<h2><SPAN name="CHAPTER_XIII" id="CHAPTER_XIII"></SPAN>CHAPTER XIII</h2>
<p>In May we sold our loved hill nest in Berkeley and started
north, stopping for a three months' vacation—our first real
vacation since we had been married—at Castle Crags, where,
almost ten years before, we had spent the first five days of our
honeymoon, before going into Southern Oregon. There, in a log-cabin
among the pines, we passed unbelievably cherished days—work
a-plenty, play a-plenty, and the family together day in, day out.
There was one little extra trip he got in with the two sons, for
which I am so thankful. The three of them went off with their
sleeping-bags and rods for two days, leaving "the girls" behind.
Each son caught his first trout with a fly. They put the fish,
cleaned, in a cool sheltered spot, because they had to be carried
home for me to see; and lo! a little bear came down in the night
and ate the fish, in addition to licking the fat all off the
frying-pan.</p>
<p>Then, like a bolt from the blue, came the fateful telegram from
Washington, D.C.—labor difficulties in construction-work at
Camp Lewis—would he report there at once as Government
Mediator. Oh! the Book, the Book—the Book that was to be
finished without fail before the new work at the University of
Washington began! Perhaps he would be back in a week! Surely he
would be back in a week! So he packed just enough for a week, and
off he went. One week! When, after four weeks, there was still no
let up in his mediation duties,—in fact they
increased,—I packed up the family and we left for Seattle. I
had rewound his fishing-rod with orange silk, and had revarnished
it, as a surprise for his home-coming to Castle Crags. He never
fished with it again.</p>
<p>How that man loved fishing! How he loved every sport, for that
matter. And he loved them with the same thoroughness and allegiance
that he gave to any cause near his heart. Baseball—he played
on his high-school team (also he could recite "Casey at the Bat"
with a gusto that many a friend of the earlier days will remember.
And here I am reminded of his "Christopher Columnibus." I recently
ran across a postcard a college mate sent Carl from Italy years
ago, with a picture of a statue of Columbus on it. On the reverse
side the friend had written, quoting from Carl's monologue: "'Boom
Joe!' says the king; which is being interpreted, 'I see you first.'
'Wheat cakes,' says Chris, which is the Egyptian for 'Boom Joe'").
He loved football, track,—he won three gold medals
broad-jumping,—canoeing, swimming, billiards,—he won a
loving cup at that, tennis, ice-skating, hand-ball; and yes, ye of
finer calibre, quiver if you will—he loved a prize-fight and
played a mighty good game of poker, as well as bridge—though
in the ten and a half years that we were married I cannot remember
that he played poker once or bridge more than five times. He did,
however, enjoy his bridge with Simon Patton in Philadelphia; and
when he played, he played well.</p>
<p>I tell you there was hardly anything the man could not do. He
could draw the funniest pictures you ever saw—I wish I could
reproduce the letters he sent his sons from the East. He was a good
carpenter—the joy it meant to his soul to add a second-hand
tool ever so often to his collection! Sunday morning was special
carpenter-time—new shelves here, a bookcase there, new steps
up to the swimming-tank, etc. I have heard many a man say that he
told a story better than any one they ever heard. He was an expert
woodsman. And, my gracious! how he did love babies! That hardly
fits in just here, but I think of it now. His love for children
colored his whole economic viewpoint.</p>
<p>"There is the thing that possessed Parker—the perception
of the destructive significance of the repressed and balked
instincts of the migratory worker, the unskilled, the casuals, the
hoboes, the womanless, jobless, voteless men. To him their tragedy
was akin to the tragedy of child-life in our commercialized cities.
More often than of anything else, he used to talk to me of the
fatuous blindness of a civilization that centred its economic
activities in places where child-life was perpetually repressed and
imperiled. The last time I saw him he was flaming indignation at
the ghastly record of children killed and maimed by trucks and
automobiles. What business had automobiles where children should be
free to play? What could be said for the human wisdom of a
civilization that placed traffic above child-life? In our denial to
children, to millions of men and women, of the means for satisfying
their instinctive desires and innate dispositions, he saw the
principal explanation of crime, labor-unrest, the violence of
strikes, the ghastly violence of war<SPAN name="FNanchor_1_1" id="FNanchor_1_1"></SPAN><SPAN href="#Footnote_1_1" class="fnanchor">[1]</SPAN>."</p>
<div class="footnote">
<p><SPAN name="Footnote_1_1" id="Footnote_1_1"></SPAN><SPAN href="#FNanchor_1_1"><span class="label">[1]</span></SPAN> Robert
Bruère, in the <i>New Republic</i>, May 18, 1918.</p>
</div>
<p>He could never pass any youngster anywhere without a word of
greeting as from friend to friend. I remember being in a crowded
car with him in our engaged days. He was sitting next to a woman
with a baby who was most unhappy over the ways of the world. Carl
asked if he could not hold the squaller. The mother looked a bit
doubtful, but relinquished her child. Within two minutes the babe
was content on Carl's knees, clutching one of his fingers in a fat
fist and sucking his watch. The woman leaned over to me later, as
she was about to depart with a very sound asleep offspring. "Is he
as lovely as that to his own?"</p>
<p>The tenderness of him over his own! Any hour of the day or night
he was alert to be of any service in any trouble, big or little. He
had a collection of tricks and stories on hand for any youngster
who happened along. The special pet of our own boys was "The
Submarine Obo Bird"—a large flapper (Dad's arms fairly rent
the air), which was especially active early in the morning, when
small boys appeared to prefer staying in bed to getting up. The Obo
Bird went "Pak! Pak!" and lit on numerous objects about the
sleeping porch. Carl's two hands would plump stiff, fingers down,
on the railing, or on a small screw sticking out somewhere.
Scratches. Then "Pak!" and more flaps. This time the Obo Bird would
light a trifle nearer the small boy whose "turn" it was—round
eyes, and an agitated grin from ear to ear, plus explosive giggles
and gurglings emerging from the covers. Nearer and nearer came the
Obo Bird. Gigglier and gigglier got the small boy. Finally, with a
spring and a last "Pak! Pak! Pak!" the Obo Bird dove under the
covers at the side of the bed and pinched the small boy who would
not get up. (Rather a premium on not rising promptly was the Obo
Bird.) Final ecstatic squeals from the pinched. Then, "Now it's my
turn, daddo!" from the other son.—The Submarine Obo Bird
lived in Alaska and ate Spooka biscuits. There was just developing
a wee Obo Bird, that made less vehement "paks!" and pinched less
agitatedly—a special June-Bug Obo Bird. In fact, the baby was
not more than three months old when the boys demanded a Submarine
Obo Bird that ate little Spooka biscuits for sister.</p>
<hr style='width: 45%;' />
<p>His trip to Camp Lewis threw him at once into the midst of the
lumber difficulties of the Northwest, which lasted for months. The
big strike in the lumber industry was on when he arrived. He wrote:
"It is a strike to better conditions. The I.W.W. are only the
display feature. The main body of opinion is from a lot of
unskilled workers who are sick of the filthy bunk-houses and rotten
grub." He wrote later of a conference with the big lumbermen, and
of how they would not stay on the point but "roared over the I.W.W.
I told them that condemnation was not a solution, or businesslike,
but what we wanted was a statement of how they were to open their
plants. More roars. More demands for troops, etc. I said I was a
college man, not used to business; but if business men had as much
trouble as this keeping to the real points involved, give me a
faculty analysis. They laughed over this and got down to business,
and in an hour lined up the affair in mighty good shape."</p>
<p>I wish it were proper to go into the details here of the various
conferences, the telegrams sent to Washington, the replies. Carl
wrote: "I am saving all the copies for you, as it is most
interesting history." Each letter would end: "By three days at
least I should start back. I am getting frantic to be home." Home,
for the Parkers, was always where we happened to be then. Castle
Crags was as much "home" as any place had ever been. We had moved
fourteen times in ten years: of the eleven Christmases we had had
together, only two had been in the same place. There were times
when "home" was a Pullman car. It made no difference. One of the
strange new feelings I have to get used to is the way I now look at
places to live in. It used to be that Carl and I, in passing the
littlest bit of a hovel, would say, "We could be perfectly happy in
a place like that, couldn't we? Nothing makes any difference if we
are together." But certain kinds of what we called "cuddly" houses
used to make us catch our breaths, to think of the extra joy it
would be living together tucked away in there. Now, when I pass a
place that looks like that, I have to drop down some kind of a
trap-door in my brain, and not think at all until I get well by
it.</p>
<p>Labor conditions in the Northwest grew worse, strikes more
general, and finally Carl wrote that he just must be indefinitely
on the job. "I am so home-sick for you that I feel like packing up
and coming. I literally feel terribly. But with all this feeling I
don't see how I can. Not only have I been telegraphed to stay on
the job, but the situation is growing steadily worse. Last night my
proposal (eight-hour day, non-partisan complaint and adjustment
board, suppression of violence by the state) was turned down by the
operators in Tacoma. President Suzzallo and I fought for six hours
but it went down. The whole situation is drifting into a state of
incipient sympathetic strikes." Later: "This is the most
bull-headed affair and I don't think it is going to get anywhere."
Still later: "Things are not going wonderfully in our mediation.
Employers demanding everything and men granting much but not that."
Again: "Each day brings a new crisis. Gee, labor is unrestful ...
and gee, the pigheadedness of bosses! Human nature is sure one
hundred per cent psychology." Also he wrote, referring to the
general situation at the University and in the community: "Am
getting absolutely crazy with enthusiasm over my job here. . . . It
is too vigorous and resultful for words." And again: "The mediation
between employers and men blew up to-day at 4 P.M. and now a host
of nice new strikes show on the horizon. . . . There are a lot of
fine operators but some hard shells." Again: "Gee, I'm learning!
And talk about material for the Book!"</p>
<p>An article appeared in one of the New York papers recently,
entitled "How Carleton H. Parker Settled Strikes":—</p>
<p>"It was under his leadership that, in less than a year,
twenty-seven disputes which concerned Government work in the
Pacific Northwest were settled, and it was his method to lay the
basis for permanent relief as he went along. . . .</p>
<p>"Parker's contribution was in the method he used. . . . Labor
leaders of all sorts would flock to him in a bitter, weltering
mass, mouthing the set phrases of class-hatred they use so
effectually in stirring up trouble. They would state their case.
And Parker would quietly deduce the irritation points that seemed
to stand out in the jumbled testimony.</p>
<p>"Then it would be almost laughable to the observer to hear the
employer's side of the case. Invariably it was just as bitter, just
as unreasoning, and just as violent, as the statement of their case
by the workers. Parker would endeavor to find, in all this heap of
words, the irritation points of the other side.</p>
<p>"But when a study was finished, his diagnosis made, and his
prescription of treatment completed, Parker always insisted in
carrying it straight to the workers. And he did not just tell them
results. He often took several hours, sometimes several meetings of
several hours each. In these meetings he would go over every detail
of his method, from start to finish, explaining, answering
questions, meeting objections with reason. And he always won them
over. But, of course, it must be said that he had a tremendously
compelling personality that carried him far."</p>
<hr style="width: 65%;" />
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />