<p><SPAN name="link2HCH0049" id="link2HCH0049"></SPAN></p>
<h2> Chapter XVIII: Future Condition Of Three Races—Part V </h2>
<p>In the North, as I have already remarked, a twofold migration ensues upon
the abolition of slavery, or even precedes that event when circumstances
have rendered it probable; the slaves quit the country to be transported
southwards; and the whites of the Northern States, as well as the
emigrants from Europe, hasten to fill up their place. But these two causes
cannot operate in the same manner in the Southern States. On the one hand,
the mass of slaves is too great for any expectation of their ever being
removed from the country to be entertained; and on the other hand, the
Europeans and Anglo-Americans of the North are afraid to come to inhabit a
country in which labor has not yet been reinstated in its rightful honors.
Besides, they very justly look upon the States in which the proportion of
the negroes equals or exceeds that of the whites, as exposed to very great
dangers; and they refrain from turning their activity in that direction.</p>
<p>Thus the inhabitants of the South would not be able, like their Northern
countrymen, to initiate the slaves gradually into a state of freedom by
abolishing slavery; they have no means of perceptibly diminishing the
black population, and they would remain unsupported to repress its
excesses. So that in the course of a few years, a great people of free
negroes would exist in the heart of a white nation of equal size.</p>
<p>The same abuses of power which still maintain slavery, would then become
the source of the most alarming perils which the white population of the
South might have to apprehend. At the present time the descendants of the
Europeans are the sole owners of the land; the absolute masters of all
labor; and the only persons who are possessed of wealth, knowledge, and
arms. The black is destitute of all these advantages, but he subsists
without them because he is a slave. If he were free, and obliged to
provide for his own subsistence, would it be possible for him to remain
without these things and to support life? Or would not the very
instruments of the present superiority of the white, whilst slavery
exists, expose him to a thousand dangers if it were abolished?</p>
<p>As long as the negro remains a slave, he may be kept in a condition not
very far removed from that of the brutes; but, with his liberty, he cannot
but acquire a degree of instruction which will enable him to appreciate
his misfortunes, and to discern a remedy for them. Moreover, there exists
a singular principle of relative justice which is very firmly implanted in
the human heart. Men are much more forcibly struck by those inequalities
which exist within the circle of the same class, than with those which may
be remarked between different classes. It is more easy for them to admit
slavery, than to allow several millions of citizens to exist under a load
of eternal infamy and hereditary wretchedness. In the North the population
of freed negroes feels these hardships and resents these indignities; but
its numbers and its powers are small, whilst in the South it would be
numerous and strong.</p>
<p>As soon as it is admitted that the whites and the emancipated blacks are
placed upon the same territory in the situation of two alien communities,
it will readily be understood that there are but two alternatives for the
future; the negroes and the whites must either wholly part or wholly
mingle. I have already expressed the conviction which I entertain as to
the latter event. *r I do not imagine that the white and black races will
ever live in any country upon an equal footing. But I believe the
difficulty to be still greater in the United States than elsewhere. An
isolated individual may surmount the prejudices of religion, of his
country, or of his race, and if this individual is a king he may effect
surprising changes in society; but a whole people cannot rise, as it were,
above itself. A despot who should subject the Americans and their former
slaves to the same yoke, might perhaps succeed in commingling their races;
but as long as the American democracy remains at the head of affairs, no
one will undertake so difficult a task; and it may be foreseen that the
freer the white population of the United States becomes, the more isolated
will it remain. *s</p>
<p class="foot">
r <br/> [ This opinion is sanctioned by authorities infinitely weightier
than anything that I can say: thus, for instance, it is stated in the
"Memoirs of Jefferson" (as collected by M. Conseil), "Nothing is more
clearly written in the book of destiny than the emancipation of the
blacks; and it is equally certain that the two races will never live in a
state of equal freedom under the same government, so insurmountable are
the barriers which nature, habit, and opinions have established between
them."]</p>
<p class="foot">
s <br/> [ If the British West India planters had governed themselves, they
would assuredly not have passed the Slave Emancipation Bill which the
mother-country has recently imposed upon them.]</p>
<p>I have previously observed that the mixed race is the true bond of union
between the Europeans and the Indians; just so the mulattoes are the true
means of transition between the white and the negro; so that wherever
mulattoes abound, the intermixture of the two races is not impossible. In
some parts of America, the European and the negro races are so crossed by
one another, that it is rare to meet with a man who is entirely black, or
entirely white: when they are arrived at this point, the two races may
really be said to be combined; or rather to have been absorbed in a third
race, which is connected with both without being identical with either.</p>
<p>Of all the Europeans the English are those who have mixed least with the
negroes. More mulattoes are to be seen in the South of the Union than in
the North, but still they are infinitely more scarce than in any other
European colony: mulattoes are by no means numerous in the United States;
they have no force peculiar to themselves, and when quarrels originating
in differences of color take place, they generally side with the whites;
just as the lackeys of the great, in Europe, assume the contemptuous airs
of nobility to the lower orders.</p>
<p>The pride of origin, which is natural to the English, is singularly
augmented by the personal pride which democratic liberty fosters amongst
the Americans: the white citizen of the United States is proud of his
race, and proud of himself. But if the whites and the negroes do not
intermingle in the North of the Union, how should they mix in the South?
Can it be supposed for an instant, that an American of the Southern
States, placed, as he must forever be, between the white man with all his
physical and moral superiority and the negro, will ever think of
preferring the latter? The Americans of the Southern States have two
powerful passions which will always keep them aloof; the first is the fear
of being assimilated to the negroes, their former slaves; and the second
the dread of sinking below the whites, their neighbors.</p>
<p>If I were called upon to predict what will probably occur at some future
time, I should say, that the abolition of slavery in the South will, in
the common course of things, increase the repugnance of the white
population for the men of color. I found this opinion upon the analogous
observation which I already had occasion to make in the North. I there
remarked that the white inhabitants of the North avoid the negroes with
increasing care, in proportion as the legal barriers of separation are
removed by the legislature; and why should not the same result take place
in the South? In the North, the whites are deterred from intermingling
with the blacks by the fear of an imaginary danger; in the South, where
the danger would be real, I cannot imagine that the fear would be less
general.</p>
<p>If, on the one hand, it be admitted (and the fact is unquestionable) that
the colored population perpetually accumulates in the extreme South, and
that it increases more rapidly than that of the whites; and if, on the
other hand, it be allowed that it is impossible to foresee a time at which
the whites and the blacks will be so intermingled as to derive the same
benefits from society; must it not be inferred that the blacks and the
whites will, sooner or later, come to open strife in the Southern States
of the Union? But if it be asked what the issue of the struggle is likely
to be, it will readily be understood that we are here left to form a very
vague surmise of the truth. The human mind may succeed in tracing a wide
circle, as it were, which includes the course of future events; but within
that circle a thousand various chances and circumstances may direct it in
as many different ways; and in every picture of the future there is a dim
spot, which the eye of the understanding cannot penetrate. It appears,
however, to be extremely probable that in the West Indian Islands the
white race is destined to be subdued, and the black population to share
the same fate upon the continent.</p>
<p>In the West India Islands the white planters are surrounded by an immense
black population; on the continent, the blacks are placed between the
ocean and an innumerable people, which already extends over them in a
dense mass, from the icy confines of Canada to the frontiers of Virginia,
and from the banks of the Missouri to the shores of the Atlantic. If the
white citizens of North America remain united, it cannot be supposed that
the negroes will escape the destruction with which they are menaced; they
must be subdued by want or by the sword. But the black population which is
accumulated along the coast of the Gulf of Mexico, has a chance of success
if the American Union is dissolved when the struggle between the two races
begins. If the federal tie were broken, the citizens of the South would be
wrong to rely upon any lasting succor from their Northern countrymen. The
latter are well aware that the danger can never reach them; and unless
they are constrained to march to the assistance of the South by a positive
obligation, it may be foreseen that the sympathy of color will be
insufficient to stimulate their exertions.</p>
<p>Yet, at whatever period the strife may break out, the whites of the South,
even if they are abandoned to their own resources, will enter the lists
with an immense superiority of knowledge and of the means of warfare; but
the blacks will have numerical strength and the energy of despair upon
their side, and these are powerful resources to men who have taken up
arms. The fate of the white population of the Southern States will,
perhaps, be similar to that of the Moors in Spain. After having occupied
the land for centuries, it will perhaps be forced to retire to the country
whence its ancestors came, and to abandon to the negroes the possession of
a territory, which Providence seems to have more peculiarly destined for
them, since they can subsist and labor in it more easily that the whites.</p>
<p>The danger of a conflict between the white and the black inhabitants of
the Southern States of the Union—a danger which, however remote it
may be, is inevitable—perpetually haunts the imagination of the
Americans. The inhabitants of the North make it a common topic of
conversation, although they have no direct injury to fear from the
struggle; but they vainly endeavor to devise some means of obviating the
misfortunes which they foresee. In the Southern States the subject is not
discussed: the planter does not allude to the future in conversing with
strangers; the citizen does not communicate his apprehensions to his
friends; he seeks to conceal them from himself; but there is something
more alarming in the tacit forebodings of the South, than in the clamorous
fears of the Northern States.</p>
<p>This all-pervading disquietude has given birth to an undertaking which is
but little known, but which may have the effect of changing the fate of a
portion of the human race. From apprehension of the dangers which I have
just been describing, a certain number of American citizens have formed a
society for the purpose of exporting to the coast of Guinea, at their own
expense, such free negroes as may be willing to escape from the oppression
to which they are subject. *t In 1820, the society to which I allude
formed a settlement in Africa, upon the seventh degree of north latitude,
which bears the name of Liberia. The most recent intelligence informs us
that 2,500 negroes are collected there; they have introduced the
democratic institutions of America into the country of their forefathers;
and Liberia has a representative system of government, negro jurymen,
negro magistrates, and negro priests; churches have been built, newspapers
established, and, by a singular change in the vicissitudes of the world,
white men are prohibited from sojourning within the settlement. *u</p>
<p class="foot">
t <br/> [ This society assumed the name of "The Society for the
Colonization of the Blacks." See its annual reports; and more particularly
the fifteenth. See also the pamphlet, to which allusion has already been
made, entitled "Letters on the Colonization Society, and on its probable
Results," by Mr. Carey, Philadelphia, 1833.]</p>
<p class="foot">
u <br/> [ This last regulation was laid down by the founders of the
settlement; they apprehended that a state of things might arise in Africa
similar to that which exists on the frontiers of the United States, and
that if the negroes, like the Indians, were brought into collision with a
people more enlightened than themselves, they would be destroyed before
they could be civilized.]</p>
<p>This is indeed a strange caprice of fortune. Two hundred years have now
elapsed since the inhabitants of Europe undertook to tear the negro from
his family and his home, in order to transport him to the shores of North
America; at the present day, the European settlers are engaged in sending
back the descendants of those very negroes to the Continent from which
they were originally taken; and the barbarous Africans have been brought
into contact with civilization in the midst of bondage, and have become
acquainted with free political institutions in slavery. Up to the present
time Africa has been closed against the arts and sciences of the whites;
but the inventions of Europe will perhaps penetrate into those regions,
now that they are introduced by Africans themselves. The settlement of
Liberia is founded upon a lofty and a most fruitful idea; but whatever may
be its results with regard to the Continent of Africa, it can afford no
remedy to the New World.</p>
<p>In twelve years the Colonization Society has transported 2,500 negroes to
Africa; in the same space of time about 700,000 blacks were born in the
United States. If the colony of Liberia were so situated as to be able to
receive thousands of new inhabitants every year, and if the negroes were
in a state to be sent thither with advantage; if the Union were to supply
the society with annual subsidies, *v and to transport the negroes to
Africa in the vessels of the State, it would still be unable to
counterpoise the natural increase of population amongst the blacks; and as
it could not remove as many men in a year as are born upon its territory
within the same space of time, it would fail in suspending the growth of
the evil which is daily increasing in the States. *w The negro race will
never leave those shores of the American continent, to which it was
brought by the passions and the vices of Europeans; and it will not
disappear from the New World as long as it continues to exist. The
inhabitants of the United States may retard the calamities which they
apprehend, but they cannot now destroy their efficient cause.</p>
<p class="foot">
v <br/> [ Nor would these be the only difficulties attendant upon the
undertaking; if the Union undertook to buy up the negroes now in America,
in order to transport them to Africa, the price of slaves, increasing with
their scarcity, would soon become enormous; and the States of the North
would never consent to expend such great sums for a purpose which would
procure such small advantages to themselves. If the Union took possession
of the slaves in the Southern States by force, or at a rate determined by
law, an insurmountable resistance would arise in that part of the country.
Both alternatives are equally impossible.]</p>
<p class="foot">
w <br/> [ In 1830 there were in the United States 2,010,327 slaves and
319,439 free blacks, in all 2,329,766 negroes: which formed about
one-fifth of the total population of the United States at that time.]</p>
<p>I am obliged to confess that I do not regard the abolition of slavery as a
means of warding off the struggle of the two races in the United States.
The negroes may long remain slaves without complaining; but if they are
once raised to the level of free men, they will soon revolt at being
deprived of all their civil rights; and as they cannot become the equals
of the whites, they will speedily declare themselves as enemies. In the
North everything contributed to facilitate the emancipation of the slaves;
and slavery was abolished, without placing the free negroes in a position
which could become formidable, since their number was too small for them
ever to claim the exercise of their rights. But such is not the case in
the South. The question of slavery was a question of commerce and
manufacture for the slave-owners in the North; for those of the South, it
is a question of life and death. God forbid that I should seek to justify
the principle of negro slavery, as has been done by some American writers!
But I only observe that all the countries which formerly adopted that
execrable principle are not equally able to abandon it at the present
time.</p>
<p>When I contemplate the condition of the South, I can only discover two
alternatives which may be adopted by the white inhabitants of those
States; viz., either to emancipate the negroes, and to intermingle with
them; or, remaining isolated from them, to keep them in a state of slavery
as long as possible. All intermediate measures seem to me likely to
terminate, and that shortly, in the most horrible of civil wars, and
perhaps in the extirpation of one or other of the two races. Such is the
view which the Americans of the South take of the question, and they act
consistently with it. As they are determined not to mingle with the
negroes, they refuse to emancipate them.</p>
<p>Not that the inhabitants of the South regard slavery as necessary to the
wealth of the planter, for on this point many of them agree with their
Northern countrymen in freely admitting that slavery is prejudicial to
their interest; but they are convinced that, however prejudicial it may
be, they hold their lives upon no other tenure. The instruction which is
now diffused in the South has convinced the inhabitants that slavery is
injurious to the slave-owner, but it has also shown them, more clearly
than before, that no means exist of getting rid of its bad consequences.
Hence arises a singular contrast; the more the utility of slavery is
contested, the more firmly is it established in the laws; and whilst the
principle of servitude is gradually abolished in the North, that self-same
principle gives rise to more and more rigorous consequences in the South.</p>
<p>The legislation of the Southern States with regard to slaves, presents at
the present day such unparalleled atrocities as suffice to show how
radically the laws of humanity have been perverted, and to betray the
desperate position of the community in which that legislation has been
promulgated. The Americans of this portion of the Union have not, indeed,
augmented the hardships of slavery; they have, on the contrary, bettered
the physical condition of the slaves. The only means by which the ancients
maintained slavery were fetters and death; the Americans of the South of
the Union have discovered more intellectual securities for the duration of
their power. They have employed their despotism and their violence against
the human mind. In antiquity, precautions were taken to prevent the slave
from breaking his chains; at the present day measures are adopted to
deprive him even of the desire of freedom. The ancients kept the bodies of
their slaves in bondage, but they placed no restraint upon the mind and no
check upon education; and they acted consistently with their established
principle, since a natural termination of slavery then existed, and one
day or other the slave might be set free, and become the equal of his
master. But the Americans of the South, who do not admit that the negroes
can ever be commingled with themselves, have forbidden them to be taught
to read or to write, under severe penalties; and as they will not raise
them to their own level, they sink them as nearly as possible to that of
the brutes.</p>
<p>The hope of liberty had always been allowed to the slave to cheer the
hardships of his condition. But the Americans of the South are well aware
that emancipation cannot but be dangerous, when the freed man can never be
assimilated to his former master. To give a man his freedom, and to leave
him in wretchedness and ignominy, is nothing less than to prepare a future
chief for a revolt of the slaves. Moreover, it has long been remarked that
the presence of a free negro vaguely agitates the minds of his less
fortunate brethren, and conveys to them a dim notion of their rights. The
Americans of the South have consequently taken measures to prevent
slave-owners from emancipating their slaves in most cases; not indeed by a
positive prohibition, but by subjecting that step to various forms which
it is difficult to comply with. I happened to meet with an old man, in the
South of the Union, who had lived in illicit intercourse with one of his
negresses, and had had several children by her, who were born the slaves
of their father. He had indeed frequently thought of bequeathing to them
at least their liberty; but years had elapsed without his being able to
surmount the legal obstacles to their emancipation, and in the mean while
his old age was come, and he was about to die. He pictured to himself his
sons dragged from market to market, and passing from the authority of a
parent to the rod of the stranger, until these horrid anticipations worked
his expiring imagination into frenzy. When I saw him he was a prey to all
the anguish of despair, and he made me feel how awful is the retribution
of nature upon those who have broken her laws.</p>
<p>These evils are unquestionably great; but they are the necessary and
foreseen consequence of the very principle of modern slavery. When the
Europeans chose their slaves from a race differing from their own, which
many of them considered as inferior to the other races of mankind, and
which they all repelled with horror from any notion of intimate
connection, they must have believed that slavery would last forever; since
there is no intermediate state which can be durable between the excessive
inequality produced by servitude and the complete equality which
originates in independence. The Europeans did imperfectly feel this truth,
but without acknowledging it even to themselves. Whenever they have had to
do with negroes, their conduct has either been dictated by their interest
and their pride, or by their compassion. They first violated every right
of humanity by their treatment of the negro and they afterwards informed
him that those rights were precious and inviolable. They affected to open
their ranks to the slaves, but the negroes who attempted to penetrate into
the community were driven back with scorn; and they have incautiously and
involuntarily been led to admit of freedom instead of slavery, without
having the courage to be wholly iniquitous, or wholly just.</p>
<p>If it be impossible to anticipate a period at which the Americans of the
South will mingle their blood with that of the negroes, can they allow
their slaves to become free without compromising their own security? And
if they are obliged to keep that race in bondage in order to save their
own families, may they not be excused for availing themselves of the means
best adapted to that end? The events which are taking place in the
Southern States of the Union appear to me to be at once the most horrible
and the most natural results of slavery. When I see the order of nature
overthrown, and when I hear the cry of humanity in its vain struggle
against the laws, my indignation does not light upon the men of our own
time who are the instruments of these outrages; but I reserve my
execration for those who, after a thousand years of freedom, brought back
slavery into the world once more.</p>
<p>Whatever may be the efforts of the Americans of the South to maintain
slavery, they will not always succeed. Slavery, which is now confined to a
single tract of the civilized earth, which is attacked by Christianity as
unjust, and by political economy as prejudicial; and which is now
contrasted with democratic liberties and the information of our age,
cannot survive. By the choice of the master, or by the will of the slave,
it will cease; and in either case great calamities may be expected to
ensue. If liberty be refused to the negroes of the South, they will in the
end seize it for themselves by force; if it be given, they will abuse it
ere long. *x</p>
<p class="foot">
x <br/> [ [This chapter is no longer applicable to the condition of the
negro race in the United States, since the abolition of slavery was the
result, though not the object, of the great Civil War, and the negroes
have been raised to the condition not only of freedmen, but of citizens;
and in some States they exercise a preponderating political power by
reason of their numerical majority. Thus, in South Carolina there were in
1870, 289,667 whites and 415,814 blacks. But the emancipation of the
slaves has not solved the problem, how two races so different and so
hostile are to live together in peace in one country on equal terms. That
problem is as difficult, perhaps more difficult than ever; and to this
difficulty the author's remarks are still perfectly applicable.]]</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />