<p><SPAN name="link182HCH0002" id="link182HCH0002"></SPAN></p>
<h2> Chapter XVIII: Character Of Constantine And His Sons.—Part II. </h2>
<p>By the death of Crispus, the inheritance of the empire seemed to devolve
on the three sons of Fausta, who have been already mentioned under the
names of Constantine, of Constantius, and of Constans. These young princes
were successively invested with the title of Caesar; and the dates of
their promotion may be referred to the tenth, the twentieth, and the
thirtieth years of the reign of their father. <SPAN href="#link18note-29"
name="link18noteref-29" id="link18noteref-29">29</SPAN> This conduct, though
it tended to multiply the future masters of the Roman world, might be
excused by the partiality of paternal affection; but it is not so easy to
understand the motives of the emperor, when he endangered the safety both
of his family and of his people, by the unnecessary elevation of his two
nephews, Dalmatius and Hannibalianus. The former was raised, by the title
of Caesar, to an equality with his cousins. In favor of the latter,
Constantine invented the new and singular appellation of Nobilissimus; <SPAN href="#link18note-30" name="link18noteref-30" id="link18noteref-30">30</SPAN>
to which he annexed the flattering distinction of a robe of purple and
gold. But of the whole series of Roman princes in any age of the empire,
Hannibalianus alone was distinguished by the title of King; a name which
the subjects of Tiberius would have detested, as the profane and cruel
insult of capricious tyranny. The use of such a title, even as it appears
under the reign of Constantine, is a strange and unconnected fact, which
can scarcely be admitted on the joint authority of Imperial medals and
contemporary writers. <SPAN href="#link18note-31" name="link18noteref-31" id="link18noteref-31">31</SPAN> <SPAN href="#link18note-3111"
name="link18noteref-3111" id="link18noteref-3111">3111</SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN name="link18note-29" id="link18note-29">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
29 (<SPAN href="#link18noteref-29">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Euseb. Orat. in
Constantin. c. 3. These dates are sufficiently correct to justify the
orator.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link18note-30" id="link18note-30">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
30 (<SPAN href="#link18noteref-30">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Zosim. l. ii. p. 117.
Under the predecessors of Constantine, No bilissimus was a vague epithet,
rather than a legal and determined title.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link18note-31" id="link18note-31">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
31 (<SPAN href="#link18noteref-31">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Adstruunt nummi veteres
ac singulares. Spanheim de Usu Numismat. Dissertat. xii. vol. ii. p. 357.
Ammianus speaks of this Roman king (l. xiv. c. l, and Valesius ad loc.)
The Valesian fragment styles him King of kings; and the Paschal Chronicle
acquires the weight of Latin evidence.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link18note-3111" id="link18note-3111">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
3111 (<SPAN href="#link18noteref-3111">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Hannibalianus is
always designated in these authors by the title of king. There still exist
medals struck to his honor, on which the same title is found, Fl.
Hannibaliano Regi. See Eckhel, Doct. Num. t. viii. 204. Armeniam
nationesque circum socias habebat, says Aur. Victor, p. 225. The writer
means the Lesser Armenia. Though it is not possible to question a fact
supported by such respectable authorities, Gibbon considers it
inexplicable and incredible. It is a strange abuse of the privilege of
doubting, to refuse all belief in a fact of such little importance in
itself, and attested thus formally by contemporary authors and public
monuments. St. Martin note to Le Beau i. 341.—M.]</p>
<p>The whole empire was deeply interested in the education of these five
youths, the acknowledged successors of Constantine. The exercise of the
body prepared them for the fatigues of war and the duties of active life.
Those who occasionally mention the education or talents of Constantius,
allow that he excelled in the gymnastic arts of leaping and running that
he was a dexterous archer, a skilful horseman, and a master of all the
different weapons used in the service either of the cavalry or of the
infantry. <SPAN href="#link18note-32" name="link18noteref-32" id="link18noteref-32">32</SPAN> The same assiduous cultivation was bestowed,
though not perhaps with equal success, to improve the minds of the sons
and nephews of Constantine. <SPAN href="#link18note-33"
name="link18noteref-33" id="link18noteref-33">33</SPAN> The most celebrated
professors of the Christian faith, of the Grecian philosophy, and of the
Roman jurisprudence, were invited by the liberality of the emperor, who
reserved for himself the important task of instructing the royal youths in
the science of government, and the knowledge of mankind. But the genius of
Constantine himself had been formed by adversity and experience. In the
free intercourse of private life, and amidst the dangers of the court of
Galerius, he had learned to command his own passions, to encounter those
of his equals, and to depend for his present safety and future greatness
on the prudence and firmness of his personal conduct. His destined
successors had the misfortune of being born and educated in the imperial
purple. Incessantly surrounded with a train of flatterers, they passed
their youth in the enjoyment of luxury, and the expectation of a throne;
nor would the dignity of their rank permit them to descend from that
elevated station from whence the various characters of human nature appear
to wear a smooth and uniform aspect. The indulgence of Constantine
admitted them, at a very tender age, to share the administration of the
empire; and they studied the art of reigning, at the expense of the people
intrusted to their care. The younger Constantine was appointed to hold his
court in Gaul; and his brother Constantius exchanged that department, the
ancient patrimony of their father, for the more opulent, but less martial,
countries of the East. Italy, the Western Illyricum, and Africa, were
accustomed to revere Constans, the third of his sons, as the
representative of the great Constantine. He fixed Dalmatius on the Gothic
frontier, to which he annexed the government of Thrace, Macedonia, and
Greece. The city of Caesarea was chosen for the residence of
Hannibalianus; and the provinces of Pontus, Cappadocia, and the Lesser
Armenia, were destined to form the extent of his new kingdom. For each of
these princes a suitable establishment was provided. A just proportion of
guards, of legions, and of auxiliaries, was allotted for their respective
dignity and defence. The ministers and generals, who were placed about
their persons, were such as Constantine could trust to assist, and even to
control, these youthful sovereigns in the exercise of their delegated
power. As they advanced in years and experience, the limits of their
authority were insensibly enlarged: but the emperor always reserved for
himself the title of Augustus; and while he showed the Caesars to the
armies and provinces, he maintained every part of the empire in equal
obedience to its supreme head. <SPAN href="#link18note-34"
name="link18noteref-34" id="link18noteref-34">34</SPAN> The tranquillity of
the last fourteen years of his reign was scarcely interrupted by the
contemptible insurrection of a camel-driver in the Island of Cyprus, <SPAN href="#link18note-35" name="link18noteref-35" id="link18noteref-35">35</SPAN>
or by the active part which the policy of Constantine engaged him to
assume in the wars of the Goths and Sarmatians.</p>
<p><SPAN name="link18note-32" id="link18note-32">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
32 (<SPAN href="#link18noteref-32">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ His dexterity in
martial exercises is celebrated by Julian, (Orat. i. p. 11, Orat. ii. p.
53,) and allowed by Ammianus, (l. xxi. c. 16.)]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link18note-33" id="link18note-33">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
33 (<SPAN href="#link18noteref-33">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Euseb. in Vit.
Constantin. l. iv. c. 51. Julian, Orat. i. p. 11-16, with Spanheim's
elaborate Commentary. Libanius, Orat. iii. p. 109. Constantius studied
with laudable diligence; but the dulness of his fancy prevented him from
succeeding in the art of poetry, or even of rhetoric.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link18note-34" id="link18note-34">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
34 (<SPAN href="#link18noteref-34">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Eusebius, (l. iv. c.
51, 52,) with a design of exalting the authority and glory of Constantine,
affirms, that he divided the Roman empire as a private citizen might have
divided his patrimony. His distribution of the provinces may be collected
from Eutropius, the two Victors and the Valesian fragment.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link18note-35" id="link18note-35">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
35 (<SPAN href="#link18noteref-35">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Calocerus, the obscure
leader of this rebellion, or rather tumult, was apprehended and burnt
alive in the market-place of Tarsus, by the vigilance of Dalmatius. See
the elder Victor, the Chronicle of Jerom, and the doubtful traditions of
Theophanes and Cedrenus.]</p>
<p>Among the different branches of the human race, the Sarmatians form a very
remarkable shade; as they seem to unite the manners of the Asiatic
barbarians with the figure and complexion of the ancient inhabitants of
Europe. According to the various accidents of peace and war, of alliance
or conquest, the Sarmatians were sometimes confined to the banks of the
Tanais; and they sometimes spread themselves over the immense plains which
lie between the Vistula and the Volga. <SPAN href="#link18note-36"
name="link18noteref-36" id="link18noteref-36">36</SPAN> The care of their
numerous flocks and herds, the pursuit of game, and the exercises of war,
or rather of rapine, directed the vagrant motions of the Sarmatians. The
movable camps or cities, the ordinary residence of their wives and
children, consisted only of large wagons drawn by oxen, and covered in the
form of tents. The military strength of the nation was composed of
cavalry; and the custom of their warriors, to lead in their hand one or
two spare horses, enabled them to advance and to retreat with a rapid
diligence, which surprised the security, and eluded the pursuit, of a
distant enemy. <SPAN href="#link18note-37" name="link18noteref-37" id="link18noteref-37">37</SPAN> Their poverty of iron prompted their rude
industry to invent a sort of cuirass, which was capable of resisting a
sword or javelin, though it was formed only of horses' hoofs, cut into
thin and polished slices, carefully laid over each other in the manner of
scales or feathers, and strongly sewed upon an under garment of coarse
linen. <SPAN href="#link18note-38" name="link18noteref-38" id="link18noteref-38">38</SPAN> The offensive arms of the Sarmatians were
short daggers, long lances, and a weighty bow with a quiver of arrows.
They were reduced to the necessity of employing fish-bones for the points
of their weapons; but the custom of dipping them in a venomous liquor,
that poisoned the wounds which they inflicted, is alone sufficient to
prove the most savage manners, since a people impressed with a sense of
humanity would have abhorred so cruel a practice, and a nation skilled in
the arts of war would have disdained so impotent a resource. <SPAN href="#link18note-39" name="link18noteref-39" id="link18noteref-39">39</SPAN>
Whenever these Barbarians issued from their deserts in quest of prey,
their shaggy beards, uncombed locks, the furs with which they were covered
from head to foot, and their fierce countenances, which seemed to express
the innate cruelty of their minds, inspired the more civilized provincials
of Rome with horror and dismay.</p>
<p><SPAN name="link18note-36" id="link18note-36">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
36 (<SPAN href="#link18noteref-36">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Cellarius has collected
the opinions of the ancients concerning the European and Asiatic Sarmatia;
and M. D'Anville has applied them to modern geography with the skill and
accuracy which always distinguish that excellent writer.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link18note-37" id="link18note-37">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
37 (<SPAN href="#link18noteref-37">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Ammian. l. xvii. c. 12.
The Sarmatian horses were castrated to prevent the mischievous accidents
which might happen from the noisy and ungovernable passions of the males.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link18note-38" id="link18note-38">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
38 (<SPAN href="#link18noteref-38">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Pausanius, l. i. p.
50,. edit. Kuhn. That inquisitive traveller had carefully examined a
Sarmatian cuirass, which was preserved in the temple of Aesculapius at
Athens.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link18note-39" id="link18note-39">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
39 (<SPAN href="#link18noteref-39">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Aspicis et mitti sub
adunco toxica ferro, Et telum causas mortis habere duas. Ovid, ex Ponto,
l. iv. ep. 7, ver. 7.——See in the Recherches sur les
Americains, tom. ii. p. 236—271, a very curious dissertation on
poisoned darts. The venom was commonly extracted from the vegetable reign:
but that employed by the Scythians appears to have been drawn from the
viper, and a mixture of human blood.]</p>
<p>The use of poisoned arms, which has been spread over both worlds, never
preserved a savage tribe from the arms of a disciplined enemy. The tender
Ovid, after a youth spent in the enjoyment of fame and luxury, was
condemned to a hopeless exile on the frozen banks of the Danube, where he
was exposed, almost without defence, to the fury of these monsters of the
desert, with whose stern spirits he feared that his gentle shade might
hereafter be confounded. In his pathetic, but sometimes unmanly
lamentations, <SPAN href="#link18note-40" name="link18noteref-40" id="link18noteref-40">40</SPAN> he describes in the most lively colors the
dress and manners, the arms and inroads, of the Getae and Sarmatians, who
were associated for the purposes of destruction; and from the accounts of
history there is some reason to believe that these Sarmatians were the
Jazygae, one of the most numerous and warlike tribes of the nation. The
allurements of plenty engaged them to seek a permanent establishment on
the frontiers of the empire. Soon after the reign of Augustus, they
obliged the Dacians, who subsisted by fishing on the banks of the River
Teyss or Tibiscus, to retire into the hilly country, and to abandon to the
victorious Sarmatians the fertile plains of the Upper Hungary, which are
bounded by the course of the Danube and the semicircular enclosure of the
Carpathian Mountains. <SPAN href="#link18note-41" name="link18noteref-41" id="link18noteref-41">41</SPAN> In this advantageous position, they watched
or suspended the moment of attack, as they were provoked by injuries or
appeased by presents; they gradually acquired the skill of using more
dangerous weapons, and although the Sarmatians did not illustrate their
name by any memorable exploits, they occasionally assisted their eastern
and western neighbors, the Goths and the Germans, with a formidable body
of cavalry. They lived under the irregular aristocracy of their
chieftains: <SPAN href="#link18note-42" name="link18noteref-42" id="link18noteref-42">42</SPAN> but after they had received into their bosom
the fugitive Vandals, who yielded to the pressure of the Gothic power,
they seem to have chosen a king from that nation, and from the illustrious
race of the Astingi, who had formerly dwelt on the hores of the northern
ocean. <SPAN href="#link18note-43" name="link18noteref-43" id="link18noteref-43">43</SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN name="link18note-40" id="link18note-40">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
40 (<SPAN href="#link18noteref-40">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The nine books of
Poetical Epistles which Ovid composed during the seven first years of his
melancholy exile, possess, beside the merit of elegance, a double value.
They exhibit a picture of the human mind under very singular
circumstances; and they contain many curious observations, which no Roman
except Ovid, could have an opportunity of making. Every circumstance which
tends to illustrate the history of the Barbarians, has been drawn together
by the very accurate Count de Buat. Hist. Ancienne des Peuples de
l'Europe, tom. iv. c. xvi. p. 286-317]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link18note-41" id="link18note-41">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
41 (<SPAN href="#link18noteref-41">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The Sarmatian Jazygae
were settled on the banks of Pathissus or Tibiscus, when Pliny, in the
year 79, published his Natural History. See l. iv. c. 25. In the time of
Strabo and Ovid, sixty or seventy years before, they appear to have
inhabited beyond the Getae, along the coast of the Euxine.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link18note-42" id="link18note-42">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
42 (<SPAN href="#link18noteref-42">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Principes Sarmaturum
Jazygum penes quos civitatis regimen plebem quoque et vim equitum, qua
sola valent, offerebant. Tacit. Hist. iii. p. 5. This offer was made in
the civil war between Vitellino and Vespasian.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link18note-43" id="link18note-43">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
43 (<SPAN href="#link18noteref-43">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ This hypothesis of a
Vandal king reigning over Sarmatian subjects, seems necessary to reconcile
the Goth Jornandes with the Greek and Latin historians of Constantine. It
may be observed that Isidore, who lived in Spain under the dominion of the
Goths, gives them for enemies, not the Vandals, but the Sarmatians. See
his Chronicle in Grotius, p. 709. Note: I have already noticed the
confusion which must necessarily arise in history, when names purely
geographical, as this of Sarmatia, are taken for historical names
belonging to a single nation. We perceive it here; it has forced Gibbon to
suppose, without any reason but the necessity of extricating himself from
his perplexity, that the Sarmatians had taken a king from among the
Vandals; a supposition entirely contrary to the usages of Barbarians
Dacia, at this period, was occupied, not by Sarmatians, who have never
formed a distinct race, but by Vandals, whom the ancients have often
confounded under the general term Sarmatians. See Gatterer's
Welt-Geschiehte p. 464—G.]</p>
<p>This motive of enmity must have inflamed the subjects of contention, which
perpetually arise on the confines of warlike and independent nations. The
Vandal princes were stimulated by fear and revenge; the Gothic kings
aspired to extend their dominion from the Euxine to the frontiers of
Germany; and the waters of the Maros, a small river which falls into the
Teyss, were stained with the blood of the contending Barbarians. After
some experience of the superior strength and numbers of their adversaries,
the Sarmatians implored the protection of the Roman monarch, who beheld
with pleasure the discord of the nations, but who was justly alarmed by
the progress of the Gothic arms. As soon as Constantine had declared
himself in favor of the weaker party, the haughty Araric, king of the
Goths, instead of expecting the attack of the legions, boldly passed the
Danube, and spread terror and devastation through the province of Maesia.</p>
<p>To oppose the inroad of this destroying host, the aged emperor took the
field in person; but on this occasion either his conduct or his fortune
betrayed the glory which he had acquired in so many foreign and domestic
wars. He had the mortification of seeing his troops fly before an
inconsiderable detachment of the Barbarians, who pursued them to the edge
of their fortified camp, and obliged him to consult his safety by a
precipitate and ignominious retreat. <SPAN href="#link18note-4311"
name="link18noteref-4311" id="link18noteref-4311">4311</SPAN> The event of a
second and more successful action retrieved the honor of the Roman name;
and the powers of art and discipline prevailed, after an obstinate
contest, over the efforts of irregular valor. The broken army of the Goths
abandoned the field of battle, the wasted province, and the passage of the
Danube: and although the eldest of the sons of Constantine was permitted
to supply the place of his father, the merit of the victory, which
diffused universal joy, was ascribed to the auspicious counsels of the
emperor himself.</p>
<p><SPAN name="link18note-4311" id="link18note-4311">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
4311 (<SPAN href="#link18noteref-4311">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Gibbon states, that
Constantine was defeated by the Goths in a first battle. No ancient author
mentions such an event. It is, no doubt, a mistake in Gibbon. St Martin,
note to Le Beau. i. 324.—M.]</p>
<p>He contributed at least to improve this advantage, by his negotiations
with the free and warlike people of Chersonesus, <SPAN href="#link18note-44"
name="link18noteref-44" id="link18noteref-44">44</SPAN> whose capital,
situate on the western coast of the Tauric or Crimaean peninsula, still
retained some vestiges of a Grecian colony, and was governed by a
perpetual magistrate, assisted by a council of senators, emphatically
styled the Fathers of the City.</p>
<p>The Chersonites were animated against the Goths, by the memory of the
wars, which, in the preceding century, they had maintained with unequal
forces against the invaders of their country. They were connected with the
Romans by the mutual benefits of commerce; as they were supplied from the
provinces of Asia with corn and manufactures, which they purchased with
their only productions, salt, wax, and hides. Obedient to the requisition
of Constantine, they prepared, under the conduct of their magistrate
Diogenes, a considerable army, of which the principal strength consisted
in cross-bows and military chariots. The speedy march and intrepid attack
of the Chersonites, by diverting the attention of the Goths, assisted the
operations of the Imperial generals. The Goths, vanquished on every side,
were driven into the mountains, where, in the course of a severe campaign,
above a hundred thousand were computed to have perished by cold and hunger
Peace was at length granted to their humble supplications; the eldest son
of Araric was accepted as the most valuable hostage; and Constantine
endeavored to convince their chiefs, by a liberal distribution of honors
and rewards, how far the friendship of the Romans was preferable to their
enmity. In the expressions of his gratitude towards the faithful
Chersonites, the emperor was still more magnificent. The pride of the
nation was gratified by the splendid and almost royal decorations bestowed
on their magistrate and his successors. A perpetual exemption from all
duties was stipulated for their vessels which traded to the ports of the
Black Sea. A regular subsidy was promised, of iron, corn, oil, and of
every supply which could be useful either in peace or war. But it was
thought that the Sarmatians were sufficiently rewarded by their
deliverance from impending ruin; and the emperor, perhaps with too strict
an economy, deducted some part of the expenses of the war from the
customary gratifications which were allowed to that turbulent nation.</p>
<p><SPAN name="link18note-44" id="link18note-44">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
44 (<SPAN href="#link18noteref-44">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ I may stand in need of
some apology for having used, without scruple, the authority of
Constantine Porphyrogenitus, in all that relates to the wars and
negotiations of the Chersonites. I am aware that he was a Greek of the
tenth century, and that his accounts of ancient history are frequently
confused and fabulous. But on this occasion his narrative is, for the most
part, consistent and probable nor is there much difficulty in conceiving
that an emperor might have access to some secret archives, which had
escaped the diligence of meaner historians. For the situation and history
of Chersone, see Peyssonel, des Peuples barbares qui ont habite les Bords
du Danube, c. xvi. 84-90. ——Gibbon has confounded the
inhabitants of the city of Cherson, the ancient Chersonesus, with the
people of the Chersonesus Taurica. If he had read with more attention the
chapter of Constantius Porphyrogenitus, from which this narrative is
derived, he would have seen that the author clearly distinguishes the
republic of Cherson from the rest of the Tauric Peninsula, then possessed
by the kings of the Cimmerian Bosphorus, and that the city of Cherson
alone furnished succors to the Romans. The English historian is also
mistaken in saying that the Stephanephoros of the Chersonites was a
perpetual magistrate; since it is easy to discover from the great number
of Stephanephoroi mentioned by Constantine Porphyrogenitus, that they were
annual magistrates, like almost all those which governed the Grecian
republics. St. Martin, note to Le Beau i. 326.—M.]</p>
<p>Exasperated by this apparent neglect, the Sarmatians soon forgot, with the
levity of barbarians, the services which they had so lately received, and
the dangers which still threatened their safety. Their inroads on the
territory of the empire provoked the indignation of Constantine to leave
them to their fate; and he no longer opposed the ambition of Geberic, a
renowned warrior, who had recently ascended the Gothic throne. Wisumar,
the Vandal king, whilst alone, and unassisted, he defended his dominions
with undaunted courage, was vanquished and slain in a decisive battle,
which swept away the flower of the Sarmatian youth. <SPAN href="#link18note-4411" name="link18noteref-4411" id="link18noteref-4411">4411</SPAN>
The remainder of the nation embraced the desperate expedient of arming
their slaves, a hardy race of hunters and herdsmen, by whose tumultuary
aid they revenged their defeat, and expelled the invader from their
confines. But they soon discovered that they had exchanged a foreign for a
domestic enemy, more dangerous and more implacable. Enraged by their
former servitude, elated by their present glory, the slaves, under the
name of Limigantes, claimed and usurped the possession of the country
which they had saved. Their masters, unable to withstand the ungoverned
fury of the populace, preferred the hardships of exile to the tyranny of
their servants. Some of the fugitive Sarmatians solicited a less
ignominious dependence, under the hostile standard of the Goths. A more
numerous band retired beyond the Carpathian Mountains, among the Quadi,
their German allies, and were easily admitted to share a superfluous waste
of uncultivated land. But the far greater part of the distressed nation
turned their eyes towards the fruitful provinces of Rome. Imploring the
protection and forgiveness of the emperor, they solemnly promised, as
subjects in peace, and as soldiers in war, the most inviolable fidelity to
the empire which should graciously receive them into its bosom. According
to the maxims adopted by Probus and his successors, the offers of this
barbarian colony were eagerly accepted; and a competent portion of lands
in the provinces of Pannonia, Thrace, Macedonia, and Italy, were
immediately assigned for the habitation and subsistence of three hundred
thousand Sarmatians. <SPAN href="#link18note-45" name="link18noteref-45" id="link18noteref-45">45</SPAN> <SPAN href="#link18note-4511"
name="link18noteref-4511" id="link18noteref-4511">4511</SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN name="link18note-4411" id="link18note-4411">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
4411 (<SPAN href="#link18noteref-4411">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Gibbon supposes
that this war took place because Constantine had deducted a part of the
customary gratifications, granted by his predecessors to the Sarmatians.
Nothing of this kind appears in the authors. We see, on the contrary, that
after his victory, and to punish the Sarmatia is for the ravages they had
committed, he withheld the sums which it had been the custom to bestow.
St. Martin, note to Le Beau, i. 327.—M.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link18note-45" id="link18note-45">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
45 (<SPAN href="#link18noteref-45">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The Gothic and
Sarmatian wars are related in so broken and imperfect a manner, that I
have been obliged to compare the following writers, who mutually supply,
correct, and illustrate each other. Those who will take the same trouble,
may acquire a right of criticizing my narrative. Ammianus, l. xvii. c. 12.
Anonym. Valesian. p. 715. Eutropius, x. 7. Sextus Rufus de Provinciis, c.
26. Julian Orat. i. p. 9, and Spanheim, Comment. p. 94. Hieronym. in
Chron. Euseb. in Vit. Constantin. l. iv. c. 6. Socrates, l. i. c. 18.
Sozomen, l. i. c. 8. Zosimus, l. ii. p. 108. Jornandes de Reb. Geticis, c.
22. Isidorus in Chron. p. 709; in Hist. Gothorum Grotii. Constantin.
Porphyrogenitus de Administrat. Imperii, c. 53, p. 208, edit. Meursii.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link18note-4511" id="link18note-4511">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
4511 (<SPAN href="#link18noteref-4511">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Compare, on this
very obscure but remarkable war, Manso, Leben Coa xantius, p. 195—M.]</p>
<p>By chastising the pride of the Goths, and by accepting the homage of a
suppliant nation, Constantine asserted the majesty of the Roman empire;
and the ambassadors of Aethiopia, Persia, and the most remote countries of
India, congratulated the peace and prosperity of his government. <SPAN href="#link18note-46" name="link18noteref-46" id="link18noteref-46">46</SPAN>
If he reckoned, among the favors of fortune, the death of his eldest son,
of his nephew, and perhaps of his wife, he enjoyed an uninterrupted flow
of private as well as public felicity, till the thirtieth year of his
reign; a period which none of his predecessors, since Augustus, had been
permitted to celebrate. Constantine survived that solemn festival about
ten months; and at the mature age of sixty-four, after a short illness, he
ended his memorable life at the palace of Aquyrion, in the suburbs of
Nicomedia, whither he had retired for the benefit of the air, and with the
hope of recruiting his exhausted strength by the use of the warm baths.
The excessive demonstrations of grief, or at least of mourning, surpassed
whatever had been practised on any former occasion. Notwithstanding the
claims of the senate and people of ancient Rome, the corpse of the
deceased emperor, according to his last request, was transported to the
city, which was destined to preserve the name and memory of its founder.
The body of Constantine adorned with the vain symbols of greatness, the
purple and diadem, was deposited on a golden bed in one of the apartments
of the palace, which for that purpose had been splendidly furnished and
illuminated. The forms of the court were strictly maintained. Every day,
at the appointed hours, the principal officers of the state, the army, and
the household, approaching the person of their sovereign with bended knees
and a composed countenance, offered their respectful homage as seriously
as if he had been still alive. From motives of policy, this theatrical
representation was for some time continued; nor could flattery neglect the
opportunity of remarking that Constantine alone, by the peculiar
indulgence of Heaven, had reigned after his death. <SPAN href="#link18note-47"
name="link18noteref-47" id="link18noteref-47">47</SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN name="link18note-46" id="link18note-46">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
46 (<SPAN href="#link18noteref-46">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Eusebius (in Vit.
Const. l. iv. c. 50) remarks three circumstances relative to these
Indians. 1. They came from the shores of the eastern ocean; a description
which might be applied to the coast of China or Coromandel. 2. They
presented shining gems, and unknown animals. 3. They protested their kings
had erected statues to represent the supreme majesty of Constantine.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link18note-47" id="link18note-47">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
47 (<SPAN href="#link18noteref-47">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Funus relatum in urbem
sui nominis, quod sane P. R. aegerrime tulit. Aurelius Victor. Constantine
prepared for himself a stately tomb in the church of the Holy Apostles.
Euseb. l. iv. c. 60. The best, and indeed almost the only account of the
sickness, death, and funeral of Constantine, is contained in the fourth
book of his Life by Eusebius.]</p>
<p>But this reign could subsist only in empty pageantry; and it was soon
discovered that the will of the most absolute monarch is seldom obeyed,
when his subjects have no longer anything to hope from his favor, or to
dread from his resentment. The same ministers and generals, who bowed with
such referential awe before the inanimate corpse of their deceased
sovereign, were engaged in secret consultations to exclude his two
nephews, Dalmatius and Hannibalianus, from the share which he had assigned
them in the succession of the empire. We are too imperfectly acquainted
with the court of Constantine to form any judgment of the real motives
which influenced the leaders of the conspiracy; unless we should suppose
that they were actuated by a spirit of jealousy and revenge against the
praefect Ablavius, a proud favorite, who had long directed the counsels
and abused the confidence of the late emperor. The arguments, by which
they solicited the concurrence of the soldiers and people, are of a more
obvious nature; and they might with decency, as well as truth, insist on
the superior rank of the children of Constantine, the danger of
multiplying the number of sovereigns, and the impending mischiefs which
threatened the republic, from the discord of so many rival princes, who
were not connected by the tender sympathy of fraternal affection. The
intrigue was conducted with zeal and secrecy, till a loud and unanimous
declaration was procured from the troops, that they would suffer none
except the sons of their lamented monarch to reign over the Roman empire.
<SPAN href="#link18note-48" name="link18noteref-48" id="link18noteref-48">48</SPAN>
The younger Dalmatius, who was united with his collateral relations by the
ties of friendship and interest, is allowed to have inherited a
considerable share of the abilities of the great Constantine; but, on this
occasion, he does not appear to have concerted any measure for supporting,
by arms, the just claims which himself and his royal brother derived from
the liberality of their uncle. Astonished and overwhelmed by the tide of
popular fury, they seem to have remained, without the power of flight or
of resistance, in the hands of their implacable enemies. Their fate was
suspended till the arrival of Constantius, the second, and perhaps the
most favored, of the sons of Constantine. <SPAN href="#link18note-49"
name="link18noteref-49" id="link18noteref-49">49</SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN name="link18note-48" id="link18note-48">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
48 (<SPAN href="#link18noteref-48">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Eusebius (l. iv. c. 6)
terminates his narrative by this loyal declaration of the troops, and
avoids all the invidious circumstances of the subsequent massacre.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link18note-49" id="link18note-49">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
49 (<SPAN href="#link18noteref-49">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The character of
Dalmatius is advantageously, though concisely drawn by Eutropius. (x. 9.)
Dalmatius Ceasar prosperrima indole, neque patrou absimilis, haud multo
post oppressus est factione militari. As both Jerom and the Alexandrian
Chronicle mention the third year of the Ceasar, which did not commence
till the 18th or 24th of September, A. D. 337, it is certain that these
military factions continued above four months.]</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />