<p><SPAN name="link2HCH0005" id="link2HCH0005"></SPAN></p>
<br/>
<h2> CHAPTER 5. THE STORY OF MY CATS. </h2>
<p>If this swinging-process fails entirely when its object is to make the
insect lose its bearings, what influence can it have upon the Cat? Is the
method of whirling the animal round in a bag, to prevent its return,
worthy of confidence? I believed in it at first, so close-allied was it to
the hopeful idea suggested by the great Darwin. But my faith is now
shaken: my experience with the insect makes me doubtful of the Cat. If the
former returns after being whirled, why should not the latter? I therefore
embark upon fresh experiments.</p>
<p>And, first of all, to what extent does the Cat deserve his reputation of
being able to return to the beloved home, to the scenes of his amorous
exploits on the tiles and in the hay-lofts? The most curious facts are
told of his instinct; children's books on natural history abound with
feats that do the greatest credit to his prowess as a pilgrim. I do not
attach much importance to these stories: they come from casual observers,
uncritical folk given to exaggeration. It is not everybody who can talk
about animals correctly. When some one not of the craft gets on the
subject and says to me, 'Such or such an animal is black,' I begin by
finding out if it does not happen to be white; and many a time the truth
is discovered in the converse proposition. Men come to me and sing the
praises of the Cat as a travelling-expert. Well and good: we will now look
upon the Cat as a poor traveller. And that would be the extent of my
knowledge if I had only the evidence of books and of people unaccustomed
to the scruples of scientific examination. Fortunately, I am acquainted
with a few incidents that will stand the test of my incredulity. The Cat
really deserves his reputation as a discerning pilgrim. Let us relate
these incidents.</p>
<p>One day—it was at Avignon—there appeared upon the garden-wall
a wretched-looking Cat, with matted coat and protruding ribs, so thin that
his back was a mere jagged ridge. He was mewing with hunger. My children,
at that time very young, took pity on his misery. Bread soaked in milk was
offered him at the end of a reed. He took it. And the mouthfuls succeeded
one another to such good purpose that he was sated and went off, heedless
of the 'Puss! Puss!' of his compassionate friends. Hunger returned; and
the starveling reappeared in his wall-top refectory. He received the same
fare of bread soaked in milk, the same soft words. He allowed himself to
be tempted. He came down from the wall. The children were able to stroke
his back. Goodness, how thin he was!</p>
<p>It was the great topic of conversation. We discussed it at table: we would
tame the vagabond, we would keep him, we would make him a bed of hay. It
was a most important matter: I can see to this day, I shall always see the
council of rattleheads deliberating on the Cat's fate. They were not
satisfied until the savage animal remained. Soon he grew into a
magnificent Tom. His large round head, his muscular legs, his reddish fur,
flecked with darker patches, reminded one of a little jaguar. He was
christened Ginger because of his tawny hue. A mate joined him later,
picked up in almost similar circumstances. Such was the origin of my
series of Gingers, which I have retained for little short of twenty years
through the vicissitudes of my various removals.</p>
<p>The first of these removals took place in 1870. A little earlier, a
minister who has left a lasting memory in the University, that fine man,
Victor Duruy (Jean Victor Duruy (1811-1894), author of a number of
historical works, including a well-known "Histoire des Romains", and
minister of public instruction under Napoleon III. from 1863 to 1869. Cf.
"The Life of the Fly": chapter 20.—Translator's Note.), had
instituted classes for the secondary education of girls. This was the
beginning, as far as was then possible, of the burning question of to-day.
I very gladly lent my humble aid to this labour of light. I was put to
teach physical and natural science. I had faith and was not sparing of
work, with the result that I rarely faced a more attentive or interested
audience. The days on which the lessons fell were red-letter days,
especially when the lesson was botany and the table disappeared from view
under the treasures of the neighbouring conservatories.</p>
<p>That was going too far. In fact, you can see how heinous my crime was: I
taught those young persons what air and water are; whence the lightning
comes and the thunder; by what device our thoughts are transmitted across
the seas and continents by means of a metal wire; why fire burns and why
we breathe; how a seed puts forth shoots and how a flower blossoms: all
eminently hateful things in the eyes of some people, whose feeble eyes are
dazzled by the light of day.</p>
<p>The little lamp must be put out as quickly as possible and measures taken
to get rid of the officious person who strove to keep it alight. The
scheme was darkly plotted with the old maids who owned my house and who
saw the abomination of desolation in these new educational methods. I had
no written agreement to protect me. The bailiff appeared with a notice on
stamped paper. It baldly informed that I must move out within four weeks
from date, failing which the law would turn my goods and chattels into the
street. I had hurriedly to provide myself with a dwelling. The first house
which we found happened to be at Orange. Thus was my exodus from Avignon
effected.</p>
<p>We were somewhat anxious about the moving of the Cats. We were all of us
attached to them and should have thought it nothing short of criminal to
abandon the poor creatures, whom we had so often petted, to distress and
probably to thoughtless persecution. The shes and the kittens would travel
without any trouble: all you have to do is to put them in a basket; they
will keep quiet on the journey. But the old Tom-cats were a serious
problem. I had two: the head of the family, the patriarch; and one of his
descendants, quite as strong as himself. We decided to take the grandsire,
if he consented to come, and to leave the grandson behind, after finding
him a home.</p>
<p>My friend Dr. Loriol offered to take charge of the forsaken one. The
animal was carried to him at nightfall in a closed hamper. Hardly were we
seated at the evening-meal, talking of the good fortune of our Tom-cat,
when we saw a dripping mass jump through the window. The shapeless bundle
came and rubbed itself against our legs, purring with happiness. It was
the Cat.</p>
<p>I learnt his story next day. On arriving at Dr. Loriol's, he was locked up
in a bedroom. The moment he saw himself a prisoner in the unfamiliar room,
he began to jump about wildly on the furniture, against the window-panes,
among the ornaments on the mantelpiece, threatening to make short work of
everything. Mme. Loriol was frightened by the little lunatic; she hastened
to open the window; and the Cat leapt out among the passers-by. A few
minutes later, he was back at home. And it was no easy matter: he had to
cross the town almost from end to end; he had to make his way through a
long labyrinth of crowded streets, amid a thousand dangers, including
first boys and next dogs; lastly—and this perhaps was an even more
serious obstacle—he had to pass over the Sorgue, a river running
through Avignon. There were bridges at hand, many, in fact; but the
animal, taking the shortest cut, had used none of them, bravely jumping
into the water, as its streaming fur showed. I had pity on the poor Cat,
so faithful to his home. We agreed to do our utmost to take him with us.
We were spared the worry: a few days later, he was found lying stiff and
stark under a shrub in the garden. The plucky animal had fallen a victim
to some stupid act of spite. Some one had poisoned him for me. Who? It is
not likely that it was a friend!</p>
<p>There remained the old Cat. He was not indoors when we started; he was
prowling round the hay-lofts of the neighbourhood. The carrier was
promised an extra ten francs if he brought the Cat to Orange with one of
the loads which he had still to convey. On his last journey he brought him
stowed away under the driver's seat. I scarcely knew my old Tom when we
opened the moving prison in which he had been confined since the day
before. He came out looking a most alarming beast, scratching and
spitting, with bristling hair, bloodshot eyes, lips white with foam. I
thought him mad and watched him closely for a time. I was wrong: it was
merely the fright of a bewildered animal. Had there been trouble with the
carrier when he was caught? Did he have a bad time on the journey? History
is silent on both points. What I do know is that the very nature of the
Cat seemed changed: there was no more friendly purring, no more rubbing
against our legs; nothing but a wild expression and the deepest gloom.
Kind treatment could not soothe him. For a few weeks longer, he dragged
his wretched existence from corner to corner; then, one day, I found him
lying dead in the ashes on the hearth. Grief, with the help of old age,
had killed him. Would he have gone back to Avignon, had he had the
strength? I would not venture to affirm it. But, at least, I think it very
remarkable that an animal should let itself die of home-sickness because
the infirmities of age prevent it from returning to its old haunts.</p>
<p>What the patriarch could not attempt, we shall see another do, over a much
shorter distance, I admit. A fresh move is resolved upon, that I may have,
at length, the peace and quiet essential to my work. This time, I hope
that it will be the last. I leave Orange for Serignan.</p>
<p>The family of Gingers has been renewed: the old ones have passed away, new
ones have come, including a full-grown Tom, worthy in all respects of his
ancestors. He alone will give us some difficulty; the others, the babies
and the mothers, can be removed without trouble. We put them into baskets.
The Tom has one to himself, so that the peace may be kept. The journey is
made by carriage, in company with my family. Nothing striking happens
before our arrival. Released from their hampers, the females inspect the
new home, explore the rooms one by one; with their pink noses they
recognize the furniture: they find their own seats, their own tables,
their own arm-chairs; but the surroundings are different. They give little
surprised miaows and questioning glances. A few caresses and a saucer of
milk allay all their apprehensions; and, by the next day, the mother Cats
are acclimatised.</p>
<p>It is a different matter with the Tom. We house him in the attics, where
he will find ample room for his capers; we keep him company, to relieve
the weariness of captivity; we take him a double portion of plates to
lick; from time to time, we place him in touch with some of his family, to
show him that he is not alone in the house; we pay him a host of
attentions, in the hope of making him forget Orange. He appears, in fact,
to forget it: he is gentle under the hand that pets him, he comes when
called, purrs, arches his back. It is well: a week of seclusion and kindly
treatment have banished all notions of returning. Let us give him his
liberty. He goes down to the kitchen, stands by the table like the others,
goes out into the garden, under the watchful eye of Aglae, who does not
lose sight of him; he prowls all around with the most innocent air. He
comes back. Victory! The Tom-cat will not run away.</p>
<p>Next morning:</p>
<p>'Puss! Puss!'</p>
<p>Not a sign of him! We hunt, we call. Nothing. Oh, the hypocrite, the
hypocrite! How he has tricked us! He has gone, he is at Orange. None of
those about me can believe in this venturesome pilgrimage. I declare that
the deserter is at this moment at Orange mewing outside the empty house.</p>
<p>Aglae and Claire went to Orange. They found the Cat, as I said they would,
and brought him back in a hamper. His paws and belly were covered with red
clay; and yet the weather was dry, there was no mud. The Cat, therefore,
must have got wet crossing the Aygues torrent; and the moist fur had kept
the red earth of the fields through which he passed. The distance from
Serignan to Orange, in a straight line, is four and a half miles. There
are two bridges over the Aygues, one above and one below that line, some
distance away. The Cat took neither the one nor the other: his instinct
told him the shortest road and he followed that road, as his belly,
covered with red mud, proved. He crossed the torrent in May, at a time
when the rivers run high; he overcame his repugnance to water in order to
return to his beloved home. The Avignon Tom did the same when crossing the
Sorgue.</p>
<p>The deserter was reinstated in his attic at Serignan. He stayed there for
a fortnight; and at last we let him out. Twenty-four hours had not elapsed
before he was back at Orange. We had to abandon him to his unhappy fate. A
neighbour living out in the country, near my former house, told me that he
saw him one day hiding behind a hedge with a rabbit in his mouth. Once no
longer provided with food, he, accustomed to all the sweets of a Cat's
existence, turned poacher, taking toll of the farm-yards round about my
old home. I heard no more of him. He came to a bad end, no doubt: he had
become a robber and must have met with a robber's fate.</p>
<p>The experiment has been made and here is the conclusion, twice proved.
Full-grown Cats can find their way home, in spite of the distance and
their complete ignorance of the intervening ground. They have, in their
own fashion, the instinct of my Mason-bees. A second point remains to be
cleared up, that of the swinging motion in the bag. Are they thrown out of
their latitude by this stratagem, are or they not? I was thinking of
making some experiments, when more precise information arrived and taught
me that it was not necessary. The first who acquainted me with the method
of the revolving bag was telling the story told him by a second person,
who repeated the story of a third, a story related on the authority of a
fourth; and so on. None had tried it, none had seen it for himself. It is
a tradition of the country-side. One and all extol it as an infallible
method, without, for the most part, having attempted it. And the reason
which they give for its success is, in their eyes, conclusive. If, say
they, we ourselves are blind-folded and then spin round for a few seconds,
we no longer know where we are. Even so with the Cat carried off in the
darkness of the swinging bag. They argue from man to the animal, just as
others argue from the animal to man: a faulty method in either case, if
there really be two distinct psychic worlds.</p>
<p>The belief would not be so deep-rooted in the peasant's mind, if facts had
not from time to time confirmed it. But we may assume that, in successful
cases, the Cats made to lose their bearings were young and unemancipated
animals. With those neophytes, a drop of milk is enough to dispel the
grief of exile. They do not return home, whether they have been whirled in
a bag or not. People have thought it as well to subject them to the
whirling operation by way of an additional precaution; and the method has
received the credit of a success that has nothing to do with it. In order
to test the method properly, it should have been tried on a full-grown
Cat, a genuine Tom.</p>
<p>I did in the end get the evidence which I wanted on this point.
Intelligent and trustworthy people, not given to jumping to conclusions,
have told me that they have tried the trick of the swinging bag to keep
Cats from returning to their homes. None of them succeeded when the animal
was full-grown. Though carried to a great distance, into another house,
and subjected to a conscientious series of revolutions, the Cat always
came back. I have in mind more particularly a destroyer of the Goldfish in
a fountain, who, when transported from Serignan to Piolenc, according to
the time-honoured method, returned to his fish; who, when carried into the
mountain and left in the woods, returned once more. The bag and the
swinging round proved of no avail; and the miscreant had to be put to
death. I have verified a fair number of similar instances, all under most
favourable conditions. The evidence is unanimous: the revolving motion
never keeps the adult Cat from returning home. The popular belief, which I
found so seductive at first, is a country prejudice, based upon imperfect
observation. We must, therefore, abandon Darwin's idea when trying to
explain the homing of the Cat as well as of the Mason-bee.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />