<h2>CHAPTER XIV</h2>
<p class="center"><small>THE PIMLICO MYSTERY</small></p>
<p><span class="smcap">Chloroform</span> belongs to the class
of neurotic poisons which act
on the brain, and produce loss
of sensation. It is a colourless,
heavy, and volatile liquid, having
a peculiar ethereal odour
which cannot be easily mistaken,
and a sweet pungent taste when
diluted. For producing insensibility
it requires very careful
and experienced administration,
and more lives have been lost
by carelessness in using, than
from the noxious character of
the drug.</p>
<p>Many stories are related of the
peculiar hallucinations and remarks
made by patients while
under, or partially under the
influence of chloroform. The
following has the merit of being
true:—</p>
<p>"Doctor (<em>who has just administered
chloroform to a lady</em>):
'Nurse, some 1 in 1,000, if you
please.'</p>
<p>"Patient (<em>under the anæsthetic</em>):
'Ah! that's my Jack.
He's one in a thousand. Dear
Jack!'"</p>
<p>The stories that crop up from
time to time, of persons who
have been rendered unconscious
by simply waving a chloroformed
handkerchief before the face,
usually emanate from the fertile
brain of some imaginative
journalist. As an internal
poison chloroform has rarely
been used, although there are
many cases on record where
persons have accustomed themselves
to drinking chloroform,
until they have been able to
swallow it in very large quantities.
The one recorded instance
in which it was alleged
to have been used for the criminal
destruction of life was in the
remarkable case known as the
"Pimlico Mystery."</p>
<p>The trial of Adelaide Bartlett
for the wilful murder of her
husband by administering
chloroform to him, was held
before Mr. Justice Wills at the
Central Criminal Court on
April 12, 1886, and lasted for
six days. The case attracted
considerable attention and interest
throughout, which culminated
in a dramatic scene
at the close, and the acquittal
of the accused woman. The
strange relations which existed
between Mrs. Bartlett and her<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_76" id="Page_76">76</SPAN></span>
husband, with whose murder she
was charged, the yet more
strange relations between her
and the man who in the first
instance was included in the
accusation, together with the
exceptional circumstances of his
acquittal, and his immediate
appearance in the witness box
formed a case of peculiar
dramatic interest. Thomas
Edwin Bartlett was a grocer,
having several shops in the
suburbs of London, and at the
time of his death was forty
years of age. In 1875 he married
a Frenchwoman, Adelaide
Blanche de la Tremoille, who
was a native of Orleans, and
whom he met at the house of his
brother, she being at that time
about twenty years of age. After
the marriage she went to a
boarding-school at Stoke Newington,
and lived with her husband
only during the vacation.
At a later period she went to a
convent school in Belgium, where
she remained for some eighteen
months, after which she rejoined
her husband, and settled
down to live in London. During
Christmas of 1881 she gave birth
to a stillborn child, which so
affected her that she came to the
resolution that she would have
no more children. Some four
years later Bartlett and his
wife made the acquaintance of
George Dyson, a young Wesleyan
minister, who soon became on
terms of great social intimacy
with them, visiting and dining
with them frequently. The admiration
for their friend seems
to have been common to both
husband and wife. In 1885
Edwin Bartlett made a will,
leaving all he possessed to his
wife, and making Mr. Dyson and
his solicitors his executors.
Shortly afterwards the couple
removed to furnished apartments
in Claverton Street, Pimlico,
where they apparently lived on
good terms, and were still frequently
visited by their friend
Mr. Dyson.</p>
<p>On December 10, in the same
year, Mr. Bartlett became seriously
ill. Peculiar symptoms
developed, which excited the
curiosity and surprise of the
medical man called in to attend
him. The state of his gums
suggested to the doctor that the
illness was due to mercury,
which in some way was being
taken or administered to him,
and he complained of nervous
depression and sleeplessness. He
appeared to be gradually recovering
from this, but on
December 19, Mr. Bartlett himself
suggested that a second
doctor should be called in, lest,
as he put it, "his friends should
suspect, if anything happened to<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_77" id="Page_77">77</SPAN></span>
him, that his wife was poisoning
him." The cause for this was
put down to some ill-feeling
which had formerly existed between
Mrs. Bartlett and her
husband's father. A second
practitioner, therefore, was called
in, and the patient, on December
26, was practically well and went
out for a drive though still weak.</p>
<p>The next day Mrs. Bartlett
asked Mr. Dyson, who was constantly
calling at the house, to
procure for her a considerable
quantity of chloroform, which
she told him she had used before
with good effect on her husband
for some internal ailment of long
standing, and that this internal
affliction had upon previous
occasions given him paroxysms.
She further expressed apparently
some belief that he might die
suddenly in one of these attacks.
Dyson seems meekly to have
yielded to her request, and obtained
three different lots of
chloroform, in all six ounces,
from various chemists, giving
the reason, that he required it
for taking out grease spots, and
placed it all together in one
bottle. Two days after he met
Mrs. Bartlett on the Embankment
and handed her the chloroform.
During his illness, Mr.
Bartlett had slept on a camp
bedstead in the front drawing-room,
his wife occupying a sofa
in the same room. On December
31 he was apparently quite
well again, and about half-past
ten o'clock in the evening, Mrs.
Bartlett told the servant she
required nothing else and retired
with her husband for the night.
At four o'clock in the morning
the house was aroused by Mrs.
Bartlett, and it was discovered
her husband was dead in bed.</p>
<p>The statement made by the
lady was, that when her husband
had settled for the night she sat
down at the foot of the bed; that
her hand was resting upon his
feet; that she dozed off in her
chair; she awoke with a sensation
of cramp, and was horrified to
find her husband's feet were
deathly cold. She tried to pour
some brandy down his throat,
and she found he was dead. She
then aroused the household. The
first person who entered the room
was the landlord, who noticed a
peculiar smell that reminded
him of chloric ether. The doctor
was promptly sent for, but from
external examination could find
nothing to account for death.
The only bottle found was one
that contained a drop or two
of chlorodyne. A post-mortem
examination was held, and the
stomach showed evidence of
having contained a considerable
quantity of chloroform. There
was no internal disease or growth,<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_78" id="Page_78">78</SPAN></span>
the organs being quite healthy,
and nothing to account for death
beyond the chloroform, which
the medical men concluded must
have been the cause of death.</p>
<p>The coroner's inquiry resulted
in a verdict of wilful murder
against Adelaide Bartlett and
George Dyson, and they were
both arrested. At the trial, the
Crown decided to offer no evidence
against Dyson, and, after
being indicted and pleading "Not
guilty," he was discharged by
the judge to be called as a witness.</p>
<p>A brilliant array of counsel
were engaged on the case, the
late Lord Chief Justice, then
Sir Charles Russell, having
charge of the prosecution, while
the defence of Mrs. Bartlett was
entrusted to Sir Edward Clark,
and that of Mr. Dyson to Mr.
Lockwood.</p>
<p>Dyson's examination occupied
nearly the whole of the second
day, during which he detailed
the form of the intimacy between
Mrs. Bartlett and himself;
how he procured the chloroform
and disposed of the bottles
after hearing the result of the
post-mortem, by throwing them
away on Wandsworth Common
while on his way to preach at
Tooting. He was in the habit of
kissing Mrs. Bartlett, and usually
called her Adelaide. He had
had conversations with Mr.
Bartlett on the subject of
marriage, and had heard him
express the opinion that a man
should have two wives, one to
look after the household duties,
and another to be a companion
and confidante. He had told
Mr. Bartlett he was becoming
attached to his wife, but the
latter seemed to encourage it,
and asked him to continue the
intimacy. He did not mention
the matter of having procured
the chloroform for Mrs. Bartlett
until he had heard the result of
the post-mortem.</p>
<p>The medical man called in
to attend Mr. Bartlett during
his illness, described the condition
in which he found him,
and his recovery from the illness.
He also gave an account of a
very extraordinary statement,
which was made to him by Mrs.
Bartlett after the death of her
husband. It was as follows.
At the age of sixteen years she
was selected by Mr. Bartlett as
a wife for companionship only,
and for whom no carnal feeling
should be entertained. The
marriage compact was, that they
should live together simply as
loving friends. This rule was
faithfully observed for about six
years of their married life, and
then only broken at her earnest
and repeated entreaty that she<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_79" id="Page_79">79</SPAN></span>
should be permitted to be really
a wife and a mother. The child
was still-born, and from that
time the two lived together, but
their relations were not those
of matrimony. Her husband
showed great affection for her
of an ultra-platonic kind, and
encouraged her to pursue studies
of various kinds, which she did
to please him. He affected to
admire her, and liked to surround
her with male acquaintances, and
enjoy their attentions to her.
Then they became acquainted
with Dyson. Her husband conceived
a great liking for him,
and threw them together. He
requested them to kiss in his
presence and seemed to enjoy
it, and gave her to understand
that he had "given her" to
Mr. Dyson. As her husband
gradually recovered from his
illness he expressed a wish that
they should resume the ordinary
relations of man and wife, but
she resented it. She therefore
sought for some means to prevent
his desire, and for this purpose
she asked Dyson to procure
the chloroform.</p>
<p>On the night of the death,
some conversation of this kind
had taken place between them,
and when he was in bed she
brought the bottle of chloroform
and gave it to him, informing
him of her intention to
sprinkle some upon a handkerchief
and wave it in his face,
thinking that thereby he would
go peacefully to sleep. He
looked at the bottle and placed it
by the side of the low bed, then
turning over on his side apparently
went to sleep. She fell
asleep also, sitting at the foot
of the bed, with her arm round
his foot; she heard him snoring,
then woke again, and found he
was dead.</p>
<p>Dr. Stevenson, who made the
analysis, gave evidence as to
finding eleven and a quarter
grains of pure chloroform in the
stomach of the deceased, but,
judging from the time that had
elapsed and the very volatile
nature of the liquid, a large
quantity must have been swallowed.
No other poisons were
found. The jury, after deliberating
nearly two hours, returned
a verdict of "Not guilty," thus
making another addition to the
list of unsolved poisoning mysteries.</p>
<hr class="chap" />
<p><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_80" id="Page_80">80</SPAN></span></p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />