested.
He was a man who was devoted to his friends, and he
had a good many with whom he liked to sit down and
talk. In conversation he was witty and satirical; he
told a story well, and was very companionable.</p>
<p>There is a popular impression that Mr. Stanton took
a malevolent delight in browbeating his subordinates,
and every now and then making a spectacle of some
poor officer or soldier, who unfortunately fell into his
clutches in the Secretary's reception room, for the edification
of bystanders. This idea, like many other false
notions concerning great men, is largely a mistaken
one. The stories which are told of Mr. Stanton's impatience
and violence are exaggerated. He could speak
in a very peremptory tone, but I never heard him say
anything that could be called vituperative.</p>
<p>There were certain men in whom he had little faith,
and I have heard him speak to some of these in a tone
of severity. He was a man of the quickest intelligence,
and understood a thing before half of it was told him.
His judgment was just as swift, and when he got hold
of a man who did not understand, who did not state
his case clearly, he was very impatient.</p>
<p>If Stanton liked a man, he was always pleasant. I
was with him for several years in the most confidential
relations, and I can now recall only one instance of his
speaking to me in a harsh tone. It was a curious case.
Among the members of Congress at that period was a
Jew named Strouse. One of Strouse's race, who lived
in Virginia, had gone down to the mouth of the James<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_160" id="Page_160">[Pg 160]</SPAN></span>
River when General Butler was at Fortress Monroe,
and had announced his wish to leave the Confederacy.
Now, the orders were that when a man came to a commanding
officer with a request to go through the lines,
he was to be examined and all the money he had was
to be taken from him. General Butler had taken from
this Virginian friend of Strouse between fifty thousand
and seventy-five thousand dollars. When a general
took money in this way he had to deposit it at once in
the Treasury; there a strict account was kept of the
amount, whom it was taken by, and whom it was taken
from. Butler gave a receipt to this man, and he afterward
came to Washington to get his money. He and
Strouse came to the War Department, where they
bothered Mr. Stanton a good deal. Finally, Mr. Stanton
sent for me.</p>
<p>"Strouse is after me," he said; "he wants that
money, and I want you to settle the matter."</p>
<p>"What shall I do?" I asked; "what are the orders?"
He took the papers in the case and wrote on
the back of them:</p>
<div class='letter'>
<p>Referred to Mr. Dana, Assistant Secretary of War,
to be settled as in his judgment shall be best.</p>
<p class='nr5right'>
<span class="smcap">E. M. Stanton.</span></p>
</div>
<p>The man then turned his attention from the Secretary
to me. I looked into the matter, and gave him
back the money. The next day Mr. Stanton sent for
me. I saw he was angry.</p>
<p>"Did you give that Jew back his money?" he asked
in a harsh tone.</p>
<p>"Yes, sir."</p>
<p><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_161" id="Page_161">[Pg 161]</SPAN></span></p>
<p>"Well," he said, "I should like to know by what
authority you did it."</p>
<p>"If you will excuse me while I go to my room, I
will show my authority to you," I replied.</p>
<p>So I went up and brought down the paper he had
indorsed, and read to him:</p>
<p>"Referred to Mr. Dana, Assistant Secretary of War,
to be settled as in his judgment shall be best." Then I
handed it over to him. He looked at it, and then he
laughed.</p>
<p>"You are right," he said; "you have got me this
time." That was the only time he spoke to me in a
really harsh tone.</p>
<p>At the time that I entered the War Department for
regular duty, it was a very busy place. Mr. Stanton
frequently worked late at night, keeping his carriage
waiting for him. I never worked at night, as my eyes
would not allow it. I got to my office about nine
o'clock in the morning, and I stayed there nearly the
whole day, for I made it a rule never to go away until
my desk was cleared. When I arrived I usually found
on my table a big pile of papers which were to be acted
on, papers of every sort that had come to me from the
different departments of the office.</p>
<p>The business of the War Department during the
first winter that I spent in Washington was something
enormous. Nearly $285,000,000 was paid out that
year (from June, 1863, to June, 1864) by the quartermaster's
office, and $221,000,000 stood in accounts at
the end of the year awaiting examination before payment
was made. We had to buy every conceivable<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_162" id="Page_162">[Pg 162]</SPAN></span>
thing that an army of men could need. We bought fuel,
forage, furniture, coffins, medicine, horses, mules, telegraph
wire, sugar, coffee, flour, cloth, caps, guns, powder,
and thousands of other things. Sometimes our
supplies came by contract; again by direct purchase;
again by manufacture. Of course, by the fall of 1863
the army was pretty well supplied; still, that year we
bought over 3,000,000 pairs of trousers, nearly 5,000,000
flannel shirts and drawers, some 7,000,000 pairs of
stockings, 325,000 mess pans, 207,000 camp kettles,
over 13,000 drums, and 14,830 fifes. It was my duty
to make contracts for many of these supplies.</p>
<p>In making contracts for supplies of all kinds, we
were obliged to take careful precautions against frauds.
I had a colleague in the department, the Hon. Peter
H. Watson, the distinguished patent lawyer, who had
a great knack at detecting army frauds. One which
Watson had spent much time in trying to ferret out
came to light soon after I went into office. This was
an extensive fraud in forage furnished to the Army of
the Potomac. The trick of the fraud consisted in a dishonest
mixture of oats and Indian corn for the horses
and mules of the army. By changing the proportions
of the two sorts of grain, the contractors were able to
make a considerable difference in the cost of the bushel,
on account of the difference in the weight and price
of the grain, and it was difficult to detect the cheat.
However, Watson found it out, and at once arrested
the men who were most directly involved.</p>
<p>Soon after the arrest Watson went to New York.
While he was gone, certain parties from Philadelphia<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_163" id="Page_163">[Pg 163]</SPAN></span>
interested in the swindle came to me at the War Department.
Among them was the president of the Corn
Exchange. They paid me thirty-three thousand dollars
to cover the sum which one of the men confessed he
had appropriated; thirty-two thousand dollars was the
amount restored by another individual. The morning
after this transaction the Philadelphians returned to me,
demanding both that the villains should be released, and
that the papers and funds belonging to them, taken
at the time of their arrest, should be restored. It was
my judgment that, instead of being released, they should
be remanded to solitary confinement until they could
clear up all the forage frauds and make complete justice
possible. Then I should have released them, but not
before. So I telegraphed to Watson what had happened,
and asked him to return to prevent any false
step.</p>
<p>Now, it happened that the men arrested were of
some political importance in Pennsylvania, and eminent
politicians took a hand in getting them out of
the scrape. Among others, the Hon. David Wilmot,
then Senator of the United States and author of the
famous Wilmot proviso, was very active. He went to
Mr. Lincoln and made such representations and appeals
that finally the President consented to go with him
over to the War Department and see Watson in his
office. Wilmot remained outside, and Mr. Lincoln
went in to labor with the Assistant Secretary. Watson
eloquently described the nature of the fraud, and
the extent to which it had already been developed
by his partial investigation. The President, in reply,<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_164" id="Page_164">[Pg 164]</SPAN></span>
dwelt upon the fact that a large amount of money had
been refunded by the guilty men, and urged the greater
question of the safety of the cause and the necessity
of preserving united the powerful support which Pennsylvania
was giving to the administration in suppressing
the rebellion. Watson answered:</p>
<p>"Very well, Mr. President, if you wish to have these
men released, all that is necessary is to give the order;
but I shall ask to have it in writing. In such a case as
this it would not be safe for me to obey a verbal order;
and let me add that if you do release them the fact and
the reason will necessarily become known to the
people."</p>
<p>Finally Mr. Lincoln took up his hat and went out.
Wilmot was waiting in the corridor, and came to meet
him.</p>
<p>"Wilmot," he said, "I can't do anything with Watson;
he won't release them."</p>
<p>The reply which the Senator made to this remark
can not be printed here, but it did not affect the judgment
or the action of the President.</p>
<p>The men were retained for a long time afterward.
The fraud was fully investigated, and future swindles
of the kind were rendered impossible. If Watson could
have had his way, the guilty parties—and there were
some whose names never got to the public—would
have been tried by military commission and sternly
dealt with. But my own reflections upon the subject
led me to the conclusion that the moderation of the
President was wiser than the unrelenting justice of the
Assistant Secretary would have been.</p>
<p><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_165" id="Page_165">[Pg 165]</SPAN></span></p>
<p>Not a little of my time at the department was taken
up with people who had missions of some kind within
the lines of the army. I remember one of these particularly,
because it brought me a characteristic letter
from General Sherman. There was much suffering
among the loyal citizens and the Quakers of East Tennessee
in the winter of 1863-'64, and many relief committees
came to us seeking transportation and safe conduct
for themselves and their supplies into that country.
Some of these were granted, to the annoyance of
General Sherman, then in command of the Military
Division of the Mississippi. The reasons for his objections
he gave in this letter to me:</p>
<div class='letter'>
<p class='center'>
<span class="smcap">Headquarters Military Division of the Mississippi</span>,</p>
<p class='nr5right'><span class="smcap">Nashville, Tenn.</span>, <i class='date'>April 21, 1864</i>.</p>
<p><span class="smcap">C. A. Dana</span>, Esq., Ass't Sec. of War, Washington.</p>
<p><span class="smcap">My dear Friend</span>: It may be parliamentary, but is
not military, for me to write you; but I feel assured
anything I may write will only have the force of a casual
conversation, such as we have indulged in by the camp
fire or as we jogged along by the road. The text of
my letter is one you gave a Philadelphia gentleman who
is going up to East Tennessee to hunt up his brother
Quakers and administer the bounties of his own and his
fellow-citizens' charity. Now who would stand in the
way of one so kindly and charitably disposed? Surely
not I. But other questions present themselves. We
have been working hard with tens of thousands of men,
and at a cost of millions of dollars, to make railroads to
carry to the line of the Tennessee enough provisions
and material of war to enable us to push in our physical
force to the next stop in the war. I have found on
personal inspection that hitherto the railroads have
barely been able to feed our men, that mules have died
by the thousand, that arms and ammunition had [have]
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_166" id="Page_166">[Pg 166]</SPAN></span>laid in the depot for two weeks for want of cars, that no
accumulation at all of clothing and stores had been
or could be moved at Chattanooga, and that it took
four sets of cars and locomotives to accommodate the
passes given by military commanders; that gradually
the wants of citizens and charities were actually consuming
the real resources of a road designed exclusively
for army purposes. You have been on the spot and
can understand my argument. At least one hundred
citizens daily presented good claims to go forward—women
to attend sick children, parents in search of the
bodies of some slain in battle, sanitary committees sent
by States and corporations to look after the personal
wants of their constituents, ministers and friends to minister
to the Christian wants of their flocks; men who
had fled, anxious to go back to look after lost families,
etc.; and, more still, the tons of goods which they all
bore on their merciful errands. None but such as you,
who have been present and seen the tens, hundreds,
and thousands of such cases, can measure them in the
aggregate and segregate the exceptions.</p>
<p>I had no time to hesitate, for but a short month was
left me to prepare, and I must be ready to put in motion
near one hundred thousand men to move when naught
remains to save life. I figured up the mathematics, and
saw that I must have daily one hundred and forty-five
car loads of essentials for thirty days to enable me to
fill the requirement. Only seventy-five daily was all
the roads were doing. Now I have got it up to one
hundred and thirty-five. Troops march, cattle go by
the road, sanitary and sutler's stores limited, and all is
done that human energy can accomplish. Yet come
these pressing claims of charity, by men and women
who can not grasp the great problem. My usual answer
is, "Show me that your presence at the front is more
valuable than two hundred pounds of powder, bread,
or oats"; and it is generally conclusive. I have given
Mr. Savery a pass on your letter, and it takes two hundred
pounds of bread from our soldiers, or the same
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_167" id="Page_167">[Pg 167]</SPAN></span>of oats from our patient mules; but I could not promise
to feed the suffering Quakers at the expense of our
army. I have ordered all who can not provide food
at the front to be allowed transportation back in our
empty cars; but I can not undertake to transport the
food needed by the worthy East Tennesseeans or any
of them. In peace there is a beautiful harmony in all
the departments of life—they all fit together like the
Chinese puzzle; but in war all is ajar. Nothing fits,
and it is the struggle between the stronger and weaker;
and the latter, however it may appeal to the better feelings
of our nature, must kick the beam. To make war
we must and will harden our hearts.</p>
<p>Therefore, when preachers clamor and the sanitaries
wail, don't join in, but know that war, like the thunderbolt,
follows its laws, and turns not aside even if the
beautiful, the virtuous, and charitable stand in its path.</p>
<p>When the day and the hour comes, I'll strike Joe
Johnston, be the result what it may; but in the time allotted
to me for preparation I must and will be selfish
in making those preparations which I know to be necessary.</p>
<p class='center'>
Your friend,</p>
<p class='nr5right'><span class="smcap">W. T. Sherman</span>, <i class='title'>Major General</i>.<br/></p>
</div>
<p><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_168" id="Page_168">[Pg 168]</SPAN></span></p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />