<SPAN name="startofbook"></SPAN>
<h1>WASHINGTON<br/> SQUARE</h1>
<div class="gapspace"> </div>
<p style="text-align: center"><span class="GutSmall">BY</span><br/>
HENRY JAMES</p>
<div class="gapspace"> </div>
<h2><SPAN name="page1"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>I</h2>
<p><span class="smcap">During</span> a portion of the first half
of the present century, and more particularly during the latter
part of it, there flourished and practised in the city of New
York a physician who enjoyed perhaps an exceptional share of the
consideration which, in the United States, has always been
bestowed upon distinguished members of the medical
profession. This profession in America has constantly been
held in honour, and more successfully than elsewhere has put
forward a claim to the epithet of “liberal.” In
a country in which, to play a social part, you must either earn
your income or make believe that you earn it, the healing art has
appeared in a high degree to combine two recognised sources of
credit. It belongs to the realm of the practical, which in
the United States is a great recommendation; and it is touched by
the light of science—a merit appreciated in a community in
which the love of knowledge has not always been accompanied by
leisure and opportunity. It was an element in Dr.
Sloper’s reputation that his learning and his skill were
very evenly balanced; he was what you might call a scholarly
doctor, and yet there was nothing abstract in his
remedies—he always ordered you to take something.
Though he was felt to be extremely thorough, he was not
uncomfortably theoretic, and if he sometimes explained matters
rather more minutely than might seem of use to the patient, he
never went so far (like some practitioners one has heard of) as
to trust to the explanation alone, but always left behind him an
inscrutable prescription. There were some doctors that left
the prescription without offering any explanation at all; and he
did not belong to that class either, which was, after all, the
most vulgar. It will be seen that I am describing a clever
man; and this is really the reason why Dr. Sloper had become a
local celebrity. At the time at which we are chiefly
concerned with him, he was some fifty years of age, and his
popularity was at its height. He was very witty, and he
passed in the best society of New York for a man of the
world—which, indeed, he was, in a very sufficient
degree. I hasten to add, to anticipate possible
misconception, that he was not the least of a charlatan. He
was a thoroughly honest man—honest in a degree of which he
had perhaps lacked the opportunity to give the complete measure;
and, putting aside the great good-nature of the circle in which
he practised, which was rather fond of boasting that it possessed
the “brightest” doctor in the country, he daily
justified his claim to the talents attributed to him by the
popular voice. He was an observer, even a philosopher, and
to be bright was so natural to him, and (as the popular voice
said) came so easily, that he never aimed at mere effect, and had
none of the little tricks and pretensions of second-rate
reputations. It must be confessed that fortune had favoured
him, and that he had found the path to prosperity very soft to
his tread. He had married at the age of twenty-seven, for
love, a very charming girl, Miss Catherine Harrington, of New
York, who, in addition to her charms, had brought him a solid
dowry. Mrs. Sloper was amiable, graceful, accomplished,
elegant, and in 1820 she had been one of the pretty girls of the
small but promising capital which clustered about the Battery and
overlooked the Bay, and of which the uppermost boundary was
indicated by the grassy waysides of Canal Street. Even at
the age of twenty-seven Austin Sloper had made his mark
sufficiently to mitigate the anomaly of his having been chosen
among a dozen suitors by a young woman of high fashion, who had
ten thousand dollars of income and the most charming eyes in the
island of Manhattan. These eyes, and some of their
accompaniments, were for about five years a source of extreme
satisfaction to the young physician, who was both a devoted and a
very happy husband. The fact of his having married a rich
woman made no difference in the line he had traced for himself,
and he cultivated his profession with as definite a purpose as if
he still had no other resources than his fraction of the modest
patrimony which on his father’s death he had shared with
his brothers and sisters. This purpose had not been
preponderantly to make money—it had been rather to learn
something and to do something. To learn something
interesting, and to do something useful—this was, roughly
speaking, the programme he had sketched, and of which the
accident of his wife having an income appeared to him in no
degree to modify the validity. He was fond of his practice,
and of exercising a skill of which he was agreeably conscious,
and it was so patent a truth that if he were not a doctor there
was nothing else he could be, that a doctor he persisted in
being, in the best possible conditions. Of course his easy
domestic situation saved him a good deal of drudgery, and his
wife’s affiliation to the “best people” brought
him a good many of those patients whose symptoms are, if not more
interesting in themselves than those of the lower orders, at
least more consistently displayed. He desired experience,
and in the course of twenty years he got a great deal. It
must be added that it came to him in some forms which, whatever
might have been their intrinsic value, made it the reverse of
welcome. His first child, a little boy of extraordinary
promise, as the Doctor, who was not addicted to easy enthusiasms,
firmly believed, died at three years of age, in spite of
everything that the mother’s tenderness and the
father’s science could invent to save him. Two years
later Mrs. Sloper gave birth to a second infant—an infant
of a sex which rendered the poor child, to the Doctor’s
sense, an inadequate substitute for his lamented first-born, of
whom he had promised himself to make an admirable man. The
little girl was a disappointment; but this was not the
worst. A week after her birth the young mother, who, as the
phrase is, had been doing well, suddenly betrayed alarming
symptoms, and before another week had elapsed Austin Sloper was a
widower.</p>
<p>For a man whose trade was to keep people alive, he had
certainly done poorly in his own family; and a bright doctor who
within three years loses his wife and his little boy should
perhaps be prepared to see either his skill or his affection
impugned. Our friend, however, escaped criticism: that is,
he escaped all criticism but his own, which was much the most
competent and most formidable. He walked under the weight
of this very private censure for the rest of his days, and bore
for ever the scars of a castigation to which the strongest hand
he knew had treated him on the night that followed his
wife’s death. The world, which, as I have said,
appreciated him, pitied him too much to be ironical; his
misfortune made him more interesting, and even helped him to be
the fashion. It was observed that even medical families
cannot escape the more insidious forms of disease, and that,
after all, Dr. Sloper had lost other patients beside the two I
have mentioned; which constituted an honourable precedent.
His little girl remained to him, and though she was not what he
had desired, he proposed to himself to make the best of
her. He had on hand a stock of unexpended authority, by
which the child, in its early years, profited largely. She
had been named, as a matter of course, after her poor mother, and
even in her most diminutive babyhood the Doctor never called her
anything but Catherine. She grew up a very robust and
healthy child, and her father, as he looked at her, often said to
himself that, such as she was, he at least need have no fear of
losing her. I say “such as she was,” because,
to tell the truth—But this is a truth of which I will defer
the telling.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />