<p><SPAN name="link2HCH0002" id="link2HCH0002"></SPAN></p>
<br/>
<h2> CHAPTER 2. EXPERIMENTS. </h2>
<p>As the nests of the Mason-bee of the Walls are erected on small-sized
pebbles, which can be easily carried wherever you like and moved about
from one place to another, without disturbing either the work of the
builder or the repose of the occupants of the cells, they lend themselves
readily to practical experiment, the only method that can throw a little
light on the nature of instinct. To study the insect's mental faculties to
any purpose, it is not enough for the observer to be able to profit by
some happy combination of circumstances: he must know how to produce other
combinations, vary them as much as possible and test them by substitution
and interchange. Lastly, to provide science with a solid basis of facts,
he must experiment. In this way, the evidence of formal records will one
day dispel the fantastic legends with which our books are crowded: the
Sacred Beetle (A Dung-beetle who rolls the manure of cattle into balls for
his own consumption and that of his young. Cf. "Insect Life", by J.H.
Fabre, translated by the author of "Mademoiselle Mori": chapters 1 and 2;
and "The Life and Love of the Insect", by J. Henri Fabre, translated by
Alexander Teixeira de Mattos: chapters 1 to 4.—Translator's Note.)
calling on his comrades to lend a helping hand in dragging his pellet out
of a rut; the Sphex (A species of Hunting Wasp. Cf. "Insect Life":
chapters 6 to 12.—Translator's Note.) cutting up her Fly so as to be
able to carry him despite the obstacle of the wind; and all the other
fallacies which are the stock-in-trade of those who wish to see in the
animal world what is not really there. In this way, again, materials will
be prepared which will one day be worked up by the hand of a master and
consign hasty and unfounded theories to oblivion.</p>
<p>Reaumur, as a rule, confines himself to stating facts as he sees them in
the normal course of events and does not try to probe deeper into the
insect's ingenuity by means of artificially produced conditions. In his
time, everything had yet to be done; and the harvest was so great that the
illustrious harvester went straight to what was most urgent, the gathering
of the crop, and left his successors to examine the grain and the ear in
detail. Nevertheless, in connection with the Chalicodoma of the Walls, he
mentions an experiment made by his friend, Duhamel. (Henri Louis Duhamel
du Monceau (1700-1781), a distinguished writer on botany and agriculture.—Translator's
Note.) He tells us how a Mason-bee's nest was enclosed in a glass funnel,
the mouth of which was covered merely with a bit of gauze. From it there
issued three males, who, after vanquishing mortar as hard as stone, either
never thought of piercing the flimsy gauze or else deemed the work beyond
their strength. The three Bees died under the funnel. Reaumur adds that
insects generally know only how to do what they have to do in the ordinary
course of nature.</p>
<p>The experiment does not satisfy me, for two reasons: first, to ask workers
equipped with tools for cutting clay as hard as granite to cut a piece of
gauze does not strike me as a happy inspiration; you cannot expect a
navvy's pick-axe to do the same work as a dressmaker's scissors. Secondly,
the transparent glass prison seems to me ill-chosen. As soon as the insect
has made a passage through the thickness of its earthen dome, it finds
itself in broad daylight; and to it daylight means the final deliverance,
means liberty. It strikes against an invisible obstacle, the glass; and to
it glass is nothing at all and yet an obstruction. On the far side, it
sees free space, bathed in sunshine. It wears itself out in efforts to fly
there, unable to understand the futile nature of its attempts against that
strange barrier which it cannot see. It perishes, at last, of exhaustion,
without, in its obstinacy, giving a glance at the gauze closing the
conical chimney. The experiment must be renewed under better conditions.</p>
<p>The obstacle which I select is ordinary brown paper, stout enough to keep
the insect in the dark and thin enough not to offer serious resistance to
the prisoner's efforts. As there is a great difference, in so far as the
actual nature of the barrier is concerned, between a paper partition and a
clay ceiling, let us begin by enquiring if the Mason-bee of the Walls
knows how or rather is able to make her way through one of these
partitions. The mandibles are pickaxes suitable for breaking through hard
mortar: are they also scissors capable of cutting a thin membrane? This is
the point to look into first of all.</p>
<p>In February, by which time the insect is in its perfect state, I take a
certain number of cocoons, without damaging them, from their cells and
insert them each in a separate stump of reed, closed at one end by the
natural wall of the node and open at the other. These pieces of reed
represent the cells of the nest. The cocoons are introduced with the
insect's head turned towards the opening. Lastly, my artificial cells are
closed in different ways. Some receive a stopper of kneaded clay, which,
when dry, will correspond in thickness and consistency with the mortar
ceiling of the natural nest. Others are plugged with a cylinder of
sorghum, at least a centimetre (.39 inch—Translator's Note.) thick;
and the remainder with a disk of brown paper solidly fastened by the edge.
All these bits of reed are placed side by side in a box, standing upright,
with the roof of my making at the top. The insects, therefore, are in the
exact position which they occupied in the nest. To open a passage, they
must do what they would have done without my interference, they must break
through the wall situated above their heads. I shelter the whole under a
wide bell-glass and wait for the month of May, the period of the
deliverance.</p>
<p>The results far exceed my anticipations. The clay stopper, the work of my
fingers, is perforated with a round hole, differing in no wise from that
which the Mason-bee contrives through her native mortar dome. The
vegetable barrier, new to my prisoners, namely, the sorghum cylinder, also
opens with a neat orifice, which might have been the work of a punch.
Lastly, the brown-paper cover allows the Bee to make her exit not by
bursting through, by making a violent rent, but once more by a clearly
defined round hole. My Bees therefore are capable of a task for which they
were not born; to come out of their reed cells they do what probably none
of their race did before them; they perforate the wall of sorghum-pith,
they make a hole in the paper barrier, just as they would have pierced
their natural clay ceiling. When the moment comes to free themselves, the
nature of the impediment does not stop them, provided that it be not
beyond their strength; and henceforth the argument of incapacity cannot be
raised when a mere paper barrier is in question.</p>
<p>In addition to the cells made out of bits of reed, I put under the
bell-glass, at the same time, two nests which are intact and still resting
on their pebbles. To one of them I have attached a sheet of brown paper
pressed close against the mortar dome. In order to come out, the insect
will have to pierce first the dome and then the paper, which follows
without any intervening space. Over the other, I have placed a little
brown paper cone, gummed to the pebble. There is here, therefore, as in
the first case, a double wall—a clay partition and a paper partition—with
this difference, that the two walls do not come immediately after each
other, but are separated by an empty space of about a centimetre at the
bottom, increasing as the cone rises.</p>
<p>The results of these two experiments are quite different. The Bees in the
nest to which a sheet of paper was tightly stuck come out by piercing the
two enclosures, of which the outer wall, the paper wrapper, is perforated
with a very clean round hole, as we have already seen in the reed cells
closed with a lid of the same material. We thus become aware, for the
second time, that, when the Mason-bee is stopped by a paper barrier, the
reason is not her incapacity to overcome the obstacle. On the other hand,
the occupants of the nest covered with the cone, after making their way
through the earthen dome, finding the sheet of paper at some distance, do
not even try to perforate this obstacle, which they would have conquered
so easily had it been fastened to the nest. They die under the cover
without making any attempt to escape. Even so did Reaumur's Bees perish in
the glass funnel, where their liberty depended only upon their cutting
through a bit of gauze.</p>
<p>This fact strikes me as rich in inferences. What! Here are sturdy insects,
to whom boring through granite is mere play, to whom a stopper of soft
wood and a paper partition are walls quite easy to perforate despite the
novelty of the material; and yet these vigorous housebreakers allow
themselves to perish stupidly in the prison of a paper bag, which they
could have torn open with one stroke of their mandibles! They are capable
of tearing it, but they do not dream of doing so! There can be only one
explanation of this suicidal inaction. The insect is well-endowed with
tools and instinctive faculties for accomplishing the final act of its
metamorphosis, namely, the act of emerging from the cocoon and from the
cell. Its mandibles provide it with scissors, file, pick-axe and lever
wherewith to cut, gnaw through and demolish either its cocoon and its
mortar enclosure or any other not too obstinate barrier substituted for
the natural covering of the nest. Moreover—and this is an important
proviso, except for which the outfit would be useless—it has, I will
not say the will to use those tools, but a secret stimulus inviting it to
employ them. When the hour for the emergence arrives, this stimulus is
aroused and the insect sets to work to bore a passage. It little cares in
this case whether the material to be pierced be the natural mortar,
sorghum-pith, or paper: the lid that holds it imprisoned does not resist
for long. Nor even does it care if the obstacle be increased in thickness
and a paper wall be added outside the wall of clay: the two barriers, with
no interval between them, form but one to the Bee, who passes through them
because the act of getting out is still one act and one only. With the
paper cone, whose wall is a little way off, the conditions are changed,
though the total thickness of wall is really the same. Once outside its
earthen abode, the insect has done all that it was destined to do in order
to release itself; to move freely on the mortar dome represents to it the
end of the release, the end of the act of boring. Around the nest a new
barrier appears, the wall made by the paper bag; but, in order to pierce
this, the insect would have to repeat the act which it has just
accomplished, the act which it is not intended to perform more than once
in its life; it would, in short, have to make into a double act that which
by nature is a single one; and the insect cannot do this, for the sole
reason that it has not the wish to. The Mason-bee perishes for lack of the
smallest gleam of intelligence. And this is the singular intellect in
which it is the fashion nowadays to see a germ of human reason! The
fashion will pass and the facts remain, bringing us back to the good old
notions of the soul and its immortal destinies.</p>
<p>Reaumur tells us how his friend Duhamel, having seized a Mason-bee with a
forceps when she had half entered the cell, head foremost, to fill it with
pollen-paste, carried her to a closet at some distance from the spot where
he captured her. The Bee got away from him in this closet and flew out
through the window. Duhamel made straight for the nest. The Mason arrived
almost as soon as he did and renewed her work. She only seemed a little
wilder, says the narrator, in conclusion.</p>
<p>Why were you not here with me, revered master, on the banks of the Aygues,
which is a vast expanse of pebbles for three-fourths of the year and a
mighty torrent when it rains? I should have shown you something infinitely
better than the fugitive escaping from the forceps. You would have
witnessed—and in so doing, would have shared my surprise—not
the brief flight of the Mason who, carried to the nearest room, releases
herself and forthwith returns to her nest in that familiar neighbourhood,
but long journeys through unknown country. You would have seen the Bee
whom I carried to a great distance from her home, to quite unfamiliar
ground, find her way back with a geographical sense of which the Swallow,
the Martin and the Carrier-pigeon would not have been ashamed; and you
would have asked yourself, as I did, what incomprehensible knowledge of
the local map guides that mother seeking her nest.</p>
<p>To come to facts: it is a matter of repeating with the Mason-bee of the
Walls my former experiments with the Cerceris-wasps (Cf. "Insect Life":
chapter 19.—Translator's Note.), of carrying the insect, in the
dark, a long way from its nest, marking it and then leaving it to its own
resources. In case any one should wish to try the experiment for himself,
I make him a present of my manner of operation, which may save him time at
the outset. The insect intended for a long journey must obviously be
handled with certain precautions. There must be no forceps employed, no
pincers, which might maim a wing, strain it and weaken the power of
flight. While the Bee is in her cell, absorbed in her work, I place a
small glass test-tube over it. The Mason, when she flies away, rushes into
the tube, which enables me, without touching her, to transfer her at once
into a screw of paper. This I quickly close. A tin box, an ordinary
botanizing-case, serves to convey the prisoners, each in her separate
paper bag.</p>
<p>The most delicate business, that of marking each captive before setting
her free, is left to be done on the spot selected for the starting-point.
I use finely-powdered chalk, steeped in a strong solution of gum arabic.
The mixture, applied to some part of the insect with a straw, leaves a
white patch, which soon dries and adheres to the fleece. When a particular
Mason-bee has to be marked so as to distinguish her from another in short
experiments, such as I shall describe presently, I confine myself to
touching the tip of the abdomen with my straw while the insect is half in
the cell, head downwards. The slight touch is not noticed by the Bee, who
continues her work quite undisturbed; but the mark is not very deep and
moreover it is in a rather bad place for any prolonged experiment, for the
Bee is constantly brushing her belly to detach the pollen and is sure to
rub it off sooner or later. I therefore make another one, dropping the
sticky chalk right in the middle of the thorax, between the wings.</p>
<p>It is hardly possible to wear gloves at this work: the fingers need all
their deftness to take up the restless Bee delicately and to overpower her
without rough pressure. It is easily seen that, though the job may yield
no other profit, you are at least sure of being stung. The sting can be
avoided with a little dexterity, but not always. You have to put up with
it. In any case, the Mason-bee's sting is far less painful than that of
the Hive-bee. The white spot is dropped on the thorax; the Mason flies
off; and the mark dries on the journey.</p>
<p>I start with two Mason-bees of the Walls working at their nests on the
pebbles in the alluvia of the Aygues, not far from Serignan. I carry them
home with me to Orange, where I release them after marking them. According
to the ordnance-survey map, the distance is about two and a half miles as
the crow flies. The captives are set at liberty in the evening, at a time
when the Bees begin to leave off work for the day. It is therefore
probable that my two Bees will spend their night in the neighbourhood.</p>
<p>Next morning, I go to the nests. The weather is still too cool and the
works are suspended. When the dew has gone, the Masons begin work. I see
one, but without a white spot, bringing pollen to one of the nests which
had been occupied by the travellers whom I am expecting. She is a stranger
who, finding the cell whose owner I myself had exiled untenanted, has
installed herself there and made it her property, not knowing that it is
already the property of another. She has perhaps been victualling it since
yesterday evening. Close upon ten o'clock, when the heat is at its full,
the mistress of the house suddenly arrives: her title-deeds as the
original occupant are inscribed for me in undeniable characters on her
thorax white with chalk. Here is one of my travellers back.</p>
<p>Over waving corn, over fields all pink with sainfoin, she has covered the
two miles and a half; and here she is, back at the nest, after foraging on
the way, for the doughty creature arrives with her abdomen yellow with
pollen. To come home again from the verge of the horizon is wonderful in
itself; to come home with a well-filled pollen-brush is superlative
economy. A journey, even a forced journey, always becomes a
foraging-expedition.</p>
<p>She finds the stranger in the nest:</p>
<p>'What's this? I'll teach you!'</p>
<p>And the owner falls furiously upon the intruder, who possibly was meaning
no harm. A hot chase in mid-air now takes place between the two Masons.
From time to time, they hover almost without movement, face to face, with
only a couple of inches separating them, and here, doubtless measuring
forces with their eyes, they buzz insults at each other. Then they go back
and alight on the nest in dispute, first one, then the other. I expect to
see them come to blows, to make them draw their stings. But my hopes are
disappointed: the duties of maternity speak in too imperious a voice for
them to risk their lives and wipe out the insult in a mortal duel. The
whole thing is confined to hostile demonstrations and a few insignificant
cuffs.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, the real proprietress seems to derive double courage and
double strength from the feeling that she is in her rights. She takes up a
permanent position on the nest and receives the other, each time that she
ventures to approach, with an angry quiver of her wings, an unmistakable
sign of her righteous indignation. The stranger, at last discouraged,
retires from the field. Forthwith the Mason resumes her work, as actively
as though she had not just undergone the hardships of a long journey.</p>
<p>One more word on these quarrels about property. It is not unusual, when
one Mason-bee is away on an expedition, for another, some homeless
vagabond, to call at the nest, take a fancy to it and set to work on it,
sometimes at the same cell, sometimes at the next, if there are several
vacant, which is generally the case in the old nests. The first occupier,
on her return, never fails to drive away the intruder, who always ends by
being turned out, so keen and invincible is the mistress' sense of
ownership. Reversing the savage Prussian maxim, 'Might is right,' among
the Mason-bees right is might, for there is no other explanation of the
invariable retreat of the usurper, whose strength is not a whit inferior
to that of the real owner. If she is less bold, this is because she has
not the tremendous moral support of knowing herself in the right, which
makes itself respected, among equals, even in the brute creation.</p>
<p>The second of my travellers does not reappear, either on the day when the
first arrived or on the following days. I decide upon another experiment,
on this occasion with five subjects. The starting-place is the same; and
the place of arrival, the distance, the time of day, all remain unchanged.
Of the five with whom I experiment, I find three at their nests next day;
the two others are missing.</p>
<p>It is therefore fully established that the Mason-bee of the Walls, carried
to a distance of two and a half miles and released at a place which she
has certainly never seen before, is able to return to the nest. But why do
first one out of two and then two out of five fail to join their fellows?
What one can do cannot another do? Is there a difference in the faculty
that guides them over unknown ground? Or is it not rather a difference in
flying-power? I remember that my Bees did not all start off with the same
vigour. Some were hardly out of my fingers before they darted furiously
into the air, where I at once lost sight of them, whereas the others came
dropping down a few yards away from me, after a short flight. The latter,
it seems certain, must have suffered on the journey, perhaps from the heat
concentrated in the furnace of my box. Or I may have hurt the articulation
of the wings in marking them, an operation difficult to perform when you
are guarding against stings. These are maimed, feeble creatures, who will
linger in the sainfoin-fields close by, and not the powerful aviators
required by the journey.</p>
<p>The experiment must be tried again, taking count only of the Bees who
start off straight from between my fingers with a clean, vigorous flight.
The waverers, the laggards who stop almost at once on some bush shall be
left out of the reckoning. Moreover, I will do my best to estimate the
time taken in returning to the nest. For an experiment of this kind, I
need plenty of subjects, as the weak and the maimed, of whom there may be
many, are to be disregarded. The Mason-bee of the Walls is unable to
supply me with the requisite number: there are not enough of her; and I am
anxious not to interfere too much with the little Aygues-side colony, for
whom I have other experiments in view. Fortunately, I have at my own
place, under the eaves of a shed, a magnificent nest of Chalicodoma sicula
in full activity. I can draw to whatever extent I please on the populous
city. The insect is small, less than half the size of C. muraria, but no
matter: it will deserve all the more credit if it can traverse the two
miles and a half in store for it and find its way back to the nest. I take
forty Bees, isolating them, as usual, in screws of paper.</p>
<p>In order to reach the nest, I place a ladder against the wall: it will be
used by my daughter Aglae and will enable her to mark the exact moment of
the return of the first Bee. I set the clock on the mantelpiece and my
watch at the same time, so that we may compare the instant of departure
and of arrival. Things being thus arranged, I carry off my forty captives
and go to the identical spot where C. muraria works, in the pebbly bed of
the Aygues. The trip will have a double object: to observe Reaumur's Mason
and to set the Sicilian Mason at liberty. The latter, therefore, will also
have two and a half miles to travel home.</p>
<p>At last my prisoners are released, all of them being first marked with a
big white dot in the middle of the thorax.</p>
<p>You do not come off scot-free when handling one after the other forty
wrathful Bees, who promptly unsheathe and brandish their poisoned stings.
The stab is but too often given before the mark is made. My smarting
fingers make movements of self-defence which my will is not always able to
control. I take hold with greater precaution for myself than for the
insect; I sometimes squeeze harder than I ought to if I am to spare my
travellers. To experiment so as to lift, if possible, a tiny corner of the
veil of truth is a fine and noble thing, a mighty stimulant in the face of
danger; but still one may be excused for displaying some impatience when
it is a matter of receiving forty stings in one's fingers at one short
sitting. If any man should reproach me for being too careless with my
thumbs, I would suggest that he should have a try: he can then judge for
himself the pleasures of the situation.</p>
<p>To cut a long story short, either through the fatigue of the journey, or
through my fingers pressing too hard and perhaps injuring some
articulations, only twenty out of my forty Bees start with a bold,
vigorous flight. The others, unable to keep their balance, wander about on
the nearest bit of grass or remain on the osier-shoots on which I have
placed them, refusing to fly even when I tickle them with a straw. These
weaklings, these cripples, these incapables injured by my fingers must be
struck off my list. Those who started with an unhesitating flight number
about twenty. That is ample.</p>
<p>At the actual moment of departure, there is nothing definite about the
direction taken, none of that straight flight to the nest which the
Cerceris-wasps once showed me in similar circumstances. As soon as they
are liberated, the Mason-bees flee as though scared, some in one
direction, some in exactly the opposite direction. Nevertheless, as far as
their impetuous flight allows, I seem to perceive a quick return on the
part of those Bees who have started flying towards a point opposite to
their home; and the majority appear to me to be making for those blue
distances where their nest lies. I leave this question with certain doubts
which are inevitable in the case of insects which I cannot follow with my
eyes for more than twenty yards.</p>
<p>Hitherto, the operation has been favoured by calm weather; but now things
become complicated. The heat is stifling and the sky becomes stormy. A
stiff breeze springs up, blowing from the south, the very direction which
my Bees must take to return to the nest. Can they overcome this opposing
current and cleave the aerial torrent with their wings? If they try, they
will have to fly close to the ground, as I now see the Bees do who
continue their foraging; but soaring to lofty regions, whence they can
obtain a clear view of the country, is, so it seems to me, prohibited. I
am therefore very apprehensive as to the success of my experiment when I
return to Orange, after first trying to steal some fresh secret from the
Aygues Mason-bee of the Pebbles.</p>
<p>I have scarcely reached the house before Aglae greets me, her cheeks
flushed with excitement:</p>
<p>'Two!' she cries. 'Two came back at twenty minutes to three, with a load
of pollen under their bellies!'</p>
<p>A friend of mine had appeared upon the scene, a grave man of the law, who
on hearing what was happening, had neglected code and stamped paper and
insisted upon also being present at the arrival of my Carrier-pigeons. The
result interested him more than his case about a party-wall. Under a
tropical sun, in a furnace heat reflected from the wall of the shed, every
five minutes he climbed the ladder bare-headed, with no other protection
against sunstroke than his thatch of thick, grey locks. Instead of the one
observer whom I had posted, I found two good pairs of eyes watching the
Bees' return.</p>
<p>I had released my insects at about two o'clock; and the first arrivals
returned to the nest at twenty minutes to three. They had therefore taken
less than three-quarters of an hour to cover the two miles and a half, a
very striking result, especially when we remember that the Bees did some
foraging on the road, as was proved by the yellow pollen on their bellies,
and that, on the other hand, the travellers' flight must have been
hindered by the wind blowing against them. Three more came home before my
eyes, each with her load of pollen, an outward and visible sign of the
work done on the journey. As it was growing late, our observations had to
cease. When the sun goes down, the Mason-bees leave the nest and take
refuge somewhere or other, perhaps under the tiles of the roofs, or in
little corners of the walls. I could not reckon on the arrival of the
others before work was resumed, in the full sunshine.</p>
<p>Next day, when the sun recalled the scattered workers to the nest, I took
a fresh census of Bees with a white spot on the thorax. My success
exceeded all my hopes: I counted fifteen, fifteen of the transported
prisoners of the day before, storing their cells or building as though
nothing out of the way had happened. The weather had become more and more
threatening; and now the storm burst and was followed by a succession of
rainy days which prevented me from continuing.</p>
<p>The experiment suffices as it stands. Of some twenty Bees who had seemed
fit to make the long journey when I released them, fifteen at least had
returned: two within the first hour, three in the course of the evening
and the rest next morning. They had returned in spite of having the wind
against them and—a graver difficulty still—in spite of being
unacquainted with the locality to which I had transported them. There is,
in fact, no doubt that they were setting eyes for the first time on those
osier-beds of the Aygues which I had selected as the starting-point. Never
would they have travelled so far afield of their own accord, for
everything that they want for building and victualling under the roof of
my shed is within easy reach. The path at the foot of the wall supplies
the mortar; the flowery meadows surrounding my house furnish nectar and
pollen. Economical of their time as they are, they do not go flying two
miles and a half in search of what abounds at a few yards from the nest.
Besides, I see them daily taking their building-materials from the path
and gathering their harvest on the wild-flowers, especially on the meadow
sage. To all appearance, their expeditions do not cover more than a radius
of a hundred yards or so. Then how did my exiles return? What guided them?
It was certainly not memory, but some special faculty which we must
content ourselves with recognizing by its astonishing effects without
pretending to explain it, so greatly does it transcend our own psychology.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />